Generally, some of the advantages of the Sony DSC-T500 compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 2.7"), is much smaller (compact (97×59×22 mm) vs compact (104×59×29 mm)) and is thinner (0.9" vs 1.4").
However, on average it has slightly less zoom (5x vs 30x), has a much narrower wide angle lens (33 mm vs 25 mm), doesn't have a built-in GPS, has a slightly lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 921k dots) and slightly lower maximum light sensitivity (3,200 ISO vs 12,800 ISO).
Fujifilm FinePix T400
3 years newer
Significant advantages of the T400 (vs the DSC-T500)
- Much better wide angle: 28 mm vs 33 mm
- Much faster max shutter speed: 1/2000 of a second vs 1/1000 of a second
Significant disadvantages of the T400 (vs the DSC-T500)
- Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
- Much larger: Compact (104×59×29 mm) vs Compact (97×59×22 mm)
- Worse image stabilization:
- Sensor shift
vs - Lens
common strengths of the T400 and DSC-T500
- Very small: Compact (104×59×29 mm) vs Compact (97×59×22 mm)
- Very light: 159 g vs 185 g
- Very thin: 1.1" vs 0.9"
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX90V
6 years newer
$367
Significant advantages of the DSC-HX90V (vs the DSC-T500)
- Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 33 mm
- Has a GPS
- Significantly more zoom: 30x vs 5x
Significant disadvantages of the DSC-HX90V (vs the DSC-T500)
- Much larger: Compact (102×58×36 mm) vs Compact (97×59×22 mm)
- Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
- Much thicker: 1.4" vs 0.9"
common strengths of the DSC-HX90V and DSC-T500
- Very small: Compact (102×58×36 mm) vs Compact (97×59×22 mm)
- Thin: 1.4" vs 0.9"
- Light weight: 245 g vs 185 g
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W830
5 years newer
$117 - $118
Significant advantages of the DSC-W830 (vs the DSC-T500)
- Much better wide angle: 25 mm vs 33 mm
- Significantly smaller: Super compact (93×52×23 mm) vs Compact (97×59×22 mm)
- Significantly lighter: 122 g vs 185 g
Significant disadvantages of the DSC-W830 (vs the DSC-T500)
- Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
common strengths of the DSC-W830 and DSC-T500
- Very small: Super compact (93×52×23 mm) vs Compact (97×59×22 mm)
- Very thin: 0.9" vs 0.9"
- Very light: 122 g vs 185 g