As well as being compared against other travel zooms, the Samsung WB200F is also often compared to mirrorless and super zooms. The Samsung WB200F's top rivals come from Samsung (such as the Galaxy Camera and the WB30F) and Sony (such as the Cyber-shot DSC-WX80 and the Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V)

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Samsung WB200F compared to other travel zoom competitors include: it has a touch screen and is newer (january 2013 vs august 2012).

However, on average it doesn't have a built-in GPS, has a significantly smaller screen (3" vs 4.8"), is slightly larger (compact (107×62×22 mm) vs super compact (92×52×22 mm)), slightly lower maximum light sensitivity (3,200 ISO vs 12,800 ISO) and has a CCD-family sensor (CCD vs CMOS).

Samsung Galaxy Camera

Samsung Galaxy Camera
4 months older
$100

Significant advantages of the Camera (vs the WB200F)

  • Much larger screen: 4.8" vs 3"
  • Has a GPS
  • Has a CMOS-family sensor: CMOS vs CCD

Significant disadvantages of the Camera (vs the WB200F)

  • Much larger: Compact (129×71×19 mm) vs Compact (107×62×22 mm)
  • Significantly heavier: 300 g vs 226 g

common strengths of the Camera and WB200F

  • Very small: Compact (129×71×19 mm) vs Compact (107×62×22 mm)
  • Have touch screens
  • Very thin: 0.8" vs 0.9"

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX80

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX80
similar age

Significant advantages of the DSC-WX80 (vs the WB200F)

  • Much smaller: Super compact (92×52×22 mm) vs Compact (107×62×22 mm)
  • Has a CMOS-family sensor: CMOS vs CCD
  • Better maximum light sensitivity: 12,800 ISO vs 3,200 ISO

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-WX80 (vs the WB200F)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3"
  • No touch screen
  • Slower max shutter speed: 1/1600 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

common strengths of the DSC-WX80 and WB200F

  • Very small: Super compact (92×52×22 mm) vs Compact (107×62×22 mm)
  • Very thin: 0.9" vs 0.9"
  • Very light: 124 g vs 226 g

Samsung WB30F

Samsung WB30F
similar age
$177

Significant advantages of the WB30F (vs the WB200F)

  • Much smaller: Ultra compact (98×58×17 mm) vs Compact (107×62×22 mm)
  • Much lighter: 128 g vs 226 g

Significant disadvantages of the WB30F (vs the WB200F)

  • No touch screen

common strengths of the WB30F and WB200F

  • Very small: Ultra compact (98×58×17 mm) vs Compact (107×62×22 mm)
  • Very thin: 0.7" vs 0.9"
  • Very light: 128 g vs 226 g

Samsung WB250F

Samsung WB250F
similar age
$214

Significant advantages of the WB250F (vs the WB200F)

  • Has a CMOS-family sensor: CMOS vs CCD

Significant disadvantages of the WB250F (vs the WB200F)

  • None found

common strengths of the WB250F and WB200F

  • Very small: Compact (107×62×22 mm) vs Compact (107×62×22 mm)
  • Have touch screens
  • Very thin: 0.9" vs 0.9"

Samsung WB150F

Samsung WB150F
1 year older

Significant advantages of the WB150F (vs the WB200F)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the WB150F (vs the WB200F)

  • None found

common strengths of the WB150F and WB200F

  • Very small: Compact (107×60×23 mm) vs Compact (107×62×22 mm)
  • Very thin: 0.9" vs 0.9"
  • Very light: 188 g vs 226 g

Samsung WB800F

Samsung WB800F
similar age

Significant advantages of the WB800F (vs the WB200F)

  • Has a CMOS-family sensor: CMOS vs CCD

Significant disadvantages of the WB800F (vs the WB200F)

  • Larger: Compact (111×65×22 mm) vs Compact (107×62×22 mm)

common strengths of the WB800F and WB200F

  • Very small: Compact (111×65×22 mm) vs Compact (107×62×22 mm)
  • Have touch screens
  • Very thin: 0.9" vs 0.9"

compared toMirrorless interchangeable-lens competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Samsung WB200F compared to mirrorless interchangeable-lens competitors include: it has image stabilization (lens vs none), has a touch screen, is newer (january 2013 vs april 2012), is thinner (0.9" vs 1.6") and has a built-in flash.

