Canon EOS 1D X vs Canon EOS-1D X Mark II

Winner
Canon EOS 1D X

100

Canon EOS-1D X Mark II

77

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Canon EOS 1D X

Low noise at high ISO
Low light performance
2,786 ISO
Great image quality
Overall image quality
82.0
Great color depth
Color depth
23.8 bits
Barely any delay taking photos
Shutter lag
36 ms shutter lag
 

Reasons to buy the Canon EOS-1D X Mark II

Touch screen
Touch screen
Fewer buttons
Continuous shooting
Rapid fire
16 fps
GPS
Built-in GPS
Great for travel
Viewfinder size
Large viewfinder
0.76x

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Canon EOS 1D X.

competitors

Canon EOS 1D X Competitors

Canon EOS 5D Mark III

Canon EOS 5D Mark III

Pro DSLR

$1,999 - $2,349 body only

$2,599 - $2,699 with 24-105mm lens

True resolution Higher true resolution
Size Significantly smaller
Continuous shooting Shoots significantly slower
Canon EOS 5D Mark IV

Canon EOS 5D Mark IV

Pro DSLR

$2,949 - $3,299 body only

$3,399 - $4,199 with 24-105mm lens

True resolution Much higher true resolution
Touch screen Has a touch screen
Continuous shooting Shoots significantly slower
Canon EOS-1D Mark IV

Canon EOS 1D Mark IV

Pro DSLR

$6,188 body only

Size Smaller
Weight Lighter
Screen size Significantly smaller screen

Canon EOS-1D X Mark II Competitors

Canon EOS 5D Mark IV

Canon EOS 5D Mark IV

Pro DSLR

$2,949 - $3,299 body only

$3,399 - $4,199 with 24-105mm lens

True resolution Significantly higher true resolution
Size Significantly smaller
Continuous shooting Shoots much slower
Nikon D5

Nikon D5

Pro DSLR

$5,561 - $6,497 body only

$6,731 with 50mm lens

Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
Battery life Much longer battery life
Viewfinder size Smaller viewfinder
Sony Alpha a99 II

Sony Alpha a99 II

Boutique

$3,198

Focus points Many more focus points
True resolution Much higher true resolution
Viewfinder Has a digital viewfinder

discussion

Canon EOS 1D X
EOS 1D X
Canon

Report a correction
Canon EOS-1D X Mark II
EOS-1D X Mark II
Canon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments