As well as being compared against other ultra compacts, the Sony DSC-RX0 is also often compared to travel zooms, pro digicams, compacts, mirrorless, boutiques and super zooms. The Sony DSC-RX0's top rivals come from Sony (such as the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 VI and the Cybershot DSC-RX100) and GoPro (such as the Hero6 Black and the Fusion)

compared toUltra compact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Sony DSC-RX0 compared to other ultra compact competitors include: it takes significantly higher resolution photos (15.4 MP vs 9 MP), much higher maximum light sensitivity (12,800 ISO vs 3,200 ISO), shoots faster continuously (16 fps vs 10 fps), has a much larger sensor (nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm vs 1/2.5" 5.9x4.43mm) and has an external mic jack.

However, on average it has a significantly narrower aperture (f/4 vs f/2.4), doesn't have a built-in flash, has a much smaller screen (1.5" vs 2.7"), is thicker (1.2" vs 0.8") and is slightly more expensive ($760.20 vs $457.39).

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX1

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX1
8 years older
$457

Significant advantages of the DSC-WX1 (vs the DSC-RX0)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-WX1 (vs the DSC-RX0)

  • None found

common strengths of the DSC-WX1 and DSC-RX0

  • None found

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Sony DSC-RX0 compared to travel zoom competitors include: it takes slightly higher resolution photos (15.4 MP vs 9.7 MP), slightly higher maximum light sensitivity (12,800 ISO vs 6,400 ISO), has a significantly larger sensor (nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm vs 1/2.3" 6.17x4.55mm), has an external mic jack and is slightly lighter (110 g vs 301 g).

However, on average it has a significantly narrower aperture (f/4 vs f/2.8), doesn't have a built-in flash, has a much smaller screen (1.5" vs 3"), has a much lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 1,040k dots) and doesn't have a touch screen.

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 VI

Placeholder
9 months newer
$1,198

Significant advantages of the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 VI (vs the DSC-RX0)

  • Built-in flash
  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 1.5"
  • Much wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/4

Significant disadvantages of the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 VI (vs the DSC-RX0)

  • Lacks an external mic jack
  • Much slower max shutter speed: 1/2000 of a second vs 1/32000 of a second

common strengths of the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 VI and DSC-RX0

  • Fast continuous shooting: 24 fps vs 16 fps
  • Large sensors: Nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm vs Nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm

Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS80 (Lumix DC-TZ95)

Placeholder
1 year newer

Significant advantages of the Lumix DC-ZS80 (Lumix DC-TZ95) (vs the DSC-RX0)

  • Built-in flash
  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 1.5"
  • Much higher resolution screen: 1,040k dots vs 230k dots

Significant disadvantages of the Lumix DC-ZS80 (Lumix DC-TZ95) (vs the DSC-RX0)

  • Lacks an external mic jack
  • Much smaller sensor: 1/2.3" 6.17x4.55mm vs Nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm
  • Significantly lower true resolution: 9.7 MP vs 15.4 MP

common strengths of the Lumix DC-ZS80 (Lumix DC-TZ95) and DSC-RX0

  • None found

Nikon Coolpix A1000

Placeholder
1 year newer
$477

Significant advantages of the Coolpix A1000 (vs the DSC-RX0)

  • Built-in flash
  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 1.5"
  • Much higher resolution screen: 921k dots vs 230k dots

Significant disadvantages of the Coolpix A1000 (vs the DSC-RX0)

  • Lacks an external mic jack
  • Much smaller sensor: 1/2.3" 6.17x4.55mm vs Nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm
  • Significantly lower true resolution: 9.7 MP vs 15.4 MP

common strengths of the Coolpix A1000 and DSC-RX0

  • Fast max shutter speeds: 1/4000 of a second vs 1/32000 of a second

Canon PowerShot SX740 HS

Placeholder
1 year newer
$338 - $399

Significant advantages of the PowerShot SX740 HS (vs the DSC-RX0)

  • Built-in flash
  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 1.5"
  • Much higher resolution screen: 922k dots vs 230k dots

Significant disadvantages of the PowerShot SX740 HS (vs the DSC-RX0)

  • Lacks an external mic jack
  • Much smaller sensor: 1/2.3" 6.17x4.55mm vs Nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm
  • Worse maximum light sensitivity: 3,200 ISO vs 12,800 ISO

common strengths of the PowerShot SX740 HS and DSC-RX0

  • Fast max shutter speeds: 1/3200 of a second vs 1/32000 of a second

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX99

Placeholder
1 year newer
$448

Significant advantages of the Cyber-shot DSC-HX99 (vs the DSC-RX0)

