Summary Sony DSC-WX5

Prices Price
Camera only
$280
Score Snapsort rank
Within its price range
#n/a of 29
Among similar cameras
#n/a of 38
Specifications Key specs
Zoom
Help 5x
Screen size
Help 2.8"
Aperture
Help f/2.4
Screen resolution
Help 460k dots
Wide angle
Help 24 mm
Movie format
Help 1080p @ 30fps
see all specifications
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX5Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX5

Replacement

Sony has replaced the Cyber-shot DSC-WX5 with the WX9.

Sony Cybershot DSC-WX9
Sony Cybershot DSC-WX9 announced February 2011
Screen size Significantly larger screen
Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Thickness Thinner

Compare the new Sony WX9 vs the DSC-WX5

gallery

Explore our gallery of 1 sample photo taken by the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX5.

Pros

Report a correction

The Sony DSC-WX5 vs other recent compacts

Aperture Wide aperture Help
f/2.4
Size Really small Help
Super compact (92×52×22 mm)
Continuous shooting Rapid fire Help
10 fps
Thickness Thin Help
0.9"
Wide angle Great wide angle lens Help
24 mm
Image stabilization Image stabilization Help
  1. Lens
Sensor type CMOS Sensor Help
Better in low light
Weight Light Help
146 g

Cons

Report a correction

The Sony DSC-WX5 vs other recent compacts

Zoom Below average zoom Help
5x
Screen size Below average sized screen Help
2.8"
Supports 24p No 24p movies Help
Missing that film look
Announced Old Help
July 2010
Longest exposure Short exposures Help
2 seconds
Screen resolution Low resolution screen Help
460k dots
Light sensitivity Poor maximum light sensitivity Help
3,200 ISO
Screen flips out Fixed screen Help
Less flexible
Fastest shutter speed Slow shutter speed Help
1/1600 of a second
Popularity Not so popular Help
Among snapsort users

Appearance

front photo of the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX5back photo of the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX5angle photo of the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX5

Discussion

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX5
Cyber-shot DSC-WX5
Sony

Report a correction

Showing 2 comments

Nsuronyon (3:55 AM, May 14, 2012)
Greatest camera during its age...
Vivid colours, sharp results, lightweight..
 
Robert R (5:26 AM, May 09, 2011)
Bought it, hated it, moved on.

Sure there are some neat features, but the photos suck and the video is awful. You get better video from a flip video camera or similar pocket sized camcorder.
Avoid this camera and get a Canon S95 instead. It's only 150 dollars more and it's a pro digicam to boot.