The Toshiba PDR-M60 is mostly gets compared to mirrorless, entry-level DSLRs and compacts. The Toshiba PDR-M60's top rivals come from Panasonic (such as the Lumix DMC-GX1) and Canon (such as the EOS Rebel T6i)

compared toMirrorless interchangeable-lens competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Toshiba PDR-M60 compared to mirrorless interchangeable-lens competitors include: it has a viewfinder (tunnel vs none).

However, on average it doesn't record movies (none vs 1080p @ 60fps), has a much smaller screen (1.8" vs 3"), takes much lower resolution photos (2.2 MP vs 16 MP), doesn't have a touch screen and has a marginally smaller sensor (1/2" 6.4x4.8mm vs four thirds 17.3x13mm).

Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX1

Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX1
11 years newer
$347 (body only)

Significant advantages of the DMC-GX1 (vs the PDR-M60)

  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 1.8"
  • Has a touch screen
  • Has interchangeable lenses

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-GX1 (vs the PDR-M60)

  • No viewfinder: None vs Tunnel

common strengths of the DMC-GX1 and PDR-M60

  • Light weight: 318 g vs 320 g
  • Each has a built-in flash

compared toEntry-level DSLR competitors

Canon EOS Rebel T6i

Canon EOS Rebel T6i
15 years newer
$549 (body only)
$729 18-55mm, 75-300mm lenses

Significant advantages of the T6i (vs the PDR-M60)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the T6i (vs the PDR-M60)

  • None found

common strengths of the T6i and PDR-M60

  • None found

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Toshiba PDR-M60 compared to compact competitors include: it has a much larger screen (1.8" vs 1.5").

However, on average it has a slightly narrower wide angle lens (38 mm vs 34 mm), is much larger (standard size (121×75×61 mm) vs compact (94×56×26 mm)), is older (february 2000 vs october 2003), is thicker (2.4" vs 1") and is much heavier (320 g vs 190 g).

Olympus D-150Z

Placeholder
1 year newer

Significant advantages of the D-150Z (vs the PDR-M60)

  • Much smaller: Compact (110×62×34 mm) vs Standard size (121×75×61 mm)
  • Much thinner: 1.3" vs 2.4"
  • Much lighter: 190 g vs 320 g

Significant disadvantages of the D-150Z (vs the PDR-M60)

  • Much smaller screen: 1.5" vs 1.8"

common strengths of the D-150Z and PDR-M60

  • Wide aperture: f/2.8 vs f/2.8
  • Both have tunnel viewfinders: Tunnel vs Tunnel

Konica Minolta DiMAGE G400

Minolta DiMAGE G400
3 years newer

Significant advantages of the G400 (vs the PDR-M60)

  • Much smaller: Compact (94×56×26 mm) vs Standard size (121×75×61 mm)
  • Significantly better wide angle: 34 mm vs 38 mm
  • Much thinner: 1" vs 2.4"

Significant disadvantages of the G400 (vs the PDR-M60)

  • Much smaller screen: 1.5" vs 1.8"

common strengths of the G400 and PDR-M60

  • Wide aperture: f/2.8 vs f/2.8
  • Both have tunnel viewfinders: Tunnel vs Tunnel