As well as being compared against other travel zooms, the Sony Cybershot DSC-HX7V is also often compared to entry-level DSLRs, pro digicams, pro DSLRs, super zooms, waterproofs and compacts. The Sony Cybershot DSC-HX7V's top rivals come from Sony (such as the Cybershot DSC-HX9v and the Cyber-shot DSC-HX50V) and Canon (such as the ELPH 300 HS and the Rebel T4i)

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Sony DSC-HX7v compared to other travel zoom competitors include: it has a slightly higher resolution screen (921k dots vs 461k dots), has in-camera HDR and captures 3D images.

However, on average it doesn't record movies in 24p, is older (january, 2011 vs february, 2012), doesn't support an external flash and is less popular.

Sony Cybershot DSC-HX9v

Sony Cybershot DSC-HX9v
similar age
$350

Significant advantages of the DSC-HX9v (vs the DSC-HX7v)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-HX9v (vs the DSC-HX7v)

  • None found

common strengths of the DSC-HX9v and DSC-HX7v

  • Built-in GPS
  • High resolution screens: 921k dots vs 921k dots
  • Both can take 3D photos, many cameras like these don't
arrow Compare the Cybershot DSC-HX9v vs the Cyber-shot DSC-HX7v

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX50V

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX50V
2 years newer
$348

Significant advantages of the DSC-HX50V (vs the DSC-HX7v)

  • Has boost ISO: 12,800 ISO vs None
  • Supports an external flash

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-HX50V (vs the DSC-HX7v)

  • None found

common strengths of the DSC-HX50V and DSC-HX7v

  • Built-in GPS
  • High resolution screens: 921k dots vs 921k dots
  • Both can take 3D photos, many cameras like these don't
arrow Compare the DSC-HX50V vs the DSC-HX7v

Sony Cybershot H70

Sony Cybershot DSC-H70
similar age

Significant advantages of the H70 (vs the DSC-HX7v)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the H70 (vs the DSC-HX7v)

  • No built-in GPS
  • Much lower resolution screen: 230k dots vs 921k dots
  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 60fps

common strengths of the H70 and DSC-HX7v

  • In-camera panoramas
arrow Compare the Cybershot H70 vs the Cyber-shot DSC-HX7v

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX5v

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX5v
1 year older

Significant advantages of the DSC-HX5v (vs the DSC-HX7v)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-HX5v (vs the DSC-HX7v)

  • Much lower resolution screen: 230k dots vs 921k dots
  • Doesn't take 3D photos
  • Lacks in-camera HDR

common strengths of the DSC-HX5v and DSC-HX7v

  • Built-in GPS
  • In-camera panoramas
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
arrow Compare the DSC-HX5v vs the DSC-HX7v

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX10V

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX10V
1 year newer
$328

Significant advantages of the DSC-HX10V (vs the DSC-HX7v)

  • Better maximum light sensitivity: 12,800 ISO vs 3,200 ISO

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-HX10V (vs the DSC-HX7v)

  • None found

common strengths of the DSC-HX10V and DSC-HX7v

  • Built-in GPS
  • High resolution screens: 921k dots vs 921k dots
  • Both can take 3D photos, many cameras like these don't
arrow Compare the DSC-HX10V vs the DSC-HX7v

Canon PowerShot SX230 HS

Canon PowerShot SX230 HS
similar age
$200

Significant advantages of the SX230 HS (vs the DSC-HX7v)

  • Supports 24p
  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None

Significant disadvantages of the SX230 HS (vs the DSC-HX7v)

  • Significantly lower resolution screen: 461k dots vs 921k dots
  • Doesn't take 3D photos
  • Lacks in-camera HDR

common strengths of the SX230 HS and DSC-HX7v

  • Built-in GPS
  • In-camera panoramas
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
arrow Compare the Canon PowerShot SX230 HS vs the Sony Cybershot DSC-HX7V

compared toEntry-level DSLR competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Sony DSC-HX7v compared to entry-level DSLR competitors include: it records higher quality movies (1080p @ 60fps vs 1080p @ 30fps), has image stabilization (lens vs none), shoots faster continuously (10 fps vs 5 fps), has in-camera HDR and creates panoramas in-camera.

However, on average it takes much lower resolution photos (9.8 MP vs 24 MP), doesn't have a touch screen, doesn't record movies in 24p, doesn't have a screen which flips out and has a much smaller sensor (1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm vs APS-C 23.5x15.6mm).

Nikon D5300

Nikon D5300
2 years newer
$720 - $747 (body only)
$847 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the D5300 (vs the DSC-HX7v)

  • Much larger sensor: APS-C 23.5x15.6mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None
  • Much higher true resolution: 24.2 MP vs 9.8 MP

Significant disadvantages of the D5300 (vs the DSC-HX7v)

  • Much larger: Prosumer size 124x99x76 mm vs Compact 101x58x27 mm
  • No image stabilization: None vs Lens
  • Doesn't take 3D photos

common strengths of the D5300 and DSC-HX7v

  • Both shoot high resolution HD movies: 1080p @ 60fps vs 1080p @ 60fps
  • Built-in GPS
  • Light weight: 479 g vs 208 g
arrow Compare the Nikon D5300 vs the Sony Cybershot DSC-HX7V

Canon Rebel T4i

Canon Rebel T4i
1 year newer
$609 (body only)
$200 - $699 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the T4i (vs the DSC-HX7v)

  • Much larger sensor: APS-C 22.3x14.9mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None
  • Faster autofocus: Phase detection vs Contrast detection

Significant disadvantages of the T4i (vs the DSC-HX7v)

  • Lower frame rate movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 60fps
  • Much larger: Professional size 133x99x78 mm vs Compact 101x58x27 mm
  • No image stabilization: None vs Lens

common strengths of the T4i and DSC-HX7v

  • Inexpensive: $199.95 vs $329.99
arrow Compare the Canon Rebel T4i vs the Sony Cybershot DSC-HX7V

Nikon D3300

Nikon D3300
3 years newer
$597 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the D3300 (vs the DSC-HX7v)

  • Much larger sensor: APS-C 23.5x15.6mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None
  • Much higher true resolution: 24.2 MP vs 9.8 MP

Significant disadvantages of the D3300 (vs the DSC-HX7v)

  • Much larger: Prosumer size 124x98x75 mm vs Compact 101x58x27 mm
  • No image stabilization: None vs Lens
  • Doesn't take 3D photos

common strengths of the D3300 and DSC-HX7v

  • Both shoot high resolution HD movies: 1080p @ 60fps vs 1080p @ 60fps
  • Both have in-camera panoramic stitching, many cameras like these don't
  • Light weight: 430 g vs 208 g
arrow Compare the Nikon D3300 vs the Sony Cybershot DSC-HX7V

Nikon D5200

Nikon D5200
1 year newer
$597 - $647 (body only)
$544 - $747 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the D5200 (vs the DSC-HX7v)

  • Much larger sensor: APS-C 23.5x15.6mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None
  • Much higher true resolution: 24 MP vs 9.8 MP

Significant disadvantages of the D5200 (vs the DSC-HX7v)

  • Much larger: Prosumer size 129x98x78 mm vs Compact 101x58x27 mm
  • No image stabilization: None vs Lens
  • Doesn't take 3D photos

common strengths of the D5200 and DSC-HX7v

  • Both shoot high resolution HD movies: 1080p @ 60fps vs 1080p @ 60fps
arrow Compare the Nikon D5200 vs the Sony Cybershot DSC-HX7V

Nikon D7000

Nikon D7000
3 months older
$701 - $840 (body only)
$915 - $989 18-105mm lens

Significant advantages of the D7000 (vs the DSC-HX7v)

  • Much larger sensor: APS-C 23.6x15.6mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentaprism vs None
  • Faster autofocus: Phase detection vs Contrast detection

Significant disadvantages of the D7000 (vs the DSC-HX7v)

  • Lower frame rate movies: 1080p @ 24fps vs 1080p @ 60fps
  • Much larger: Professional size 132x105x77 mm vs Compact 101x58x27 mm
  • No image stabilization: None vs Lens

common strengths of the D7000 and DSC-HX7v

  • None found
arrow Compare the Nikon D7000 vs the Sony Cybershot DSC-HX7V

compared toPro digicam competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Sony DSC-HX7v compared to pro digicam competitors include: it creates panoramas in-camera, captures 3D images and has a built-in GPS.

However, on average it has a significantly smaller sensor (1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm vs nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm), doesn't shoot RAW, has a much narrower aperture (f/3.5 vs f/1.4), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 120 fps) and takes slightly lower resolution photos (9.8 MP vs 20 MP).

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 III

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 III
3 years newer
$798

Significant advantages of the DSC-RX100 III (vs the DSC-HX7v)

  • Much larger sensor: Nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm
  • Much wider aperture: f/1.8 vs f/3.5
  • Shoots RAW

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-RX100 III (vs the DSC-HX7v)

  • Doesn't take 3D photos
  • No built-in GPS

common strengths of the DSC-RX100 III and DSC-HX7v

  • In-camera panoramas
  • In-camera HDR
arrow Compare the DSC-RX100 III vs the DSC-HX7v

Canon PowerShot S110

Canon PowerShot S110
1 year newer
$220 - $249

Significant advantages of the S110 (vs the DSC-HX7v)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.0 vs f/3.5
  • Shoots RAW
  • Supports 24p

Significant disadvantages of the S110 (vs the DSC-HX7v)

  • Significantly lower resolution screen: 461k dots vs 921k dots
  • Doesn't take 3D photos
  • Lacks in-camera panoramic stitching

common strengths of the S110 and DSC-HX7v

  • In-camera HDR
arrow Compare the Canon PowerShot S110 vs the Sony Cybershot DSC-HX7V

Nikon Coolpix P300

Nikon Coolpix P300
similar age
$278

Significant advantages of the P300 (vs the DSC-HX7v)

  • Much wider aperture: f/1.8 vs f/3.5

Significant disadvantages of the P300 (vs the DSC-HX7v)

  • Doesn't take 3D photos
  • No built-in GPS

common strengths of the P300 and DSC-HX7v

  • In-camera panoramas
  • In-camera HDR
arrow Compare the Nikon Coolpix P300 vs the Sony Cybershot DSC-HX7V

Canon PowerShot S95

Canon PowerShot S95
4 months older
$335

Significant advantages of the S95 (vs the DSC-HX7v)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.0 vs f/3.5
  • Shoots RAW
  • Supports 24p

Significant disadvantages of the S95 (vs the DSC-HX7v)

  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 24fps vs 1080p @ 60fps
  • Significantly lower resolution screen: 461k dots vs 921k dots
  • Doesn't take 3D photos

common strengths of the S95 and DSC-HX7v

  • In-camera HDR
arrow Compare the Canon PowerShot S95 vs the Sony Cybershot DSC-HX7V

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX7

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX7
1 year newer
$345 - $348

Significant advantages of the DMC-LX7 (vs the DSC-HX7v)

  • Much wider aperture: f/1.4 vs f/3.5
  • Shoots RAW
  • Significantly better macro capability: 1 cm vs 5 cm

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-LX7 (vs the DSC-HX7v)

  • No built-in GPS

common strengths of the DMC-LX7 and DSC-HX7v

  • Both can take 3D photos, many cameras like these don't
  • In-camera panoramas
  • In-camera HDR
arrow Compare the Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX7 vs the Sony Cybershot DSC-HX7V

compared toPro DSLR competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Sony DSC-HX7v compared to pro DSLR competitors include: it has image stabilization (lens vs none), shoots faster continuously (10 fps vs 5.5 fps), creates panoramas in-camera, captures 3D images and is much smaller (compact 101x58x27 mm vs professional size 141x113x82 mm).

