Summary Sony DSC-HX20V

Prices Price
Camera only
Unknown
Score Snapsort rank
Among similar cameras
#n/a of 11
Specifications Key specs
Zoom
Help 20x
Screen size
Help 3"
Aperture
Help f/3.2
Screen resolution
Help 921k dots
Wide angle
Help 25 mm
Movie format
Help 1080p @ 60fps
see all specifications
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX20VSony Cyber-shot DSC-HX20V

gallery

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX20V.

Videos

Sony Nex-3n - Shooting Modes, Menus, and Camera Setup Explained
  • Sample video
  • Zoom
  • Autofocus
  • Manual focus

Pros

Report a correction

The Sony DSC-HX20V vs other recent compacts

GPS Built-in GPS Help
Great for travel
Battery life Above average battery life Help
320 shots
Movie format Full HD Help
1080p @ 60fps
Report a correction

The Sony DSC-HX20V vs other recent travel zooms

Continuous shooting Rapid fire Help
10 fps
Longest exposure Long exposures Help
30 seconds
Light sensitivity Very good maximum light sensitivity Help
12,800 ISO

Cons

Report a correction

The Sony DSC-HX20V vs other recent compacts

Size Slightly large Help
Compact (107×62×35 mm)
Screen flips out Fixed screen Help
Less flexible
Announced Old Help
February 2012
Weight Heavy Help
254 g
True resolution Lower true resolution Help
9.7 MP
Sensor size Slightly smaller than average sensor Help
1/2.3" 6.17x4.55mm
Thickness Thick Help
1.4"
Viewfinder Can only preview photos on the screen Help
None
Report a correction

The Sony DSC-HX20V vs other recent travel zooms

Zoom Poor zoom Help
20x
Supports 24p No 24p movies Help
Missing that film look
Popularity Not so popular Help
Among snapsort users
Movie format Full HD Help
1080p @ 60fps
Fastest shutter speed Slow shutter speed Help
1/1600 of a second

Appearance

front photo of the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX20Vback photo of the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX20Vangle photo of the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX20V

Discussion

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX20V
Cyber-shot DSC-HX20V
Sony

Report a correction

Showing 4 comments

Lean-2 (5:07 PM, May 03, 2012)
I miss a full instruction manual. It isn't immediately obvious what some things do.
 
Doshi1985 (8:30 AM, April 27, 2012)
canon sx260hs is 12.1 mp and 20x optical zoom so as compared to hx9v 16 mp and 16x optical zoom it was the best choice as canon lens are far more superior than sony but with hx20v ,no one would be able to beat sony, only if price would be reasonable enough will people go for sony 
 
PL (3:52 PM, April 23, 2012)
Canon SX240-SX260 is better. 
 
Pete (5:27 PM, April 08, 2012)
The Sony HX20V is definitely  the best travel zoom for 2012. Simply amazing. Great zoom, very good photo quality (very decent for a travel
zoom), good photos with low light (better than HX9V), amazing (stunning) macro, fantastic video recording (the same quality as HX9V), decent battery life, very good materials...     in comparison, its main 2012's competitors, Canon SX 240 - SX 260 and Nikon 9300, are not better in photo quality (about the same quality) and are far worst in video quality (much worst.) Canon's 24 fps in video is just ridiculous. Instead of a film look you get jerky videos. I returned a Canon SX230 for that reason. Canon should definitely do something about it. And Nikon 9300 is worst than both, at least for me.  Not good enough. Many people bought the Sony HX9V only because of a much better video quality compared to the rest, especially compared to Canon’s SX 220-230, even if the photo quality was slightly inferior, but the new Sony HX20V not only is still much better in video but it also makes amazing pictures, at the Canon SX 240-260’s level. For real. With regard to the HX20V's main disadvantages, I would say: a) price. Too expensive! You can buy a Canon S100 for that price! B) manual control: still
no full manual control. Canon is better in that aspect.