Canon EOS 1D X vs Canon EOS 600D

Winner
Canon EOS 1D X

100

Canon EOS 600D

52

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Canon EOS 1D X

Large screen
Screen size
3.2"
Large viewfinder
Viewfinder size
0.76x
Weather sealed
Weather sealed
Shoot in extreme weather
Rapid fire
Continuous shooting
14 fps
 

Reasons to buy the Canon EOS 600D

Screen flips out
Flip-out screen
Great for movies
Movie format
Full HD
1080p @ 30fps
Screen resolution
High resolution screen
1,040k dots
Supports 24p
24p movies
For that film look

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Canon EOS 1D X.
Explore our gallery of 49 sample photos taken by the Canon EOS 600D.

competitors

Canon EOS 1D X Competitors

Canon EOS 5D Mark IV

Canon EOS 5D Mark IV

Pro DSLR

$2,271 - $2,799 body only

$2,571 - $3,699 with 24-105mm lens

True resolution Much higher true resolution
Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Continuous shooting Shoots much slower
Canon EOS 6D

Canon EOS 6D

Pro DSLR

$866 - $999 body only

$1,406 - $1,699 with 24-105mm lens

Size Much smaller
Lowest price Much cheaper
Continuous shooting Shoots much slower
Nikon D4

Nikon D4

Pro DSLR

$5,575 body only

$6,344 with 24-85mm lens

Movie continuous focus Continuous video focus
Battery life Much longer battery life
Shutter lag Much more shutter lag

Canon EOS 600D Competitors

Canon EOS 700D

Canon EOS 700D

Entry-level DSLR

$518 body only

Touch screen Has a touch screen
Continuous shooting Shoots significantly faster
Lowest price More expensive
Canon EOS 1200D

Canon EOS 1200D

Entry-level DSLR

$324 body only

$376 with 18-55mm lens

Battery life Slightly longer battery life
Thickness Thinner
Screen resolution Significantly lower resolution screen
Canon EOS Rebel T6

Canon EOS Rebel T6

Entry-level DSLR

$310 - $549 body only

$285 - $399 with 18-55mm lens

Battery life Slightly longer battery life
Thickness Thinner
External mic jack Lacks an external mic jack

discussion

Canon EOS 1D X
EOS 1D X
Canon

Report a correction
Canon EOS 600D
EOS 600D
Canon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments