As well as being compared against other pro digicams, the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V is also often compared to boutiques, travel zooms, mirrorless and super zooms. The Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V's top rivals come from Sony (such as the Cyber-shot DSC-HX99 and the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 VI) and Canon (such as the PowerShot G1X Mark II and the PowerShot SX70 HS)

compared toPro digicam competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V compared to other pro digicam competitors include: it has a slightly wider wide angle lens (24 mm vs 28 mm), shoots faster continuously (24 fps vs 10 fps), uses fast phase detection autofocus (phase detection vs contrast detection), has significantly more focus points (315 vs 31) and is newer (october 2016 vs october 2015).

However, on average it doesn't have a touch screen, has a slightly shorter battery life (220 shots vs 265 shots), is slightly more expensive ($911.49 vs $548.00) and doesn't support an external flash.

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V(A)

Placeholder
1 year newer
$899

Significant advantages of the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V(A) (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V(A) (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V)

  • None found

common strengths of the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V(A) and Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V

  • Large sensors: Nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm vs Nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm
  • Good wide angle: 24 mm vs 24 mm
  • High resolution screens: 1,228k dots vs 1,228k dots

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 II

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 II
3 years older
$548

Significant advantages of the DSC-RX100 II (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V)

  • Much longer battery life: 350 shots vs 220 shots
  • Supports an external flash

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-RX100 II (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V)

  • Much worse wide angle: 28 mm vs 24 mm
  • Slower autofocus: Contrast detection vs Phase detection
  • Shoots significantly slower: 10 fps vs 24 fps

common strengths of the DSC-RX100 II and Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V

  • Large sensors: 1" 13.2x8.8mm vs Nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm
  • High resolution screens: 1,229k dots vs 1,228k dots
  • Capture very high resolution images: 20 MP vs 20 MP

Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II

Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II
3 months newer
$429 - $828

Significant advantages of the PowerShot G9 X Mark II (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V)

  • Has a touch screen

Significant disadvantages of the PowerShot G9 X Mark II (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V)

  • Much worse wide angle: 28 mm vs 24 mm
  • Slower autofocus: Contrast detection vs Phase detection
  • Shoots much slower: 8.2 fps vs 24 fps

common strengths of the PowerShot G9 X Mark II and Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V

  • Large sensors: Nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm vs Nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm
  • Capture very high resolution images: 20 MP vs 20 MP

Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II

Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II
7 months older
$516 - $649

Significant advantages of the PowerShot G7 X Mark II (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V)

  • Has a touch screen
  • Better maximum light sensitivity: 25,600 ISO vs 12,800 ISO

Significant disadvantages of the PowerShot G7 X Mark II (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V)

  • Slower autofocus: Contrast detection vs Phase detection
  • Shoots much slower: 8 fps vs 24 fps
  • No viewfinder: None vs Digital

common strengths of the PowerShot G7 X Mark II and Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V

  • Large sensors: Nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm vs Nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm
  • Good wide angle: 24 mm vs 24 mm
  • Capture very high resolution images: 20 MP vs 20 MP

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 IV

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 IV
1 year older
$798 - $811

Significant advantages of the DSC-RX100 IV (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V)

  • Longer battery life: 280 shots vs 220 shots

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-RX100 IV (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V)

  • Slower autofocus: Contrast detection vs Phase detection
  • Shoots slower: 16 fps vs 24 fps

common strengths of the DSC-RX100 IV and Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V

  • Large sensors: Nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm vs Nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm
  • Good wide angle: 24 mm vs 24 mm
  • High resolution screens: 1,228k dots vs 1,228k dots

Canon PowerShot G5 X

Canon PowerShot G5 X
1 year older
$699

Significant advantages of the PowerShot G5 X (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V)

  • Has an external mic jack
  • Has a touch screen
  • Supports an external flash

Significant disadvantages of the PowerShot G5 X (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V)

  • Slower autofocus: Contrast detection vs Phase detection
  • Shoots much slower: 5.9 fps vs 24 fps

common strengths of the PowerShot G5 X and Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V

  • Large sensors: Nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm vs Nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm
  • Good wide angle: 24 mm vs 24 mm
  • Capture very high resolution images: 20 MP vs 20 MP

compared toBoutique competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V compared to boutique competitors include: it is slightly smaller (compact (102×58×41 mm) vs standard size (115×66×64 mm)), shoots faster continuously (24 fps vs 6 fps), has a screen which flips out, uses fast phase detection autofocus (phase detection vs contrast detection) and is thinner (1.6" vs 2.5").

However, on average it has way more less zoom (2.9x vs 5x), slightly lower maximum light sensitivity (12,800 ISO vs 51,200 ISO), doesn't have a touch screen, has a marginally smaller sensor (nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm vs full frame 35.9x24mm) and slightly smaller viewfinder (0.22x vs 0.67x).

Canon PowerShot G1X Mark II

Canon PowerShot G1X Mark II
2 years older
$799

Significant advantages of the G1X Mark II (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V)

  • Much more zoom: 5x vs 2.9x
  • Has a touch screen
  • Supports an external flash

Significant disadvantages of the G1X Mark II (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V)

  • Shoots much slower: 5.2 fps vs 24 fps
  • Larger: Standard size (116×74×66 mm) vs Compact (102×58×41 mm)
  • Slower autofocus: Contrast detection vs Phase detection

common strengths of the G1X Mark II and Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V

  • Wide aperture: f/2 vs f/1.8
  • Good image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Lens
  • Flip-out screens

Panasonic Lumix DC-LX100 II

Placeholder
1 year newer
$998

Significant advantages of the Lumix DC-LX100 II (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V)

  • Much more zoom: 3.1x vs 2.9x
  • Has a touch screen
  • Significantly longer battery life: 340 shots vs 220 shots

Significant disadvantages of the Lumix DC-LX100 II (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V)

  • Shoots much slower: 11 fps vs 24 fps
  • Screen does not flip out
  • Slower autofocus: Contrast detection vs Phase detection

common strengths of the Lumix DC-LX100 II and Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V

  • Wide aperture: f/1.7 vs f/1.8
  • Good image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Lens
  • Fast continuous shooting: 11 fps vs 24 fps

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX100

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX100
2 years older
$530 - $598

Significant advantages of the DMC-LX100 (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V)

  • Much more zoom: 3.1x vs 2.9x
  • Significantly larger viewfinder: 0.67x vs 0.22x
  • Longer battery life: 300 shots vs 220 shots

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-LX100 (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V)

  • Shoots much slower: 11 fps vs 24 fps
  • Screen does not flip out
  • Slower autofocus: Contrast detection vs Phase detection

common strengths of the DMC-LX100 and Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V

  • Wide aperture: f/1.7 vs f/1.8
  • Fairly small: Mid size (115×66×55 mm) vs Compact (102×58×41 mm)
  • Good image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Lens

Fujifilm XF10

Placeholder
1 year newer
$499

Significant advantages of the XF10 (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V)

  • Has a touch screen
  • Has an external mic jack
  • Significantly longer battery life: 330 shots vs 220 shots

Significant disadvantages of the XF10 (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V)

  • Shoots much slower: 6 fps vs 24 fps
  • Significantly narrower aperture: f/2.8 vs f/1.8
  • Screen does not flip out

common strengths of the XF10 and Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V

  • Fairly small: Mid size (113×64×41 mm) vs Compact (102×58×41 mm)
  • Both use faster phase detection autofocus: Phase detection vs Phase detection
  • Light weight: 279 g vs 299 g

Fujifilm X100F

Fujifilm X100F
3 months newer
$1,099 - $1,199

Significant advantages of the X100F (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V)

  • Much longer battery life: 390 shots vs 220 shots
  • Has an external mic jack
  • Supports an external flash

Significant disadvantages of the X100F (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V)

  • Shoots much slower: 8 fps vs 24 fps
  • Screen does not flip out

common strengths of the X100F and Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V

  • Wide aperture: f/2 vs f/1.8
  • Both use faster phase detection autofocus: Phase detection vs Phase detection
  • Each has a built-in flash

