As well as being compared against other ultra compacts, the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX1 is also often compared to mirrorless, pro digicams, travel zooms and compacts. The Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX1's top rivals come from Sony (such as the Cybershot WX7 and the Cyber-shot DSC-WX5) and Canon (such as the Powershot S100 and the ELPH 300 HS)

compared toUltra compact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Sony DSC-WX1 compared to other ultra compact competitors include: it has a slightly wider aperture (f/2.4 vs f/3.5), has a significantly wider wide angle lens (24 mm vs 28 mm), shoots faster continuously (10 fps vs 1.5 fps) and has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs CCD).

However, on average it takes much lower resolution photos (8.1 MP vs 9.8 MP), significantly lower maximum light sensitivity (3,200 ISO vs 12,800 ISO), has a significantly smaller sensor (1/2.7" 5.6x4.2mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm), is older (august, 2009 vs february, 2011) and is slightly heavier (149 g vs 117 g).

Sony Cybershot W570

Sony Cybershot DSC-W570
1 year newer
$129

Significant advantages of the W570 (vs the DSC-WX1)

  • Much higher true resolution: 9.7 MP vs 8.1 MP
  • Significantly larger sensor: 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm vs 1/2.7" 5.6x4.2mm

Significant disadvantages of the W570 (vs the DSC-WX1)

  • Significantly worse wide angle: 28 mm vs 24 mm
  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS
  • Shoots significantly slower: 1 fps vs 10 fps

common strengths of the W570 and DSC-WX1

  • Wide aperture: f/2.6 vs f/2.4
  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
arrow Compare the Cybershot W570 vs the Cyber-shot DSC-WX1

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W380

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W380
5 months newer
$225 - $315

Significant advantages of the DSC-W380 (vs the DSC-WX1)

  • Much higher true resolution: 9.8 MP vs 8.1 MP
  • Significantly larger sensor: 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm vs 1/2.7" 5.6x4.2mm

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-W380 (vs the DSC-WX1)

  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS
  • Shoots significantly slower: 1.5 fps vs 10 fps

common strengths of the DSC-W380 and DSC-WX1

  • Wide aperture: f/2.4 vs f/2.4
  • Good wide angle: 24 mm vs 24 mm
  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
arrow Compare the DSC-W380 vs the DSC-WX1

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W350

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W350
5 months newer
$139 - $183

Significant advantages of the DSC-W350 (vs the DSC-WX1)

  • Much higher true resolution: 9.8 MP vs 8.1 MP
  • Significantly larger sensor: 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm vs 1/2.7" 5.6x4.2mm

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-W350 (vs the DSC-WX1)

  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS
  • Shoots significantly slower: 1.4 fps vs 10 fps

common strengths of the DSC-W350 and DSC-WX1

  • Wide aperture: f/2.7 vs f/2.4
  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
arrow Compare the DSC-W350 vs the DSC-WX1

Sony Cyber-shot WX70

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX70
2 years newer

Significant advantages of the WX70 (vs the DSC-WX1)

  • Better maximum light sensitivity: 12,800 ISO vs 3,200 ISO
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 60fps vs 720p @ 30fps
  • Much higher true resolution: 9.7 MP vs 8.1 MP

Significant disadvantages of the WX70 (vs the DSC-WX1)

  • None found

common strengths of the WX70 and DSC-WX1

  • Wide aperture: f/2.6 vs f/2.4
  • Good wide angle: 25 mm vs 24 mm
  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
arrow Compare the WX70 vs the DSC-WX1

Olympus Stylus 1040

Olympus Stylus 1040
1 year older
$102

Significant advantages of the 1040 (vs the DSC-WX1)

  • Much higher true resolution: 9.8 MP vs 8.1 MP
  • Significantly larger sensor: 1/2.3" 6.1x4.6mm vs 1/2.7" 5.6x4.2mm

Significant disadvantages of the 1040 (vs the DSC-WX1)

  • Much worse wide angle: 38 mm vs 24 mm
  • Much narrower aperture: f/3.5 vs f/2.4
  • No image stabilization: None vs Lens

common strengths of the 1040 and DSC-WX1

  • None found
arrow Compare the Olympus Stylus 1040 vs the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX1

