Samsung TL320
Competitors

As well as being compared against other compacts, the Samsung TL320 is also often compared to travel zooms, mirrorless, pro digicams, ultra compacts and super zooms. The Samsung TL320's top rivals come from Samsung (such as the TL350 and the DV300F) and Sony (such as the Cybershot DSC-HX9v and the Cybershot H70)

Generally, some of the advantages of the Samsung TL320 compared to other compact competitors include: it has a significantly wider wide angle lens (24 mm vs 32 mm), has a slightly larger screen (3.0" vs 2.7"), is slightly smaller (super compact 97x61x21 mm vs compact 99x58x29 mm), has better image stabilization (sensor shift, lens vs sensor shift) and takes significantly higher resolution photos (9.8 MP vs 6 MP).

However, on average it has a slightly lower resolution screen (460k dots vs 920k dots), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 1,000 fps), doesn't record movies in 24p, has a CCD-family sensor (CCD vs CMOS) and has a much smaller sensor (1/2.3" 6.1x4.6mm vs 1/1.7" 7.6x5.7mm).

Samsung TL350 1 year newer	Significant advantages of the TL350 (vs the TL320) Records high-speed movies: 1,000 fps vs None Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps Significantly higher resolution screen: 920k dots vs 460k dots Significant disadvantages of the TL350 (vs the TL320) None found common strengths of the TL350 and TL320 Wide aperture: f/2.4 vs f/2.8 Good wide angle: 24 mm vs 24 mm Good image stabilization: Lens vs Sensor shift, Lens
	Compare the TL350 vs the TL320
Canon PowerShot S95 1 year newer $364 - $389	Significant advantages of the S95 (vs the TL320) Much larger sensor: 1/1.7" 7.6x5.7mm vs 1/2.3" 6.1x4.6mm Significantly wider aperture: f/2.0 vs f/2.8 Supports 24p Significant disadvantages of the S95 (vs the TL320) Doesn't have an OLED screen: LCD vs OLED Significantly worse wide angle: 28 mm vs 24 mm Larger: Compact 99x58x29 mm vs Super compact 97x61x21 mm common strengths of the S95 and TL320 Wide aperture: f/2.0 vs f/2.8 Good image stabilization: Lens vs Sensor shift, Lens
	Compare the Canon PowerShot S95 vs the Samsung TL320
Nikon Coolpix S3300 2 years newer $120	Significant advantages of the S3300 (vs the TL320) None found Significant disadvantages of the S3300 (vs the TL320) Doesn't have an OLED screen: LCD vs OLED Significantly narrower aperture: f/3.5 vs f/2.8 Significantly smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.0" common strengths of the S3300 and TL320 Thin: 0.7" vs 0.8"
	Compare the Nikon Coolpix S3300 vs the Samsung TL320
Nikon Coolpix P300 1 year newer $299	Significant advantages of the P300 (vs the TL320) Much wider aperture: f/1.8 vs f/2.8 Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps Significantly higher resolution screen: 921k dots vs 460k dots Significant disadvantages of the P300 (vs the TL320) Doesn't have an OLED screen: LCD vs OLED Significantly larger: Compact 103x58x32 mm vs Super compact 97x61x21 mm Much thicker: 1.3" vs 0.8" common strengths of the P300 and TL320 Wide aperture: f/1.8 vs f/2.8 Good wide angle: 24 mm vs 24 mm Good image stabilization: Lens, Sensor shift vs Sensor shift, Lens
	Compare the Nikon Coolpix P300 vs the Samsung TL320
Fujifilm FinePix F710 5 years older	Significant advantages of the F710 (vs the TL320) Much larger sensor: 1/1.7" 7.6x5.7mm vs 1/2.3" 6.1x4.6mm Shoots RAW Has a viewfinder: Tunnel vs None Significant disadvantages of the F710 (vs the TL320) Much smaller screen: 2.1" vs 3.0" Much lower true resolution: 6 MP vs 9.8 MP Much worse wide angle: 32 mm vs 24 mm common strengths of the F710 and TL320 Wide aperture: f/2.8 vs f/2.8
	Compare the Fujifilm FinePix F710 vs the Samsung TL320
Samsung CL65 5 months older	Significant advantages of the CL65 (vs the TL320) Much higher resolution screen: 1,152k dots vs 460k dots Much larger screen: 3.5" vs 3.0" Has a touch screen Significant disadvantages of the CL65 (vs the TL320) Much worse wide angle: 35 mm vs 24 mm Doesn't have an OLED screen: LCD vs OLED Significantly narrower aperture: f/3.6 vs f/2.8 common strengths of the CL65 and TL320 Good image stabilization: Lens vs Sensor shift, Lens Thin: 0.7" vs 0.8"
	Compare the CL65 vs the TL320

Generally, some of the advantages of the Samsung TL320 compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has a slightly wider aperture (f/2.8 vs f/3.3), has an OLED screen (OLED vs LCD) and has boost light sensitivity (3,200 ISO vs none).

However, on average it has slightly less zoom (5x vs 16x), records lower quality movies (720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 440 fps), has a CCD-family sensor (CCD vs CMOS) and lacks a built in HDR feature.

Samsung WB750 2 years newer $262 - $375	Significant advantages of the WB750 (vs the TL320) Records high-speed movies: 440 fps vs None Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps More zoom: 18x vs 5x Significant disadvantages of the WB750 (vs the TL320) Doesn't have an OLED screen: LCD vs OLED common strengths of the WB750 and TL320 Good wide angle: 24 mm vs 24 mm
	Compare the WB750 vs the TL320
Samsung HZ30W 1 year newer	Significant advantages of the HZ30W (vs the TL320) None found Significant disadvantages of the HZ30W (vs the TL320) Doesn't have an OLED screen: LCD vs OLED common strengths of the HZ30W and TL320 Good wide angle: 24 mm vs 24 mm
	Compare the HZ30W vs the TL320
Sony Cybershot DSC-HX9v 1 year newer $319 - $330	Significant advantages of the DSC-HX9v (vs the TL320) Has a GPS Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 60fps vs 720p @ 30fps Significantly higher resolution screen: 921k dots vs 460k dots Significant disadvantages of the DSC-HX9v (vs the TL320) Doesn't have an OLED screen: LCD vs OLED Narrower aperture: f/3.3 vs f/2.8 common strengths of the DSC-HX9v and TL320 Good wide angle: 24 mm vs 24 mm
	Compare the Sony Cybershot DSC-HX9v vs the Samsung TL320
Sony Cybershot H70 2 years newer $180	Significant advantages of the H70 (vs the TL320) Can create panoramas in-camera Significant disadvantages of the H70 (vs the TL320) Doesn't have an OLED screen: LCD vs OLED Significantly narrower aperture: f/3.5 vs f/2.8 common strengths of the H70 and TL320 None found
	Compare the Sony Cybershot DSC-H70 vs the Samsung TL320
Samsung WB700 1 year newer $178 - $215	Significant advantages of the WB700 (vs the TL320) More zoom: 18x vs 5x Significant disadvantages of the WB700 (vs the TL320) Doesn't have an OLED screen: LCD vs OLED common strengths of the WB700 and TL320 Good wide angle: 24 mm vs 24 mm
	Compare the WB700 vs the TL320
Canon PowerShot SX130 IS 1 year newer $145 - $245	Significant advantages of the SX130 IS (vs the TL320) Significantly better macro capability: 1 cm vs 5 cm Significant disadvantages of the SX130 IS (vs the TL320) Significantly worse wide angle: 28 mm vs 24 mm Doesn't have an OLED screen: LCD vs OLED Significantly narrower aperture: f/3.4 vs f/2.8 common strengths of the SX130 IS and TL320 None found
	Compare the Canon PowerShot SX130 IS vs the Samsung TL320

Generally, some of the advantages of the Samsung TL320 compared to mirrorless interchangeable-lens competitors include: it has image stabilization (sensor shift, lens vs none), is slightly smaller (super compact 97x61x21 mm vs mid size 117x63x37 mm), is thinner (0.8" vs 1.5") and has a built-in flash.

However, on average it records lower quality movies (720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps), has a slightly lower resolution screen (460k dots vs 614k dots), takes much lower resolution photos (9.8 MP vs 20 MP), significantly lower maximum light sensitivity (3,200 ISO vs 12,800 ISO) and has a much smaller sensor (1/2.3" 6.1x4.6mm vs APS-C 23.5x15.7mm).

Samsung NX210 3 years newer $1,286 - $1,311 18-55mm lens	Significant advantages of the NX210 (vs the TL320) Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps Much higher true resolution: 20 MP vs 9.8 MP Shoots RAW Significant disadvantages of the NX210 (vs the TL320) No image stabilization: None vs Sensor shift, Lens Larger: Mid size 117x63x37 mm vs Super compact 97x61x21 mm Significantly thicker: 1.5" vs 0.8" common strengths of the NX210 and TL320 OLED screens: OLED vs OLED Fairly small: Mid size 117x63x37 mm vs Super compact 97x61x21 mm
	Compare the NX210 vs the TL320

Generally, some of the advantages of the Samsung TL320 compared to pro digicam competitors include: it has a slightly wider wide angle lens (24 mm vs 28 mm), has a slightly larger screen (3.0" vs 2.8"), is slightly smaller (super compact 97x61x21 mm vs mid size 112x76x48 mm), has an OLED screen (OLED vs LCD) and is thinner (0.8" vs 1.9").

However, on average it has a much smaller sensor (1/2.3" 6.1x4.6mm vs 1/1.7" 8.3x6.2mm), doesn't shoot RAW, has a slightly narrower aperture (f/2.8 vs f/2.0), doesn't record movies in 24p and doesn't have a screen which flips out.

Canon PowerShot G12 1 year newer $370 - $496	Significant advantages of the G12 (vs the TL320) Much larger sensor: 1/1.7" 7.6x5.7mm vs 1/2.3" 6.1x4.6mm Shoots RAW Has a flip-out screen Significant disadvantages of the G12 (vs the TL320) Doesn't have an OLED screen: LCD vs OLED Significantly worse wide angle: 28 mm vs 24 mm Smaller screen: 2.8" vs 3.0" common strengths of the G12 and TL320 None found
	Compare the Canon PowerShot G12 vs the Samsung TL320
Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5 1 year newer $359	Significant advantages of the DMC-LX5 (vs the TL320) Much larger sensor: 1/1.7" 8.3x6.2mm vs 1/2.3" 6.1x4.6mm Shoots RAW Significantly wider aperture: f/2.0 vs f/2.8 Significant disadvantages of the DMC-LX5 (vs the TL320) Doesn't have an OLED screen: LCD vs OLED common strengths of the DMC-LX5 and TL320 Good wide angle: 24 mm vs 24 mm Fairly small: Mid size 109x65x42 mm vs Super compact 97x61x21 mm
	Compare the Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5 vs the Samsung TL320

Generally, some of the advantages of the Samsung TL320 compared to ultra compact competitors include: it has an OLED screen (OLED vs LCD) and slightly longer exposures (16 seconds vs 8 seconds).

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/2.8 vs f/2.5), is slightly larger (super compact 97x61x21 mm vs ultra compact 95x57x18 mm), doesn't have a touch screen, lacks a built in panoramas and doesn't take 3D photos.

Samsung DV300F 2 years newer $159	Significant advantages of the DV300F (vs the TL320) Has a touch screen Takes 3D photos Can create panoramas in-camera Significant disadvantages of the DV300F (vs the TL320) Doesn't have an OLED screen: LCD vs OLED common strengths of the DV300F and TL320 Wide aperture: f/2.5 vs f/2.8 Good wide angle: 25 mm vs 24 mm Good image stabilization: Lens vs Sensor shift, Lens
	Compare the DV300F vs the TL320

Generally, some of the advantages of the Samsung TL320 compared to super zoom competitors include: it has a significantly wider wide angle lens (24 mm vs 28 mm), has a slightly larger screen (3.0" vs 2.7"), is much smaller (super compact 97x61x21 mm vs professional size 123x92x108 mm), has an OLED screen (OLED vs LCD) and is thinner (0.8" vs 4.3").

However, on average it has much less zoom (5x vs 35x), doesn't record movies in 24p, doesn't have a screen which flips out, has a CCD-family sensor (CCD vs CMOS) and lacks a built in panoramas.

Kodak EasyShare Z1012 IS 1 year older	Significant advantages of the Z1012 IS (vs the TL320) Has a viewfinder: Digital vs None Significantly faster max shutter speed: 1/3200 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second Significant disadvantages of the Z1012 IS (vs the TL320) Much worse wide angle: 33 mm vs 24 mm Doesn't have an OLED screen: LCD vs OLED Much smaller screen: 2.5" vs 3.0" common strengths of the Z1012 IS and TL320 Fairly small: Standard size 109x74x77 mm vs Super compact 97x61x21 mm Thin: 3" vs 0.8"
	Compare the Kodak EasyShare Z1012 IS vs the Samsung TL320
Fujifilm FinePix S2950 2 years newer $159 - $160	Significant advantages of the S2950 (vs the TL320) More zoom: 18x vs 5x Can create panoramas in-camera Has a viewfinder: Digital vs None Significant disadvantages of the S2950 (vs the TL320) Doesn't have an OLED screen: LCD vs OLED Significantly worse wide angle: 28 mm vs 24 mm Significantly larger: Prosumer size 110x73x81 mm vs Super compact 97x61x21 mm common strengths of the S2950 and TL320 Fairly small: Prosumer size 110x73x81 mm vs Super compact 97x61x21 mm Thin: 3.2" vs 0.8"
	Compare the Fujifilm FinePix S2950 vs the Samsung TL320
Canon Powershot SX40 2 years newer $340 - $380	Significant advantages of the SX40 (vs the TL320) Much more zoom: 35x vs 5x Has a flip-out screen Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 24fps vs 720p @ 30fps Significant disadvantages of the SX40 (vs the TL320) Much larger: Professional size 123x92x108 mm vs Super compact 97x61x21 mm Doesn't have an OLED screen: LCD vs OLED Significantly smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.0" common strengths of the SX40 and TL320 None found
	Compare the Canon Powershot SX40 vs the Samsung TL320
Nikon Coolpix L120 1 year newer $180 - $220	Significant advantages of the L120 (vs the TL320) Significantly more zoom: 21x vs 5x Significantly higher resolution screen: 920k dots vs 460k dots Significantly better macro capability: 1 cm vs 5 cm Significant disadvantages of the L120 (vs the TL320) Doesn't have an OLED screen: LCD vs OLED Significantly larger: Prosumer size 110x77x78 mm vs Super compact 97x61x21 mm Much thicker: 3.1" vs 0.8" common strengths of the L120 and TL320 Fairly small: Prosumer size 110x77x78 mm vs Super compact 97x61x21 mm Thin: 3.1" vs 0.8"
	Compare the Nikon Coolpix L120 vs the Samsung TL320