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R II

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R II
1 year older
$3,298

Significant advantages of the Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R II (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V)

  • Much higher true resolution: 42.2 MP vs 20 MP
  • Much larger sensor: Full frame 35.9x24mm vs Nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm
  • Has an external mic jack

Significant disadvantages of the Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R II (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V)

  • Shoots much slower: 5 fps vs 24 fps
  • Significantly thicker: 2.8" vs 1.6"
  • Significantly heavier: 507 g vs 299 g

common strengths of the Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R II and Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V

  • Wide aperture: f/2 vs f/1.8
  • Flip-out screens
  • Both use faster phase detection autofocus: Phase detection vs Phase detection

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has a much wider aperture (f/1.8 vs f/3.3), takes slightly higher resolution photos (20 MP vs 9.7 MP), has a screen which flips out, has a slightly larger sensor (nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm vs 1/2.3" 6.17x4.55mm) and uses fast phase detection autofocus (phase detection vs contrast detection).

However, on average it has a much narrower wide angle lens (24 mm vs 4 mm), doesn't have a built-in GPS, doesn't have a touch screen, has a significantly shorter battery life (220 shots vs 320 shots) and is older (october 2016 vs february 2018).

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX99

Placeholder
1 year newer
$448

Significant advantages of the Cyber-shot DSC-HX99 (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V)

  • Has a touch screen

Significant disadvantages of the Cyber-shot DSC-HX99 (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V)

  • Much narrower aperture: f/3.5 vs f/1.8
  • Slower autofocus: Contrast detection vs Phase detection
  • Much lower true resolution: 9.7 MP vs 20 MP

common strengths of the Cyber-shot DSC-HX99 and Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V

  • Flip-out screens

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 VI

Placeholder
1 year newer
$1,198

Significant advantages of the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 VI (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V)

  • Has a touch screen

Significant disadvantages of the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 VI (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V)

  • Significantly narrower aperture: f/2.8 vs f/1.8

common strengths of the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 VI and Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V

  • Wide aperture: f/2.8 vs f/1.8
  • Very fast continuous shooting: 24 fps vs 24 fps
  • Capture very high resolution images: 20 MP vs 20 MP

Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 (Lumix DC-TZ200)

Placeholder
1 year newer

Significant advantages of the Lumix DC-ZS200 (Lumix DC-TZ200) (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V)

  • Much longer battery life: 370 shots vs 220 shots
  • Has a touch screen
  • Better maximum light sensitivity: 25,600 ISO vs 12,800 ISO

Significant disadvantages of the Lumix DC-ZS200 (Lumix DC-TZ200) (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V)

  • Much narrower aperture: f/3.3 vs f/1.8
  • Slower autofocus: Contrast detection vs Phase detection
  • Many fewer focus points: 49 vs 315

common strengths of the Lumix DC-ZS200 (Lumix DC-TZ200) and Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V

  • Capture very high resolution images: 20 MP vs 20 MP
  • Large sensors: Nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm vs Nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS60 (Lumix DMC-TZ80)

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS60 (Lumix DMC-TZ80)
9 months older

Significant advantages of the Lumix DMC-ZS60 (Lumix DMC-TZ80) (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V)

  • Shoots much faster: 40 fps vs 24 fps
  • Has a touch screen
  • Significantly longer battery life: 320 shots vs 220 shots

Significant disadvantages of the Lumix DMC-ZS60 (Lumix DMC-TZ80) (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V)

  • Much narrower aperture: f/3.3 vs f/1.8
  • Slower autofocus: Contrast detection vs Phase detection
  • Much lower true resolution: 9.7 MP vs 20 MP

common strengths of the Lumix DMC-ZS60 (Lumix DMC-TZ80) and Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V

  • Very fast continuous shooting: 40 fps vs 24 fps

Sony Cyber-Shot HX60V

Sony Cyber-Shot HX60V
2 years older
$267

Significant advantages of the HX60V (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V)

  • Much better wide angle: 4 mm vs 24 mm
  • Has a GPS
  • Supports an external flash

Significant disadvantages of the HX60V (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V)

  • Much narrower aperture: f/3.5 vs f/1.8
  • Slower autofocus: Contrast detection vs Phase detection

common strengths of the HX60V and Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V

  • None found

compared toMirrorless interchangeable-lens competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V compared to mirrorless interchangeable-lens competitors include: it has a slightly higher resolution screen (1,228k dots vs 921k dots), has higher quality type of viewfinder (digital vs none), has better image stabilization (lens vs sensor shift), shoots faster continuously (24 fps vs 8.6 fps) and uses fast phase detection autofocus (phase detection vs contrast detection).

However, on average it much smaller viewfinder (0.22x vs 0.70x), doesn't have a touch screen, has a slightly smaller sensor (nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm vs full frame 35.8x23.9mm), lacks and external mic jack and has a slightly shorter battery life (220 shots vs 350 shots).

Olympus PEN E-PL9

Placeholder
1 year newer
$599 - $798 (body only)
$699 - $700 14-42mm lens

Significant advantages of the PEN E-PL9 (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V)

  • Has a touch screen
  • Has interchangeable lenses
  • Supports an external flash

Significant disadvantages of the PEN E-PL9 (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V)

  • Worse image stabilization:
    1. Sensor shift
    vs
    1. Lens
  • Shoots much slower: 8.6 fps vs 24 fps
  • No viewfinder: None vs Digital

common strengths of the PEN E-PL9 and Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V

  • Fairly small: Mid size (117×68×39 mm) vs Compact (102×58×41 mm)
  • Light weight: 380 g vs 299 g
  • Thin: 1.5" vs 1.6"

Panasonic Lumix DC-GF10 (GF90)

Placeholder
1 year newer

Significant advantages of the Lumix DC-GF10 (GF90) (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V)

  • Has a touch screen
  • Has interchangeable lenses
  • Significantly longer exposures: 60 seconds vs 30 seconds

Significant disadvantages of the Lumix DC-GF10 (GF90) (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V)

  • Shoots much slower: 10 fps vs 24 fps
  • No viewfinder: None vs Digital
  • Slower autofocus: Contrast detection vs Phase detection

common strengths of the Lumix DC-GF10 (GF90) and Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V

  • Fairly small: Compact (107×65×33 mm) vs Compact (102×58×41 mm)
  • Light weight: 270 g vs 299 g
  • Thin: 1.3" vs 1.6"

Sony Alpha a6300

Sony Alpha a6300
8 months older
$695 - $798 (body only)
$794 - $898 16-50mm lens

Significant advantages of the Alpha a6300 (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V)

  • Much larger viewfinder: 0.70x vs 0.22x
  • Has interchangeable lenses
  • Has an external mic jack

Significant disadvantages of the Alpha a6300 (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V)

  • Shoots much slower: 11 fps vs 24 fps
  • Significantly lower resolution screen: 921k dots vs 1,228k dots

common strengths of the Alpha a6300 and Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V

  • Both have digital viewfinders: Digital vs Digital
  • Both use faster phase detection autofocus: Phase detection vs Phase detection
  • Fairly small: Mid size (120×67×49 mm) vs Compact (102×58×41 mm)

Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX80

Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX80
6 months older
$493 (body only)
$712 12-32mm lens

Significant advantages of the DMC-GX80 (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V)

  • Much larger viewfinder: 0.67x vs 0.22x
  • Has a touch screen
  • Has interchangeable lenses

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-GX80 (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V)

  • Worse image stabilization:
    1. Sensor shift
    vs
    1. Lens
  • Shoots much slower: 8 fps vs 24 fps
  • Slower autofocus: Contrast detection vs Phase detection

common strengths of the DMC-GX80 and Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V

  • Both have digital viewfinders: Digital vs Digital
  • Fairly small: Mid size (122×71×44 mm) vs Compact (102×58×41 mm)
  • Thin: 1.7" vs 1.6"

Sony Alpha 7 II

Sony Alpha 7 II
1 year older
$1,056 - $1,098 (body only)
$1,272 - $1,298 28-70mm lens