However, on average it records lower quality movies (720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps), has a much lower resolution screen (460k dots vs 921k dots), takes significantly lower resolution photos (9.7 MP vs 20 MP), doesn't record movies in 24p and has a slightly smaller sensor (1/2.3" 6.16x4.55mm vs APS-C 23.5x15.7mm).

Samsung NX1100

Samsung NX1100
similar age
$450 20-50mm lens

Significant advantages of the NX1100 (vs the WB200F)

  • Supports 24p
  • Much higher resolution screen: 921k dots vs 460k dots
  • Has interchangeable lenses

Significant disadvantages of the NX1100 (vs the WB200F)

  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Lens
  • No touch screen
  • No built-in flash

common strengths of the NX1100 and WB200F

  • Fairly small: Mid size (114×63×40 mm) vs Compact (107×62×22 mm)
  • Very light: 119 g vs 226 g
  • Thin: 1.6" vs 0.9"

Samsung NX1000

Samsung NX1000
8 months older
$360 20-50mm lens

Significant advantages of the NX1000 (vs the WB200F)

  • Supports 24p
  • Much higher resolution screen: 921k dots vs 460k dots
  • Has interchangeable lenses

Significant disadvantages of the NX1000 (vs the WB200F)

  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Lens
  • No touch screen
  • No built-in flash

common strengths of the NX1000 and WB200F

  • Fairly small: Mid size (114×63×37 mm) vs Compact (107×62×22 mm)
  • Thin: 1.5" vs 0.9"
  • Very light: 222 g vs 226 g

compared toSuper zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Samsung WB200F compared to super zoom competitors include: it is slightly smaller (compact (107×62×22 mm) vs large (137×99×131 mm)), has a touch screen, is newer (january 2013 vs june 2010), is thinner (0.9" vs 5.1") and is slightly lighter (226 g vs 583 g).

However, on average it has a slightly lower resolution screen (460k dots vs 921k dots), takes slightly lower resolution photos (9.7 MP vs 20.9 MP), doesn't have a screen which flips out, has a CCD-family sensor (CCD vs CMOS) and has a marginally smaller sensor (1/2.3" 6.16x4.55mm vs nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm).

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V
10 months older

Significant advantages of the DSC-HX200V (vs the WB200F)

  • Has a CMOS-family sensor: CMOS vs CCD
  • Significantly higher resolution screen: 921k dots vs 460k dots
  • Has a GPS

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-HX200V (vs the WB200F)

  • No touch screen
  • Larger: Prosumer size (122×87×93 mm) vs Compact (107×62×22 mm)
  • Significantly thicker: 3.7" vs 0.9"

common strengths of the DSC-HX200V and WB200F

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size (122×87×93 mm) vs Compact (107×62×22 mm)
  • Thin: 3.7" vs 0.9"
  • Light weight: 583 g vs 226 g

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000
2 years older
$496 - $498

Significant advantages of the DMC-FZ1000 (vs the WB200F)

  • Has a CMOS-family sensor: CMOS vs CCD
  • Significantly higher resolution screen: 921k dots vs 460k dots
  • Has an external mic jack

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-FZ1000 (vs the WB200F)

  • Much larger: Large (137×99×131 mm) vs Compact (107×62×22 mm)
  • No touch screen
  • Much thicker: 5.1" vs 0.9"

common strengths of the DMC-FZ1000 and WB200F

  • None found

Canon PowerShot SX500 IS

Canon PowerShot SX500 IS
4 months older
$962

Significant advantages of the SX500 IS (vs the WB200F)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the SX500 IS (vs the WB200F)

  • No touch screen
  • Significantly thicker: 3.2" vs 0.9"

common strengths of the SX500 IS and WB200F

  • Very small: Standard size (104×70×80 mm) vs Compact (107×62×22 mm)
  • Very light: 341 g vs 226 g
  • Thin: 3.2" vs 0.9"

Fujifilm FinePix S4200

Fujifilm FinePix S4200
1 year older

Significant advantages of the S4200 (vs the WB200F)

  • Has a viewfinder: Digital vs None

Significant disadvantages of the S4200 (vs the WB200F)

  • No touch screen
  • Larger: Prosumer size (118×81×100 mm) vs Compact (107×62×22 mm)
  • Worse image stabilization:
    1. Sensor shift
    vs
    1. Lens

common strengths of the S4200 and WB200F

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size (118×81×100 mm) vs Compact (107×62×22 mm)
  • Thin: 3.9" vs 0.9"
  • Light weight: 543 g vs 226 g