As well as being compared against other compacts, the Samsung TL220 is also often compared to travel zooms, ultra compacts, super zooms and digicams. The Samsung TL220's top rivals come from Panasonic (such as the Lumix SZ9 and the Lumix DMC-TS30) and Canon (such as the PowerShot ELPH 360 HS and the PowerShot G9 X)

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Samsung TL220 compared to other compact competitors include: it has a significantly wider wide angle lens (27 mm vs 35 mm), has a slightly larger screen (3" vs 2.7"), is much smaller (super compact (100×60×19 mm) vs compact (98×58×31 mm)), has better image stabilization (lens vs digital) and has a touch screen.

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.5 vs f/3), has a slightly lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 1,040k dots), has a CCD-family sensor (CCD vs CMOS), is older (august 2009 vs february 2011) and slightly shorter exposures (8 seconds vs 30 seconds).

Canon PowerShot G9 X

Canon PowerShot G9 X
6 years newer
$391

Significant advantages of the PowerShot G9 X (vs the TL220)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2 vs f/3.5
  • Has a CMOS-family sensor: CMOS vs CCD
  • Much higher resolution screen: 1,040k dots vs 230k dots

Significant disadvantages of the PowerShot G9 X (vs the TL220)

  • Much larger: Compact (98×58×31 mm) vs Super compact (100×60×19 mm)
  • Much thicker: 1.2" vs 0.7"

common strengths of the PowerShot G9 X and TL220

  • Very small: Compact (98×58×31 mm) vs Super compact (100×60×19 mm)
  • Good image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Lens
  • Have touch screens

Canon ELPH 100 HS

Canon ELPH 100 HS
1 year newer

Significant advantages of the 100 HS (vs the TL220)

  • Has a CMOS-family sensor: CMOS vs CCD

Significant disadvantages of the 100 HS (vs the TL220)

  • No touch screen
  • Significantly slower max shutter speed: 1/1500 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

common strengths of the 100 HS and TL220

  • Very small: Super compact (93×56×20 mm) vs Super compact (100×60×19 mm)
  • Good image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Lens
  • Very thin: 0.8" vs 0.7"

Samsung TL225

Samsung TL225
similar age

Significant advantages of the TL225 (vs the TL220)

  • Much larger screen: 3.5" vs 3"
  • Much higher resolution screen: 1,152k dots vs 230k dots

Significant disadvantages of the TL225 (vs the TL220)

  • None found

common strengths of the TL225 and TL220

  • Very small: Super compact (100×60×19 mm) vs Super compact (100×60×19 mm)
  • Good image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Lens
  • Have touch screens

Samsung Digimax A50

Placeholder
4 years older

Significant advantages of the Digimax A50 (vs the TL220)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the Digimax A50 (vs the TL220)

  • Much larger: Compact (107×59×36 mm) vs Super compact (100×60×19 mm)
  • Much worse wide angle: 35 mm vs 27 mm
  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Lens

common strengths of the Digimax A50 and TL220

  • Light weight: 185 g vs 169 g

Canon PowerShot A495

Canon PowerShot A495
4 months newer
$112

Significant advantages of the A495 (vs the TL220)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the A495 (vs the TL220)

  • Much worse wide angle: 37 mm vs 27 mm
  • Much larger: Compact (94×62×31 mm) vs Super compact (100×60×19 mm)
  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Lens

common strengths of the A495 and TL220

  • Very small: Compact (94×62×31 mm) vs Super compact (100×60×19 mm)
  • Thin: 1.2" vs 0.7"
  • Very light: 175 g vs 169 g

Samsung ST65

Samsung ST65
1 year newer

Significant advantages of the ST65 (vs the TL220)

  • Significantly lighter: 109 g vs 169 g
  • Has a viewfinder: Digital vs None

Significant disadvantages of the ST65 (vs the TL220)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3"
  • Worse image stabilization:
    1. Digital
    vs
    1. Lens
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the ST65 and TL220

  • Very small: Super compact (92×56×22 mm) vs Super compact (100×60×19 mm)
  • Very thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"
  • Very light: 109 g vs 169 g

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Samsung TL220 compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has a touch screen.

However, on average it has a significantly narrower wide angle lens (27 mm vs 24 mm), doesn't have a built-in GPS, has a much lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 920k dots), has a CCD-family sensor (CCD vs CMOS) and is older (august 2009 vs february 2014).

Panasonic Lumix SZ9

Panasonic Lumix SZ9
3 years newer
$248

Significant advantages of the SZ9 (vs the TL220)

  • Has a CMOS-family sensor: CMOS vs CCD
  • Longer exposures: 30 seconds vs 8 seconds

Significant disadvantages of the SZ9 (vs the TL220)

  • No touch screen

common strengths of the SZ9 and TL220

  • None found

Canon PowerShot ELPH 360 HS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 360 HS
6 years newer
$180 - $189

Significant advantages of the PowerShot ELPH 360 HS (vs the TL220)

  • Has a CMOS-family sensor: CMOS vs CCD

Significant disadvantages of the PowerShot ELPH 360 HS (vs the TL220)

  • No touch screen

common strengths of the PowerShot ELPH 360 HS and TL220

  • None found

Samsung HZ30W

Samsung HZ30W
5 months newer

Significant advantages of the HZ30W (vs the TL220)

  • Significantly better wide angle: 24 mm vs 27 mm

Significant disadvantages of the HZ30W (vs the TL220)

  • No touch screen

common strengths of the HZ30W and TL220

  • None found

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS50

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS50
5 years newer
$279

Significant advantages of the DMC-ZS50 (vs the TL220)

  • Much higher resolution screen: 1,040k dots vs 230k dots
  • Significantly better wide angle: 24 mm vs 27 mm
  • Has a CMOS-family sensor: CMOS vs CCD