However, on average it has a significantly smaller screen (3.0" vs 3.2"), takes much lower resolution photos (9.8 MP vs 24.2 MP), doesn't record movies in 24p, has a much smaller sensor (1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm vs full frame 35.9x24.0mm) and doesn't have a viewfinder (none vs pentaprism).

Nikon D600

Nikon D600
1 year newer
$1,559 - $1,600 (body only)
$1,999 - $2,150 24-85mm lens

Significant advantages of the D600 (vs the DSC-HX7v)

  • Has a viewfinder: Pentaprism vs None
  • Faster autofocus: Phase detection vs Contrast detection
  • Supports 24p

Significant disadvantages of the D600 (vs the DSC-HX7v)

  • No image stabilization: None vs Lens
  • Doesn't take 3D photos
  • Lacks in-camera panoramic stitching

common strengths of the D600 and DSC-HX7v

  • Inexpensive: $1,559.09 vs $329.99
  • Each has a built-in flash
arrow Compare the Nikon D600 vs the Sony Cybershot DSC-HX7V

compared toSuper zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Sony DSC-HX7v compared to super zoom competitors include: it records higher quality movies (1080p @ 60fps vs 720p @ 30fps), has a slightly higher resolution screen (921k dots vs 461k dots), is significantly smaller (compact 101x58x27 mm vs professional size 125x84x102 mm), has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs CCD) and has in-camera HDR.

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.5 vs f/3.0), has much less zoom (10x vs 41.7x), has a slightly narrower wide angle lens (25 mm vs 22 mm), doesn't record movies in 24p and doesn't have a screen which flips out.

Nikon Coolpix P520

Nikon Coolpix P520
2 years newer
$327 - $347

Significant advantages of the P520 (vs the DSC-HX7v)

  • Significantly more zoom: 41.7x vs 10x
  • Has a flip-out screen
  • Significantly better macro capability: 1 cm vs 5 cm

Significant disadvantages of the P520 (vs the DSC-HX7v)

  • Much larger: Professional size 125x84x102 mm vs Compact 101x58x27 mm
  • Much thicker: 4" vs 1.1"
  • Significantly heavier: 550 g vs 208 g

common strengths of the P520 and DSC-HX7v

  • High resolution screens: 921k dots vs 921k dots
  • Both can take 3D photos, many cameras like these don't
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
arrow Compare the Nikon Coolpix P520 vs the Sony Cybershot DSC-HX7V

Sony Cyber-Shot DSC-HX300

Sony Cyber-Shot DSC-HX300
2 years newer
$398

Significant advantages of the DSC-HX300 (vs the DSC-HX7v)

  • Much more zoom: 50x vs 10x
  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.5
  • Has a flip-out screen

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-HX300 (vs the DSC-HX7v)

  • Much larger: Professional size 130x93x103 mm vs Compact 101x58x27 mm
  • No built-in GPS
  • Much heavier: 650 g vs 208 g

common strengths of the DSC-HX300 and DSC-HX7v

  • High resolution screens: 921k dots vs 921k dots
  • Both can take 3D photos, many cameras like these don't
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
arrow Compare the Cyber-Shot DSC-HX300 vs the Cyber-shot DSC-HX7v

Sony CyberShot DSC-H200

Sony CyberShot DSC-H200
2 years newer
$188 - $237

Significant advantages of the DSC-H200 (vs the DSC-HX7v)

  • Better macro capability: 2 cm vs 5 cm

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-H200 (vs the DSC-HX7v)

