Updated (August 2011): Compare the Canon IXUS 230 HS vs Canon IXUS 115 HS

Canon IXUS 115 HS vs Canon IXUS 230 HS

Winner
Canon IXUS 115 HS

58

Canon IXUS 230 HS

56

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Canon IXUS 115 HS

Really small
Size
Super compact (93×56×20 mm)
Thin
Thickness
0.8"
Full HD
Movie format
1080p @ 24fps
Large screen
Screen size
3"
 

Reasons to buy the Canon IXUS 230 HS

Movie format
Full HD
1080p @ 30fps
Fastest shutter speed
Fast shutter speed
1/2000 of a second
Screen size
Large screen
3"
Size
Really small
Super compact (96×57×22 mm)

galleries

Explore our gallery of 1 sample photo taken by the Canon IXUS 230 HS.
Explore our gallery of 9 sample photos taken by the Canon IXUS 115 HS.

competitors

Canon IXUS 115 HS Competitors

Canon IXUS 220 HS

Canon IXUS 220 HS

Compact

$210

Wide angle Significantly better wide angle
Aperture Slightly wider aperture
Screen size Significantly smaller screen
Canon PowerShot A3100 IS

Canon PowerShot A3100 IS

Compact

$653

Aperture Slightly wider aperture
Fastest shutter speed Faster max shutter speed
Wide angle Much worse wide angle
Canon IXUS 125 HS

Canon PowerShot IXUS 125 HS

Compact

Wide angle Significantly better wide angle
Screen resolution Higher resolution screen
Continuous shooting Shoots slightly slower

Canon IXUS 230 HS Competitors

Polaroid Z2300 Instant Digital Camera

Polaroid Z2300 Instant Digital Camera

Digicam

$88 - $99

Lowest price Cheaper
Image stabilization No image stabilization
Canon PowerShot IXUS 240 HS

Canon IXUS 240 HS

Compact

Wide angle Significantly better wide angle
Touch screen Has a touch screen
Battery life Shorter battery life
Canon PowerShot SX170 IS

Canon PowerShot SX170 IS

Travel zoom

$348

Zoom More zoom
Battery life Significantly longer battery life
Size Much larger

discussion

Showing 2 comments

Avatar for Snapsort Snapsort (4:36 PM, February 26, 2012)
Yeah that is kinda funny, I apologize, we'll get that fixed up!  It looks like the 115 HS somehow has been called the 230 HS in our system.
 
Arius (4:01 PM, February 26, 2012)
That is funny. There is an error in your url redirection. The 115 HS on the whole website is taken as 230HS. And here is a comparision between 230 HS and 230 HS.