Summary Sigma DP1

Prices Price
Camera only
Score Snapsort rank
Among similar cameras
#n/a of 16
Specifications Key specs
Help 1x
Screen size
Help 2.5"
Help Unknown
Screen resolution
Help 230k dots
Wide angle
Help 28 mm
Movie format
Help Unknown
see all specifications
Sigma DP1Sigma DP1


Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Sigma DP1.


Report a correction

The Sigma DP1 vs other recent boutiques

Size Quite small Help
Compact (109×60×31 mm)
Weight Light Help
270 g
Thickness Thin Help
Built-in flash Built-in flash Help
Usually standard


Report a correction

The Sigma DP1 vs other recent boutiques

Zoom Very poor zoom Help
Screen resolution Very low resolution screen Help
230k dots
Image stabilization No image stabilization Help
Risk of blur
Touch screen No touch screen Help
More buttons
Screen flips out Fixed screen Help
Less flexible
Battery life Shorter battery life Help
250 shots
Announced Old Help
September 2006
Popularity Not so popular Help
Among snapsort users
Wide angle Very poor wide angle lens Help
28 mm
Screen size Very small screen Help
Light sensitivity Poor maximum light sensitivity Help
800 ISO
True resolution Lower true resolution Help
4.6 MP
Autofocus contrast detection autofocus Help
slower focusing
Sensor size Small sensor Help
Sigma X3 20.7x13.8mm
Viewfinder Can only preview photos on the screen Help


front photo of the Sigma DP1back photo of the Sigma DP1angle photo of the Sigma DP1


Sigma DP1

Report a correction

Showing 1 comments

screwbiedooo (11:18 AM, April 13, 2012)
This camera fails on so many levels. Slow autofocus, snail-like write-times, an indistinct little screen, pointless movie mode, massive minimum focus distance, no integrated lens cap, poor low-light performance, high noise, slow fixed lens (f4), poor ergonomics, poor indoor flash exposure, expensive and hard-to-justify accessories such as the close up lens, which makes little impact - forget it for macro, optical viewfinder, accessory attachment, flash etc. Sigma's short pedigree in building cameras really seems to show itself. It seems there is no reason to buy this garbage.

But for one thing...

The image quality it produces is like nothing else around. The Foveon sensor truly produces silk-like and gorgeous detail throughout the spectrum. At 100% magnification what you see is what you get at about 50% on a regular Bayer image. It is not a 14MP camera but then neither are 14MP Bayer sensors, truly full colour 14MP. With the Sigma you can enlarge the files with confidence to nearly double linear resolution and still have a really good file to work with. You couldn't quite do this on a Bayer camera.

I love the Sigma images for their crispness, depth and detail, (taken at 100 ISO, calmly and in decent light). Mr Merrill (RIP) deserves a posthumous medal. I only wish Sigma could get it right on the rest of the thing, and this concept would be a world beater. Another note: You can make some gorgeous panoramas with this using simple stitch software.