  • Significantly larger: Prosumer size 123x83x87 mm vs Compact 101x58x27 mm
  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 60fps
  • Significantly lower resolution screen: 460k dots vs 921k dots

common strengths of the DSC-H200 and DSC-HX7v

  • None found
arrow Compare the CyberShot DSC-H200 vs the Cyber-shot DSC-HX7v

Nikon Coolpix L320

Nikon Coolpix L320
2 years newer
$172

Significant advantages of the L320 (vs the DSC-HX7v)

  • Significantly better macro capability: 1 cm vs 5 cm

Significant disadvantages of the L320 (vs the DSC-HX7v)

  • Much lower resolution screen: 230k dots vs 921k dots
  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 60fps
  • Doesn't take 3D photos

common strengths of the L320 and DSC-HX7v

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size 111x76x83 mm vs Compact 101x58x27 mm
  • Light weight: 430 g vs 208 g
arrow Compare the Nikon Coolpix L320 vs the Sony Cybershot DSC-HX7V

Canon PowerShot SX50 HS

Canon PowerShot SX50 HS
1 year newer
$399 - $400

Significant advantages of the PowerShot SX50 HS (vs the DSC-HX7v)

  • Much more zoom: 50x vs 10x
  • Supports 24p
  • Has a flip-out screen

Significant disadvantages of the PowerShot SX50 HS (vs the DSC-HX7v)

  • Much larger: Professional size 123x87x106 mm vs Compact 101x58x27 mm
  • Significantly lower resolution screen: 461k dots vs 921k dots
  • Doesn't take 3D photos

common strengths of the PowerShot SX50 HS and DSC-HX7v

  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
  • In-camera HDR
arrow Compare the Canon PowerShot SX50 HS vs the Sony Cybershot DSC-HX7V

compared toWaterproof competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Sony DSC-HX7v compared to waterproof competitors include: it records higher quality movies (1080p @ 60fps vs 480p @ 30fps), has a much wider wide angle lens (25 mm vs 38 mm), has a significantly larger screen (3.0" vs 2.5"), has a much higher resolution screen (921k dots vs 115k dots) and has better image stabilization (lens vs none).

However, on average it slightly worse macro focusing (5 cm vs 1 cm), is slightly heavier (208 g vs 160 g), is slightly more expensive ($329.99 vs $199.99) and is not waterproof.

Pentax Optio W10

Pentax Optio W10
4 years older

Significant advantages of the W10 (vs the DSC-HX7v)

  • Better macro capability: 1 cm vs 5 cm
  • Waterproof

Significant disadvantages of the W10 (vs the DSC-HX7v)

  • Much worse wide angle: 38 mm vs 25 mm
  • Much lower resolution screen: 115k dots vs 921k dots
  • No image stabilization: None vs Lens

common strengths of the W10 and DSC-HX7v

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Fairly small: Compact 107x55x23 mm vs Compact 101x58x27 mm
arrow Compare the Pentax Optio W10 vs the Sony Cybershot DSC-HX7V

Panasonic Lumix TS4

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS4
1 year newer
$200

Significant advantages of the TS4 (vs the DSC-HX7v)

  • Waterproof
  • Much longer exposures: 60 seconds vs 30 seconds

Significant disadvantages of the TS4 (vs the DSC-HX7v)

  • Much lower resolution screen: 230k dots vs 921k dots
  • Smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.0"
  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS

common strengths of the TS4 and DSC-HX7v

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
  • Both can take 3D photos, many cameras like these don't
arrow Compare the Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS4 vs the Sony Cybershot DSC-HX7V

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Sony DSC-HX7v compared to compact competitors include: it records higher quality movies (1080p @ 60fps vs 720p @ 30fps), has a slightly wider wide angle lens (25 mm vs 28 mm), has a slightly larger screen (3.0" vs 2.7"), has a significantly higher resolution screen (921k dots vs 230k dots) and has better image stabilization (lens vs digital).

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.5 vs f/2.7), is slightly larger (compact 101x58x27 mm vs super compact 97x55x20 mm), doesn't record movies in 24p, is thicker (1.1" vs 0.8") and is slightly heavier (208 g vs 141 g).

