Canon EOS 1D X vs Canon EOS 600D

Winner
Canon EOS 1D X

100

Canon EOS 600D

50

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Canon EOS 1D X

Low noise at high ISO
Low light performance
2,786 ISO
Great image quality
Overall image quality
82.0
Great color depth
Color depth
23.8 bits
Large screen
Screen size
3.2"
 

Reasons to buy the Canon EOS 600D

Screen flips out
Flip-out screen
Great for movies
Sensor cleaning
Self cleaning sensor
Avoids dust in your photos
Supports 24p
24p movies
For that film look
External mic jack
External mic jack
Record higher quality audio with a microphone

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Canon EOS 1D X.
Explore our gallery of 49 sample photos taken by the Canon EOS 600D.

competitors

Canon EOS 1D X Competitors

Canon EOS-1D X Mark II

Canon EOS-1D X Mark II

Pro DSLR

$5,272 - $5,999 body only

Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Touch screen Has a touch screen
Low light performance Much more noise at high ISO
Canon EOS 5D Mark III

Canon EOS 5D Mark III

Pro DSLR

$2,033 - $2,299 body only

$2,399 - $2,899 with 24-105mm lens

Size Significantly smaller
True resolution Higher true resolution
Low light performance More noise at high ISO
Canon EOS-1D Mark IV

Canon EOS 1D Mark IV

Pro DSLR

$2,201 body only

Dynamic range More dynamic range
Lowest price Significantly cheaper
Low light performance Much more noise at high ISO

Canon EOS 600D Competitors

Canon EOS 1200D

Canon EOS 1200D

Entry-level DSLR

$310 body only

Autofocus Video autofocus
Thickness Thinner
External mic jack Lacks an external mic jack
Canon EOS 700D

Canon EOS 700D

Entry-level DSLR

$496 with 18-55mm lens

Autofocus Video autofocus
HDR Has in-camera HDR
Color depth Worse color depth
Canon EOS 1100D

Canon EOS 1100D

Entry-level DSLR

$326 body only

$495 with 18-55mm lens

Startup delay Much less startup delay
Shutter lag Much less shutter lag
Screen size Much smaller screen

discussion

Canon EOS 1D X
EOS 1D X
Canon

Report a correction
Canon EOS 600D
EOS 600D
Canon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments