As well as being compared against other pro digicams, the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V is also often compared to mirrorless, boutiques, travel zooms, pro DSLRs and super zooms. The Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V's top rivals come from Sony (such as the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 VI and the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 VA) and Canon (such as the EOS M50 (EOS Kiss M) and the EOS 5D Mark III)

compared toPro digicam competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V compared to other pro digicam competitors include: it shoots faster continuously (24 fps vs 10 fps), uses fast phase detection autofocus (phase detection vs contrast detection), has significantly more focus points (315 vs 49), is newer (october 2016 vs june 2015) and has higher quality type of viewfinder (digital vs none).

However, on average it slightly lower maximum light sensitivity (12,800 ISO vs 25,600 ISO), doesn't have a touch screen, has a slightly shorter battery life (220 shots vs 320 shots), is slightly more expensive ($895.00 vs $556.69) and doesn't support an external flash.

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 VA

Placeholder
1 year newer
$898

Significant advantages of the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 VA (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 VA (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V)

  • None found

common strengths of the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 VA and Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V

  • Large sensors: Nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm vs Nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm
  • Good wide angle: 24 mm vs 24 mm
  • High resolution screens: 1,228k dots vs 1,228k dots

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX10 (Lumix DMC-LX15)

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX10 (Lumix DMC-LX15)
similar age

Significant advantages of the Lumix DMC-LX10 (Lumix DMC-LX15) (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V)

  • Has a touch screen
  • Better maximum light sensitivity: 25,600 ISO vs 12,800 ISO
  • Significantly longer exposures: 60 seconds vs 30 seconds

Significant disadvantages of the Lumix DMC-LX10 (Lumix DMC-LX15) (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V)

  • Slower autofocus: Contrast detection vs Phase detection
  • Shoots significantly slower: 10 fps vs 24 fps
  • Worse image stabilization:
    1. Sensor shift
    vs
    1. Lens

common strengths of the Lumix DMC-LX10 (Lumix DMC-LX15) and Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V

  • Large sensors: Nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm vs Nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm
  • Good wide angle: 24 mm vs 24 mm
  • Capture very high resolution images: 20 MP vs 20 MP

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 IV

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 IV
1 year older
$798 - $811

Significant advantages of the DSC-RX100 IV (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-RX100 IV (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V)

  • Slower autofocus: Contrast detection vs Phase detection
  • Shoots slower: 16 fps vs 24 fps

common strengths of the DSC-RX100 IV and Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V

  • Large sensors: Nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm vs Nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm
  • Good wide angle: 24 mm vs 24 mm
  • High resolution screens: 1,228k dots vs 1,228k dots

Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II

Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II
7 months older
$492 - $649

Significant advantages of the PowerShot G7 X Mark II (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V)

  • Has a touch screen
  • Better maximum light sensitivity: 25,600 ISO vs 12,800 ISO

Significant disadvantages of the PowerShot G7 X Mark II (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V)

  • Slower autofocus: Contrast detection vs Phase detection
  • Shoots much slower: 8 fps vs 24 fps
  • No viewfinder: None vs Digital

common strengths of the PowerShot G7 X Mark II and Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V

  • Large sensors: Nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm vs Nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm
  • Good wide angle: 24 mm vs 24 mm
  • Good image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Lens

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 III

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 III
2 years older
$557 - $648

Significant advantages of the DSC-RX100 III (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V)

  • Significantly longer battery life: 320 shots vs 220 shots
  • Supports an external flash

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-RX100 III (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V)

  • Slower autofocus: Contrast detection vs Phase detection
  • Shoots significantly slower: 10 fps vs 24 fps

common strengths of the DSC-RX100 III and Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V

  • Large sensors: Nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm vs Nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm
  • Good wide angle: 24 mm vs 24 mm
  • High resolution screens: 1,229k dots vs 1,228k dots

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 II

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 II
3 years older
$548

Significant advantages of the DSC-RX100 II (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V)

  • Much longer battery life: 350 shots vs 220 shots
  • Supports an external flash

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-RX100 II (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V)

  • Much worse wide angle: 28 mm vs 24 mm
  • Slower autofocus: Contrast detection vs Phase detection
  • Shoots significantly slower: 10 fps vs 24 fps

common strengths of the DSC-RX100 II and Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V

  • Large sensors: 1" 13.2x8.8mm vs Nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm
  • High resolution screens: 1,229k dots vs 1,228k dots
  • Good image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Lens

compared toMirrorless interchangeable-lens competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V compared to mirrorless interchangeable-lens competitors include: it has a significantly higher resolution screen (1,228k dots vs 921k dots), has higher quality type of viewfinder (digital vs none), has better image stabilization (lens vs sensor shift), shoots faster continuously (24 fps vs 11 fps) and uses fast phase detection autofocus (phase detection vs contrast detection).

However, on average it much smaller viewfinder (0.22x vs 0.70x), doesn't have a touch screen, has a marginally smaller sensor (nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm vs APS-C 22.3x14.9mm), lacks and external mic jack and has a slightly shorter battery life (220 shots vs 350 shots).

Olympus PEN E-PL9

Placeholder
1 year newer
$599 - $798 (body only)
$699 - $700 14-42mm lens

Significant advantages of the PEN E-PL9 (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V)

  • Has a touch screen
  • Has interchangeable lenses
  • Supports an external flash

Significant disadvantages of the PEN E-PL9 (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V)

  • Worse image stabilization:
    1. Sensor shift
    vs
    1. Lens
  • No viewfinder: None vs Digital
  • Shoots much slower: 8.6 fps vs 24 fps

common strengths of the PEN E-PL9 and Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V

  • Fairly small: Mid size (117×68×39 mm) vs Compact (102×58×41 mm)
  • Light weight: 380 g vs 299 g
  • Thin: 1.5" vs 1.6"

Canon EOS M50 (EOS Kiss M)

Placeholder
1 year newer

Significant advantages of the EOS M50 (EOS Kiss M) (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V)

  • Has a touch screen
  • Has interchangeable lenses
  • Has an external mic jack

Significant disadvantages of the EOS M50 (EOS Kiss M) (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V)

  • Shoots much slower: 10 fps vs 24 fps
  • Lower resolution screen: 1,040k dots vs 1,228k dots
  • Larger: Standard size (116×88×59 mm) vs Compact (102×58×41 mm)

common strengths of the EOS M50 (EOS Kiss M) and Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V

  • Both use faster phase detection autofocus: Phase detection vs Phase detection
  • Light weight: 390 g vs 299 g
  • Each has a built-in flash

Sony Alpha a6300

Sony Alpha a6300
8 months older
$698 - $748 (body only)
$811 - $848 16-50mm lens

Significant advantages of the Alpha a6300 (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V)

  • Much larger viewfinder: 0.70x vs 0.22x
  • Has interchangeable lenses
  • Has an external mic jack

Significant disadvantages of the Alpha a6300 (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V)

  • Significantly lower resolution screen: 921k dots vs 1,228k dots
  • Shoots much slower: 11 fps vs 24 fps

common strengths of the Alpha a6300 and Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V

  • Both use faster phase detection autofocus: Phase detection vs Phase detection
  • Fairly small: Mid size (120×67×49 mm) vs Compact (102×58×41 mm)
  • Light weight: 404 g vs 299 g

Sony Alpha a6500

Sony Alpha a6500
similar age
$1,198 (body only)
$1,598 18-135mm lens

Significant advantages of the Alpha a6500 (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V)

  • Has a touch screen
  • Has interchangeable lenses
  • Has an external mic jack

Significant disadvantages of the Alpha a6500 (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V)

  • Worse image stabilization:
    1. Sensor shift
    vs
    1. Lens
  • Significantly lower resolution screen: 921k dots vs 1,228k dots
  • Shoots much slower: 11 fps vs 24 fps

common strengths of the Alpha a6500 and Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V

  • Both use faster phase detection autofocus: Phase detection vs Phase detection
  • Fairly small: Mid size (120×67×53 mm) vs Compact (102×58×41 mm)
  • Each has a built-in flash

Panasonic Lumix DC-GF10 (GF90)

Placeholder
1 year newer

Significant advantages of the Lumix DC-GF10 (GF90) (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V)

  • Has a touch screen
  • Has interchangeable lenses
  • Significantly longer exposures: 60 seconds vs 30 seconds

Significant disadvantages of the Lumix DC-GF10 (GF90) (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V)

  • No viewfinder: None vs Digital
  • Shoots much slower: 10 fps vs 24 fps
  • Slower autofocus: Contrast detection vs Phase detection

common strengths of the Lumix DC-GF10 (GF90) and Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V

  • Fairly small: Compact (107×65×33 mm) vs Compact (102×58×41 mm)
  • Light weight: 270 g vs 299 g
  • Thin: 1.3" vs 1.6"

Nikon 1 J5

Nikon 1 J5
1 year older
$427 10-30mm lens

Significant advantages of the 1 J5 (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V)

  • Shoots much faster: 60 fps vs 24 fps
  • Has a touch screen
  • Has interchangeable lenses

Significant disadvantages of the 1 J5 (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V)

  • No viewfinder: None vs Digital
  • Lower resolution screen: 1,037k dots vs 1,228k dots

common strengths of the 1 J5 and Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V

  • Very fast continuous shooting: 60 fps vs 24 fps
  • Both use faster phase detection autofocus: Phase detection vs Phase detection
  • Fairly small: Compact (98×60×32 mm) vs Compact (102×58×41 mm)

compared toBoutique competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V compared to boutique competitors include: it is slightly smaller (compact (102×58×41 mm) vs standard size (116×74×66 mm)), shoots faster continuously (24 fps vs 6 fps), has a screen which flips out, uses fast phase detection autofocus (phase detection vs contrast detection) and is thinner (1.6" vs 2.5").

However, on average it has way more less zoom (2.9x vs 5x), doesn't have a touch screen, has a slightly smaller sensor (nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm vs full frame 44x33mm), slightly smaller viewfinder (0.22x vs 0.67x) and lacks and external mic jack.

Leica D-Lux (Typ 109)

Leica D-Lux (Typ 109)
2 years older
$895 - $999

Significant advantages of the D-Lux (Typ 109) (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V)

  • Much more zoom: 3.1x vs 2.9x
  • Significantly larger viewfinder: 0.67x vs 0.22x
  • Significantly longer battery life: 300 shots vs 220 shots

Significant disadvantages of the D-Lux (Typ 109) (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V)

  • Shoots much slower: 11 fps vs 24 fps
  • Screen does not flip out
  • Slower autofocus: Contrast detection vs Phase detection

common strengths of the D-Lux (Typ 109) and Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V

  • Wide aperture: f/1.7 vs f/1.8
  • Fairly small: Mid size (118×66×55 mm) vs Compact (102×58×41 mm)
  • Good image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Lens

Canon PowerShot G1X Mark II

Canon PowerShot G1X Mark II
2 years older
$399

Significant advantages of the G1X Mark II (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V)

  • Much more zoom: 5x vs 2.9x
  • Has a touch screen
  • Supports an external flash

Significant disadvantages of the G1X Mark II (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V)

  • Shoots much slower: 5.2 fps vs 24 fps
  • Larger: Standard size (116×74×66 mm) vs Compact (102×58×41 mm)
  • Slower autofocus: Contrast detection vs Phase detection

common strengths of the G1X Mark II and Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V

  • Good image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Lens
  • Flip-out screens
  • Built-in flashes

Fujifilm X100F

Fujifilm X100F
3 months newer
$1,059 - $1,299

Significant advantages of the X100F (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V)

  • Much longer battery life: 390 shots vs 220 shots
  • Has an external mic jack
  • Supports an external flash

Significant disadvantages of the X100F (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V)

  • Shoots much slower: 8 fps vs 24 fps
  • Screen does not flip out
  • Heavier: 469 g vs 299 g

common strengths of the X100F and Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V

  • Both use faster phase detection autofocus: Phase detection vs Phase detection
  • Built-in flashes
  • Inexpensive: $1,058.99 vs $895.00

Panasonic Lumix DC-LX100 II

Placeholder
1 year newer
$998

Significant advantages of the Lumix DC-LX100 II (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V)

  • Much more zoom: 3.1x vs 2.9x
  • Has a touch screen
  • Significantly longer battery life: 340 shots vs 220 shots

Significant disadvantages of the Lumix DC-LX100 II (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V)

  • Shoots much slower: 11 fps vs 24 fps
  • Screen does not flip out
  • Slower autofocus: Contrast detection vs Phase detection

common strengths of the Lumix DC-LX100 II and Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V

  • Wide aperture: f/1.7 vs f/1.8
  • Good image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Lens
  • Fast continuous shooting: 11 fps vs 24 fps

Fujifilm XF10

Placeholder
1 year newer
$449

Significant advantages of the XF10 (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V)

  • Has a touch screen
  • Has an external mic jack
  • Significantly longer battery life: 330 shots vs 220 shots

Significant disadvantages of the XF10 (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V)

  • Shoots much slower: 6 fps vs 24 fps
  • Significantly narrower aperture: f/2.8 vs f/1.8
  • Screen does not flip out

common strengths of the XF10 and Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V

  • Fairly small: Mid size (113×64×41 mm) vs Compact (102×58×41 mm)
  • Both use faster phase detection autofocus: Phase detection vs Phase detection
  • Light weight: 279 g vs 299 g

Hasselblad X1D

Hasselblad X1D
3 months older
$6,495

Significant advantages of the X1D (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V)

  • Has a touch screen
  • Much larger sensor: Full frame 44x33mm vs Nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm
  • Much higher true resolution: 51.3 MP vs 20 MP

Significant disadvantages of the X1D (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V)

  • Shoots much slower: 2.3 fps vs 24 fps
  • Much larger: Professional size (150×98×71 mm) vs Compact (102×58×41 mm)
  • Screen does not flip out

common strengths of the X1D and Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V

  • None found

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has a much wider aperture (f/1.8 vs f/3.3), has a slightly higher resolution screen (1,228k dots vs 922k dots), takes slightly higher resolution photos (20 MP vs 9.7 MP), shoots faster continuously (24 fps vs 10 fps) and has a screen which flips out.

However, on average it doesn't have a built-in GPS, doesn't have a touch screen, has a significantly shorter battery life (220 shots vs 360 shots), is older (october 2016 vs february 2018) and is slightly more expensive ($895.00 vs $448.00).

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 VI

Placeholder
1 year newer
$1,198

Significant advantages of the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 VI (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V)

  • Has a touch screen

Significant disadvantages of the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 VI (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V)

  • Significantly narrower aperture: f/2.8 vs f/1.8

common strengths of the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 VI and Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V

  • Wide aperture: f/2.8 vs f/1.8
  • High resolution screens: 1,228k dots vs 1,228k dots
  • Very fast continuous shooting: 24 fps vs 24 fps

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX99

Placeholder
1 year newer
$448

Significant advantages of the Cyber-shot DSC-HX99 (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V)

  • Has a touch screen

Significant disadvantages of the Cyber-shot DSC-HX99 (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V)

  • Much narrower aperture: f/3.5 vs f/1.8
  • Slower autofocus: Contrast detection vs Phase detection
  • Much lower true resolution: 9.7 MP vs 20 MP

common strengths of the Cyber-shot DSC-HX99 and Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V

  • Flip-out screens

Leica C-Lux

Placeholder
1 year newer
$999 - $1,050

Significant advantages of the C-Lux (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V)

  • Much longer battery life: 370 shots vs 220 shots
  • Has a touch screen
  • Better maximum light sensitivity: 25,600 ISO vs 12,800 ISO

Significant disadvantages of the C-Lux (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V)

  • Much narrower aperture: f/3.3 vs f/1.8
  • Slower autofocus: Contrast detection vs Phase detection
  • Shoots significantly slower: 10 fps vs 24 fps

common strengths of the C-Lux and Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V

  • High resolution screens: 1,240k dots vs 1,228k dots
  • Capture very high resolution images: 20 MP vs 20 MP
  • Large sensors: Nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm vs Nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX90V

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX90V
1 year older
$448

Significant advantages of the DSC-HX90V (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V)

  • Has a GPS
  • Much longer battery life: 360 shots vs 220 shots

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-HX90V (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V)

  • Much narrower aperture: f/3.5 vs f/1.8
  • Slower autofocus: Contrast detection vs Phase detection
  • Much lower true resolution: 9.7 MP vs 20 MP

common strengths of the DSC-HX90V and Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V

  • Flip-out screens

Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 (Lumix DC-TZ200)

Placeholder
1 year newer

Significant advantages of the Lumix DC-ZS200 (Lumix DC-TZ200) (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V)

  • Much longer battery life: 370 shots vs 220 shots
  • Has a touch screen
  • Better maximum light sensitivity: 25,600 ISO vs 12,800 ISO

Significant disadvantages of the Lumix DC-ZS200 (Lumix DC-TZ200) (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V)

  • Much narrower aperture: f/3.3 vs f/1.8
  • Slower autofocus: Contrast detection vs Phase detection
  • Shoots significantly slower: 10 fps vs 24 fps

common strengths of the Lumix DC-ZS200 (Lumix DC-TZ200) and Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V

  • High resolution screens: 1,240k dots vs 1,228k dots
  • Capture very high resolution images: 20 MP vs 20 MP
  • Large sensors: Nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm vs Nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm

Canon PowerShot SX720 HS

Canon PowerShot SX720 HS
7 months older
$254

Significant advantages of the PowerShot SX720 HS (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the PowerShot SX720 HS (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V)

  • Much narrower aperture: f/3.3 vs f/1.8
  • Shoots much slower: 5.9 fps vs 24 fps
  • Slower autofocus: Contrast detection vs Phase detection

common strengths of the PowerShot SX720 HS and Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V

  • None found

compared toPro DSLR competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V compared to pro DSLR competitors include: it has a slightly higher resolution screen (1,228k dots vs 1,040k dots), has image stabilization (lens vs none), shoots faster continuously (24 fps vs 6 fps), has a screen which flips out and has much more focus points (315 vs 61).

