Canon EOS 1100D vs Canon EOS Rebel T6

Canon EOS 1100D
Canon EOS Rebel T6

Reasons to buy the Canon EOS 1100D

Almost no delay when powering up
Startup delay
100 ms startup delay
Barely any delay taking photos
Shutter lag
110 ms shutter lag
Interchangeable lenses
Interchangeable lenses
Many lenses to choose from
Built-in flash
Built-in flash
External flash not needed
 

Reasons to buy the Canon EOS Rebel T6

Movie format
Full HD
1080p @ 30fps
Screen resolution
High resolution screen
920k dots
Supports 24p
24p movies
For that film look
Interchangeable lenses
Interchangeable lenses
Many lenses to choose from

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Canon EOS 1100D.

competitors

Canon EOS 1100D Competitors

Canon EOS 1200D

Canon EOS 1200D

Entry-level DSLR

$385 with 18-55mm lens

True resolution Much higher true resolution
Screen resolution Much higher resolution screen
Viewfinder size Smaller viewfinder
Canon EOS 600D

Canon EOS 600D

Entry-level DSLR

$425 body only

$532 with 18-55mm lens

True resolution Much higher true resolution
Screen resolution Much higher resolution screen
Startup delay Much more startup delay
Canon EOS 100D

Canon EOS 100D

Entry-level DSLR

$670 with 18-55mm lens

True resolution Much higher true resolution
Screen resolution Much higher resolution screen
Startup delay Much more startup delay

Canon EOS Rebel T6 Competitors

Nikon D3400

Nikon D3400

Entry-level DSLR

$309 body only

$395 - $397 with 18-55mm lens

True resolution Much higher true resolution
Movie format Lower frame rate movies
Placeholder

Canon EOS RP

Boutique

$1,299 - $1,699

Focus points Many more focus points
True resolution Much higher true resolution
Viewfinder Has a digital viewfinder
Canon EOS 750D

Canon EOS 750D

Entry-level DSLR

$556 with 18-55mm lens

True resolution Much higher true resolution
Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Lowest price More expensive

discussion

Canon EOS 1100D
EOS 1100D
Canon

Report a correction
Canon EOS Rebel T6
EOS Rebel T6
Canon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments