As well as being compared against other travel zooms, the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX350 is also often compared to pro digicams, super zooms, ultra compacts, waterproofs and compacts. The Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX350's top rivals come from Canon (such as the PowerShot SX620 HS and the PowerShot G9 X) and Sony (such as the Cyber-shot DSC-WX500 and the Cyber-shot DSC-WX220)

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Sony DSC-WX350 compared to other travel zoom competitors include: it slightly higher maximum light sensitivity (12,800 ISO vs 3,200 ISO).

However, on average it has a significantly narrower wide angle lens (25 mm vs 4 mm), has a significantly lower resolution screen (460k dots vs 921k dots), doesn't have a screen which flips out, is older (february 2014 vs january 2015) and doesn't support an external flash.

Canon PowerShot SX620 HS

Canon PowerShot SX620 HS
2 years newer
$179 - $249

Significant advantages of the PowerShot SX620 HS (vs the DSC-WX350)

  • Much higher resolution screen: 922k dots vs 460k dots

Significant disadvantages of the PowerShot SX620 HS (vs the DSC-WX350)

  • Worse maximum light sensitivity: 3,200 ISO vs 12,800 ISO
  • Shoots slower: 2.5 fps vs 10 fps

common strengths of the PowerShot SX620 HS and DSC-WX350

  • Inexpensive: $179.49 vs $268.00

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX500

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX500
1 year newer
$348 - $428

Significant advantages of the DSC-WX500 (vs the DSC-WX350)

  • Much higher resolution screen: 921k dots vs 460k dots
  • Has a flip-out screen
  • Longer exposures: 30 seconds vs 4 seconds

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-WX500 (vs the DSC-WX350)

  • None found

common strengths of the DSC-WX500 and DSC-WX350

  • Inexpensive: $348.00 vs $268.00

Canon PowerShot SX610 HS

Canon PowerShot SX610 HS
10 months newer
$254

Significant advantages of the SX610 HS (vs the DSC-WX350)

  • Much higher resolution screen: 922k dots vs 460k dots

Significant disadvantages of the SX610 HS (vs the DSC-WX350)

  • Worse maximum light sensitivity: 3,200 ISO vs 12,800 ISO
  • Shoots slower: 2.5 fps vs 10 fps

common strengths of the SX610 HS and DSC-WX350

  • Inexpensive: $253.76 vs $268.00

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX220

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX220
similar age
$198

Significant advantages of the DSC-WX220 (vs the DSC-WX350)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-WX220 (vs the DSC-WX350)

  • Worse maximum light sensitivity: 3,200 ISO vs 12,800 ISO

common strengths of the DSC-WX220 and DSC-WX350

  • Light weight: 121 g vs 137 g
  • Inexpensive: $197.00 vs $268.00

Sony Cyber-Shot HX60

Sony Cyber-Shot HX60
similar age
$265

Significant advantages of the HX60 (vs the DSC-WX350)

  • Much better wide angle: 4 mm vs 25 mm
  • Much higher resolution screen: 921k dots vs 460k dots
  • Supports an external flash

Significant disadvantages of the HX60 (vs the DSC-WX350)

  • None found

common strengths of the HX60 and DSC-WX350

  • Inexpensive: $265.23 vs $268.00

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS45

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS45
10 months newer
$552

Significant advantages of the DMC-ZS45 (vs the DSC-WX350)

  • Much higher resolution screen: 1,040k dots vs 460k dots
  • Has a flip-out screen

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-ZS45 (vs the DSC-WX350)

  • None found

common strengths of the DMC-ZS45 and DSC-WX350

  • None found

compared toPro digicam competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Sony DSC-WX350 compared to pro digicam competitors include: it has a slightly wider wide angle lens (25 mm vs 28 mm), is thinner (1" vs 4"), is slightly lighter (137 g vs 813 g) and is slightly less expensive ($268.00 vs $598.00).

However, on average it has a significantly smaller sensor (1/2.3" 6.17x4.55mm vs nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm), has a much narrower aperture (f/3.5 vs f/2), has a much lower resolution screen (460k dots vs 1,229k dots), takes significantly lower resolution photos (9.7 MP vs 20 MP) and doesn't have a screen which flips out.

Canon PowerShot G9 X

Canon PowerShot G9 X
1 year newer
$391

Significant advantages of the PowerShot G9 X (vs the DSC-WX350)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2 vs f/3.5
  • Much larger sensor: Nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm vs 1/2.3" 6.17x4.55mm
  • Much higher resolution screen: 1,040k dots vs 460k dots

Significant disadvantages of the PowerShot G9 X (vs the DSC-WX350)

  • Significantly worse wide angle: 28 mm vs 25 mm

common strengths of the PowerShot G9 X and DSC-WX350

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Inexpensive: $379.00 vs $268.00

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10
4 months older
$798 - $1,097

Significant advantages of the DSC-RX10 (vs the DSC-WX350)

  • Much larger sensor: Nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm vs 1/2.3" 6.17x4.55mm
  • Much higher resolution screen: 1,229k dots vs 460k dots
  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.5

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-RX10 (vs the DSC-WX350)

  • Significantly larger: Professional size (129×88×102 mm) vs Compact (96×55×26 mm)
  • Much heavier: 813 g vs 137 g
  • Significantly thicker: 4" vs 1"

common strengths of the DSC-RX10 and DSC-WX350

  • Each has a built-in flash

Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100

Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100
1 year older
$403 - $448

Significant advantages of the DSC-RX100 (vs the DSC-WX350)

  • Much wider aperture: f/1.8 vs f/3.5
  • Much larger sensor: 1" 13.2x8.8mm vs 1/2.3" 6.17x4.55mm
  • Much higher resolution screen: 1,229k dots vs 460k dots

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-RX100 (vs the DSC-WX350)

  • Significantly worse wide angle: 28 mm vs 25 mm

common strengths of the DSC-RX100 and DSC-WX350

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Inexpensive: $403.11 vs $268.00

Fujifilm XQ2

Fujifilm XQ2
1 year newer

Significant advantages of the XQ2 (vs the DSC-WX350)

  • Much wider aperture: f/1.8 vs f/3.5
  • Much higher resolution screen: 920k dots vs 460k dots
  • Faster autofocus: Phase detection vs Contrast detection

Significant disadvantages of the XQ2 (vs the DSC-WX350)

  • None found

common strengths of the XQ2 and DSC-WX350

  • Each has a built-in flash

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 II

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 II
7 months older
$598

Significant advantages of the DSC-RX100 II (vs the DSC-WX350)

  • Much wider aperture: f/1.8 vs f/3.5
  • Much larger sensor: 1" 13.2x8.8mm vs 1/2.3" 6.17x4.55mm
  • Much higher resolution screen: 1,229k dots vs 460k dots

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-RX100 II (vs the DSC-WX350)

  • Significantly worse wide angle: 28 mm vs 25 mm

common strengths of the DSC-RX100 II and DSC-WX350

  • Each has a built-in flash

compared toSuper zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Sony DSC-WX350 compared to super zoom competitors include: it is significantly smaller (compact (96×55×26 mm) vs large (130×94×119 mm)), slightly higher maximum light sensitivity (12,800 ISO vs 3,200 ISO), has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs CCD), is thinner (1" vs 4.3") and is significantly lighter (137 g vs 588 g).

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.5 vs f/2.8), has a slightly narrower wide angle lens (25 mm vs 23 mm), has a slightly lower resolution screen (460k dots vs 921k dots), doesn't have a screen which flips out and lacks and external mic jack.

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200
1 year older
$534

Significant advantages of the DMC-FZ200 (vs the DSC-WX350)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.5
  • Has an external mic jack
  • Has a flip-out screen

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-FZ200 (vs the DSC-WX350)

  • Significantly larger: Professional size (125×87×110 mm) vs Compact (96×55×26 mm)
  • Worse maximum light sensitivity: 3,200 ISO vs 12,800 ISO
  • Much thicker: 4.3" vs 1"

common strengths of the DMC-FZ200 and DSC-WX350

  • Fairly small: Professional size (125×87×110 mm) vs Compact (96×55×26 mm)
  • Light weight: 588 g vs 137 g
  • Thin: 4.3" vs 1"

Samsung WB100

Samsung WB100
1 year older
$399

Significant advantages of the WB100 (vs the DSC-WX350)

  • Significantly better wide angle: 22 mm vs 25 mm

Significant disadvantages of the WB100 (vs the DSC-WX350)

  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS
  • Lower resolution screen: 230k dots vs 460k dots
  • Worse maximum light sensitivity: 3,200 ISO vs 12,800 ISO

common strengths of the WB100 and DSC-WX350

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size (114×79×86 mm) vs Compact (96×55×26 mm)
  • Very light: 403 g vs 137 g
  • Thin: 3.4" vs 1"

Panasonic Lumix DC-FZ80 (Lumix DC-FZ82)

Panasonic Lumix DC-FZ80 (Lumix DC-FZ82)
2 years newer

Significant advantages of the Lumix DC-FZ80 (Lumix DC-FZ82) (vs the DSC-WX350)

  • Much better wide angle: 20 mm vs 25 mm
  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.5
  • Much higher resolution screen: 1,040k dots vs 460k dots

Significant disadvantages of the Lumix DC-FZ80 (Lumix DC-FZ82) (vs the DSC-WX350)

  • Significantly larger: Large (130×94×119 mm) vs Compact (96×55×26 mm)
  • Much thicker: 4.7" vs 1"
  • Significantly heavier: 616 g vs 137 g

common strengths of the Lumix DC-FZ80 (Lumix DC-FZ82) and DSC-WX350

  • Light weight: 616 g vs 137 g

Sony CyberShot DSC-H400

Sony CyberShot DSC-H400
similar age
$244

Significant advantages of the DSC-H400 (vs the DSC-WX350)

  • More zoom: 64.6x vs 20x
  • Has an external mic jack
  • Has a viewfinder: Digital vs None

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-H400 (vs the DSC-WX350)

  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS
  • Significantly larger: Large (130×95×122 mm) vs Compact (96×55×26 mm)
  • Shoots significantly slower: 1 fps vs 10 fps

common strengths of the DSC-H400 and DSC-WX350

  • Light weight: 628 g vs 137 g
  • Very inexpensive: $243.51 vs $268.00

Nikon Coolpix B500

Nikon Coolpix B500
2 years newer
$242 - $257

Significant advantages of the Coolpix B500 (vs the DSC-WX350)

  • Much higher resolution screen: 921k dots vs 460k dots
  • Wider aperture: f/3 vs f/3.5
  • Has a flip-out screen

Significant disadvantages of the Coolpix B500 (vs the DSC-WX350)

  • Worse maximum light sensitivity: 3,200 ISO vs 12,800 ISO
  • Significantly thicker: 3.7" vs 1"
  • Significantly heavier: 541 g vs 137 g

common strengths of the Coolpix B500 and DSC-WX350

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size (114×78×95 mm) vs Compact (96×55×26 mm)
  • Light weight: 541 g vs 137 g
  • Thin: 3.7" vs 1"

Fujifilm FinePix HS25 EXR

Fujifilm FinePix HS25 EXR
2 years older
$299

Significant advantages of the HS25 EXR (vs the DSC-WX350)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.5
  • Has a flip-out screen
  • Supports an external flash

Significant disadvantages of the HS25 EXR (vs the DSC-WX350)

  • Much larger: Large (130×98×126 mm) vs Compact (96×55×26 mm)
  • Worse image stabilization:
    1. Sensor shift
    vs
    1. Lens
  • Much thicker: 5" vs 1"

common strengths of the HS25 EXR and DSC-WX350

  • Light weight: 730 g vs 137 g
  • Very inexpensive: $299.00 vs $268.00

compared toUltra compact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Sony DSC-WX350 compared to ultra compact competitors include: it has slightly more zoom (20x vs 4x), has a slightly larger screen (3" vs 2.7"), has a slightly higher resolution screen (460k dots vs 230k dots), much higher maximum light sensitivity (12,800 ISO vs 3,200 ISO) and shoots faster continuously (10 fps vs 1.4 fps).

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.5 vs f/2.4), is slightly larger (compact (96×55×26 mm) vs ultra compact (91×52×17 mm)) and is thicker (1" vs 0.7").

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W350

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W350
4 years older

Significant advantages of the DSC-W350 (vs the DSC-WX350)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-W350 (vs the DSC-WX350)

  • None found

common strengths of the DSC-W350 and DSC-WX350

  • None found

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX1

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX1
4 years older
$457

Significant advantages of the DSC-WX1 (vs the DSC-WX350)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-WX1 (vs the DSC-WX350)

  • None found

common strengths of the DSC-WX1 and DSC-WX350

  • None found

compared toWaterproof competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Sony DSC-WX350 compared to waterproof competitors include: it has slightly more zoom (20x vs 5x), has a significantly wider wide angle lens (25 mm vs 28 mm), is slightly smaller (compact (96×55×26 mm) vs compact (110×71×28 mm)), has better image stabilization (lens vs digital) and much higher maximum light sensitivity (12,800 ISO vs 100 ISO).

However, on average it is slightly more expensive ($268.00 vs $78.00) and is not waterproof.

Pentax Optio WG-1

Pentax Optio WG-1
3 years older

Significant advantages of the WG-1 (vs the DSC-WX350)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the WG-1 (vs the DSC-WX350)

  • None found

common strengths of the WG-1 and DSC-WX350

  • None found

Fujifilm XP90

Fujifilm XP90
1 year newer
$78

Significant advantages of the XP90 (vs the DSC-WX350)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the XP90 (vs the DSC-WX350)

  • None found

common strengths of the XP90 and DSC-WX350

  • None found

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Sony DSC-WX350 compared to compact competitors include: it has slightly more zoom (20x vs 4x), has a much wider wide angle lens (25 mm vs 35 mm), has better image stabilization (lens vs digital), much higher maximum light sensitivity (12,800 ISO vs 1,600 ISO) and shoots faster continuously (10 fps vs 1.3 fps).

However, on average it doesn't have a touch screen, doesn't have an OLED screen (LCD vs OLED), is thicker (1" vs 0.8"), doesn't have a built-in GPS and doesn't have a viewfinder (none vs tunnel).

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W710

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W710
1 year older

Significant advantages of the DSC-W710 (vs the DSC-WX350)

  • Significantly thinner: 0.8" vs 1"
  • Significantly faster max shutter speed: 1/2000 of a second vs 1/1600 of a second

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-W710 (vs the DSC-WX350)

  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS
  • Significantly worse wide angle: 28 mm vs 25 mm
  • Worse image stabilization:
    1. Digital
    vs
    1. Lens

common strengths of the DSC-W710 and DSC-WX350

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Fairly small: Super compact (97×55×20 mm) vs Compact (96×55×26 mm)
  • Very thin: 0.8" vs 1"

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX100v

Sony Cybershot DSC-TX100V
3 years older

Significant advantages of the DSC-TX100v (vs the DSC-WX350)

  • Has an OLED screen: OLED vs LCD
  • Much higher resolution screen: 1,229k dots vs 460k dots
  • Has a GPS

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-TX100v (vs the DSC-WX350)

  • Worse maximum light sensitivity: 3,200 ISO vs 12,800 ISO

common strengths of the DSC-TX100v and DSC-WX350

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Fairly small: Super compact (97×58×18 mm) vs Compact (96×55×26 mm)
  • Larger than average screens: 3.5" vs 3"

Canon PowerShot SD850 IS

Canon PowerShot SD850 IS
6 years older

Significant advantages of the SD850 IS (vs the DSC-WX350)

  • Has a viewfinder: Tunnel vs None

Significant disadvantages of the SD850 IS (vs the DSC-WX350)

  • Much worse wide angle: 35 mm vs 25 mm
  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS
  • Worse maximum light sensitivity: 1,600 ISO vs 12,800 ISO

common strengths of the SD850 IS and DSC-WX350

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Fairly small: Compact (90×57×26 mm) vs Compact (96×55×26 mm)
  • Good image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Lens