Sony Cyber-shot WX50

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX50
2 years newer

Significant advantages of the WX50 (vs the DSC-WX1)

  • Better maximum light sensitivity: 12,800 ISO vs 3,200 ISO
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 60fps vs 720p @ 30fps
  • Much higher true resolution: 9.7 MP vs 8.1 MP

Significant disadvantages of the WX50 (vs the DSC-WX1)

  • None found

common strengths of the WX50 and DSC-WX1

  • Wide aperture: f/2.6 vs f/2.4
  • Good wide angle: 25 mm vs 24 mm
  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
arrow Compare the WX50 vs the DSC-WX1

compared toMirrorless interchangeable-lens competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Sony DSC-WX1 compared to mirrorless interchangeable-lens competitors include: it has image stabilization (lens vs none), has slightly less shutter lag (180 ms vs 441 ms), is slightly smaller (ultra compact 91x52x20 mm vs compact 111x59x38 mm), is slightly less expensive ($284.99 vs $599.00) and is thinner (0.8" vs 1.5").

However, on average it records lower quality movies (720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 60fps), has a much smaller screen (2.7" vs 3.0"), has a much lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 920k dots), takes much lower resolution photos (8.1 MP vs 16 MP) and much lower maximum light sensitivity (3,200 ISO vs 25,600 ISO).

Sony Alpha NEX-5

Sony Alpha NEX-5
9 months newer
$569 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the NEX-5 (vs the DSC-WX1)

  • Much larger screen: 3.0" vs 2.7"
  • Much higher resolution screen: 920k dots vs 230k dots
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps

Significant disadvantages of the NEX-5 (vs the DSC-WX1)

  • No image stabilization: None vs Lens
  • Significantly more shutter lag: 441 ms vs 180 ms
  • Significantly heavier: 287 g vs 149 g

common strengths of the NEX-5 and DSC-WX1

  • Fairly small: Compact 111x59x38 mm vs Ultra compact 91x52x20 mm
  • Light weight: 287 g vs 149 g
arrow Compare the Alpha NEX-5 vs the Cyber-shot DSC-WX1

Sony NEX-5N

Sony NEX-5N
2 years newer
$599 - $600 (body only)
$698 - $699 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the NEX-5N (vs the DSC-WX1)

  • Much larger screen: 3.0" vs 2.7"
  • Much higher resolution screen: 920k dots vs 230k dots
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 60fps vs 720p @ 30fps

Significant disadvantages of the NEX-5N (vs the DSC-WX1)

  • No image stabilization: None vs Lens
  • Significantly thicker: 1.5" vs 0.8"
  • Significantly heavier: 269 g vs 149 g

common strengths of the NEX-5N and DSC-WX1

  • Minimal shutter lag: 235 ms vs 180 ms
  • Fairly small: Compact 111x59x38 mm vs Ultra compact 91x52x20 mm
  • Light weight: 269 g vs 149 g
arrow Compare the NEX-5N vs the Cyber-shot DSC-WX1

compared toPro digicam competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Sony DSC-WX1 compared to pro digicam competitors include: it has a slightly wider wide angle lens (24 mm vs 28 mm), is significantly smaller (ultra compact 91x52x20 mm vs compact 99x60x28 mm), shoots faster continuously (10 fps vs 3.7 fps), has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs CCD) and is thinner (0.8" vs 1.1").

However, on average it has a much smaller sensor (1/2.7" 5.6x4.2mm vs 1/1.8" 7.5x5.5mm), doesn't shoot RAW, has a slightly narrower aperture (f/2.4 vs f/2.0), records lower quality movies (720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 24fps) and has a significantly smaller screen (2.7" vs 3.0").

Canon Powershot S100

Canon Powershot S100
2 years newer
$414 - $430

Significant advantages of the S100 (vs the DSC-WX1)

  • Much larger sensor: 1/1.8" 7.5x5.5mm vs 1/2.7" 5.6x4.2mm
  • Shoots RAW
  • Much higher true resolution: 12 MP vs 8.1 MP

Significant disadvantages of the S100 (vs the DSC-WX1)

  • Significantly larger: Compact 99x60x28 mm vs Ultra compact 91x52x20 mm
  • Significantly thicker: 1.1" vs 0.8"
  • Significantly heavier: 198 g vs 149 g

common strengths of the S100 and DSC-WX1

  • Good wide angle: 24 mm vs 24 mm
  • Very small: Compact 99x60x28 mm vs Ultra compact 91x52x20 mm
  • Fast continuous shooting: 10 fps vs 10 fps
arrow Compare the Canon Powershot S100 vs the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX1

Canon PowerShot S95

Canon PowerShot S95
1 year newer
$369

Significant advantages of the S95 (vs the DSC-WX1)

  • Much larger sensor: 1/1.7" 7.6x5.7mm vs 1/2.7" 5.6x4.2mm
  • Shoots RAW
  • Much higher true resolution: 10 MP vs 8.1 MP

Significant disadvantages of the S95 (vs the DSC-WX1)

  • Significantly larger: Compact 99x58x29 mm vs Ultra compact 91x52x20 mm
  • Significantly worse wide angle: 28 mm vs 24 mm
  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS

common strengths of the S95 and DSC-WX1

  • Very small: Compact 99x58x29 mm vs Ultra compact 91x52x20 mm
  • Very light: 193 g vs 149 g
  • Very thin: 1.2" vs 0.8"
arrow Compare the Canon PowerShot S95 vs the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX1

Canon PowerShot SD4000 IS

Canon PowerShot SD4000 IS
9 months newer
$294

Significant advantages of the SD4000 IS (vs the DSC-WX1)

  • Significantly larger sensor: 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm vs 1/2.7" 5.6x4.2mm
  • Much higher true resolution: 9.8 MP vs 8.1 MP
  • Significantly larger screen: 3.0" vs 2.7"

Significant disadvantages of the SD4000 IS (vs the DSC-WX1)

  • Significantly worse wide angle: 28 mm vs 24 mm
  • Shoots slower: 3.7 fps vs 10 fps

common strengths of the SD4000 IS and DSC-WX1

  • Very small: Super compact 100x54x23 mm vs Ultra compact 91x52x20 mm
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
  • Very thin: 0.9" vs 0.8"
arrow Compare the Canon PowerShot SD4000 IS vs the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX1

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Sony DSC-WX1 compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has a slightly wider wide angle lens (24 mm vs 28 mm), has a significantly wider aperture (f/2.4 vs f/3.3), is much smaller (ultra compact 91x52x20 mm vs compact 104x59x33 mm), shoots faster continuously (10 fps vs 3 fps) and has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs CCD).

However, on average it has significantly less zoom (5x vs 14x), doesn't have a built-in GPS, records lower quality movies (720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 24fps), has a slightly smaller screen (2.7" vs 3.0") and has a slightly lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 921k dots).

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ3

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ3
2 years older

Significant advantages of the DMC-TZ3 (vs the DSC-WX1)

  • Significantly larger screen: 3.0" vs 2.7"

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-TZ3 (vs the DSC-WX1)

  • Significantly narrower aperture: f/3.3 vs f/2.4
  • Much larger: Compact 105x59x37 mm vs Ultra compact 91x52x20 mm
  • Significantly worse wide angle: 28 mm vs 24 mm

common strengths of the DMC-TZ3 and DSC-WX1

  • None found
arrow Compare the Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ3 vs the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX1

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH20

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH20
5 months newer
$156 - $165

Significant advantages of the DMC-FH20 (vs the DSC-WX1)

  • Much higher true resolution: 9.8 MP vs 8.1 MP
  • Significantly larger sensor: 1/2.3" 6.1x4.6mm vs 1/2.7" 5.6x4.2mm
  • Has boost ISO: 6,400 ISO vs None

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-FH20 (vs the DSC-WX1)

  • Significantly narrower aperture: f/3.3 vs f/2.4
  • Significantly worse wide angle: 28 mm vs 24 mm
  • Significantly larger: Compact 100x56x28 mm vs Ultra compact 91x52x20 mm

common strengths of the DMC-FH20 and DSC-WX1

  • Fairly small: Compact 100x56x28 mm vs Ultra compact 91x52x20 mm
  • Light weight: 178 g vs 149 g
arrow Compare the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH20 vs the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX1

