Summary Sony DSC-WX5

Prices Price
Camera only
Score Snapsort rank
Within its price range
#n/a of 29
Among similar cameras
#n/a of 37
Specifications Key specs
Help 5x
Screen size
Help 2.8"
Help f/2.4
Screen resolution
Help 460k dots
Wide angle
Help 24 mm
Movie format
Help 1080p @ 30fps
see all specifications
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX5Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX5


Sony has replaced the Cyber-shot DSC-WX5 with the WX9.

Sony Cybershot DSC-WX9
Sony Cybershot DSC-WX9 announced February 2011
Screen size Significantly larger screen
Screen resolution Higher resolution screen
Thickness Thinner

Compare the new Sony WX9 vs the DSC-WX5


Explore our gallery of 1 sample photo taken by the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX5.


Report a correction

The Sony DSC-WX5 vs other recent compacts

Aperture Wide aperture Help
Size Quite small Help
Super compact (92×52×22 mm)
Sensor type CMOS Sensor Help
Better in low light
Weight Light Help
146 g
Wide angle Great wide angle lens Help
24 mm
Image stabilization Image stabilization Help
  1. Lens
Thickness Thin Help


Report a correction

The Sony DSC-WX5 vs other recent compacts

Screen resolution Low resolution screen Help
460k dots
Light sensitivity Poor maximum light sensitivity Help
3,200 ISO
Sensor size Slightly smaller than average sensor Help
1/2.3" 6.16x4.62mm
Viewfinder Can only preview photos on the screen Help
Longest exposure Short exposures Help
2 seconds
Screen size Below average sized screen Help
Screen flips out Fixed screen Help
Less flexible
Announced Old Help
July 2010
Fastest shutter speed Slow shutter speed Help
1/1600 of a second
Popularity Not so popular Help
Among snapsort users


front photo of the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX5back photo of the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX5angle photo of the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX5


Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX5
Cyber-shot DSC-WX5

Report a correction

Showing 2 comments

Nsuronyon (3:55 AM, May 14, 2012)
Greatest camera during its age...
Vivid colours, sharp results, lightweight..
Robert R (5:26 AM, May 09, 2011)
Bought it, hated it, moved on.

Sure there are some neat features, but the photos suck and the video is awful. You get better video from a flip video camera or similar pocket sized camcorder.
Avoid this camera and get a Canon S95 instead. It's only 150 dollars more and it's a pro digicam to boot.