Generally, some of the advantages of the Sony DSC-H20 compared to compact competitors include: it has slightly more zoom (10x vs 3x), slightly higher maximum light sensitivity (3,200 ISO vs 1,600 ISO) and slightly closer macro focusing (2 cm vs 5 cm).
However, on average it has a significantly narrower aperture (f/3.5 vs f/2.6), has a much narrower wide angle lens (38 mm vs 25 mm), is much larger (mid size 107x69x47 mm vs super compact 92x57x21 mm), has a CCD-family sensor (CCD vs CMOS) and lacks boost light sensitivity (none vs 6,400 ISO).
Canon PowerShot SD790 IS
1 year older
|
Significant advantages of the SD790 IS (vs the DSC-H20)
- Much smaller: Super compact 92x57x21 mm vs Mid size 107x69x47 mm
- Significantly wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.5
- Better wide angle: 35 mm vs 38 mm
Significant disadvantages of the SD790 IS (vs the DSC-H20)
common strengths of the SD790 IS and DSC-H20
- Good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
- Good macro capabilities: 3 cm vs 2 cm
|
|
|
|
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX580
similar age
$308
|
Significant advantages of the DMC-FX580 (vs the DSC-H20)
- Much better wide angle: 25 mm vs 38 mm
- Much smaller: Super compact 95x57x22 mm vs Mid size 107x69x47 mm
- Significantly wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.5
Significant disadvantages of the DMC-FX580 (vs the DSC-H20)
common strengths of the DMC-FX580 and DSC-H20
- Good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
- Long exposures: 60 seconds vs 30 seconds
|
|
|
|
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX500
1 year older
$240
|
Significant advantages of the DMC-FX500 (vs the DSC-H20)
- Much better wide angle: 25 mm vs 38 mm
- Much smaller: Super compact 95x57x23 mm vs Mid size 107x69x47 mm
- Significantly wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.5
Significant disadvantages of the DMC-FX500 (vs the DSC-H20)
common strengths of the DMC-FX500 and DSC-H20
- Good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
- Long exposures: 60 seconds vs 30 seconds
|
|
|
|
Sony Cybershot WX7
2 years newer
$254 - $305
|
Significant advantages of the WX7 (vs the DSC-H20)
- Much better wide angle: 25 mm vs 38 mm
- Much smaller: Super compact 94x56x19 mm vs Mid size 107x69x47 mm
- Significantly wider aperture: f/2.6 vs f/3.5
Significant disadvantages of the WX7 (vs the DSC-H20)
- Significantly shorter max exposures: 2 seconds vs 30 seconds
common strengths of the WX7 and DSC-H20
- Good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
|
|
|
|