Samsung Digimax 530

3x, f/2.7, 38 mm
Retailer
    Style
      Color
        You save

        Summary Samsung Digimax 530

        Prices Price
        Camera only
        $126
        all Digimax 530 prices
        Score Snapsort rank
        Within its price range
        #n/a of 6
        Among similar cameras
        #n/a of 35
        Specifications Key specs
        Zoom
        Help 3x
        Screen size
        Help 1.5"
        Aperture
        Help f/2.7
        Screen resolution
        Help 118k dots
        Wide angle
        Help 38 mm
        Movie format
        Help Unknown
        see all specifications

        gallery

        Explore our gallery of 4 sample photos taken by the Samsung Digimax 530.

        Pros

        The Samsung Digimax 530 vs other recent digicams

        Size Quite small Help
        Mid size (110×59×40 mm)
        Weight Light Help
        195 g
        Viewfinder Doesn't use battery, see more detail Help
        Tunnel
        Thickness Thin Help
        1.6"
        Lowest price Inexpensive Help
        $125.69

        Cons

        The Samsung Digimax 530 vs other recent digicams

        Zoom Below average zoom Help
        3x
        Screen resolution Very low resolution screen Help
        118k dots
        Image stabilization No image stabilization Help
        Risk of blur
        Touch screen No touch screen Help
        More buttons
        Screen flips out Fixed screen Help
        Less flexible
        Sensor type Sensor type Help
        CCD
        External flash No external flash Help
        Less expandable
        Popularity Not so popular Help
        Among snapsort users
        Wide angle Very poor wide angle lens Help
        38 mm
        Screen size Very small screen Help
        1.5"
        Light sensitivity Poor maximum light sensitivity Help
        400 ISO
        True resolution Lower true resolution Help
        5 MP
        Sensor size Slightly smaller than average sensor Help
        1/1.8" 7.18x5.32mm
        Announced Old Help
        February 2004
        Longest exposure Short exposures Help
        1/2 of a second

        Discussion

        Showing 0 comments