However, on average it has a significantly smaller screen (3" vs 3.2"), much smaller viewfinder (0.22x vs 0.71x), takes slightly lower resolution photos (20 MP vs 22.3 MP), has a much smaller sensor (nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm vs full frame 36x24mm) and has a lower quality type of viewfinder (digital vs pentaprism).

Canon EOS 5D Mark III

Canon EOS 5D Mark III
4 years older
$2,389 (body only)
$2,642 50mm lens

Significant advantages of the 5D Mark III (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V)

  • Much larger viewfinder: 0.71x vs 0.22x
  • Has an optical viewfinder: Pentaprism vs Digital
  • Significantly larger screen: 3.2" vs 3"

Significant disadvantages of the 5D Mark III (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V)

  • Shoots much slower: 6 fps vs 24 fps
  • Many fewer focus points: 61 vs 315
  • Much larger: Professional size (152×116×76 mm) vs Compact (102×58×41 mm)

common strengths of the 5D Mark III and Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V

  • None found

compared toSuper zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V compared to super zoom competitors include: it has a significantly wider aperture (f/1.8 vs f/2.8), is significantly smaller (compact (102×58×41 mm) vs 146×119×181 mm), uses fast phase detection autofocus (phase detection vs contrast detection), has significantly more focus points (315 vs 25) and is thinner (1.6" vs 5.5").

However, on average it has significantly less zoom (2.9x vs 125x), slightly lower maximum light sensitivity (12,800 ISO vs 25,600 ISO), doesn't have an OLED screen (LCD vs OLED), lacks and external mic jack and has a significantly shorter battery life (220 shots vs 400 shots).

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 II

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 II
1 year older
$998

Significant advantages of the DSC-RX10 II (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V)

  • Much longer battery life: 400 shots vs 220 shots
  • Has an external mic jack
  • Better maximum light sensitivity: 25,600 ISO vs 12,800 ISO

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-RX10 II (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V)

  • Significantly narrower aperture: f/2.8 vs f/1.8
  • Slower autofocus: Contrast detection vs Phase detection
  • Larger: Professional size (129×88×102 mm) vs Compact (102×58×41 mm)

common strengths of the DSC-RX10 II and Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V

  • Fairly small: Professional size (129×88×102 mm) vs Compact (102×58×41 mm)
  • High resolution screens: 1,228k dots vs 1,228k dots
  • Capture very high resolution images: 20 MP vs 20 MP

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III
6 months older
$1,298

Significant advantages of the Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V)

  • Much longer battery life: 420 shots vs 220 shots
  • Has an external mic jack
  • Better maximum light sensitivity: 25,600 ISO vs 12,800 ISO

Significant disadvantages of the Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V)

  • Significantly larger: Large (133×94×127 mm) vs Compact (102×58×41 mm)
  • Slower autofocus: Contrast detection vs Phase detection
  • Shoots significantly slower: 14 fps vs 24 fps

common strengths of the Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III and Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V

  • Wide aperture: f/2.4 vs f/1.8
  • High resolution screens: 1,228k dots vs 1,228k dots
  • Capture very high resolution images: 20 MP vs 20 MP

Nikon DL24-500

Nikon DL24-500
7 months older

Significant advantages of the DL24-500 (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V)

  • Shoots much faster: 60 fps vs 24 fps
  • Has an OLED screen: OLED vs LCD
  • Has a touch screen

Significant disadvantages of the DL24-500 (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V)

  • Significantly narrower aperture: f/2.8 vs f/1.8
  • Significantly larger: Large (123×90×139 mm) vs Compact (102×58×41 mm)
  • Much thicker: 5.5" vs 1.6"

common strengths of the DL24-500 and Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V

  • Very fast continuous shooting: 60 fps vs 24 fps
  • Capture very high resolution images: 20.7 MP vs 20 MP
  • Both use faster phase detection autofocus which is uncommon: Phase detection vs Phase detection

Nikon Coolpix P1000

Placeholder
1 year newer
$900 - $997

Significant advantages of the Coolpix P1000 (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V)

  • Much more zoom: 125x vs 2.9x
  • Has an external mic jack
  • Supports an external flash

Significant disadvantages of the Coolpix P1000 (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V)

  • Much larger: 146×119×181 mm vs Compact (102×58×41 mm)
  • Significantly narrower aperture: f/2.8 vs f/1.8
  • Slower autofocus: Contrast detection vs Phase detection

common strengths of the Coolpix P1000 and Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V

  • None found