As well as being compared against other pro digicams, the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 II is also often compared to boutiques, mirrorless, entry-level DSLRs, super zooms and travel zooms. The Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 II's top rivals come from Sony (such as the Cybershot DSC-RX100 and the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 III) and Panasonic (such as the Lumix DMC-LX100 and the Lumix DMC-LX10 (Lumix DMC-LX15))

compared toPro digicam competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Sony DSC-RX100 II compared to other pro digicam competitors include: it records movies in 24p, has a screen which flips out and supports an external flash.

However, on average it has a significantly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 24 mm), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 120 fps), doesn't have a touch screen, is older (june 2013 vs february 2016) and doesn't have a viewfinder (none vs digital).

Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100

Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100
1 year older
$368 - $425

Significant advantages of the DSC-RX100 (vs the DSC-RX100 II)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-RX100 (vs the DSC-RX100 II)

  • Screen does not flip out
  • No external flash support

common strengths of the DSC-RX100 and DSC-RX100 II

  • Large sensors: 1" 13.2x8.8mm vs 1" 13.2x8.8mm
  • High resolution screens: 1,229k dots vs 1,229k dots
  • Capture very high resolution images: 20 MP vs 20 MP

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 III

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 III
10 months newer
$571 - $648

Significant advantages of the DSC-RX100 III (vs the DSC-RX100 II)

  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm
  • Has a viewfinder: Digital vs None

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-RX100 III (vs the DSC-RX100 II)

  • None found

common strengths of the DSC-RX100 III and DSC-RX100 II

  • Large sensors: Nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm vs 1" 13.2x8.8mm
  • High resolution screens: 1,229k dots vs 1,229k dots
  • Capture very high resolution images: 20 MP vs 20 MP

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX10 (Lumix DMC-LX15)

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX10 (Lumix DMC-LX15)
3 years newer

Significant advantages of the Lumix DMC-LX10 (Lumix DMC-LX15) (vs the DSC-RX100 II)

  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm
  • Has a touch screen
  • Better maximum light sensitivity: 25,600 ISO vs 12,800 ISO

Significant disadvantages of the Lumix DMC-LX10 (Lumix DMC-LX15) (vs the DSC-RX100 II)

  • Worse image stabilization:
    1. Sensor shift
    vs
    1. Lens
  • Significantly shorter battery life: 260 shots vs 350 shots
  • No external flash support

common strengths of the Lumix DMC-LX10 (Lumix DMC-LX15) and DSC-RX100 II

  • Large sensors: Nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm vs 1" 13.2x8.8mm
  • Capture very high resolution images: 20 MP vs 20 MP
  • Flip-out screens

Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II

Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II
2 years newer
$544 - $649

Significant advantages of the PowerShot G7 X Mark II (vs the DSC-RX100 II)

  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm
  • Has a touch screen
  • Better maximum light sensitivity: 25,600 ISO vs 12,800 ISO

Significant disadvantages of the PowerShot G7 X Mark II (vs the DSC-RX100 II)

  • Significantly shorter battery life: 265 shots vs 350 shots
  • No external flash support

common strengths of the PowerShot G7 X Mark II and DSC-RX100 II

  • Large sensors: Nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm vs 1" 13.2x8.8mm
  • Capture very high resolution images: 20 MP vs 20 MP
  • Flip-out screens

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10
3 months newer
$798 - $1,198

Significant advantages of the DSC-RX10 (vs the DSC-RX100 II)

  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm
  • Has an external mic jack
  • Longer battery life: 420 shots vs 350 shots

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-RX10 (vs the DSC-RX100 II)

  • Significantly narrower aperture: f/2.8 vs f/1.8
  • Significantly larger: Professional size (129×88×102 mm) vs Compact (102×58×38 mm)
  • Significantly heavier: 813 g vs 281 g

common strengths of the DSC-RX10 and DSC-RX100 II

  • Large sensors: Nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm vs 1" 13.2x8.8mm
  • High resolution screens: 1,229k dots vs 1,229k dots
  • Capture very high resolution images: 20 MP vs 20 MP

Canon PowerShot G16

Canon PowerShot G16
similar age
$500

Significant advantages of the G16 (vs the DSC-RX100 II)

  • Much longer exposures: 250 seconds vs 30 seconds
  • Has a viewfinder: Tunnel vs None
  • Significantly faster max shutter speed: 1/4000 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

Significant disadvantages of the G16 (vs the DSC-RX100 II)

  • Significantly smaller sensor: 1/1.8" 7.44x5.58mm vs 1" 13.2x8.8mm
  • Screen does not flip out
  • Significantly lower true resolution: 12 MP vs 20 MP

common strengths of the G16 and DSC-RX100 II

  • Very long battery life: 360 shots vs 350 shots
  • Support external flash

compared toBoutique competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Sony DSC-RX100 II compared to boutique competitors include: it has a significantly wider aperture (f/1.8 vs f/2.8), has way more more zoom (3.6x vs 3.1x), shoots faster continuously (10 fps vs 6 fps), has a screen which flips out and has a built-in flash.

However, on average it records higher quality movies (1080p @ 60fps vs UHD @ 30fps), has a much narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 24 mm), slightly lower maximum light sensitivity (12,800 ISO vs 51,200 ISO), doesn't have a touch screen and has a marginally smaller sensor (1" 13.2x8.8mm vs APS-C 23.5x15.7mm).

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX100

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX100
1 year newer
$580 - $598

Significant advantages of the DMC-LX100 (vs the DSC-RX100 II)

  • Higher resolution movies: UHD @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 60fps
  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm
  • Has a viewfinder: Digital vs None

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-LX100 (vs the DSC-RX100 II)

  • Screen does not flip out
  • No built-in flash

common strengths of the DMC-LX100 and DSC-RX100 II

  • Very wide aperture: f/1.7 vs f/1.8
  • Incredible zoom: 3.1x vs 3.6x
  • Good movie support: UHD @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 60fps

Fujifilm XF10

Placeholder
5 years newer
$499

Significant advantages of the XF10 (vs the DSC-RX100 II)

  • Has a touch screen
  • Has an external mic jack
  • Faster autofocus: Phase detection vs Contrast detection

Significant disadvantages of the XF10 (vs the DSC-RX100 II)

  • Much narrower aperture: f/2.8 vs f/1.8
  • Screen does not flip out
  • Shoots significantly slower: 6 fps vs 10 fps

common strengths of the XF10 and DSC-RX100 II

  • Fairly small: Mid size (113×64×41 mm) vs Compact (102×58×38 mm)
  • Light weight: 279 g vs 281 g
  • Thin: 1.6" vs 1.5"

Ricoh GR II

Ricoh GR II
2 years newer
$584 - $597

Significant advantages of the GR II (vs the DSC-RX100 II)

  • Has a viewfinder: Optical vs None
  • Much longer exposures: 300 seconds vs 30 seconds
  • Much faster max shutter speed: 1/4000 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

Significant disadvantages of the GR II (vs the DSC-RX100 II)

  • Much narrower aperture: f/2.8 vs f/1.8
  • Higher frame rate movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 60fps
  • Shoots much slower: 4 fps vs 10 fps

common strengths of the GR II and DSC-RX100 II

  • Fairly small: Mid size (117×63×35 mm) vs Compact (102×58×38 mm)
  • 24p support
  • Light weight: 251 g vs 281 g

compared toMirrorless interchangeable-lens competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Sony DSC-RX100 II compared to mirrorless interchangeable-lens competitors include: it has a significantly higher resolution screen (1,229k dots vs 460k dots), has better image stabilization (lens vs none), takes slightly higher resolution photos (20 MP vs 16 MP), has a screen which flips out and has slightly less shutter lag (149 ms vs 257 ms).

However, on average it doesn't have a viewfinder (none vs digital), doesn't have a touch screen, has significantly more startup delay (2800 ms vs 2000 ms), has a marginally smaller sensor (1" 13.2x8.8mm vs APS-C 22.3x14.9mm) and users slower contrast detection autofocus (contrast detection vs phase detection).

Canon EOS M3

Canon EOS M3
1 year newer
$368 - $679 (body only)
$451 15-45mm lens

Significant advantages of the M3 (vs the DSC-RX100 II)

  • Has a touch screen
  • Has a viewfinder: Digital vs None
  • Has interchangeable lenses

Significant disadvantages of the M3 (vs the DSC-RX100 II)

  • None found

common strengths of the M3 and DSC-RX100 II

  • 24p support
  • Fairly small: Mid size (111×68×44 mm) vs Compact (102×58×38 mm)
  • Light weight: 366 g vs 281 g

Sony Alpha NEX-6

Sony Alpha NEX-6
10 months older
$606 (body only)

Significant advantages of the NEX-6 (vs the DSC-RX100 II)

  • Has a viewfinder: Digital vs None
  • Has interchangeable lenses
  • Significantly less startup delay: 2000 ms vs 2800 ms

Significant disadvantages of the NEX-6 (vs the DSC-RX100 II)

  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Lens
  • Significantly lower resolution screen: 921k dots vs 1,229k dots

common strengths of the NEX-6 and DSC-RX100 II

  • 24p support
  • Fairly small: Mid size (120×67×43 mm) vs Compact (102×58×38 mm)
  • Light weight: 287 g vs 281 g

Fujifilm X-T10

Fujifilm X-T10
1 year newer
$530 (body only)
$879 16-50mm lens

Significant advantages of the X-T10 (vs the DSC-RX100 II)

  • Has a viewfinder: Digital vs None
  • Has interchangeable lenses
  • Faster autofocus: Phase detection vs Contrast detection

Significant disadvantages of the X-T10 (vs the DSC-RX100 II)

  • Significantly lower resolution screen: 920k dots vs 1,229k dots

common strengths of the X-T10 and DSC-RX100 II

  • 24p support
  • Fairly small: Mid size (118×83×41 mm) vs Compact (102×58×38 mm)
  • Light weight: 381 g vs 281 g

Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF7

Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF7
1 year newer
$534 12-32mm lens

Significant advantages of the DMC-GF7 (vs the DSC-RX100 II)

  • Has a touch screen
  • Has interchangeable lenses
  • Significantly longer exposures: 60 seconds vs 30 seconds

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-GF7 (vs the DSC-RX100 II)

  • No external flash support
  • Much slower max shutter speed: 1/500 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

common strengths of the DMC-GF7 and DSC-RX100 II

  • 24p support
  • Fairly small: Compact (107×65×33 mm) vs Compact (102×58×38 mm)
  • Light weight: 266 g vs 281 g

Olympus PEN Mini

Olympus PEN Mini
2 years older
$252 (body only)

Significant advantages of the Mini (vs the DSC-RX100 II)

  • Has interchangeable lenses
  • Significantly longer exposures: 60 seconds vs 30 seconds

Significant disadvantages of the Mini (vs the DSC-RX100 II)

  • Worse image stabilization:
    1. Sensor shift
    vs
    1. Lens
  • Much lower resolution screen: 460k dots vs 1,229k dots
  • Screen does not flip out

common strengths of the Mini and DSC-RX100 II

  • Fairly small: Mid size (110×64×37 mm) vs Compact (102×58×38 mm)
  • Light weight: 313 g vs 281 g
  • Thin: 1.5" vs 1.5"

compared toEntry-level DSLR competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Sony DSC-RX100 II compared to entry-level DSLR competitors include: it records higher quality movies (1080p @ 60fps vs none), has a much higher resolution screen (1,229k dots vs 460k dots), has better image stabilization (lens vs none), shoots faster continuously (10 fps vs 3.7 fps) and has a screen which flips out.

However, on average it has much more startup delay (2800 ms vs 500 ms), has a much smaller sensor (1" 13.2x8.8mm vs APS-C 23.4x15.6mm), doesn't have a viewfinder (none vs pentamirror), lacks and external mic jack and has a slightly shorter battery life (350 shots vs 600 shots).

Nikon D3300

Nikon D3300
6 months newer
$399 (body only)
$395 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the D3300 (vs the DSC-RX100 II)

  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None
  • Has interchangeable lenses
  • Faster autofocus: Phase detection vs Contrast detection

Significant disadvantages of the D3300 (vs the DSC-RX100 II)

  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Lens
  • Much lower resolution screen: 921k dots vs 1,229k dots
  • Shoots much slower: 5 fps vs 10 fps

common strengths of the D3300 and DSC-RX100 II

  • Light weight: 430 g vs 281 g

Sony Alpha DSLR-A450

Sony Alpha DSLR-A450
3 years older

Significant advantages of the DSLR-A450 (vs the DSC-RX100 II)

  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None
  • Has interchangeable lenses
  • Has more storage slots: 2 vs 1

Significant disadvantages of the DSLR-A450 (vs the DSC-RX100 II)

  • Does not take movies: None vs 1080p @ 60fps
  • Much lower resolution screen: 230k dots vs 1,229k dots
  • Worse image stabilization:
    1. Sensor shift
    vs
    1. Lens

common strengths of the DSLR-A450 and DSC-RX100 II

  • None found

Canon EOS Rebel T6i

Canon EOS Rebel T6i
1 year newer
$649 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the T6i (vs the DSC-RX100 II)

  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None
  • Has interchangeable lenses
  • Faster autofocus: Phase detection vs Contrast detection

Significant disadvantages of the T6i (vs the DSC-RX100 II)

  • Much lower resolution screen: 1,040k dots vs 1,229k dots
  • Higher frame rate movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 60fps
  • Shoots much slower: 5 fps vs 10 fps

common strengths of the T6i and DSC-RX100 II

  • High resolution screens: 1,040k dots vs 1,229k dots
  • Flip-out screens

Canon EOS Rebel T5

Canon EOS Rebel T5
7 months newer
$359 (body only)
$399 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the Rebel T5 (vs the DSC-RX100 II)

  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None
  • Has interchangeable lenses
  • Faster autofocus: Phase detection vs Contrast detection

Significant disadvantages of the Rebel T5 (vs the DSC-RX100 II)

  • Much lower resolution screen: 460k dots vs 1,229k dots
  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Lens
  • Higher frame rate movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 60fps

common strengths of the Rebel T5 and DSC-RX100 II

  • Light weight: 480 g vs 281 g

Nikon D5300

Nikon D5300
3 months newer
$430 (body only)
$500 - $550 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the D5300 (vs the DSC-RX100 II)

  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None
  • Much larger screen: 3.2" vs 3"
  • Has interchangeable lenses

Significant disadvantages of the D5300 (vs the DSC-RX100 II)

  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Lens
  • Much lower resolution screen: 1,037k dots vs 1,229k dots
  • Shoots much slower: 5 fps vs 10 fps

common strengths of the D5300 and DSC-RX100 II

  • High resolution screens: 1,037k dots vs 1,229k dots
  • Flip-out screens
  • Light weight: 480 g vs 281 g

Canon Rebel T3i

Canon Rebel T3i
2 years older
$708 18-55mm, 55-250mm lenses

Significant advantages of the T3i (vs the DSC-RX100 II)

  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None
  • Has interchangeable lenses
  • Faster autofocus: Phase detection vs Contrast detection

Significant disadvantages of the T3i (vs the DSC-RX100 II)

  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Lens
  • Much lower resolution screen: 1,040k dots vs 1,229k dots
  • Higher frame rate movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 60fps

common strengths of the T3i and DSC-RX100 II

  • High resolution screens: 1,040k dots vs 1,229k dots
  • Flip-out screens

compared toSuper zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Sony DSC-RX100 II compared to super zoom competitors include: it has a significantly wider aperture (f/1.8 vs f/3.1), has a significantly higher resolution screen (1,229k dots vs 230k dots), is slightly smaller (compact (102×58×38 mm) vs professional size (129×88×102 mm)), has better image stabilization (lens vs none) and takes significantly higher resolution photos (20 MP vs 9.7 MP).

However, on average it doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 120 fps), lacks and external mic jack, has a slightly shorter battery life (350 shots vs 400 shots) and doesn't have a viewfinder (none vs digital).

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 II

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 II
1 year newer
$1,198 - $1,296

Significant advantages of the DSC-RX10 II (vs the DSC-RX100 II)

  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm
  • Has an external mic jack
  • Better maximum light sensitivity: 25,600 ISO vs 12,800 ISO

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-RX10 II (vs the DSC-RX100 II)

  • Significantly narrower aperture: f/2.8 vs f/1.8
  • Significantly larger: Professional size (129×88×102 mm) vs Compact (102×58×38 mm)
  • Significantly heavier: 813 g vs 281 g

common strengths of the DSC-RX10 II and DSC-RX100 II

  • Fairly small: Professional size (129×88×102 mm) vs Compact (102×58×38 mm)
  • Capture very high resolution images: 20 MP vs 20 MP
  • Large sensors: Nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm vs 1" 13.2x8.8mm

Olympus SP-510 UZ

Olympus SP-510 UZ
6 years older

Significant advantages of the SP-510 UZ (vs the DSC-RX100 II)

  • Has a viewfinder: Digital vs None

Significant disadvantages of the SP-510 UZ (vs the DSC-RX100 II)

  • Much worse wide angle: 38 mm vs 28 mm
  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Lens
  • Much lower resolution screen: 115k dots vs 1,229k dots

common strengths of the SP-510 UZ and DSC-RX100 II

  • Very small: Standard size (106×75×70 mm) vs Compact (102×58×38 mm)
  • Very thin: 2.8" vs 1.5"
  • Very light: 410 g vs 281 g

Nikon Coolpix L120

Nikon Coolpix L120
2 years older
$394

Significant advantages of the L120 (vs the DSC-RX100 II)

  • Significantly better wide angle: 25 mm vs 28 mm

Significant disadvantages of the L120 (vs the DSC-RX100 II)

  • Significantly narrower aperture: f/3.1 vs f/1.8
  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS
  • Much lower true resolution: 9.7 MP vs 20 MP

common strengths of the L120 and DSC-RX100 II

  • Very small: Prosumer size (110×77×78 mm) vs Compact (102×58×38 mm)
  • Thin: 3.1" vs 1.5"
  • Very light: 406 g vs 281 g

Olympus SP-610 UZ

Olympus SP-610 UZ
2 years older

Significant advantages of the SP-610 UZ (vs the DSC-RX100 II)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the SP-610 UZ (vs the DSC-RX100 II)

  • Much narrower aperture: f/3.3 vs f/1.8
  • Much lower resolution screen: 230k dots vs 1,229k dots
  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS

common strengths of the SP-610 UZ and DSC-RX100 II

  • Very small: Standard size (107×73×73 mm) vs Compact (102×58×38 mm)
  • Very thin: 2.9" vs 1.5"
  • Very light: 405 g vs 281 g

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Sony DSC-RX100 II compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has a much wider aperture (f/1.8 vs f/3.5), has a slightly higher resolution screen (1,229k dots vs 921k dots), takes significantly higher resolution photos (20 MP vs 9.8 MP), records movies in 24p and has a screen which flips out.

However, on average it has a much narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 24 mm), doesn't have a built-in GPS, doesn't shoot as fast continuously (10 fps vs 50 fps), doesn't have an OLED screen (LCD vs OLED) and is older (june 2013 vs february 2015).

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX50V

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX50V
similar age
$647

Significant advantages of the DSC-HX50V (vs the DSC-RX100 II)

  • Has a GPS
  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm
  • Significantly faster max shutter speed: 1/4000 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-HX50V (vs the DSC-RX100 II)

  • Much narrower aperture: f/3.5 vs f/1.8
  • No 24p support
  • Much lower true resolution: 9.7 MP vs 20 MP

common strengths of the DSC-HX50V and DSC-RX100 II

  • Great battery life: 400 shots vs 350 shots
  • Support external flash

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS100 (Lumix DMC-TZ100)

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS100 (Lumix DMC-TZ100)
2 years newer

Significant advantages of the Lumix DMC-ZS100 (Lumix DMC-TZ100) (vs the DSC-RX100 II)

  • Significantly better wide angle: 25 mm vs 28 mm
  • Shoots much faster: 50 fps vs 10 fps
  • Has a touch screen

Significant disadvantages of the Lumix DMC-ZS100 (Lumix DMC-TZ100) (vs the DSC-RX100 II)

  • Significantly narrower aperture: f/2.8 vs f/1.8
  • No 24p support
  • Screen does not flip out

common strengths of the Lumix DMC-ZS100 (Lumix DMC-TZ100) and DSC-RX100 II

  • Wide aperture: f/2.8 vs f/1.8
  • Capture very high resolution images: 20 MP vs 20 MP
  • Large sensors: Nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm vs 1" 13.2x8.8mm

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX90V

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX90V
1 year newer
$448

Significant advantages of the DSC-HX90V (vs the DSC-RX100 II)

  • Has a GPS
  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm
  • Has a viewfinder: Digital vs None

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-HX90V (vs the DSC-RX100 II)

  • Much narrower aperture: f/3.5 vs f/1.8
  • Much lower true resolution: 9.7 MP vs 20 MP
  • Much smaller sensor: 1/2.3" 6.17x4.55mm vs 1" 13.2x8.8mm

common strengths of the DSC-HX90V and DSC-RX100 II

  • Both support 24p, which is uncommon in cameras similar to these
  • Flip-out screens
  • Great battery life: 360 shots vs 350 shots

Nikon Coolpix S9900

Nikon Coolpix S9900
1 year newer
$536

Significant advantages of the S9900 (vs the DSC-RX100 II)

  • Has a GPS
  • Significantly better wide angle: 25 mm vs 28 mm
  • Significantly faster max shutter speed: 1/4000 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

Significant disadvantages of the S9900 (vs the DSC-RX100 II)

  • Much narrower aperture: f/3.7 vs f/1.8
  • No 24p support
  • Much lower true resolution: 9.7 MP vs 20 MP

common strengths of the S9900 and DSC-RX100 II

  • Flip-out screens

Samsung HZ35W

Samsung HZ35W
3 years older

Significant advantages of the HZ35W (vs the DSC-RX100 II)

  • Has a GPS
  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm
  • Has an OLED screen: OLED vs LCD

Significant disadvantages of the HZ35W (vs the DSC-RX100 II)

  • Much narrower aperture: f/3.2 vs f/1.8
  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS
  • No 24p support

common strengths of the HZ35W and DSC-RX100 II

  • None found