As well as being compared against other pro DSLRs, the Sony Alpha DSLR-A900 is also often compared to entry-level DSLRs, boutiques, mirrorless, pro digicams, super zooms and compacts. The Sony Alpha DSLR-A900's top rivals come from Sony (such as the SLT A77 and the Alpha DSLR-A850) and Nikon (such as the D800 and the D700)

compared toPro DSLR competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Sony DSLR-A900 compared to other pro DSLR competitors include: it has better image stabilization (sensor shift vs none), slightly better viewfinder coverage (100% vs 98%) and has more storage slots (2 vs 1).

However, on average it is slightly more noisy at high ISO (1,431 ISO vs 2,293 ISO), doesn't record movies (none vs 1080p @ 30fps), slightly lower maximum light sensitivity (1,600 ISO vs 16,000 ISO), doesn't let you preview your photos on the screen and lacks a built in HDR feature.

Sony SLT A77

Sony SLT-A77
2 years newer
$1,398 (body only)
$1,998 16-50mm lens

Significant advantages of the SLT A77 (vs the DSLR-A900)

  • Has live view
  • Shoots movies: 1080p @ 60fps vs None
  • Video autofocus: Phase detection vs None

Significant disadvantages of the SLT A77 (vs the DSLR-A900)

  • Much more startup delay: 3100 ms vs 500 ms
  • Has a digital viewfinder: Digital vs Pentaprism
  • Much smaller sensor: APS-C 23.5x15.6mm vs Full frame 35.9x24.0mm

common strengths of the SLT A77 and DSLR-A900

  • Very good image stabilization: Sensor shift vs Sensor shift
  • Capture very high resolution images: 24 MP vs 24.4 MP
  • Fairly small: Professional size 143x104x81 mm vs Large 156x117x82 mm
arrow Compare the SLT A77 vs the Alpha DSLR-A900

Canon EOS 5D Mark II

Canon EOS 5D Mark II
similar age
$2,154 (body only)
$2,898 - $2,999 24-105mm lens

Significant advantages of the 5D Mark II (vs the DSLR-A900)

  • Has live view
  • Shoots movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs None
  • Significantly more lenses available: 125 lenses vs 62 lenses

Significant disadvantages of the 5D Mark II (vs the DSLR-A900)

  • No image stabilization: None vs Sensor shift
  • Has fewer storage slots: 1 vs 2

common strengths of the 5D Mark II and DSLR-A900

  • Large sensors: Full frame 36.0x24.0mm vs Full frame 35.9x24.0mm
  • Fairly small: Professional size 152x114x75 mm vs Large 156x117x82 mm
  • Supports RAW
arrow Compare the Canon EOS 5D Mark II vs the Sony Alpha DSLR-A900

Nikon D800

Nikon D800
3 years newer
$2,999 - $3,000 (body only)

Significant advantages of the D800 (vs the DSLR-A900)

  • Significantly lower noise at high ISO: 2,853 ISO vs 1,431 ISO
  • Significantly better image quality: 95.0 vs 79.0
  • Has live view

Significant disadvantages of the D800 (vs the DSLR-A900)

  • No image stabilization: None vs Sensor shift

common strengths of the D800 and DSLR-A900

  • Capture very high resolution images: 36.2 MP vs 24.4 MP
  • Large sensors: Full frame 35.9x24.0mm vs Full frame 35.9x24.0mm
  • Supports RAW
arrow Compare the Nikon D800 vs the Sony Alpha DSLR-A900

Sony Alpha DSLR-A850

Sony Alpha DSLR-A850
1 year newer
$2,900 28-75mm lens

Significant advantages of the DSLR-A850 (vs the DSLR-A900)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the DSLR-A850 (vs the DSLR-A900)

  • None found

common strengths of the DSLR-A850 and DSLR-A900

  • Very good image stabilization: Sensor shift vs Sensor shift
  • Above average viewfinder size: 0.74x vs 0.74x
  • Capture very high resolution images: 24.4 MP vs 24.4 MP
arrow Compare the DSLR-A850 vs the DSLR-A900

Nikon D700

Nikon D700
similar age
$2,900 (body only)

Significant advantages of the D700 (vs the DSLR-A900)

  • Lower noise at high ISO: 2,303 ISO vs 1,431 ISO
  • Has live view
  • Significantly more focus points: 51 vs 19

Significant disadvantages of the D700 (vs the DSLR-A900)

  • No image stabilization: None vs Sensor shift
  • Much lower true resolution: 12.1 MP vs 24.4 MP
  • Much less viewfinder coverage: 95% vs 100%

common strengths of the D700 and DSLR-A900

  • Large sensors: Full frame 36.0x24.0mm vs Full frame 35.9x24.0mm
  • Fairly small: Large 147x123x77 mm vs Large 156x117x82 mm
  • Supports RAW
arrow Compare the Nikon D700 vs the Sony Alpha DSLR-A900

Canon EOS 5D Mark III

Canon EOS 5D Mark III
3 years newer
$3,499 - $3,500 (body only)
$4,299 - $4,300 24-105mm lens

Significant advantages of the 5D Mark III (vs the DSLR-A900)

  • Lower noise at high ISO: 2,293 ISO vs 1,431 ISO
  • Has live view
  • Shoots movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs None

Significant disadvantages of the 5D Mark III (vs the DSLR-A900)

  • No image stabilization: None vs Sensor shift

common strengths of the 5D Mark III and DSLR-A900

  • Capture very high resolution images: 22.1 MP vs 24.4 MP
  • Large sensors: Full frame 36.0x24.0mm vs Full frame 35.9x24.0mm
  • Fairly small: Professional size 152x116x76 mm vs Large 156x117x82 mm
arrow Compare the Canon EOS 5D Mark III vs the Sony Alpha DSLR-A900

compared toEntry-level DSLR competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Sony DSLR-A900 compared to entry-level DSLR competitors include: it is much less noisy at high ISO (1,431 ISO vs 717 ISO), much larger viewfinder (0.74x vs 0.59x), has better image stabilization (sensor shift vs none), takes much higher resolution photos (24.4 MP vs 16.1 MP) and has a weather sealed body.

However, on average it doesn't record movies (none vs 1080p @ 24fps), significantly lower maximum light sensitivity (1,600 ISO vs 12,800 ISO), doesn't let you preview your photos on the screen, doesn't shoot as fast continuously (5 fps vs 7 fps) and doesn't have a screen which flips out.

Nikon D7000

Nikon D7000
2 years newer
$1,000 - $1,197 (body only)
$1,100 55-200mm lens

Significant advantages of the D7000 (vs the DSLR-A900)

  • Shoots movies: 1080p @ 24fps vs None
  • Has live view
  • Many more focus points: 39 vs 19

Significant disadvantages of the D7000 (vs the DSLR-A900)

  • Much smaller sensor: APS-C 23.6x15.6mm vs Full frame 35.9x24.0mm
  • Significantly more noise at high ISO: 1,167 ISO vs 1,431 ISO
  • Much lower true resolution: 16.1 MP vs 24.4 MP

common strengths of the D7000 and DSLR-A900

  • Very low noise at high ISO: 1,167 ISO vs 1,431 ISO
  • Good image quality: 80.0 vs 79.0
  • Good color depth: 23.5 bits vs 23.7 bits
arrow Compare the Nikon D7000 vs the Sony Alpha DSLR-A900

Pentax K-5

Pentax K-5
2 years newer
$1,129 (body only)
$1,283 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the K-5 (vs the DSLR-A900)

  • Shoots movies: 1080p @ 25fps vs None
  • Has live view
  • Many more cross-type focus points: 9 vs 1

Significant disadvantages of the K-5 (vs the DSLR-A900)