  • Built-in flash
  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 1.5"
  • Much higher resolution screen: 921k dots vs 230k dots

Significant disadvantages of the Cyber-shot DSC-HX99 (vs the DSC-RX0)

  • Lacks an external mic jack
  • Much smaller sensor: 1/2.3" 6.17x4.55mm vs Nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm
  • Significantly lower true resolution: 9.7 MP vs 15.4 MP

common strengths of the Cyber-shot DSC-HX99 and DSC-RX0

  • None found

compared toPro digicam competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Sony DSC-RX0 compared to pro digicam competitors include: it has an external mic jack, is newer (august 2017 vs june 2015), is slightly lighter (110 g vs 298 g) and has a faster max shutter speed (1/32000 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second).

However, on average it has a much narrower aperture (f/4 vs f/1.8), doesn't have a built-in flash, has a much smaller screen (1.5" vs 3"), has a much lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 1,228k dots) and takes slightly lower resolution photos (15.4 MP vs 20 MP).

Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100

Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100
5 years older
$403 - $448

Significant advantages of the DSC-RX100 (vs the DSC-RX0)

  • Much wider aperture: f/1.8 vs f/4
  • Built-in flash
  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 1.5"

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-RX100 (vs the DSC-RX0)

  • Lacks an external mic jack
  • Much slower max shutter speed: 1/2000 of a second vs 1/32000 of a second

common strengths of the DSC-RX100 and DSC-RX0

  • Large sensors: 1" 13.2x8.8mm vs Nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 VA

Placeholder
10 months newer
$998

Significant advantages of the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 VA (vs the DSC-RX0)

  • Much wider aperture: f/1.8 vs f/4
  • Built-in flash
  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 1.5"

Significant disadvantages of the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 VA (vs the DSC-RX0)

  • Lacks an external mic jack
  • Much slower max shutter speed: 1/2000 of a second vs 1/32000 of a second

common strengths of the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 VA and DSC-RX0

  • Large sensors: Nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm vs Nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm
  • Announced: July 2018 vs August 2017

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V
10 months older
$998 - $1,010

Significant advantages of the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V (vs the DSC-RX0)

  • Much wider aperture: f/1.8 vs f/4
  • Built-in flash
  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 1.5"

Significant disadvantages of the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V (vs the DSC-RX0)

  • Lacks an external mic jack
  • Much slower max shutter speed: 1/2000 of a second vs 1/32000 of a second

common strengths of the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V and DSC-RX0

  • Large sensors: Nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm vs Nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 IV

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 IV
2 years older
$650 - $898

Significant advantages of the DSC-RX100 IV (vs the DSC-RX0)

  • Much wider aperture: f/1.8 vs f/4
  • Built-in flash
  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 1.5"

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-RX100 IV (vs the DSC-RX0)

  • Lacks an external mic jack
  • Much slower max shutter speed: 1/2000 of a second vs 1/32000 of a second

common strengths of the DSC-RX100 IV and DSC-RX0

  • Large sensors: Nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm vs Nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm

Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II

Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II
1 year older
$532 - $649

Significant advantages of the PowerShot G7 X Mark II (vs the DSC-RX0)

  • Much wider aperture: f/1.8 vs f/4
  • Built-in flash
  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 1.5"

Significant disadvantages of the PowerShot G7 X Mark II (vs the DSC-RX0)

  • Lacks an external mic jack
  • Shoots slower: 8 fps vs 16 fps
  • Much slower max shutter speed: 1/2000 of a second vs 1/32000 of a second

common strengths of the PowerShot G7 X Mark II and DSC-RX0

  • Large sensors: Nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm vs Nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm

Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II

Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II
7 months older
$369 - $429

Significant advantages of the PowerShot G9 X Mark II (vs the DSC-RX0)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2 vs f/4
  • Built-in flash
  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 1.5"

Significant disadvantages of the PowerShot G9 X Mark II (vs the DSC-RX0)

  • Lacks an external mic jack
  • Shoots slower: 8.2 fps vs 16 fps
  • Much slower max shutter speed: 1/2000 of a second vs 1/32000 of a second

common strengths of the PowerShot G9 X Mark II and DSC-RX0

  • Large sensors: Nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm vs Nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Sony DSC-RX0 compared to compact competitors include: it is significantly smaller (ultra compact (59×41×30 mm) vs compact (74×75×40 mm)), has a much larger sensor (nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm vs 1/2.3" 6.17x4.55mm), has an external mic jack, is thinner (1.2" vs 1.6") and is significantly lighter (110 g vs 220 g).

However, on average it has a slightly smaller screen (1.5" vs 2"), doesn't have a touch screen, doesn't shoot as fast continuously (16 fps vs 30 fps) and is slightly more expensive ($760.20 vs $498.37).

GoPro Hero6 Black

Placeholder
similar age
$498

Significant advantages of the Hero6 Black (vs the DSC-RX0)

  • Larger screen: 2" vs 1.5"
  • Has a touch screen
  • Shoots significantly faster: 30 fps vs 16 fps

Significant disadvantages of the Hero6 Black (vs the DSC-RX0)

  • Thicker: 1.4" vs 1.2"

common strengths of the Hero6 Black and DSC-RX0

  • Very small: Super compact (65×45×35 mm) vs Ultra compact (59×41×30 mm)
  • You can plug a microphone into both of these

GoPro Fusion

Placeholder
4 months older
$591

Significant advantages of the Fusion (vs the DSC-RX0)

  • Shoots significantly faster: 30 fps vs 16 fps

Significant disadvantages of the Fusion (vs the DSC-RX0)

  • Much larger: Compact (74×75×40 mm) vs Ultra compact (59×41×30 mm)
  • Lacks an external mic jack
  • Much smaller sensor: 1/2.3" 6.17x4.55mm vs Nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm

common strengths of the Fusion and DSC-RX0

  • None found

compared toMirrorless interchangeable-lens competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Sony DSC-RX0 compared to mirrorless interchangeable-lens competitors include: it is significantly smaller (ultra compact (59×41×30 mm) vs prosumer size (127×96×74 mm)), is thinner (1.2" vs 2.4") and is much lighter (110 g vs 650 g).

However, on average it has a much smaller screen (1.5" vs 3"), has a much lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 1,037k dots), doesn't have a viewfinder (none vs digital), takes slightly lower resolution photos (15.4 MP vs 24 MP) and slightly lower maximum light sensitivity (12,800 ISO vs 102,800 ISO).

Sony a6400

Placeholder
1 year newer
$898 (body only)
$971 - $998 16-50mm lens

Significant advantages of the a6400 (vs the DSC-RX0)

  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 1.5"
  • Much higher resolution screen: 921k dots vs 230k dots
  • Has a touch screen

Significant disadvantages of the a6400 (vs the DSC-RX0)

  • Larger: Standard size (120×67×60 mm) vs Ultra compact (59×41×30 mm)
  • Significantly heavier: 403 g vs 110 g
  • Significantly thicker: 2.4" vs 1.2"

common strengths of the a6400 and DSC-RX0

  • Have external mic jacks
  • Light weight: 403 g vs 110 g
  • Inexpensive: $898.00 vs $760.20

Fujifilm X-T30

Placeholder
1 year newer
$899 (body only)
$999 - $1,039 15-45mm lens

Significant advantages of the X-T30 (vs the DSC-RX0)

  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 1.5"
  • Much higher resolution screen: 1,040k dots vs 230k dots
  • Has a touch screen

Significant disadvantages of the X-T30 (vs the DSC-RX0)

  • Larger: Standard size (118×83×47 mm) vs Ultra compact (59×41×30 mm)
  • Significantly heavier: 383 g vs 110 g

common strengths of the X-T30 and DSC-RX0

  • Have external mic jacks
  • Fairly small: Standard size (118×83×47 mm) vs Ultra compact (59×41×30 mm)
  • Light weight: 383 g vs 110 g

Olympus OM-D E-M10 III

Placeholder
similar age

Significant advantages of the OM-D E-M10 III (vs the DSC-RX0)

  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 1.5"
  • Much higher resolution screen: 1,040k dots vs 230k dots
  • Has a touch screen

Significant disadvantages of the OM-D E-M10 III (vs the DSC-RX0)

  • Lacks an external mic jack
  • Larger: Standard size (122×84×50 mm) vs Ultra compact (59×41×30 mm)
  • Significantly heavier: 410 g vs 110 g

common strengths of the OM-D E-M10 III and DSC-RX0

  • Light weight: 410 g vs 110 g
  • Thin: 2" vs 1.2"

Olympus OM-D E-M1X

Placeholder
1 year newer
$2,999 (body only)
$3,798 12-40mm lens

Significant advantages of the OM-D E-M1X (vs the DSC-RX0)

  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 1.5"
  • Much higher resolution screen: 1,037k dots vs 230k dots
  • Has a touch screen

Significant disadvantages of the OM-D E-M1X (vs the DSC-RX0)

  • Much larger: Large (144×147×75 mm) vs Ultra compact (59×41×30 mm)
  • Much heavier: 997 g vs 110 g
  • Much thicker: 3" vs 1.2"

common strengths of the OM-D E-M1X and DSC-RX0

  • Have external mic jacks

Sony Alpha a6500

Sony Alpha a6500
10 months older
$1,098 (body only)
$1,498 18-135mm lens

Significant advantages of the Alpha a6500 (vs the DSC-RX0)

  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 1.5"
  • Much higher resolution screen: 921k dots vs 230k dots
  • Has a touch screen

Significant disadvantages of the Alpha a6500 (vs the DSC-RX0)

  • Significantly heavier: 453 g vs 110 g
  • Significantly thicker: 2.1" vs 1.2"

common strengths of the Alpha a6500 and DSC-RX0

  • Have external mic jacks
  • Fairly small: Mid size (120×67×53 mm) vs Ultra compact (59×41×30 mm)

Sony a7 III

Placeholder
6 months newer
$1,876 - $1,998 (body only)
$2,116 - $2,198 28-70mm lens

Significant advantages of the a7 III (vs the DSC-RX0)

  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 1.5"
  • Much higher resolution screen: 921k dots vs 230k dots
  • Has a touch screen

Significant disadvantages of the a7 III (vs the DSC-RX0)

  • Much larger: Prosumer size (127×96×74 mm) vs Ultra compact (59×41×30 mm)
  • Much heavier: 650 g vs 110 g
  • Much thicker: 2.9" vs 1.2"

common strengths of the a7 III and DSC-RX0

  • Have external mic jacks

compared toBoutique competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Sony DSC-RX0 compared to boutique competitors include: it is slightly smaller (ultra compact (59×41×30 mm) vs prosumer size (133×85×70 mm)), shoots faster continuously (16 fps vs 8 fps), has an external mic jack, is thinner (1.2" vs 2.5") and is significantly lighter (110 g vs 485 g).

However, on average it has a much narrower aperture (f/4 vs f/1.7), has a much smaller screen (1.5" vs 3.2"), has a significantly lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 2,100k dots), takes slightly lower resolution photos (15.4 MP vs 24 MP) and slightly lower maximum light sensitivity (12,800 ISO vs 102,400 ISO).

Canon EOS RP

Placeholder
1 year newer
$1,299 - $1,699

Significant advantages of the EOS RP (vs the DSC-RX0)

  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 1.5"
  • Has a touch screen
  • Significantly higher resolution screen: 1,040k dots vs 230k dots

Significant disadvantages of the EOS RP (vs the DSC-RX0)

  • Significantly larger: Prosumer size (133×85×70 mm) vs Ultra compact (59×41×30 mm)
  • Shoots much slower: 5 fps vs 16 fps
  • Significantly thicker: 2.8" vs 1.2"

common strengths of the EOS RP and DSC-RX0

  • Have external mic jacks
  • Inexpensive: $1,299.00 vs $760.20

Leica D-Lux 7

Placeholder
1 year newer
$1,195

Significant advantages of the D-Lux 7 (vs the DSC-RX0)

  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 1.5"
  • Much wider aperture: f/1.7 vs f/4
  • Has a touch screen

Significant disadvantages of the D-Lux 7 (vs the DSC-RX0)

  • Lacks an external mic jack
  • Shoots significantly slower: 11 fps vs 16 fps
  • Significantly thicker: 2.5" vs 1.2"

common strengths of the D-Lux 7 and DSC-RX0

  • Fairly small: Standard size (118×66×64 mm) vs Ultra compact (59×41×30 mm)
  • Light weight: 403 g vs 110 g
  • Inexpensive: $1,195.00 vs $760.20

Panasonic Lumix DC-LX100 II

Placeholder
1 year newer
$898

Significant advantages of the Lumix DC-LX100 II (vs the DSC-RX0)

  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 1.5"
  • Much wider aperture: f/1.7 vs f/4
  • Has a touch screen

Significant disadvantages of the Lumix DC-LX100 II (vs the DSC-RX0)

  • Lacks an external mic jack
  • Shoots significantly slower: 11 fps vs 16 fps
  • Significantly thicker: 2.5" vs 1.2"

common strengths of the Lumix DC-LX100 II and DSC-RX0

  • Fairly small: Standard size (115×66×64 mm) vs Ultra compact (59×41×30 mm)
  • Light weight: 392 g vs 110 g
  • Inexpensive: $897.99 vs $760.20

Ricoh GR III

Placeholder
1 year newer
$900

Significant advantages of the GR III (vs the DSC-RX0)

  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 1.5"
  • Much wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/4
  • Has a touch screen

Significant disadvantages of the GR III (vs the DSC-RX0)

  • Lacks an external mic jack
  • Significantly slower max shutter speed: 1/4000 of a second vs 1/32000 of a second

common strengths of the GR III and DSC-RX0

  • Fairly small: Compact (109×62×33 mm) vs Ultra compact (59×41×30 mm)
  • Light weight: 257 g vs 110 g
  • Very thin: 1.3" vs 1.2"

Canon EOS R

Placeholder
1 year newer
$1,994 - $2,299

Significant advantages of the EOS R (vs the DSC-RX0)

  • Much larger screen: 3.2" vs 1.5"
  • Much higher resolution screen: 2,100k dots vs 230k dots
  • Has a touch screen

Significant disadvantages of the EOS R (vs the DSC-RX0)

  • Much larger: Professional size (136×98×84 mm) vs Ultra compact (59×41×30 mm)
  • Shoots much slower: 8 fps vs 16 fps
  • Much heavier: 660 g vs 110 g

common strengths of the EOS R and DSC-RX0

  • Have external mic jacks
  • Fast max shutter speeds: 1/8000 of a second vs 1/32000 of a second

Fujifilm XF10

Placeholder
10 months newer
$449

Significant advantages of the XF10 (vs the DSC-RX0)

  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 1.5"
  • Much wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/4
  • Has a touch screen

Significant disadvantages of the XF10 (vs the DSC-RX0)

  • Shoots much slower: 6 fps vs 16 fps
  • Significantly slower max shutter speed: 1/4000 of a second vs 1/32000 of a second

common strengths of the XF10 and DSC-RX0

  • Fairly small: Mid size (113×64×41 mm) vs Ultra compact (59×41×30 mm)
  • Have external mic jacks
  • Light weight: 279 g vs 110 g

compared toSuper zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Sony DSC-RX0 compared to super zoom competitors include: it is significantly smaller (ultra compact (59×41×30 mm) vs prosumer size (123×77×105 mm)), shoots faster continuously (16 fps vs 5.9 fps), has a slightly larger sensor (nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm vs 1/2.3" 6.17x4.55mm), has an external mic jack and is newer (august 2017 vs june 2015).

However, on average it has a significantly narrower aperture (f/4 vs f/2.8), doesn't have a built-in flash, has a much smaller screen (1.5" vs 3.2"), has a much lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 1,620k dots) and doesn't have a touch screen.

Canon PowerShot G3 X

Canon PowerShot G3 X
2 years older
$530 - $849

Significant advantages of the G3 X (vs the DSC-RX0)

  • Much higher resolution screen: 1,620k dots vs 230k dots
  • Much larger screen: 3.2" vs 1.5"
  • Built-in flash

Significant disadvantages of the G3 X (vs the DSC-RX0)

  • Significantly larger: Prosumer size (123×77×105 mm) vs Ultra compact (59×41×30 mm)
  • Shoots significantly slower: 5.9 fps vs 16 fps
  • Much heavier: 733 g vs 110 g

common strengths of the G3 X and DSC-RX0

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size (123×77×105 mm) vs Ultra compact (59×41×30 mm)
  • Large sensors: Nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm vs Nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm
  • Have external mic jacks

Nikon Coolpix B600

Placeholder
1 year newer
$327

Significant advantages of the Coolpix B600 (vs the DSC-RX0)

  • Built-in flash
  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 1.5"
  • Much higher resolution screen: 921k dots vs 230k dots

Significant disadvantages of the Coolpix B600 (vs the DSC-RX0)

  • Lacks an external mic jack
  • Significantly larger: Prosumer size (122×82×99 mm) vs Ultra compact (59×41×30 mm)
  • Much smaller sensor: 1/2.3" 6.17x4.55mm vs Nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm

common strengths of the Coolpix B600 and DSC-RX0

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size (122×82×99 mm) vs Ultra compact (59×41×30 mm)
  • Light weight: 500 g vs 110 g
  • Thin: 3.9" vs 1.2"