Updated (February, 2012): Compare the Canon PowerShot SX260 HS vs Nikon Coolpix S6300

vs

     
 

Reasons to buy the Canon IXUS 230 HS

High-speed framerate
High speed movies
240 fps
Supports 24p
24p movies
For that film look
Macro focus
Great macro
1 cm
 

Reasons to buy the Nikon Coolpix S6300

HDR
In-camera HDR
Combines multiple exposures
Panorama
In-camera panoramas
Stitches together multiple photos into a panorama
3D
Takes 3D photos
View photos in 3D on 3D televisions
 
Differences | Recommendations | Similarities | Competitors | Appearance | Discussion

differences

Advantages of the Canon IXUS 230 HS

Report a correction
Supports 24p Supports 24p Yes vs No
Help
Get that real film feel
Macro focus Much better macro capability 1 cm vs 10 cm
Help
Focus on subjects 10x closer to the lens
High-speed framerate Records high-speed movies 240 fps vs None
Help
Capture events too fast for the naked eye and play them back in super-slow motion
Screen size Larger screen 3.0" vs 2.7"
Help
More than 10% larger screen
Screen resolution Higher resolution screen 461k dots vs 230k dots
Help
More than 2x higher resolution screen
Aperture Wider aperture f/3.0 vs f/3.2
Help
At its widest zoom, the IXUS 230 HS's lens captures marginally more light (0.2 f-stops)
Size Smaller 96x57x22 mm vs 94x58x26 mm
Help
Around 20% smaller
Thickness Thinner 0.9" vs 1"
Help
Around 20% thinner
Weight Lighter 140 g vs 160 g
Help
More than 10% lighter
Longest exposure Longer exposures 15s vs 4s
Help
Around 4x longer exposures
Canon IXUS 230 HS Learn more about
the Canon IXUS 230 HS

Advantages of the Nikon S6300

Report a correction
3D Takes 3D photos Yes vs No
Help
Combines multiple photos into a 3D image
Wide angle Better wide angle 25 mm vs 28 mm
Help
More than 10% better wide angle
Panorama Can create panoramas in-camera Yes vs No
Help
Stitches together multiple photos for a wide perspective
HDR Has in-camera HDR Yes vs No
Help
Combines multiple exposures to capture high dynamic range
Zoom Slightly more zoom 10x vs 8x
Help
Around 60% more zoom
Continuous shooting Shoots faster 6 fps vs 3.4 fps
Help
Around 80% faster continuous shooting
Battery life Slightly longer battery life 230 shots vs 210 shots
Help
Around 10% more shots per battery charge
Lowest price Cheaper $229.00 vs $311.74
Help
The best price we've seen is $83 cheaper (around 30% less)
Nikon Coolpix S6300 Learn more about
the Nikon S6300
vs

recommendations

Which camera do we recommend? Relative to the best recent travel zooms, and ignoring price

Canon IXUS 230 HS Canon IXUS 230 HS 54
Retailer
    Style
      Color
        You save

        vs

        52 Nikon Coolpix S6300 Nikon Coolpix S6300
        Retailer
          Style
            Color
              You save

              similarities

              Compared to recent compacts

              Common Strengths Common Weaknesses
              Image stabilization Good image stabilization Help
              IXUS 230 HS:Sensor shift, Lens
              S6300:Lens
              Sensor type Better sensor types Help
              Better in low light
              Supports RAW No RAW support Help
              Less editing fidelity

              Compared to recent travel zooms

              Common Strengths Common Weaknesses
              Size Fairly small Help
              IXUS 230 HS:96x57x22 mm
              S6300:94x58x26 mm
              Weight Light weight Help
              IXUS 230 HS:140 g
              S6300:160 g
              Thickness Thin Help
              IXUS 230 HS:0.9"
              S6300:1"
              Battery life Few shots per battery charge Help
              IXUS 230 HS:210 shots
              S6300:230 shots
              Touch screen No touchscreens Help
              More buttons
              Zoom Poor zoom Help
              IXUS 230 HS:8x
              S6300:10x

              competitors

              Shared Competitors

              Advantages

              Disadvantages

              Canon IXUS 265 HS

              Canon IXUS 265 HS

              Travel zoom

              $212

              Continuous shooting Shoots faster continuously
              Aperture Has a slightly narrower aperture
              Canon IXUS 125 HS

              Canon PowerShot IXUS 125 HS

              Compact

              $108 - $263

              Shutter lag Has slightly more shutter lag
              Battery life Has a slightly shorter battery life
              Canon IXUS 155

              Canon IXUS 155

              Travel zoom

              $128

              Sensor type Has a CCD-family sensor
              Movie format Records lower quality movies
              Canon PowerShot SX600 HS

              Canon PowerShot SX600 HS

              Travel zoom

              $199 - $265

              Zoom Has significantly more zoom
              Battery life Has a slightly longer battery life
              Thickness Is thicker
              Weight Is slightly heavier

              Canon IXUS 230 HS Competitors

              Advantages

              Disadvantages

              Polaroid Z2300 Instant Digital Camera

              Polaroid Z2300 Instant Digital Camera

              Digicam

              $180

              Lowest price Cheaper
              Size Much larger
              Image stabilization No image stabilization
              Canon IXUS 220 HS

              Canon IXUS 220 HS

              Compact

              $964

              Wide angle Better wide angle
              Aperture Wider aperture
              Screen size Smaller screen
              Screen resolution Lower resolution screen
              Canon PowerShot IXUS 240 HS

              Canon IXUS 240 HS

              Compact

              $266

              Wide angle Better wide angle
              Touch screen Has a touch screen
              Macro focus Worse macro capability
              Zoom Slightly less zoom
              Canon PowerShot IXUS 145

              Canon PowerShot IXUS 145

              Travel zoom

              $117

              Battery life Slightly longer battery life
              Size Slightly smaller
              Supports 24p No 24p support
              Movie format Lower resolution movies

              Nikon Coolpix S6300 Competitors

              Advantages

              Disadvantages

              Nikon Coolpix S6500

              Nikon Coolpix S6500

              Travel zoom

              $84 - $220

              Screen size Larger screen
              Screen resolution Higher resolution screen
              Battery life Shorter battery life
              Nikon Coolpix L830

              Nikon Coolpix L830

              Super zoom

              $165 - $227

              Zoom Much more zoom
              Screen resolution Much higher resolution screen
              Size Much larger
              Thickness Much thicker
              Nikon Coolpix S6800

              Nikon Coolpix S6800

              Travel zoom

              $139 - $177

              Macro focus Much better macro capability
              Screen size Larger screen
              3D Doesn't take 3D photos
              HDR Lacks in-camera HDR
              Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W690

              Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W690

              Travel zoom

              $435

              Macro focus Much better macro capability
              Screen size Larger screen
              3D Doesn't take 3D photos
              Movie format Lower resolution movies
              Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W830

              Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W830

              Travel zoom

              $78 - $119

              Size Smaller
              Weight Lighter
              3D Doesn't take 3D photos
              Movie format Lower resolution movies

              appearance

              Canon IXUS 230 HS Nikon Coolpix S6300
              Canon IXUS 230 HS Nikon Coolpix S6300
              Canon IXUS 230 HS Nikon Coolpix S6300

              discussion

              Canon IXUS 230 HS
              IXUS 230 HS
              Canon

              Report a correction
              Nikon Coolpix S6300
              Coolpix S6300
              Nikon

              Report a correction

              Showing 0 comments