As well as being compared against other super zooms, the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III is also often compared to pro digicams, mirrorless, pro DSLRs, entry-level DSLRs and boutiques. The Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III's top rivals come from Panasonic (such as the Lumix DMC-FZ2500 (Lumix DMC-FZ2000) and the Lumix DMC-FZ1000) and Sony (such as the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V and the Alpha a6500)

compared toSuper zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III compared to other super zoom competitors include: it has a slightly wider aperture (f/2.4 vs f/2.8), has slightly better image quality (69.0 vs 64.0), records very high quality movies (UHD @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 60fps), has a slightly higher resolution screen (1,228k dots vs 921k dots) and records even higher-speed movies (120 fps vs none).

However, on average it has significantly less zoom (25x vs 50x), doesn't have a touch screen, is slightly more noisy at high ISO (474 ISO vs 531 ISO), much smaller viewfinder (0.26x vs 1.39x) and is slightly heavier (1,051 g vs 780 g).

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 (Lumix DMC-FZ2000)

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 (Lumix DMC-FZ2000)
5 months newer

Significant advantages of the Lumix DMC-FZ2500 (Lumix DMC-FZ2000) (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III)

  • Has a touch screen
  • Significantly faster max shutter speed: 1/4000 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second
  • Significantly longer exposures: 60 seconds vs 30 seconds

Significant disadvantages of the Lumix DMC-FZ2500 (Lumix DMC-FZ2000) (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III)

  • None found

common strengths of the Lumix DMC-FZ2500 (Lumix DMC-FZ2000) and Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III

  • High resolution screens: 1,040k dots vs 1,228k dots
  • Extremely good maximum light sensitivity: 25,600 ISO vs 25,600 ISO
  • Capture very high resolution images: 20 MP vs 20 MP

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX400V

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX400V
2 years older
$398

Significant advantages of the DSC-HX400V (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III)

  • Much larger viewfinder: 1.39x vs 0.26x
  • Significantly more zoom: 50x vs 25x
  • Has a GPS

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-HX400V (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III)

  • Doesn't record high-speed movies: None vs 120 fps
  • Lower resolution movies: 1080p @ 50fps vs UHD @ 30fps
  • Worse maximum light sensitivity: 3,200 ISO vs 25,600 ISO

common strengths of the DSC-HX400V and Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III

  • Both support 24p, which is uncommon in cameras similar to these
  • Flip-out screens
  • Above average viewfinder size: 1.39x vs 0.26x

Nikon Coolpix P900

Nikon Coolpix P900
1 year older
$474 - $697

Significant advantages of the P900 (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III)

  • Much more zoom: 83.3x vs 25x
  • Has a GPS
  • Significantly faster max shutter speed: 1/4000 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

Significant disadvantages of the P900 (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III)

  • Doesn't record high-speed movies: None vs 120 fps
  • Lower resolution movies: 1080p @ 60fps vs UHD @ 30fps
  • No 24p support

common strengths of the P900 and Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III

  • Flip-out screens
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
  • Both have digital viewfinders: Digital vs Digital

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000
5 years older
$665 - $698

Significant advantages of the DMC-FZ1000 (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III)

  • Lighter: 780 g vs 1,051 g
  • Much faster max shutter speed: 1/16000 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second
  • Significantly longer exposures: 60 seconds vs 30 seconds

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-FZ1000 (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III)

  • Lower resolution screen: 921k dots vs 1,228k dots
  • Worse maximum light sensitivity: 12,800 ISO vs 25,600 ISO

common strengths of the DMC-FZ1000 and Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III

  • UHD (3840x2160) video: UHD @ 25fps vs UHD @ 30fps
  • Extremely high speed movies: 120 fps vs 120 fps
  • Both support 24p, which is uncommon in cameras similar to these

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ300

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ300
8 months older
$488 - $498

Significant advantages of the DMC-FZ300 (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III)

  • Has a touch screen
  • Significantly lighter: 691 g vs 1,051 g
  • Much faster max shutter speed: 1/16000 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-FZ300 (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III)

  • Doesn't record high-speed movies: None vs 120 fps
  • Worse maximum light sensitivity: 6,400 ISO vs 25,600 ISO
  • Significantly lower true resolution: 9.7 MP vs 20 MP

common strengths of the DMC-FZ300 and Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III

  • Both shoot very high resolution HD movies: UHD @ 30fps vs UHD @ 30fps
  • High resolution screens: 1,040k dots vs 1,228k dots
  • Both support 24p, which is uncommon in cameras similar to these

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 II

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 II
9 months older
$1,098 - $1,496

Significant advantages of the DSC-RX10 II (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III)

  • Significantly faster max shutter speed: 1/3200 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-RX10 II (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III)

  • None found

common strengths of the DSC-RX10 II and Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III

  • Both shoot very high resolution HD movies: UHD @ 30fps vs UHD @ 30fps
  • High resolution screens: 1,228k dots vs 1,228k dots
  • Extremely high speed movies: 120 fps vs 120 fps

compared toPro digicam competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III compared to pro digicam competitors include: it records very high quality movies (UHD @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 60fps), records even higher-speed movies (120 fps vs none), slightly higher maximum light sensitivity (25,600 ISO vs 12,800 ISO), slightly larger viewfinder (0.26x vs 0.22x) and has an external mic jack.

However, on average it is much more noisy at high ISO (474 ISO vs 581 ISO), has a slightly narrower aperture (f/2.4 vs f/1.8), is significantly larger (large (133×94×127 mm) vs compact (102×58×41 mm)), doesn't have a touch screen and users slower contrast detection autofocus (contrast detection vs phase detection).

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V
6 months newer
$948 - $1,050

Significant advantages of the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III)

  • Much smaller: Compact (102×58×41 mm) vs Large (133×94×127 mm)
  • Many more focus points: 315 vs 25
  • Faster autofocus: Phase detection vs Contrast detection

Significant disadvantages of the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III)

  • Lacks an external mic jack
  • Much shorter battery life: 220 shots vs 420 shots
  • Worse maximum light sensitivity: 12,800 ISO vs 25,600 ISO

common strengths of the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V and Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III

  • Built-in flashes
  • High resolution screens: 1,228k dots vs 1,228k dots
  • Both have digital viewfinders: Digital vs Digital

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 IV

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 IV
9 months older
$811 - $848

Significant advantages of the DSC-RX100 IV (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III)

  • Much smaller: Compact (102×58×41 mm) vs Large (133×94×127 mm)
  • Much lighter: 298 g vs 1,051 g
  • Much thinner: 1.6" vs 5"

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-RX100 IV (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III)

  • Lacks an external mic jack
  • Significantly shorter battery life: 280 shots vs 420 shots
  • Worse maximum light sensitivity: 12,800 ISO vs 25,600 ISO

common strengths of the DSC-RX100 IV and Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III

  • Built-in flashes
  • Both shoot very high resolution HD movies: UHD @ 30fps vs UHD @ 30fps
  • High resolution screens: 1,228k dots vs 1,228k dots

Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II

Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II
similar age
$640 - $679

Significant advantages of the PowerShot G7 X Mark II (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III)

  • Significantly smaller: Mid size (106×61×42 mm) vs Large (133×94×127 mm)
  • Has a touch screen
  • Much lighter: 319 g vs 1,051 g

Significant disadvantages of the PowerShot G7 X Mark II (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III)

  • Doesn't record high-speed movies: None vs 120 fps
  • Lower resolution movies: 1080p @ 60fps vs UHD @ 30fps
  • Lacks an external mic jack

common strengths of the PowerShot G7 X Mark II and Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III

  • Built-in flashes
  • Both support 24p, which is uncommon in cameras similar to these
  • Very good maximum light sensitivity: 25,600 ISO vs 25,600 ISO

compared toMirrorless interchangeable-lens competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III compared to mirrorless interchangeable-lens competitors include: it records very high quality movies (UHD @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 60fps), has a slightly higher resolution screen (1,228k dots vs 921k dots), has higher quality type of viewfinder (digital vs none), records even higher-speed movies (120 fps vs none) and has better image stabilization (lens vs none).

However, on average it significantly smaller viewfinder (0.26x vs 0.59x), slightly lower maximum light sensitivity (25,600 ISO vs 51,200 ISO), doesn't have a touch screen, has a slightly smaller sensor (nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm vs full frame 35.8x23.9mm) and users slower contrast detection autofocus (contrast detection vs phase detection).

Sony Alpha a6500

Sony Alpha a6500
6 months newer
$1,398 (body only)
$1,498 - $1,499 16-50mm lens

Significant advantages of the Alpha a6500 (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III)

  • Many more focus points: 425 vs 25
  • Has interchangeable lenses
  • Has a touch screen

Significant disadvantages of the Alpha a6500 (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III)

  • Worse image stabilization:
    1. Sensor shift
    vs
    1. Lens
  • Lower resolution screen: 921k dots vs 1,228k dots
  • Shorter battery life: 350 shots vs 420 shots

common strengths of the Alpha a6500 and Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III

  • Flip-out screens
  • Have external mic jacks
  • Each has a built-in flash

Sony Alpha a6300

Sony Alpha a6300
similar age
$794 - $828 (body only)
$848 - $928 16-50mm lens

Significant advantages of the Alpha a6300 (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III)

  • Many more focus points: 425 vs 25
  • Has interchangeable lenses
  • Faster autofocus: Phase detection vs Contrast detection

Significant disadvantages of the Alpha a6300 (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III)

  • Lower resolution movies: 1080p @ 120fps vs UHD @ 30fps
  • Lower resolution screen: 921k dots vs 1,228k dots

common strengths of the Alpha a6300 and Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III

  • Extremely high speed movies: 120 fps vs 120 fps
  • 24p support
  • Flip-out screens

Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF7

Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF7
1 year older
$250 (body only)
$380 12-32mm lens

Significant advantages of the DMC-GF7 (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III)

  • Has interchangeable lenses
  • Has a touch screen
  • Much smaller: Compact (107×65×33 mm) vs Large (133×94×127 mm)

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-GF7 (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III)

  • Lower resolution movies: 1080p @ 60fps vs UHD @ 30fps
  • Doesn't record high-speed movies: None vs 120 fps
  • No viewfinder: None vs Digital

common strengths of the DMC-GF7 and Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III

  • 24p support
  • Flip-out screens
  • Each has a built-in flash

Olympus OM-D E-M10 II

Olympus OM-D E-M10 II
7 months older
$728 (body only)

Significant advantages of the E-M10 II (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III)

  • Has interchangeable lenses
  • Significantly larger viewfinder: 0.59x vs 0.26x
  • Has a touch screen

Significant disadvantages of the E-M10 II (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III)

  • Worse image stabilization:
    1. Sensor shift
    vs
    1. Lens
  • Lower resolution movies: 1080p @ 60fps vs UHD @ 30fps
  • Doesn't record high-speed movies: None vs 120 fps

common strengths of the E-M10 II and Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III

  • 24p support
  • Flip-out screens
  • Each has a built-in flash

Sony A7

Sony A7
2 years older
$998 - $2,898 (body only)
$1,198 28-70mm lens

Significant advantages of the A7 (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III)

  • Much larger viewfinder: 0.71x vs 0.26x
  • Has interchangeable lenses
  • Much smaller: Standard size (127×94×48 mm) vs Large (133×94×127 mm)

Significant disadvantages of the A7 (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III)

  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Lens
  • Lower resolution movies: 1080p @ 60fps vs UHD @ 30fps
  • Doesn't record high-speed movies: None vs 120 fps

common strengths of the A7 and Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III

  • 24p support
  • Flip-out screens
  • Have external mic jacks

Canon EOS M10

Canon EOS M10
5 months older
$499 15-45mm lens

Significant advantages of the EOS M10 (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III)

  • Has interchangeable lenses
  • Has a touch screen
  • Much smaller: Mid size (108×67×35 mm) vs Large (133×94×127 mm)

Significant disadvantages of the EOS M10 (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III)

  • Lower resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs UHD @ 30fps
  • Doesn't record high-speed movies: None vs 120 fps
  • No viewfinder: None vs Digital

common strengths of the EOS M10 and Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III

  • 24p support
  • Flip-out screens
  • Each has a built-in flash

compared toPro DSLR competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III compared to pro DSLR competitors include: it records very high quality movies (UHD @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps), records high-speed movies (120 fps vs none), has image stabilization (lens vs none), shoots faster continuously (14 fps vs 6.5 fps) and has a screen which flips out.

However, on average it is much more noisy at high ISO (474 ISO vs 2,340 ISO), has significantly lower image quality (69.0 vs 93.0), has slightly less color depth (22.9 bits vs 24.8 bits), has a slightly smaller screen (3" vs 3.2") and much smaller viewfinder (0.26x vs 0.70x).