  • Much smaller sensor: APS-C 23.6x15.7mm vs Full frame 35.9x24.0mm
  • Significantly more noise at high ISO: 1,162 ISO vs 1,431 ISO
  • Much smaller viewfinder: 0.60x vs 0.74x

common strengths of the K-5 and DSLR-A900

  • Very low noise at high ISO: 1,162 ISO vs 1,431 ISO
  • Good image quality: 82.0 vs 79.0
  • Good color depth: 23.7 bits vs 23.7 bits
arrow Compare the Pentax K-5 vs the Sony Alpha DSLR-A900

Sony Alpha DSLR-A580

Sony Alpha DSLR-A580
1 year newer
$949 55-200mm lens

Significant advantages of the DSLR-A580 (vs the DSLR-A900)

  • Shoots movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs None
  • Has live view
  • Better maximum light sensitivity: 12,800 ISO vs 1,600 ISO

Significant disadvantages of the DSLR-A580 (vs the DSLR-A900)

  • Much smaller sensor: APS-C 23.5x15.6mm vs Full frame 35.9x24.0mm
  • Significantly more noise at high ISO: 1,121 ISO vs 1,431 ISO
  • Much smaller viewfinder: 0.52x vs 0.74x

common strengths of the DSLR-A580 and DSLR-A900

  • Relatively low noise at high ISO: 1,121 ISO vs 1,431 ISO
  • Good image quality: 80.0 vs 79.0
  • Good color depth: 23.8 bits vs 23.7 bits
arrow Compare the DSLR-A580 vs the DSLR-A900

Nikon D5100

Nikon D5100
2 years newer
$500 - $597 (body only)
$600 - $697 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the D5100 (vs the DSLR-A900)

  • Shoots movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs None
  • Has live view
  • Much more lenses available: 169 lenses vs 62 lenses

Significant disadvantages of the D5100 (vs the DSLR-A900)

  • Much smaller sensor: APS-C 23.6x15.6mm vs Full frame 35.9x24.0mm
  • Significantly more noise at high ISO: 1,183 ISO vs 1,431 ISO
  • Much smaller viewfinder: 0.51x vs 0.74x

common strengths of the D5100 and DSLR-A900

  • Very low noise at high ISO: 1,183 ISO vs 1,431 ISO
  • Good image quality: 80.0 vs 79.0
  • Good color depth: 23.5 bits vs 23.7 bits
arrow Compare the Nikon D5100 vs the Sony Alpha DSLR-A900

Sony Alpha DSLR-A700

Sony Alpha DSLR-A700
1 year older

Significant advantages of the DSLR-A700 (vs the DSLR-A900)

  • Much smaller: Professional size 142x105x80 mm vs Large 156x117x82 mm
  • Built-in flash
  • Lighter: 768 g vs 895 g

Significant disadvantages of the DSLR-A700 (vs the DSLR-A900)

  • Much more noise at high ISO: 581 ISO vs 1,431 ISO
  • Much smaller sensor: APS-C 23.5x15.6mm vs Full frame 35.9x24.0mm
  • Significantly worse image quality: 66.0 vs 79.0

common strengths of the DSLR-A700 and DSLR-A900

  • High resolution screens: 920k dots vs 921k dots
  • Good image stabilization: Sensor shift vs Sensor shift
  • Both have pentaprism viewfinders: Pentaprism vs Pentaprism
arrow Compare the DSLR-A700 vs the DSLR-A900

Sony SLT A65

Sony SLT-A65
2 years newer
$898 (body only)
$998 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the SLT A65 (vs the DSLR-A900)

  • Shoots movies: 1080p @ 60fps vs None
  • Has live view
  • Better maximum light sensitivity: 16,000 ISO vs 1,600 ISO

Significant disadvantages of the SLT A65 (vs the DSLR-A900)

  • Much smaller sensor: APS-C 23.5x15.6mm vs Full frame 35.9x24.0mm
  • Much more noise at high ISO: 717 ISO vs 1,431 ISO
  • Has a digital viewfinder: Digital vs Pentaprism

common strengths of the SLT A65 and DSLR-A900

  • Good image quality: 74.0 vs 79.0
  • Good color depth: 23.4 bits vs 23.7 bits
  • Good dynamic range: 12.6 EV vs 12.3 EV
arrow Compare the SLT A65 vs the Alpha DSLR-A900

compared toBoutique competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Sony DSLR-A900 compared to boutique competitors include: it has significantly better image quality (79.0 vs 60.0), has a slightly higher resolution screen (921k dots vs 460k dots), has better image stabilization (sensor shift vs none), takes much higher resolution photos (24.4 MP vs 11 MP) and has a weather sealed body.

However, on average it doesn't record movies (none vs 1080p @ 24fps), is much larger (large 156x117x82 mm vs standard size 127x75x54 mm), significantly lower maximum light sensitivity (1,600 ISO vs 12,800 ISO), doesn't have a screen which flips out and lacks a built in HDR feature.

Canon PowerShot G1X

Canon PowerShot G1X
3 years newer
$799 - $800

Significant advantages of the G1X (vs the DSLR-A900)

  • Much smaller: Standard size 117x81x65 mm vs Large 156x117x82 mm
  • Shoots movies: 1080p @ 24fps vs None
  • Much lighter: 390 g vs 895 g

Significant disadvantages of the G1X (vs the DSLR-A900)

  • Much smaller sensor: Four thirds 18.7x14.0mm vs Full frame 35.9x24.0mm
  • Much worse image quality: 60.0 vs 79.0
  • Much shorter battery life: 250 shots vs 880 shots

common strengths of the G1X and DSLR-A900

  • High resolution screens: 920k dots vs 921k dots
  • Larger than average screens: 3.0" vs 3.0"
  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Sensor shift
arrow Compare the Canon PowerShot G1X vs the Sony Alpha DSLR-A900

Fujifilm FinePix X100

Fujifilm FinePix X100
2 years newer
$1,199

Significant advantages of the X100 (vs the DSLR-A900)

  • Much smaller: Standard size 127x75x54 mm vs Large 156x117x82 mm
  • Much thinner: 2.1" vs 3.2"
  • Built-in flash

Significant disadvantages of the X100 (vs the DSLR-A900)

  • Much smaller sensor: APS-C 23.6x15.8mm vs Full frame 35.9x24.0mm
  • Much shorter battery life: 300 shots vs 880 shots
  • Much more startup delay: 3200 ms vs 500 ms

common strengths of the X100 and DSLR-A900

  • Good image quality: 73.0 vs 79.0
  • Relatively low noise at high ISO: 1,001 ISO vs 1,431 ISO
  • Fast continuous shooting: 5 fps vs 5 fps
arrow Compare the Fujifilm FinePix X100 vs the Sony Alpha DSLR-A900

compared toMirrorless interchangeable-lens competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Sony DSLR-A900 compared to mirrorless interchangeable-lens competitors include: it is significantly less noisy at high ISO (1,431 ISO vs 1,016 ISO), has higher quality type of viewfinder (pentaprism vs none), has image stabilization (sensor shift vs none), takes significantly higher resolution photos (24.4 MP vs 16 MP) and has a weather sealed body.

However, on average it doesn't record movies (none vs 1080p @ 60fps), much lower maximum light sensitivity (1,600 ISO vs 25,600 ISO), doesn't have a touch screen, doesn't have a screen which flips out and doesn't let you preview your photos on the screen.

Sony NEX-7

Sony NEX-7
2 years newer
$1,200 (body only)
$1,350 - $1,499 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the NEX-7 (vs the DSLR-A900)

  • Shoots movies: 1080p @ 60fps vs None
  • Much smaller: Compact 111x59x38 mm vs Large 156x117x82 mm
  • Has live view

Significant disadvantages of the NEX-7 (vs the DSLR-A900)

  • No weather sealing
  • Much shorter battery life: 430 shots vs 880 shots
  • Significantly more noise at high ISO: 1,016 ISO vs 1,431 ISO

common strengths of the NEX-7 and DSLR-A900

  • Relatively low noise at high ISO: 1,016 ISO vs 1,431 ISO
  • Extremely good image quality: 81.0 vs 79.0
  • High resolution screens: 921k dots vs 921k dots
arrow Compare the NEX-7 vs the Alpha DSLR-A900

Sony NEX-5N

Sony NEX-5N
2 years newer
$598 - $600 (body only)
$698 - $700 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the NEX-5N (vs the DSLR-A900)

  • Shoots movies: 1080p @ 60fps vs None
  • Much smaller: Compact 111x59x38 mm vs Large 156x117x82 mm
  • Better maximum light sensitivity: 25,600 ISO vs 1,600 ISO

Significant disadvantages of the NEX-5N (vs the DSLR-A900)

  • No weather sealing
  • Much more startup delay: 1900 ms vs 500 ms
  • Much shorter battery life: 460 shots vs 880 shots

common strengths of the NEX-5N and DSLR-A900

  • Relatively low noise at high ISO: 1,079 ISO vs 1,431 ISO
  • Good image quality: 77.0 vs 79.0
  • High resolution screens: 920k dots vs 921k dots
arrow Compare the NEX-5N vs the Alpha DSLR-A900

compared toPro digicam competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Sony DSLR-A900 compared to pro digicam competitors include: it has a much larger sensor (full frame 35.9x24.0mm vs 1/1.8" 7.5x5.5mm), is much less noisy at high ISO (1,431 ISO vs 153 ISO), has much better image quality (79.0 vs 47.0), has a slightly larger screen (3.0" vs 2.8") and has a significantly higher resolution screen (921k dots vs 461k dots).

However, on average it doesn't have a built-in flash, doesn't record movies (none vs 1080p @ 24fps), is much larger (large 156x117x82 mm vs compact 99x60x28 mm), has worse image stabilization (sensor shift vs lens) and significantly lower maximum light sensitivity (1,600 ISO vs 6,400 ISO).

Canon Powershot S100

Canon Powershot S100
3 years newer
$370 - $430

Significant advantages of the S100 (vs the DSLR-A900)

  • Built-in flash
  • Much smaller: Compact 99x60x28 mm vs Large 156x117x82 mm
  • Shoots movies: 1080p @ 24fps vs None

Significant disadvantages of the S100 (vs the DSLR-A900)

  • Much smaller sensor: 1/1.8" 7.5x5.5mm vs Full frame 35.9x24.0mm
  • Much more noise at high ISO: 153 ISO vs 1,431 ISO
  • Much lower true resolution: 12 MP vs 24.4 MP

common strengths of the S100 and DSLR-A900

  • Supports RAW
  • Good image quality: 50.0 vs 79.0
  • Good color depth: 20.7 bits vs 23.7 bits
arrow Compare the Canon Powershot S100 vs the Sony Alpha DSLR-A900

Canon PowerShot G12

Canon PowerShot G12
2 years newer
$370 - $496

Significant advantages of the G12 (vs the DSLR-A900)

  • Built-in flash
  • Much smaller: Mid size 112x76x48 mm vs Large 156x117x82 mm
  • Has a flip-out screen

Significant disadvantages of the G12 (vs the DSLR-A900)

  • Much smaller sensor: 1/1.7" 7.6x5.7mm vs Full frame 35.9x24.0mm
  • Much more noise at high ISO: 161 ISO vs 1,431 ISO
  • Much lower true resolution: 10 MP vs 24.4 MP

common strengths of the G12 and DSLR-A900

  • Supports RAW
  • Good color depth: 20.4 bits vs 23.7 bits
  • Great battery life: 370 shots vs 880 shots
arrow Compare the Canon PowerShot G12 vs the Sony Alpha DSLR-A900

compared toSuper zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Sony DSLR-A900 compared to super zoom competitors include: it has a slightly higher resolution screen (921k dots vs 460k dots), takes much higher resolution photos (24.4 MP vs 9.7 MP), has a weather sealed body, has a much larger sensor (full frame 35.9x24.0mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm) and has a much longer battery life (880 shots vs 400 shots).