Canon ELPH 300 HS

Canon ELPH 300 HS
similar age

Significant advantages of the 300 HS (vs the DSC-HX7v)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.7 vs f/3.5
  • Supports 24p
  • Significantly smaller: Super compact 92x55x19 mm vs Compact 101x58x27 mm

Significant disadvantages of the 300 HS (vs the DSC-HX7v)

  • Much lower resolution screen: 230k dots vs 921k dots
  • Doesn't take 3D photos
  • Smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.0"

common strengths of the 300 HS and DSC-HX7v

  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
arrow Compare the Canon ELPH 300 HS vs the Sony Cybershot DSC-HX7V

Sony Cybershot W580

Sony Cybershot DSC-W580
similar age
$108

Significant advantages of the W580 (vs the DSC-HX7v)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.6 vs f/3.5
  • Significantly smaller: Super compact 94x56x19 mm vs Compact 101x58x27 mm
  • Has more storage slots: 2 vs 1

Significant disadvantages of the W580 (vs the DSC-HX7v)

  • Much lower resolution screen: 230k dots vs 921k dots
  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 60fps
  • Doesn't take 3D photos

common strengths of the W580 and DSC-HX7v

  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
arrow Compare the Cybershot W580 vs the Cyber-shot DSC-HX7v

Sanyo VPC-X350

Sanyo VPC-X350
12 years older

Significant advantages of the VPC-X350 (vs the DSC-HX7v)

  • Wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.5
  • Has a viewfinder: Tunnel vs None

Significant disadvantages of the VPC-X350 (vs the DSC-HX7v)

  • Much worse wide angle: 38 mm vs 25 mm
  • Much smaller screen: 2.0" vs 3.0"
  • Much lower resolution screen: 110k dots vs 921k dots

common strengths of the VPC-X350 and DSC-HX7v

  • None found
arrow Compare the Sanyo VPC-X350 vs the Sony Cybershot DSC-HX7V

Sony Cybershot WX9

Sony Cybershot DSC-WX9
similar age

Significant advantages of the WX9 (vs the DSC-HX7v)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.6 vs f/3.5
  • Significantly smaller: Super compact 94x56x19 mm vs Compact 101x58x27 mm
  • Significantly lighter: 139 g vs 208 g

Significant disadvantages of the WX9 (vs the DSC-HX7v)

  • No built-in GPS
  • Significantly shorter max exposures: 2 seconds vs 30 seconds

common strengths of the WX9 and DSC-HX7v

  • High resolution screens: 921k dots vs 921k dots
  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
  • Both can take 3D photos, many cameras like these don't
arrow Compare the Cybershot WX9 vs the Cyber-shot DSC-HX7v

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W710

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W710
2 years newer
$85 - $95

Significant advantages of the DSC-W710 (vs the DSC-HX7v)

  • Significantly smaller: Super compact 97x55x20 mm vs Compact 101x58x27 mm
  • Significantly lighter: 114 g vs 208 g
  • Thinner: 0.8" vs 1.1"

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-W710 (vs the DSC-HX7v)

  • Much lower resolution screen: 230k dots vs 921k dots
  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 60fps
  • Doesn't take 3D photos

common strengths of the DSC-W710 and DSC-HX7v

  • None found
arrow Compare the DSC-W710 vs the DSC-HX7v

Canon PowerShot SD880 IS

Canon PowerShot SD880 IS
2 years older

Significant advantages of the SD880 IS (vs the DSC-HX7v)

  • Wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.5

Significant disadvantages of the SD880 IS (vs the DSC-HX7v)

  • Much lower resolution screen: 230k dots vs 921k dots
  • Lower resolution movies: 480p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 60fps
  • Doesn't take 3D photos

common strengths of the SD880 IS and DSC-HX7v

  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
arrow Compare the Canon PowerShot SD880 IS vs the Sony Cybershot DSC-HX7V