Updated (August 2011): Compare the Canon IXUS 230 HS vs Canon IXUS 115 HS

Canon IXUS 115 HS vs Canon IXUS 230 HS

Tie
Canon IXUS 115 HS

49

Canon IXUS 230 HS

47

Tie

Reasons to buy the Canon IXUS 115 HS

Wide aperture
Aperture
f/2.8
Really small
Size
Super compact (93×56×20 mm)
Thin
Thickness
0.8"
Large screen
Screen size
3"
 

Reasons to buy the Canon IXUS 230 HS

Screen size
Large screen
3"
Size
Really small
Super compact (96×57×22 mm)
High-speed framerate
High speed movies
240 fps
Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Lens
  2. Sensor shift

galleries

Explore our gallery of 1 sample photo taken by the Canon IXUS 230 HS.
Explore our gallery of 9 sample photos taken by the Canon IXUS 115 HS.

competitors

Canon IXUS 115 HS Competitors

Canon PowerShot IXUS 145

Canon PowerShot IXUS 145

Travel zoom

$169

Macro focus Better macro capability
Zoom Slightly more zoom
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Canon IXUS 220 HS

Canon IXUS 220 HS

Compact

$137

Wide angle Much better wide angle
Aperture Slightly wider aperture
Screen size Much smaller screen
Canon PowerShot IXUS 160

Canon PowerShot IXUS 160

Travel zoom

$83 - $122

Zoom Slightly more zoom
Weight Slightly lighter
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

Canon IXUS 230 HS Competitors

Polaroid Z2300 Instant Digital Camera

Polaroid Z2300 Instant Digital Camera

Digicam

$100

High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Canon IXUS 220 HS

Canon IXUS 220 HS

Compact

$137

Wide angle Much better wide angle
Aperture Wider aperture
Screen size Much smaller screen
Canon PowerShot IXUS 170

Canon PowerShot IXUS 170

Travel zoom

$109 - $145

Wide angle Significantly better wide angle
Zoom Slightly more zoom
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

discussion

Showing 2 comments

Avatar for Snapsort Snapsort (4:36 PM, February 26, 2012)
Yeah that is kinda funny, I apologize, we'll get that fixed up!  It looks like the 115 HS somehow has been called the 230 HS in our system.
 
Arius (4:01 PM, February 26, 2012)
That is funny. There is an error in your url redirection. The 115 HS on the whole website is taken as 230HS. And here is a comparision between 230 HS and 230 HS.