Canon EOS 5D Mark IV

Canon EOS 5D Mark IV
4 months newer
$2,942 - $3,299 (body only)
$3,499 - $4,199 24-105mm lens

Significant advantages of the 5D Mark IV (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III)

  • Has an optical viewfinder: Pentaprism vs Digital
  • Much larger viewfinder: 0.71x vs 0.26x
  • Significantly larger screen: 3.2" vs 3"

Significant disadvantages of the 5D Mark IV (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III)

  • Shoots significantly slower: 7 fps vs 14 fps
  • Screen does not flip out
  • No built-in flash

common strengths of the 5D Mark IV and Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III

  • None found

Nikon D750

Nikon D750
1 year older
$1,399 - $1,797 (body only)
$1,965 - $2,297 24-120mm lens

Significant advantages of the D750 (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III)

  • Much lower noise at high ISO: 2,956 ISO vs 474 ISO
  • Has an optical viewfinder: Pentaprism vs Digital
  • Much better image quality: 93.0 vs 69.0

Significant disadvantages of the D750 (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III)

  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Lens
  • Doesn't record high-speed movies: None vs 120 fps
  • Lower resolution movies: 1080p @ 60fps vs UHD @ 30fps

common strengths of the D750 and Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III

  • Good color depth: 24.8 bits vs 22.9 bits
  • Good dynamic range: 14.5 EV vs 12.6 EV
  • Flip-out screens

Canon EOS 7D Mark II

Canon EOS 7D Mark II
3 years older
$1,088 - $1,499 (body only)
$1,497 - $1,949 18-135mm lens

Significant advantages of the 7D Mark II (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III)

  • Much lower noise at high ISO: 1,082 ISO vs 474 ISO
  • Has an optical viewfinder: Pentaprism vs Digital
  • Much larger viewfinder: 0.62x vs 0.26x

Significant disadvantages of the 7D Mark II (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III)

  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Lens
  • Doesn't record high-speed movies: None vs 120 fps
  • Lower resolution movies: 1080p @ 60fps vs UHD @ 30fps

common strengths of the 7D Mark II and Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III

  • Good dynamic range: 11.8 EV vs 12.6 EV
  • Inexpensive: $1,087.80 vs $1,298.00
  • Built-in flashes

Canon EOS 6D

Canon EOS 6D
3 years older
$1,058 - $1,399 (body only)
$1,799 24-105mm lens

Significant advantages of the 6D (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III)

  • Much lower noise at high ISO: 2,340 ISO vs 474 ISO
  • Has an optical viewfinder: Pentaprism vs Digital
  • Much larger viewfinder: 0.71x vs 0.26x

Significant disadvantages of the 6D (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III)

  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Lens
  • Doesn't record high-speed movies: None vs 120 fps
  • Lower resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs UHD @ 30fps

common strengths of the 6D and Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III

  • Good color depth: 23.8 bits vs 22.9 bits
  • Good dynamic range: 12.1 EV vs 12.6 EV
  • Inexpensive: $1,057.77 vs $1,298.00

Nikon D810

Nikon D810
1 year older
$2,199 - $2,797 (body only)
$2,900 - $3,297 24-120mm lens

Significant advantages of the D810 (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III)

  • Much lower noise at high ISO: 2,979 ISO vs 474 ISO
  • Much better image quality: 96.0 vs 69.0
  • Has an optical viewfinder: Pentaprism vs Digital

Significant disadvantages of the D810 (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III)

  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Lens
  • Doesn't record high-speed movies: None vs 120 fps
  • Lower resolution movies: 1080p @ 60fps vs UHD @ 30fps

common strengths of the D810 and Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III

  • Good color depth: 25.7 bits vs 22.9 bits
  • Good dynamic range: 14.8 EV vs 12.6 EV
  • Inexpensive: $2,199.00 vs $1,298.00

compared toEntry-level DSLR competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III compared to entry-level DSLR competitors include: it records very high quality movies (UHD @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 60fps), has a significantly higher resolution screen (1,228k dots vs 1,040k dots), records high-speed movies (120 fps vs none), has image stabilization (lens vs none) and shoots faster continuously (14 fps vs 6 fps).

However, on average it is much more noisy at high ISO (474 ISO vs 1,438 ISO), has much lower image quality (69.0 vs 87.0), has much less color depth (22.9 bits vs 24.5 bits), has much narrower dynamic range (12.6 EV vs 14.6 EV) and has a significantly smaller screen (3" vs 3.2").

