Discussion What do you think about the Sony Alpha DSLR-A850?
Speech is free, but discussion at Snapsort is moderated! Please discuss your opinion of this camera here, and discuss feedback for Snapsort at our support community.
Showing 2 comments
Johnmcmillin
(4:32 AM, April 27, 2011)
P.S. I just saw the rankings and this camera came out very well indeed, No. 2 among recent SLRs. I wonder if it would have done even better if "continuous shooting performance" had not been a critieria. Really, now, how many frames per second do we require for real estate? Frames per minute would get the job done for me...
Johnmcmillin
(4:28 AM, April 27, 2011)
This was my dream camera for two years. Now I own it and use it for my RE stills. Like my a700 before it, it's a pleasure to use, especially in full manual: I put aperture on the front dial, shutter on the rear, and shortcuts to DRO on the Custom button and flash exp. comp. on the Function button. Every necessary adjustment is one easy control action away. But adjustments aren't as often required as with the smaller format. The a850 brings a big increase in dynamic range that helps fit highlights and shadows into the same exposure. That's a benefit even at 6 MP, where I usually shoot.
If you're thinking of going to full frame to get your wide-angles back, though, you might think again. It was easier to find a suitable ultrawide for the crop format. My old Tamron 10-24 did a great job, with easily correctable barrel distortion. Its older FF counterpart, the Tamron 17-35, becomes effectively an 18+mm lens due to clipped corners, and produces uneven distortion across the frame that's difficult to correct. And it's not wide enough. I'm about to get a Sigma 12-24 to test as a replacement.
Excepting that lens issue, the move up to the a850 was all positive. My old Maxxum lenses offer exceptional value, and (excepting the Tammy) they perform even better on full frame. This a pure camera, with no frills; built to a high standard, comfortably fitted to hand and smaller than some of the "pro-level" cropped-format cameras from the Big Two. There's not a Nikon or a Canon I'd trade it for.
Showing 2 comments
If you're thinking of going to full frame to get your wide-angles back, though, you might think again. It was easier to find a suitable ultrawide for the crop format. My old Tamron 10-24 did a great job, with easily correctable barrel distortion. Its older FF counterpart, the Tamron 17-35, becomes effectively an 18+mm lens due to clipped corners, and produces uneven distortion across the frame that's difficult to correct. And it's not wide enough. I'm about to get a Sigma 12-24 to test as a replacement.
Excepting that lens issue, the move up to the a850 was all positive. My old Maxxum lenses offer exceptional value, and (excepting the Tammy) they perform even better on full frame. This a pure camera, with no frills; built to a high standard, comfortably fitted to hand and smaller than some of the "pro-level" cropped-format cameras from the Big Two. There's not a Nikon or a Canon I'd trade it for.