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-ZS50 (vs the TL220)

  • No touch screen

common strengths of the DMC-ZS50 and TL220

  • None found

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS60 (Lumix DMC-TZ80)

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS60 (Lumix DMC-TZ80)
6 years newer

Significant advantages of the Lumix DMC-ZS60 (Lumix DMC-TZ80) (vs the TL220)

  • Much higher resolution screen: 1,040k dots vs 230k dots
  • Significantly better wide angle: 24 mm vs 27 mm
  • Has a CMOS-family sensor: CMOS vs CCD

Significant disadvantages of the Lumix DMC-ZS60 (Lumix DMC-TZ80) (vs the TL220)

  • None found

common strengths of the Lumix DMC-ZS60 (Lumix DMC-TZ80) and TL220

  • Have touch screens

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ60

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ60
4 years newer
$2,192

Significant advantages of the DMC-TZ60 (vs the TL220)

  • Has a GPS
  • Much higher resolution screen: 920k dots vs 230k dots
  • Significantly better wide angle: 24 mm vs 27 mm

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-TZ60 (vs the TL220)

  • No touch screen

common strengths of the DMC-TZ60 and TL220

  • None found

compared toUltra compact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Samsung TL220 compared to ultra compact competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3" vs 2.7"), has better image stabilization (lens vs digital), has a touch screen and is thinner (0.7" vs 2.1").

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.5 vs f/2.5), is much larger (super compact (100×60×19 mm) vs ultra compact (50×22×54 mm)), is older (august 2009 vs january 2013) and is significantly heavier (169 g vs 96 g).

Samsung DV150F

Samsung DV150F
3 years newer

Significant advantages of the DV150F (vs the TL220)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the DV150F (vs the TL220)

  • None found

common strengths of the DV150F and TL220

  • None found

Samsung TL105

Samsung TL105
5 months newer

Significant advantages of the TL105 (vs the TL220)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the TL105 (vs the TL220)

  • None found

common strengths of the TL105 and TL220

  • None found

Sony CyberShot DSC-W800

Sony CyberShot DSC-W800
4 years newer
$80 - $105

Significant advantages of the DSC-W800 (vs the TL220)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-W800 (vs the TL220)

  • None found

common strengths of the DSC-W800 and TL220

  • None found

compared toSuper zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Samsung TL220 compared to super zoom competitors include: it has a significantly wider wide angle lens (27 mm vs 36 mm), has a much larger screen (3" vs 2.5"), is significantly smaller (super compact (100×60×19 mm) vs large (130×95×122 mm)), takes slightly higher resolution photos (9.8 MP vs 5 MP) and has a touch screen.

However, on average it has a significantly narrower aperture (f/3.5 vs f/2.8), doesn't have a viewfinder (none vs digital) and slightly shorter exposures (8 seconds vs 30 seconds).

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H1

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H1
4 years older
$504

Significant advantages of the DSC-H1 (vs the TL220)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.5
  • Has a viewfinder: Digital vs None
  • Longer exposures: 30 seconds vs 8 seconds

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-H1 (vs the TL220)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.5" vs 3"
  • Much worse wide angle: 36 mm vs 27 mm
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the DSC-H1 and TL220

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size (108×81×92 mm) vs Super compact (100×60×19 mm)
  • Thin: 3.6" vs 0.7"
  • Light weight: 591 g vs 169 g

Sony CyberShot DSC-H300

Sony CyberShot DSC-H300
4 years newer
$140 - $178

Significant advantages of the DSC-H300 (vs the TL220)

  • Wider aperture: f/3 vs f/3.5
  • Longer exposures: 30 seconds vs 8 seconds

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-H300 (vs the TL220)

  • Significantly larger: Large (130×95×122 mm) vs Super compact (100×60×19 mm)
  • No touch screen
  • Much thicker: 4.8" vs 0.7"

common strengths of the DSC-H300 and TL220

  • Light weight: 590 g vs 169 g

compared toDigicam competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Samsung TL220 compared to digicam competitors include: it has a slightly wider wide angle lens (27 mm vs 30 mm), has a significantly larger screen (3" vs 2.7"), has better image stabilization (lens vs digital), has a touch screen and has a faster max shutter speed (1/2000 of a second vs 1/1300 of a second).

However, on average it has a significantly lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 1,040k dots), doesn't have a screen which flips out, has a CCD-family sensor (CCD vs CMOS), is older (august 2009 vs may 2018) and doesn't have a viewfinder (none vs digital).

Nikon Coolpix W100

Nikon Coolpix W100
7 years newer
$99 - $157

Significant advantages of the Coolpix W100 (vs the TL220)

  • Has a CMOS-family sensor: CMOS vs CCD

Significant disadvantages of the Coolpix W100 (vs the TL220)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3"
  • Worse image stabilization:
    1. Digital
    vs
    1. Lens
  • Significantly worse wide angle: 30 mm vs 27 mm

common strengths of the Coolpix W100 and TL220

  • Light weight: 177 g vs 169 g

Panasonic Lumix DC-TS7 (Lumix DC-FT7)

Placeholder
8 years newer

Significant advantages of the Lumix DC-TS7 (Lumix DC-FT7) (vs the TL220)

  • Much higher resolution screen: 1,040k dots vs 230k dots
  • Has a CMOS-family sensor: CMOS vs CCD
  • Has a flip-out screen

Significant disadvantages of the Lumix DC-TS7 (Lumix DC-FT7) (vs the TL220)

  • No touch screen
  • Significantly slower max shutter speed: 1/1300 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

common strengths of the Lumix DC-TS7 (Lumix DC-FT7) and TL220

  • Good image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Lens
  • Thin: 1.5" vs 0.7"