Canon EOS 80D

Canon EOS 80D
similar age
$1,099 (body only)
$1,099 - $1,249 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the EOS 80D (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III)

  • Much larger viewfinder: 0.59x vs 0.26x
  • Has an optical viewfinder: Pentaprism vs Digital
  • Much thinner: 3.1" vs 5"

Significant disadvantages of the EOS 80D (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III)

  • Lower resolution movies: 1080p @ 60fps vs UHD @ 30fps
  • Doesn't record high-speed movies: None vs 120 fps
  • Much lower resolution screen: 1,040k dots vs 1,228k dots

common strengths of the EOS 80D and Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III

  • High resolution screens: 1,040k dots vs 1,228k dots
  • Fast continuous shooting: 7 fps vs 14 fps
  • Flip-out screens

Nikon D7200

Nikon D7200
1 year older
$799 - $997 (body only)
$1,048 - $1,297 18-140mm lens

Significant advantages of the D7200 (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III)

  • Much lower noise at high ISO: 1,333 ISO vs 474 ISO
  • Much better image quality: 87.0 vs 69.0
  • Better color depth: 24.5 bits vs 22.9 bits

Significant disadvantages of the D7200 (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III)

  • Lower resolution movies: 1080p @ 60fps vs UHD @ 30fps
  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Lens
  • Doesn't record high-speed movies: None vs 120 fps

common strengths of the D7200 and Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III

  • Very high resolution screens: 1,228k dots vs 1,228k dots
  • Have external mic jacks

Nikon D5500

Nikon D5500
1 year older
$498 (body only)
$549 - $588 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the D5500 (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III)

  • Much lower noise at high ISO: 1,438 ISO vs 474 ISO
  • Much better image quality: 84.0 vs 69.0
  • Better color depth: 24.1 bits vs 22.9 bits

Significant disadvantages of the D5500 (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III)

  • Lower resolution movies: 1080p @ 60fps vs UHD @ 30fps
  • Doesn't record high-speed movies: None vs 120 fps
  • Much lower resolution screen: 1,037k dots vs 1,228k dots

common strengths of the D5500 and Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III

  • High resolution screens: 1,037k dots vs 1,228k dots
  • Flip-out screens
  • Have external mic jacks

compared toBoutique competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III compared to boutique competitors include: it records very high quality movies (UHD @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps), records high-speed movies (120 fps vs none), records movies in 24p, shoots faster continuously (14 fps vs 5.2 fps) and has a screen which flips out.

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/2.4 vs f/2), is much larger (large (133×94×127 mm) vs standard size (127×75×52 mm)), doesn't have a touch screen, users slower contrast detection autofocus (contrast detection vs phase detection) and has slightly fewer focus points (25 vs 325).

Fujifilm X100F

Fujifilm X100F
9 months newer
$1,260 - $1,299

Significant advantages of the X100F (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III)

  • Much smaller: Standard size (127×75×52 mm) vs Large (133×94×127 mm)
  • Faster autofocus: Phase detection vs Contrast detection
  • Significantly more focus points: 325 vs 25

Significant disadvantages of the X100F (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III)

  • Lower resolution movies: 1080p @ 60fps vs UHD @ 30fps
  • Doesn't record high-speed movies: None vs 120 fps
  • Shoots significantly slower: 8 fps vs 14 fps

common strengths of the X100F and Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III

  • Good movie support: 1080p @ 60fps vs UHD @ 30fps
  • Fast continuous shooting: 8 fps vs 14 fps
  • 24p support

Canon PowerShot G1X Mark II

Canon PowerShot G1X Mark II
2 years older
$649

Significant advantages of the G1X Mark II (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III)

  • Much smaller: Standard size (116×74×66 mm) vs Large (133×94×127 mm)
  • Has a touch screen
  • Much thinner: 2.6" vs 5"

Significant disadvantages of the G1X Mark II (vs the Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III)

  • Lower resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs UHD @ 30fps
  • Doesn't record high-speed movies: None vs 120 fps
  • Much shorter battery life: 240 shots vs 420 shots

common strengths of the G1X Mark II and Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III

  • Very good image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Lens
  • Flip-out screens
  • Inexpensive: $649.00 vs $1,298.00