Sony has replaced the SLT A33 with the A35.
![]() | Sony SLT A35 announced June 2011 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sony has replaced the SLT A33 with the A35.
![]() | Sony SLT A35 announced June 2011 |
"Headline grabbing burst shooting speeds, fast auto-focus for both stills and video."photographyblog.com | talking about the camera's auto-focus
"ISO 100-800 is noise-free, whilst ISO 1600 and 3200 produce more than acceptable results."photographyblog.com | talking about the camera's iso-noise
"The Sony A33 is a great marriage of new and old, competitively priced to take on the best that mid-range DSLRs and Compact System Cameras can offer."photographyblog.com | talking about the camera's overall-performance
![]() |
|
Showing 25 comments
After a couple of months and a few holidays im looking at the D7000 or the EOS 60D.
If yhe Sony had a real optical veiw finder it would definitly be a winner. The LCD display is great but in direct sunlight gives very little impression of how the photo will actualy come out.
I did manage to get some decent shots out of the a33 after learning how to compensate for the poor SLT view finder but the standard lens is alo junk and has poor action for zooming expecialy while video recording.
If you cant afford the next level of Pro products then buy the body and get a real minolta lens
should make a world of difference. Overall i would give the a33 6.75 out of 10. Could have been a real winner if not for SLT.
Thanks for the excellent site and great work.
I am stuck in between sony slt a33 and nikon d3100...tell me which is better??? i am getting very gud discount on sony slt a33..after discount it will cost 24.5k...which would u choose ?
The only bad thing i find is the battery life... but with a replacement battery you'll be fine.
now i am confused between nikon d3100, sony nex3 , sony a55
and sony a 33
please help me with selection
thanks heaps for this site. It made the months long, arduous task of camera choice SO much easier - well in a way it made it possible... With a regular flawed human brain, trying to keep in mind the multitude of variables, especially across different classes of camera, is nigh on impossible without such a resource. Ultimately, as someone equally interested in video and stills, it came down to the GH2 or the A33/55. All good, but from a bang for buck POV the A33 was a clear winner (I purchased with the standard 18-55mm lens for $780 AUD). I have been very pleased with the resulting technology - my only issue (rather a significant one), was filming my mate's wedding and the camera overheated and stopped filming 10 seconds before "I now pronounce you..."!! :-( THEN, I found out that I could've filmed for half an hour if I hadn't had the steadyshot on - ah well, live and learn. ;-)
FWIW is a minor error in it's specs - it only has one storage slot. Also I have come across what appears to be a sister site of this, dealing with lens rather than cameras - except I can't find it again. What is this site?
I subconsciously stoke it
its as close to true love as a person can get to a camera
Electronic Viewfinder(CIPA standard)/270
Live View LCD(CIPA standard)/340
how many shots can i take and compared with others camera's battery ??
2200 v 1080
We hope you enjoy your camera.