Summary Sony DSC-W830

Prices Price
Camera only
$118 - $128
Score Snapsort rank
Within its price range
#n/a of 2
Among similar cameras
#n/a of 11
Specifications Key specs
Zoom
Help 8x
Screen size
Help 2.7"
Aperture
Help f/3.3
Screen resolution
Help 115k dots
Wide angle
Help 25 mm
Movie format
Help 720p @ 30fps
see all specifications
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W830Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W830

Videos

Sony DSC-W830
  • 720p HD
  • Sample video

Pros

Report a correction

The Sony DSC-W830 vs other recent compacts

Wide angle Great wide angle lens Help
25 mm
Lowest price Inexpensive Help
$118.00
Weight Light Help
122 g
Report a correction

The Sony DSC-W830 vs other recent travel zooms

Size Really small Help
Super compact (93×52×23 mm)
Thickness Thin Help
0.9"

Cons

Report a correction

The Sony DSC-W830 vs other recent compacts

Screen resolution Very low resolution screen Help
115k dots
Light sensitivity Poor maximum light sensitivity Help
3,200 ISO
True resolution Lower true resolution Help
9.7 MP
Sensor type Sensor type Help
CCD
Viewfinder Can only preview photos on the screen Help
None
Popularity Not so popular Help
Among snapsort users
Screen size Small screen Help
2.7"
Touch screen No touch screen Help
More buttons
Sensor size Slightly smaller than average sensor Help
1/2.3" 6.17x4.55mm
Announced Old Help
January 2014
Longest exposure Short exposures Help
2 seconds
Report a correction

The Sony DSC-W830 vs other recent travel zooms

Zoom Poor zoom Help
8x
Continuous shooting Slow continuous shooting Help
1 fps
Movie format HD movies Help
720p @ 30fps
Fastest shutter speed Slow shutter speed Help
1/1600 of a second

Appearance

front photo of the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W830back photo of the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W830angle photo of the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W830

Discussion

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W830
Cyber-shot DSC-W830
Sony

Report a correction

Showing 2 comments

Alvaro (8:54 PM, February 09, 2014)
yeah... it is a mistake... the lvl 91 at dxomark is for de RX1R... you should fix this guys
 
Avatar for Giuseppe Milo Giuseppe Milo (8:43 PM, February 01, 2014)
91 image quality? It's a mistake right?