Significant advantages of the 7 II (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V)

  • Much larger viewfinder: 0.71x vs 0.22x
  • Has interchangeable lenses
  • Has an external mic jack

Significant disadvantages of the 7 II (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V)

  • Worse image stabilization:
    1. Sensor shift
    vs
    1. Lens
  • Shoots much slower: 5 fps vs 24 fps
  • Significantly larger: Prosumer size (127×96×60 mm) vs Compact (102×58×41 mm)

common strengths of the 7 II and Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V

  • Both have digital viewfinders: Digital vs Digital
  • Both use faster phase detection autofocus: Phase detection vs Phase detection

Sony Alpha A6000

Sony Alpha A6000
2 years older
$428 - $448 (body only)
$518 - $548 16-50mm lens

Significant advantages of the A6000 (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V)

  • Much larger viewfinder: 0.70x vs 0.22x
  • Has interchangeable lenses
  • Has an external mic jack

Significant disadvantages of the A6000 (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V)

  • Shoots much slower: 11 fps vs 24 fps
  • Significantly lower resolution screen: 921k dots vs 1,228k dots
  • Slower autofocus: Hybrid detection vs Phase detection

common strengths of the A6000 and Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V

  • Very good image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Lens
  • Both have digital viewfinders: Digital vs Digital
  • Fairly small: Mid size (120×67×45 mm) vs Compact (102×58×41 mm)

compared toSuper zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V compared to super zoom competitors include: it has a significantly wider aperture (f/1.8 vs f/3.4), has a slightly higher resolution screen (1,228k dots vs 460k dots), is significantly smaller (compact (102×58×41 mm) vs large (133×94×127 mm)), takes significantly higher resolution photos (20 MP vs 9.7 MP) and shoots faster continuously (24 fps vs 12 fps).

However, on average it lacks and external mic jack, has a much shorter battery life (220 shots vs 540 shots) and doesn't support an external flash.

Canon PowerShot SX70 HS

Placeholder
1 year newer
$549

Significant advantages of the PowerShot SX70 HS (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V)

  • Significantly better wide angle: 21 mm vs 24 mm
  • More zoom: 65x vs 2.9x
  • Has an external mic jack

Significant disadvantages of the PowerShot SX70 HS (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V)

  • Much narrower aperture: f/3.4 vs f/1.8
  • Significantly larger: Large (127×91×117 mm) vs Compact (102×58×41 mm)
  • Slower autofocus: Contrast detection vs Phase detection

common strengths of the PowerShot SX70 HS and Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V

  • Fairly small: Large (127×91×117 mm) vs Compact (102×58×41 mm)
  • Light weight: 608 g vs 299 g

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III
6 months older
$1,298

Significant advantages of the Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V)

  • Much longer battery life: 420 shots vs 220 shots
  • Has an external mic jack
  • Better maximum light sensitivity: 25,600 ISO vs 12,800 ISO

Significant disadvantages of the Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V)

  • Significantly larger: Large (133×94×127 mm) vs Compact (102×58×41 mm)
  • Slower autofocus: Contrast detection vs Phase detection
  • Shoots significantly slower: 14 fps vs 24 fps

common strengths of the Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III and Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V

  • Wide aperture: f/2.4 vs f/1.8
  • High resolution screens: 1,228k dots vs 1,228k dots
  • Capture extremely high resolution images: 20 MP vs 20 MP

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200
4 years older
$554

Significant advantages of the DMC-FZ200 (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V)

  • Much longer battery life: 540 shots vs 220 shots
  • Has an external mic jack
  • Supports an external flash

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-FZ200 (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V)

  • Significantly narrower aperture: f/2.8 vs f/1.8
  • Much lower resolution screen: 460k dots vs 1,228k dots
  • Slower autofocus: Contrast detection vs Phase detection

common strengths of the DMC-FZ200 and Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V

  • Fairly small: Professional size (125×87×110 mm) vs Compact (102×58×41 mm)
  • Thin: 4.3" vs 1.6"
  • Light weight: 588 g vs 299 g