Canon IXUS 240 HS vs Nikon Coolpix L320

Winner
Canon PowerShot IXUS 240 HS

37

Nikon Coolpix L320

31

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Canon IXUS 240 HS

Wide aperture
Aperture
f/2.7
Full HD
Movie format
1080p @ 24fps
Large screen
Screen size
3.2"
Really small
Size
Super compact (94×57×21 mm)
 

Reasons to buy the Nikon Coolpix L320

Panorama
In-camera panoramas
Stitches together multiple photos into a panorama

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Canon PowerShot IXUS 240 HS.

differences

Advantages of the Canon IXUS 240 HS

Report a correction
Supports 24p
Supports 24p
Yes vs No
Help
Get that real film feel
Touch screen
Has a touch screen
Yes vs No
Help
Fewer buttons to worry about and direct interaction with camera menus
Movie format
Higher resolution movies
1080p @ 24fps vs 720p @ 30fps
Help
Shoots higher resolution Full HD (1080p) video but at a lower frame rate
High-speed framerate
Records high-speed movies
240 fps vs None
Help
Capture events too fast for the naked eye and play them back in super-slow motion
Aperture
Wider aperture
f/2.7 vs f/3.1
Help
At its widest zoom, the IXUS 240 HS's lens captures marginally more light (0.4 f-stops)
Size
Significantly smaller
94×57×21 mm vs 111×76×83 mm
Help
6.3x smaller
Sensor type
Has a CMOS-family sensor
CMOS vs CCD
Help
CMOS-family sensors often produce better quality images
Screen size
Larger screen
3.2" vs 3"
Help
Around 10% larger screen
Screen resolution
Higher resolution screen
461k dots vs 230k dots
Help
More than 2x higher resolution screen
Thickness
Significantly thinner
0.8" vs 3.3"
Help
4x thinner
Weight
Significantly lighter
145 g vs 430 g
Help
3x lighter
Light sensitivity
Better maximum light sensitivity
3,200 ISO vs 1,600 ISO
Help
The IXUS 240 HS's maximum light sensitivity is 2 f-stops better
Continuous shooting
Shoots slightly faster
2 fps vs 1.2 fps
Help
Around 70% faster continuous shooting
Fastest shutter speed
Faster max shutter speed
1/2000s vs 1/1500s
Help
More than 20% faster max shutter speed
Lowest price
Cheaper
$157.06 vs $249.00
Help
The best price we've seen is $92 cheaper (around 40% less)
Longest exposure
Longer exposures
15s vs 4s
Help
Around 4x longer exposures
Canon PowerShot IXUS 240 HS Learn more about
the Canon IXUS 240 HS

Advantages of the Nikon L320

Report a correction
Panorama
Can create panoramas in-camera
Yes vs No
Help
Stitches together multiple photos for a wide perspective
Zoom
More zoom
26.6x vs 5x
Help
Around 28.5x more zoom
Battery life
Significantly longer battery life
310 shots vs 170 shots
Help
More than 80% more shots per battery charge
Wide angle
Better wide angle
22 mm vs 24 mm
Help
Around 10% better wide angle
Macro focus
Better macro capability
1.0 cm vs 3.0 cm
Help
Focus on subjects 3x closer to the lens
Nikon Coolpix L320 Learn more about
the Nikon L320
vs

recommendations

Which camera do we recommend? Relative to the best recent digicams, and ignoring price

Snapsort Recommends
Canon PowerShot IXUS 240 HS Canon IXUS 240 HS 37
Retailer
    Style
      Color
        You save
        vs
        31 Nikon Coolpix L320 Nikon Coolpix L320
        Retailer
          Style
            Color
              You save

              similarities

              Compared to recent digicams

              Common Strengths

              Snapsort is not aware of any interesting strengths shared by these two products.

              Common Weaknesses
              Viewfinder No viewfinders Help
              Can only preview photos on the screen
              HDR Neither has in-camera HDR Help
              You could do HDR manually
              Continuous shooting Slow continuous shooting Help
              IXUS 240 HS2 fps
              L3201.2 fps
              Screen flips out No flip-out screens Help
              Less flexible
              Light sensitivity Poor maximum light sensitivity Help
              IXUS 240 HS3,200 ISO
              L3201,600 ISO

              competitors

              Shared Competitors

              Advantages

              Disadvantages

              Canon PowerShot SX400 IS

              Canon PowerShot SX400 IS

              Super zoom

              $149 - $536

              Fastest shutter speed Has a slower max shutter speed
              Thickness Is thicker
              Canon EOS 1200D

              Canon EOS 1200D

              Entry-level DSLR

              $339 body only

              True resolution Takes much higher resolution photos
              Light sensitivity Slightly higher maximum light sensitivity
              Lowest price Is slightly more expensive
              Thickness Is thicker

              Canon PowerShot IXUS 240 HS Competitors

              Advantages

              Disadvantages

              Canon IXUS 265 HS

              Canon IXUS 265 HS

              Travel zoom

              $419

              Continuous shooting Shoots significantly faster
              Macro focus Better macro capability
              Aperture Significantly narrower aperture
              Supports 24p No 24p support
              Canon PowerShot ELPH 350 HS (IXUS 275 HS)

              Canon PowerShot ELPH 350 HS (IXUS 275 HS)

              Travel zoom

              GPS Has a GPS
              Battery life Longer battery life
              Aperture Significantly narrower aperture
              Supports 24p No 24p support
              Canon IXUS 125 HS

              Canon PowerShot IXUS 125 HS

              Compact

              $173 - $189

              Touch screen No touch screen
              Screen size Smaller screen
              Canon IXUS 220 HS

              Canon IXUS 220 HS

              Compact

              $173

              Shutter lag Less shutter lag
              Continuous shooting Shoots slightly faster
              Screen size Significantly smaller screen
              Touch screen No touch screen
              Canon IXUS 230 HS

              Canon IXUS 230 HS

              Travel zoom

              $199

              Shutter lag Less shutter lag
              Macro focus Better macro capability
              Touch screen No touch screen
              Wide angle Worse wide angle

              Nikon Coolpix L320 Competitors

              Advantages

              Disadvantages

              Nikon Coolpix L830

              Nikon Coolpix L830

              Super zoom

              $159

              Screen resolution Much higher resolution screen
              Movie format Higher resolution movies
              Size Slightly larger
              Weight Heavier
              Nikon Coolpix L820

              Nikon Coolpix L820

              Super zoom

              $160

              3D Takes 3D photos
              Screen resolution Much higher resolution screen
              Wide angle Slightly worse wide angle
              Weight Slightly heavier
              Sony CyberShot DSC-H300

              Sony CyberShot DSC-H300

              Super zoom

              $110 - $168

              Screen resolution Higher resolution screen
              Zoom More zoom
              Size Significantly larger
              Wide angle Worse wide angle
              Fujifilm FinePix S4800

              Fujifilm FinePix S4800

              Super zoom

              $147

              3D Takes 3D photos
              Zoom Slightly more zoom
              Size Larger
              Wide angle Worse wide angle
              Nikon Coolpix L330

              Nikon Coolpix L330

              Super zoom

              $165

              Wide angle Much better wide angle
              Screen resolution Higher resolution screen
              Longest exposure Slightly shorter max exposures

              appearance

              Canon PowerShot IXUS 240 HS Nikon Coolpix L320
              Canon PowerShot IXUS 240 HS Nikon Coolpix L320
              Canon PowerShot IXUS 240 HS Nikon Coolpix L320

              discussion

              Canon PowerShot IXUS 240 HS
              IXUS 240 HS
              Canon

              Report a correction
              Nikon Coolpix L320
              Coolpix L320
              Nikon

              Report a correction

              Showing 0 comments