Samsung TL105

4.1x, f/3.2, 27 mm
Retailer
    Style
      Color
        You save

        Summary Samsung TL105

        Prices Price
        Camera only
        Unknown
        Score Snapsort rank
        Among similar cameras
        #n/a of 1
        Specifications Key specs
        Zoom
        Help 4.1x
        Screen size
        Help 2.7"
        Aperture
        Help f/3.2
        Screen resolution
        Help 230k dots
        Wide angle
        Help 27 mm
        Movie format
        Help 720p @ 30fps
        see all specifications

        Also known as: Samsung ST60

        Samsung TL105Samsung TL105

        gallery

        Explore our gallery of 45 sample photos taken by the Samsung TL105.

        Pros

        Report a correction

        The Samsung TL105 vs other recent compacts

        Built-in flash Built-in flash Help
        Usually standard
        Thickness Thin Help
        0.6"
        Size Really small Help
        Ultra compact (91×56×16 mm)
        Weight Very light Help
        96 g

        Cons

        Report a correction

        The Samsung TL105 vs other recent compacts

        Zoom Below average zoom Help
        4.1x
        Image stabilization Image stabilization Help
        1. Digital
        Touch screen No touch screen Help
        More buttons
        Sensor type Sensor type Help
        CCD
        Viewfinder Can only preview photos on the screen Help
        None
        Popularity Not so popular Help
        Among snapsort users
        Screen resolution Very low resolution screen Help
        230k dots
        Light sensitivity Very poor maximum light sensitivity Help
        3,200 ISO
        Screen flips out Fixed screen Help
        Less flexible
        Announced Old Help
        January 2010
        Longest exposure Short exposures Help
        8 seconds

        Appearance

        front photo of the Samsung TL105back photo of the Samsung TL105angle photo of the Samsung TL105

        Discussion

        Samsung TL105
        TL105
        Samsung

        Report a correction

        Showing 0 comments