Nikon has replaced the Coolpix S9100 with the S9300.
|
Nikon Coolpix S9300 announced February, 2012
|
|
|
![]() |
Nikon Coolpix S9100 |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nikon has replaced the Coolpix S9100 with the S9300.
|
Nikon Coolpix S9300 announced February, 2012
|
"Overall though the S9100 has delivered a very respectable ISO performance"trustedreviews.com | talking about the camera's iso-noise
"a toughened shock dampening chassis"trustedreviews.com | talking about the camera's build-quality
"Full HD video"trustedreviews.com | talking about the camera's video-quality
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||


Speech is free, but discussion at Snapsort is moderated! Please discuss your opinion of this camera here, and discuss feedback for Snapsort at our support community.
Showing 25 comments
They're quite different - you should go for the P300 if you want to shoot in low light without a flash, using the fast f/1.8 aperture. The P300 only has 4.3x zoom though which might be limiting, for example if you're taking pictures of kids play sports when you're on the sideline.
The S9100 on the other hand has a ton of zoom in a fairly small camera, 18x, making it very versatile.
cant make up mind which to get x