Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S800

6x, 37 mm, 2.5"
Retailer
    Style
      Color
        You save

        Summary Sony DSC-S800

        Prices Price
        Camera only
        Unknown
        Score Snapsort rank
        Among similar cameras
        #n/a of 5
        Specifications Key specs
        Zoom
        Help 6x
        Screen size
        Help 2.5"
        Aperture
        Help Unknown
        Screen resolution
        Help 230k dots
        Wide angle
        Help 37 mm
        Movie format
        Help 320 x 240 @ 30fps
        see all specifications
        Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S800Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S800

        gallery

        Explore our gallery of 7 sample photos taken by the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S800.

        Pros

        Cons

        Report a correction

        The Sony DSC-S800 vs other recent compacts

        Movie format Low resolution movies Help
        320 x 240 @ 30fps
        Screen resolution Very low resolution screen Help
        230k dots
        Size Slightly large Help
        Compact (93×63×39 mm)
        Light sensitivity Poor maximum light sensitivity Help
        1,200 ISO
        Sensor size Slightly smaller than average sensor Help
        1/1.8" 7.18x5.32mm
        Announced Old Help
        May 2007
        Weight Heavy Help
        245 g
        Popularity Not so popular Help
        Among snapsort users
        Wide angle Very poor wide angle lens Help
        37 mm
        Screen size Very small screen Help
        2.5"
        Image stabilization No image stabilization Help
        Risk of blur
        True resolution Lower true resolution Help
        8 MP
        Sensor type Sensor type Help
        CCD
        Thickness Thick Help
        1.5"
        Longest exposure Short exposures Help
        1/8 of a second

        Appearance

        front photo of the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S800back photo of the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S800angle photo of the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S800

        Discussion

        Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S800
        Cyber-shot DSC-S800
        Sony

        Report a correction

        Showing 0 comments