Summary Sony DSC-WX5

Prices Price
Camera only
Score Snapsort rank
Among similar cameras
#n/a of 7
Specifications Key specs
Help 5x
Screen size
Help 2.8"
Help f/2.4
Screen resolution
Help 460k dots
Wide angle
Help 24 mm
Movie format
Help 1080p @ 30fps
see all specifications
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX5Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX5


Sony has replaced the Cyber-shot DSC-WX5 with the WX9.

Sony Cybershot DSC-WX9
Sony Cybershot DSC-WX9 announced February 2011
Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Screen size Larger screen
Thickness Thinner

Compare the new Sony WX9 vs the DSC-WX5


Explore our gallery of 1 sample photo taken by the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX5.


Report a correction

The Sony DSC-WX5 vs other recent compacts

Aperture Very wide aperture Help
Wide angle Great wide angle lens Help
24 mm
Image stabilization Image stabilization Help
  1. Lens
Weight Light Help
146 g
Built-in flash Built-in flash Help
Usually standard
Size Really small Help
Super compact (92×52×22 mm)
Thickness Thin Help


Report a correction

The Sony DSC-WX5 vs other recent compacts

Zoom Below average zoom Help
Continuous shooting Slow continuous shooting Help
10 fps
Touch screen No touch screen Help
More buttons
Announced Old Help
July 2010
Fastest shutter speed Slow shutter speed Help
1/1600 of a second
Popularity Not so popular Help
Among snapsort users
Screen resolution Low resolution screen Help
460k dots
Light sensitivity Very poor maximum light sensitivity Help
3,200 ISO
Screen flips out Fixed screen Help
Less flexible
Viewfinder Can only preview photos on the screen Help
Longest exposure Short exposures Help
2 seconds


front photo of the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX5back photo of the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX5angle photo of the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX5


Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX5
Cyber-shot DSC-WX5

Report a correction

Showing 2 comments

Nsuronyon (3:55 AM, May 14, 2012)
Greatest camera during its age...
Vivid colours, sharp results, lightweight..
Robert R (5:26 AM, May 09, 2011)
Bought it, hated it, moved on.

Sure there are some neat features, but the photos suck and the video is awful. You get better video from a flip video camera or similar pocket sized camcorder.
Avoid this camera and get a Canon S95 instead. It's only 150 dollars more and it's a pro digicam to boot.