Sony Cybershot DSC-HX9v

Sony Cybershot DSC-HX9v
1 year newer
$289 - $328

Significant advantages of the DSC-HX9v (vs the DSC-WX1)

  • Much more zoom: 16x vs 5x
  • Has a GPS
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 60fps vs 720p @ 30fps

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-HX9v (vs the DSC-WX1)

  • Significantly narrower aperture: f/3.3 vs f/2.4
  • Much larger: Compact 105x59x34 mm vs Ultra compact 91x52x20 mm
  • Much heavier: 245 g vs 149 g

common strengths of the DSC-HX9v and DSC-WX1

  • Good wide angle: 24 mm vs 24 mm
  • Fast continuous shooting: 10 fps vs 10 fps
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
arrow Compare the Cybershot DSC-HX9v vs the Cyber-shot DSC-WX1

Nikon Coolpix S8200

Nikon Coolpix S8200
2 years newer
$219 - $250

Significant advantages of the S8200 (vs the DSC-WX1)

  • Significantly more zoom: 14x vs 5x
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps
  • Significantly higher resolution screen: 961k dots vs 230k dots

Significant disadvantages of the S8200 (vs the DSC-WX1)

  • Significantly narrower aperture: f/3.3 vs f/2.4
  • Much larger: Compact 104x59x33 mm vs Ultra compact 91x52x20 mm
  • Much thicker: 1.3" vs 0.8"

common strengths of the S8200 and DSC-WX1

  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
arrow Compare the Nikon Coolpix S8200 vs the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX1

Canon PowerShot SX230 HS

Canon PowerShot SX230 HS
1 year newer
$219 - $304

Significant advantages of the SX230 HS (vs the DSC-WX1)

  • Has a GPS
  • Significantly more zoom: 14x vs 5x
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 24fps vs 720p @ 30fps

Significant disadvantages of the SX230 HS (vs the DSC-WX1)

  • Significantly worse wide angle: 28 mm vs 24 mm
  • Much larger: Compact 106x59x33 mm vs Ultra compact 91x52x20 mm
  • Significantly narrower aperture: f/3.1 vs f/2.4

common strengths of the SX230 HS and DSC-WX1

  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
arrow Compare the Canon PowerShot SX230 HS vs the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX1

Fujifilm FinePix T200

Fujifilm FinePix T200
1 year newer
$150

Significant advantages of the T200 (vs the DSC-WX1)

  • Much higher true resolution: 9.7 MP vs 8.1 MP
  • Significantly larger sensor: 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm vs 1/2.7" 5.6x4.2mm

Significant disadvantages of the T200 (vs the DSC-WX1)

  • Much narrower aperture: f/3.4 vs f/2.4
  • Significantly worse wide angle: 28 mm vs 24 mm
  • Significantly larger: Compact 97x56x28 mm vs Ultra compact 91x52x20 mm

common strengths of the T200 and DSC-WX1

  • Fairly small: Compact 97x56x28 mm vs Ultra compact 91x52x20 mm
  • Light weight: 151 g vs 149 g
arrow Compare the Fujifilm FinePix T200 vs the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX1

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Sony DSC-WX1 compared to compact competitors include: it has a slightly wider aperture (f/2.4 vs f/3.9).

However, on average it records lower quality movies (720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 24fps), has a slightly lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 921k dots), takes much lower resolution photos (8.1 MP vs 9.8 MP), doesn't record movies in 24p and has a significantly smaller sensor (1/2.7" 5.6x4.2mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm).