However, on average it doesn't have a built-in flash, doesn't record movies (none vs 1080p @ 60fps), is slightly larger (large 156x117x82 mm vs prosumer size 122x87x93 mm), much lower maximum light sensitivity (1,600 ISO vs 12,800 ISO) and doesn't shoot as fast continuously (5 fps vs 10 fps).

Fujifilm FinePix HS20

Fujifilm FinePix HS20 EXR
2 years newer
$299

Significant advantages of the HS20 (vs the DSLR-A900)

  • Built-in flash
  • Shoots movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs None
  • Better maximum light sensitivity: 12,800 ISO vs 1,600 ISO

Significant disadvantages of the HS20 (vs the DSLR-A900)

  • Much smaller sensor: 1/2" 6.4x4.8mm vs Full frame 35.9x24.0mm
  • Much lower true resolution: 10.6 MP vs 24.4 MP
  • Much shorter battery life: 400 shots vs 880 shots

common strengths of the HS20 and DSLR-A900

  • Capture very high resolution images: 10.6 MP vs 24.4 MP
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
  • RAW support
arrow Compare the Fujifilm FinePix HS20 EXR vs the Sony Alpha DSLR-A900

Sony Cybershot DSC-HX100v

Sony Cybershot DSC-HX100v
2 years newer
$409

Significant advantages of the DSC-HX100v (vs the DSLR-A900)

  • Built-in flash
  • Shoots movies: 1080p @ 60fps vs None
  • Has a flip-out screen

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-HX100v (vs the DSLR-A900)

  • Much smaller sensor: 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm vs Full frame 35.9x24.0mm
  • Much lower true resolution: 9.7 MP vs 24.4 MP
  • Much shorter battery life: 410 shots vs 880 shots

common strengths of the DSC-HX100v and DSLR-A900

  • Very high resolution screens: 921k dots vs 921k dots
  • Great battery life: 410 shots vs 880 shots
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
arrow Compare the Cybershot DSC-HX100v vs the Alpha DSLR-A900

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Sony DSLR-A900 compared to compact competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.0" vs 1.6"), has a much higher resolution screen (921k dots vs 80k dots), has image stabilization (sensor shift vs none), takes much higher resolution photos (24.4 MP vs 3.1 MP) and has a weather sealed body.

However, on average it doesn't have a built-in flash, is much larger (large 156x117x82 mm vs compact 88x65x38 mm), is thicker (3.2" vs 1.5"), is much heavier (895 g vs 190 g) and is much more expensive ($2,892.58 vs $200.11).

Nikon Coolpix 3200

Nikon Coolpix 3200
4 years older
$200

Significant advantages of the 3200 (vs the DSLR-A900)

  • Much smaller: Compact 88x65x38 mm vs Large 156x117x82 mm
  • Built-in flash
  • Much lighter: 190 g vs 895 g

Significant disadvantages of the 3200 (vs the DSLR-A900)

  • Much smaller sensor: 1/3.6" 5.3x4.0mm vs Full frame 35.9x24.0mm
  • Much lower true resolution: 3.1 MP vs 24.4 MP
  • Much smaller screen: 1.6" vs 3.0"

common strengths of the 3200 and DSLR-A900

  • Viewfinders: Tunnel vs Pentaprism
  • Very fast max shutter speeds: 1/3000 of a second vs 1/8000 of a second
arrow Compare the Nikon Coolpix 3200 vs the Sony Alpha DSLR-A900