Updated (August 2011): Compare the Canon IXUS 230 HS vs Canon IXUS 115 HS

Canon IXUS 115 HS vs Canon IXUS 230 HS

Winner
Canon IXUS 115 HS

55

Canon IXUS 230 HS

53

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Canon IXUS 115 HS

Really small
Size
Super compact (93×56×20 mm)
Thin
Thickness
0.8"
Full HD
Movie format
1080p @ 24fps
Large screen
Screen size
3"
 

Reasons to buy the Canon IXUS 230 HS

Movie format
Full HD
1080p @ 30fps
Fastest shutter speed
Fast shutter speed
1/2000 of a second
Screen size
Large screen
3"
Size
Really small
Super compact (96×57×22 mm)

galleries

Explore our gallery of 1 sample photo taken by the Canon IXUS 230 HS.
Explore our gallery of 9 sample photos taken by the Canon IXUS 115 HS.

competitors

Canon IXUS 115 HS Competitors

Nikon Coolpix S3600

Nikon Coolpix S3600

Travel zoom

$99

Wide angle Significantly better wide angle
Zoom Slightly more zoom
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Canon PowerShot IXUS 145

Canon PowerShot IXUS 145

Travel zoom

$453

Zoom Slightly more zoom
Fastest shutter speed Much faster max shutter speed
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Samsung PL120

Samsung PL120

Ultra compact

$180

Touch screen Has a touch screen
Wide angle Better wide angle
Movie format Does not take movies

Canon IXUS 230 HS Competitors

Canon IXUS 265 HS

Canon IXUS 265 HS

Travel zoom

Wide angle Significantly better wide angle
Continuous shooting Shoots faster
Supports 24p No 24p support
Canon IXUS 125 HS

Canon PowerShot IXUS 125 HS

Compact

Wide angle Significantly better wide angle
Aperture Wider aperture
Battery life Shorter battery life
Canon PowerShot IXUS 240 HS

Canon IXUS 240 HS

Compact

$252

Wide angle Significantly better wide angle
Touch screen Has a touch screen
Battery life Shorter battery life

discussion

Showing 2 comments

Avatar for Snapsort Snapsort (4:36 PM, February 26, 2012)
Yeah that is kinda funny, I apologize, we'll get that fixed up!  It looks like the 115 HS somehow has been called the 230 HS in our system.
 
Arius (4:01 PM, February 26, 2012)
That is funny. There is an error in your url redirection. The 115 HS on the whole website is taken as 230HS. And here is a comparision between 230 HS and 230 HS.