Sony Cybershot WX7

Sony Cybershot DSC-WX7
1 year newer
$254 - $305

Significant advantages of the WX7 (vs the DSC-WX1)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 60fps vs 720p @ 30fps
  • Much higher true resolution: 9.7 MP vs 8.1 MP
  • Significantly higher resolution screen: 921k dots vs 230k dots

Significant disadvantages of the WX7 (vs the DSC-WX1)

  • None found

common strengths of the WX7 and DSC-WX1

  • Wide aperture: f/2.6 vs f/2.4
  • Good wide angle: 25 mm vs 24 mm
  • Fairly small: Super compact 94x56x19 mm vs Ultra compact 91x52x20 mm
arrow Compare the Cybershot WX7 vs the Cyber-shot DSC-WX1

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX5

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX5
1 year newer
$230

Significant advantages of the DSC-WX5 (vs the DSC-WX1)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps
  • Much higher true resolution: 9.8 MP vs 8.1 MP
  • Significantly larger sensor: 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm vs 1/2.7" 5.6x4.2mm

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-WX5 (vs the DSC-WX1)

  • None found

common strengths of the DSC-WX5 and DSC-WX1

  • Very wide aperture: f/2.4 vs f/2.4
  • Good wide angle: 24 mm vs 24 mm
  • Fairly small: Super compact 92x52x22 mm vs Ultra compact 91x52x20 mm
arrow Compare the DSC-WX5 vs the DSC-WX1

Sony Cybershot WX9

Sony Cybershot DSC-WX9
1 year newer
$155

Significant advantages of the WX9 (vs the DSC-WX1)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 60fps vs 720p @ 30fps
  • Much higher true resolution: 9.7 MP vs 8.1 MP
  • Significantly higher resolution screen: 921k dots vs 230k dots

Significant disadvantages of the WX9 (vs the DSC-WX1)

  • None found

common strengths of the WX9 and DSC-WX1

  • Wide aperture: f/2.6 vs f/2.4
  • Good wide angle: 25 mm vs 24 mm
  • Fairly small: Super compact 94x56x19 mm vs Ultra compact 91x52x20 mm
arrow Compare the Cybershot WX9 vs the Cyber-shot DSC-WX1

Canon ELPH 300 HS

Canon ELPH 300 HS
1 year newer
$125 - $233

Significant advantages of the 300 HS (vs the DSC-WX1)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 24fps vs 720p @ 30fps
  • Supports 24p
  • Much higher true resolution: 9.7 MP vs 8.1 MP

Significant disadvantages of the 300 HS (vs the DSC-WX1)

  • Shoots slower: 3.4 fps vs 10 fps

common strengths of the 300 HS and DSC-WX1

  • Wide aperture: f/2.7 vs f/2.4
  • Good wide angle: 24 mm vs 24 mm
  • Fairly small: Super compact 92x55x19 mm vs Ultra compact 91x52x20 mm
arrow Compare the Canon ELPH 300 HS vs the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX1

Sony Cybershot WX10

Sony Cybershot DSC-WX10
1 year newer
$210 - $238

Significant advantages of the WX10 (vs the DSC-WX1)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 60fps vs 720p @ 30fps
  • Much higher true resolution: 9.7 MP vs 8.1 MP
  • Significantly larger sensor: 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm vs 1/2.7" 5.6x4.2mm

Significant disadvantages of the WX10 (vs the DSC-WX1)

  • None found

common strengths of the WX10 and DSC-WX1

  • Very wide aperture: f/2.4 vs f/2.4
  • Good wide angle: 24 mm vs 24 mm
  • Fairly small: Super compact 95x53x23 mm vs Ultra compact 91x52x20 mm
arrow Compare the Cybershot WX10 vs the Cyber-shot DSC-WX1

Samsung ST65

Samsung ST65
1 year newer
$100 - $120

Significant advantages of the ST65 (vs the DSC-WX1)

  • Much higher true resolution: 9.7 MP vs 8.1 MP
  • Significantly larger sensor: 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm vs 1/2.7" 5.6x4.2mm
  • Lighter: 109 g vs 149 g

Significant disadvantages of the ST65 (vs the DSC-WX1)

  • Much narrower aperture: f/3.9 vs f/2.4
  • Worse wide angle: 27 mm vs 24 mm
  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS

common strengths of the ST65 and DSC-WX1

  • Fairly small: Super compact 92x56x22 mm vs Ultra compact 91x52x20 mm
arrow Compare the Samsung ST65 vs the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX1