|
|
 |
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320
|
|
As well as being compared against other ultra compacts, the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320 is also often compared to travel zooms, super zooms and compacts. The Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320's top rivals come from Sony (such as the Cyber-shot DSC-W330 and the Cybershot DSC-W530) and Canon (such as the ELPH 300 HS and the PowerShot A2200)
Generally, compared to other ultra compact competitors the Sony DSC-W320 doesn't have image stabilization (none vs sensor shift), lacks a built in panoramas and is older (january, 2010 vs february, 2011).
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W330
similar age
$139 - $149
|
Significant advantages of the DSC-W330 (vs the DSC-W320)
Significant disadvantages of the DSC-W330 (vs the DSC-W320)
common strengths of the DSC-W330 and DSC-W320
|
||
|
|||
Sony Cybershot DSC-W530
1 year newer
$171
|
Significant advantages of the DSC-W530 (vs the DSC-W320)
Significant disadvantages of the DSC-W530 (vs the DSC-W320)
common strengths of the DSC-W530 and DSC-W320
|
||
|
|||
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W350
similar age
$164 - $183
|
Significant advantages of the DSC-W350 (vs the DSC-W320)
Significant disadvantages of the DSC-W350 (vs the DSC-W320)
common strengths of the DSC-W350 and DSC-W320
|
||
|
|||
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W380
similar age
$315
|
Significant advantages of the DSC-W380 (vs the DSC-W320)
Significant disadvantages of the DSC-W380 (vs the DSC-W320)
common strengths of the DSC-W380 and DSC-W320
|
||
|
|||
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W310
similar age
$111 - $127
|
Significant advantages of the DSC-W310 (vs the DSC-W320)
Significant disadvantages of the DSC-W310 (vs the DSC-W320)
common strengths of the DSC-W310 and DSC-W320
|
||
|
|||
Sony Cybershot W570
1 year newer
$135
|
Significant advantages of the W570 (vs the DSC-W320)
Significant disadvantages of the W570 (vs the DSC-W320)
common strengths of the W570 and DSC-W320
|
||
|
|||
Generally, some of the advantages of the Sony DSC-W320 compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has a significantly wider aperture (f/2.7 vs f/3.3), is much smaller (ultra compact 93x52x17 mm vs compact 107x61x28 mm), is thinner (0.7" vs 1.3") and is much lighter (117 g vs 213 g).
However, on average it has significantly less zoom (4x vs 14x), records lower quality movies (480p vs 1080p @ 30fps), has a slightly smaller screen (2.7" vs 3.0"), has a slightly lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 920k dots) and doesn't have image stabilization (none vs lens).
Samsung WB700
1 year newer
$178 - $215
|
Significant advantages of the WB700 (vs the DSC-W320)
Significant disadvantages of the WB700 (vs the DSC-W320)
common strengths of the WB700 and DSC-W320
|
||
|
|||
Samsung HZ35W
similar age
|
Significant advantages of the HZ35W (vs the DSC-W320)
Significant disadvantages of the HZ35W (vs the DSC-W320)
common strengths of the HZ35W and DSC-W320
|
||
|
|||
Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ5
1 year older
|
Significant advantages of the DMC-TZ5 (vs the DSC-W320)
Significant disadvantages of the DMC-TZ5 (vs the DSC-W320)
common strengths of the DMC-TZ5 and DSC-W320
|
||
|
|||
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH25
1 year newer
$160 - $200
|
Significant advantages of the DMC-FH25 (vs the DSC-W320)
Significant disadvantages of the DMC-FH25 (vs the DSC-W320)
common strengths of the DMC-FH25 and DSC-W320
|
||
|
|||
Nikon Coolpix S8200
1 year newer
$229
|
Significant advantages of the S8200 (vs the DSC-W320)
Significant disadvantages of the S8200 (vs the DSC-W320)
common strengths of the S8200 and DSC-W320
|
||
|
|||
Sony Cybershot H70
1 year newer
$180
|
Significant advantages of the H70 (vs the DSC-W320)
Significant disadvantages of the H70 (vs the DSC-W320)
common strengths of the H70 and DSC-W320
|
||
|
|||
Generally, some of the advantages of the Sony DSC-W320 compared to super zoom competitors include: it has a slightly wider aperture (f/2.7 vs f/3.1), is much smaller (ultra compact 93x52x17 mm vs prosumer size 124x81x95 mm), slightly higher maximum light sensitivity (3,200 ISO vs 1,600 ISO), is thinner (0.7" vs 3.9") and is much lighter (117 g vs 540 g).
However, on average it has way more less zoom (4x vs 28x), records lower quality movies (480p vs 1080p @ 30fps), has a slightly narrower wide angle lens (26 mm vs 24 mm), has a significantly smaller screen (2.7" vs 3.0") and has a slightly lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 460k dots).
Fujifilm FinePix S3400
1 year newer
$271
|
Significant advantages of the S3400 (vs the DSC-W320)
Significant disadvantages of the S3400 (vs the DSC-W320)
common strengths of the S3400 and DSC-W320
|
||
|
|||
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ100
6 months newer
$611
|
Significant advantages of the DMC-FZ100 (vs the DSC-W320)
Significant disadvantages of the DMC-FZ100 (vs the DSC-W320)
common strengths of the DMC-FZ100 and DSC-W320
|
||
|
|||
Generally, some of the advantages of the Sony DSC-W320 compared to compact competitors include: it has a slightly wider aperture (f/2.7 vs f/3.2), has a slightly wider wide angle lens (26 mm vs 28 mm), is slightly smaller (ultra compact 93x52x17 mm vs super compact 96x55x21 mm), is thinner (0.7" vs 0.8") and is slightly lighter (117 g vs 141 g).
However, on average it records lower quality movies (480p vs 720p @ 30fps), doesn't have image stabilization (none vs sensor shift), doesn't record movies in 24p, is older (january, 2010 vs january, 2011) and lacks boost light sensitivity (none vs 6,400 ISO).
Sony Cybershot DSC-W620
2 years newer
$118
|
Significant advantages of the DSC-W620 (vs the DSC-W320)
Significant disadvantages of the DSC-W620 (vs the DSC-W320)
common strengths of the DSC-W620 and DSC-W320
|
||
|
|||
Sony Cybershot W520
1 year newer
$195
|
Significant advantages of the W520 (vs the DSC-W320)
Significant disadvantages of the W520 (vs the DSC-W320)
common strengths of the W520 and DSC-W320
|
||
|
|||
Canon ELPH 300 HS
1 year newer
$148 - $179
|
Significant advantages of the 300 HS (vs the DSC-W320)
Significant disadvantages of the 300 HS (vs the DSC-W320)
common strengths of the 300 HS and DSC-W320
|
||
|
|||
Canon PowerShot A2200
1 year newer
$91 - $142
|
Significant advantages of the A2200 (vs the DSC-W320)
Significant disadvantages of the A2200 (vs the DSC-W320)
common strengths of the A2200 and DSC-W320
|
||
|
|||
Nikon Coolpix S560
1 year older
|
Significant advantages of the S560 (vs the DSC-W320)
Significant disadvantages of the S560 (vs the DSC-W320)
common strengths of the S560 and DSC-W320
|
||
|
|||
Nikon Coolpix S3300
2 years newer
$120
|
Significant advantages of the S3300 (vs the DSC-W320)
Significant disadvantages of the S3300 (vs the DSC-W320)
common strengths of the S3300 and DSC-W320
|
||
|
|||
