As well as being compared against other travel zooms, the Samsung WB150F is also often compared to super zooms, pro digicams, ultra compacts and compacts. The Samsung WB150F's top rivals come from Nikon (such as the Coolpix A100 and the Coolpix S4100) and Olympus (such as the SP-600 UZ and the Stylus XZ-10)

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Samsung WB150F compared to other travel zoom competitors include: it has a slightly wider wide angle lens (24 mm vs 28 mm) and is newer (january 2012 vs february 2011).

However, on average it doesn't have a built-in GPS, has a CCD-family sensor (CCD vs CMOS) and doesn't have an OLED screen (LCD vs OLED).

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX5v

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX5v
2 years older

Significant advantages of the DSC-HX5v (vs the WB150F)

  • Has a GPS
  • Has a CMOS-family sensor: CMOS vs CCD

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-HX5v (vs the WB150F)

  • Lower resolution screen: 230k dots vs 460k dots

common strengths of the DSC-HX5v and WB150F

  • None found

Canon PowerShot ELPH 520 HS

Canon ELPH 520 HS
similar age
$238

Significant advantages of the ELPH 520 HS (vs the WB150F)

  • Has a CMOS-family sensor: CMOS vs CCD
  • Significantly faster max shutter speed: 1/4000 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

Significant disadvantages of the ELPH 520 HS (vs the WB150F)

  • Significantly worse wide angle: 28 mm vs 24 mm

common strengths of the ELPH 520 HS and WB150F

  • None found

Olympus SZ10

Olympus SZ-10
1 year older
$190

Significant advantages of the SZ10 (vs the WB150F)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the SZ10 (vs the WB150F)

  • Significantly worse wide angle: 28 mm vs 24 mm
  • Worse image stabilization:
    1. Sensor shift
    vs
    1. Lens

common strengths of the SZ10 and WB150F

  • None found

Samsung HZ35W

Samsung HZ35W
2 years older

Significant advantages of the HZ35W (vs the WB150F)

  • Has a GPS
  • Has an OLED screen: OLED vs LCD
  • Much higher resolution screen: 920k dots vs 460k dots

Significant disadvantages of the HZ35W (vs the WB150F)

  • None found

common strengths of the HZ35W and WB150F

  • None found

Samsung WB250F

Samsung WB250F
1 year newer
$214

Significant advantages of the WB250F (vs the WB150F)

  • Has a CMOS-family sensor: CMOS vs CCD

Significant disadvantages of the WB250F (vs the WB150F)

  • None found

common strengths of the WB250F and WB150F

  • None found

Canon PowerShot SX130 IS

Canon PowerShot SX130 IS
1 year older
$320

Significant advantages of the SX130 IS (vs the WB150F)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the SX130 IS (vs the WB150F)

  • Significantly worse wide angle: 28 mm vs 24 mm
  • Lower resolution screen: 230k dots vs 460k dots

common strengths of the SX130 IS and WB150F

  • None found

compared toSuper zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Samsung WB150F compared to super zoom competitors include: it has a slightly higher resolution screen (460k dots vs 230k dots), is slightly smaller (compact (107×60×23 mm) vs prosumer size (118×81×100 mm)), has better image stabilization (lens vs none), is newer (january 2012 vs february 2010) and is thinner (0.9" vs 3.9").

However, on average it has a CCD-family sensor (CCD vs CMOS) and doesn't have a viewfinder (none vs digital).

Olympus SP-600 UZ

Olympus SP-600 UZ
1 year older

Significant advantages of the SP-600 UZ (vs the WB150F)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the SP-600 UZ (vs the WB150F)

  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Lens
  • Significantly worse wide angle: 28 mm vs 24 mm
  • Larger: Prosumer size (110×90×91 mm) vs Compact (107×60×23 mm)

common strengths of the SP-600 UZ and WB150F

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size (110×90×91 mm) vs Compact (107×60×23 mm)
  • Light weight: 455 g vs 188 g
  • Thin: 3.6" vs 0.9"

Samsung WB100

Samsung WB100
4 months newer
$399

Significant advantages of the WB100 (vs the WB150F)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the WB100 (vs the WB150F)

  • Lower resolution screen: 230k dots vs 460k dots
  • Significantly thicker: 3.4" vs 0.9"

common strengths of the WB100 and WB150F

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size (114×79×86 mm) vs Compact (107×60×23 mm)
  • Very light: 403 g vs 188 g
  • Thin: 3.4" vs 0.9"

Fujifilm FinePix S6800

Fujifilm FinePix S6800
1 year newer

Significant advantages of the S6800 (vs the WB150F)

  • Has a CMOS-family sensor: CMOS vs CCD
  • Better maximum light sensitivity: 12,800 ISO vs 3,200 ISO

Significant disadvantages of the S6800 (vs the WB150F)

  • Significantly larger: Professional size (122×93×100 mm) vs Compact (107×60×23 mm)
  • Worse image stabilization:
    1. Sensor shift
    vs
    1. Lens
  • Significantly thicker: 3.9" vs 0.9"

common strengths of the S6800 and WB150F

  • Fairly small: Professional size (122×93×100 mm) vs Compact (107×60×23 mm)
  • Light weight: 523 g vs 188 g
  • Thin: 3.9" vs 0.9"

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ60

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ60
6 months newer

Significant advantages of the DMC-FZ60 (vs the WB150F)

  • Has a CMOS-family sensor: CMOS vs CCD
  • Has a viewfinder: Digital vs None

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-FZ60 (vs the WB150F)

  • Larger: Prosumer size (120×81×92 mm) vs Compact (107×60×23 mm)
  • Significantly thicker: 3.6" vs 0.9"
  • Heavier: 493 g vs 188 g

common strengths of the DMC-FZ60 and WB150F

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size (120×81×92 mm) vs Compact (107×60×23 mm)
  • Light weight: 493 g vs 188 g
  • Thin: 3.6" vs 0.9"

Fujifilm FinePix S4200

Fujifilm FinePix S4200
similar age

Significant advantages of the S4200 (vs the WB150F)

  • Has a viewfinder: Digital vs None

Significant disadvantages of the S4200 (vs the WB150F)

  • Larger: Prosumer size (118×81×100 mm) vs Compact (107×60×23 mm)
  • Lower resolution screen: 230k dots vs 460k dots
  • Worse image stabilization:
    1. Sensor shift
    vs
    1. Lens

common strengths of the S4200 and WB150F

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size (118×81×100 mm) vs Compact (107×60×23 mm)
  • Light weight: 543 g vs 188 g
  • Thin: 3.9" vs 0.9"

Samsung HZ25W

Samsung HZ25W
3 years older

Significant advantages of the HZ25W (vs the WB150F)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the HZ25W (vs the WB150F)

  • Larger: Prosumer size (116×83×92 mm) vs Compact (107×60×23 mm)
  • Lower resolution screen: 230k dots vs 460k dots
  • Significantly thicker: 3.6" vs 0.9"

common strengths of the HZ25W and WB150F

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size (116×83×92 mm) vs Compact (107×60×23 mm)
  • Very light: 428 g vs 188 g
  • Thin: 3.6" vs 0.9"

compared toPro digicam competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Samsung WB150F compared to pro digicam competitors include: it has slightly more zoom (18x vs 2.5x), is slightly smaller (compact (107×60×23 mm) vs compact (102×61×34 mm)), is newer (january 2012 vs july 2008), is thinner (0.9" vs 1.3") and is slightly lighter (188 g vs 265 g).

However, on average it has a significantly narrower aperture (f/3.2 vs f/1.8), slightly lower maximum light sensitivity (3,200 ISO vs 6,400 ISO), has a CCD-family sensor (CCD vs CMOS), doesn't have a built-in GPS and doesn't support an external flash.

Canon Powershot S100

Canon Powershot S100
3 months older
$382

Significant advantages of the S100 (vs the WB150F)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2 vs f/3.2
  • Has a GPS
  • Has a CMOS-family sensor: CMOS vs CCD

Significant disadvantages of the S100 (vs the WB150F)

  • Thicker: 1.1" vs 0.9"

common strengths of the S100 and WB150F

  • Fairly small: Compact (99×60×28 mm) vs Compact (107×60×23 mm)
  • Very thin: 1.1" vs 0.9"
  • Light weight: 198 g vs 188 g

Olympus Stylus XZ-10

Olympus Stylus XZ-10
1 year newer
$419

Significant advantages of the XZ-10 (vs the WB150F)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/1.8 vs f/3.2
  • Has a CMOS-family sensor: CMOS vs CCD
  • Significantly higher resolution screen: 920k dots vs 460k dots

Significant disadvantages of the XZ-10 (vs the WB150F)

  • Larger: Compact (102×61×34 mm) vs Compact (107×60×23 mm)
  • Worse image stabilization:
    1. Sensor shift
    vs
    1. Lens
  • Much thicker: 1.3" vs 0.9"

common strengths of the XZ-10 and WB150F

  • None found

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX3

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX3
3 years older
$778

Significant advantages of the DMC-LX3 (vs the WB150F)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2 vs f/3.2
  • Supports an external flash
  • Much longer exposures: 60 seconds vs 16 seconds

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-LX3 (vs the WB150F)

  • Significantly heavier: 265 g vs 188 g

common strengths of the DMC-LX3 and WB150F

  • Fairly small: Compact (109×60×27 mm) vs Compact (107×60×23 mm)
  • Very thin: 1.1" vs 0.9"

compared toUltra compact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Samsung WB150F compared to ultra compact competitors include: it has slightly more zoom (18x vs 5x), has a slightly higher resolution screen (460k dots vs 230k dots), has better image stabilization (lens vs digital) and has a faster max shutter speed (1/2000 of a second vs 1/1600 of a second).

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.2 vs f/2.5), is slightly larger (compact (107×60×23 mm) vs ultra compact (91×52×20 mm)), is thicker (0.9" vs 0.7") and is significantly heavier (188 g vs 103 g).

Samsung DV150F

Samsung DV150F
1 year newer

Significant advantages of the DV150F (vs the WB150F)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the DV150F (vs the WB150F)

  • None found

common strengths of the DV150F and WB150F

  • None found

Samsung SH100

Samsung SH100
10 months older

Significant advantages of the SH100 (vs the WB150F)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the SH100 (vs the WB150F)

  • None found

common strengths of the SH100 and WB150F

  • None found

Samsung ST150F

Samsung ST150F
1 year newer

Significant advantages of the ST150F (vs the WB150F)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the ST150F (vs the WB150F)

  • None found

common strengths of the ST150F and WB150F

  • None found

Panasonic Lumix DMC-XS1

Panasonic Lumix DMC-XS1
1 year newer
$117

Significant advantages of the DMC-XS1 (vs the WB150F)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-XS1 (vs the WB150F)

  • None found

common strengths of the DMC-XS1 and WB150F

  • None found

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W380

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W380
2 years older
$230

Significant advantages of the DSC-W380 (vs the WB150F)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-W380 (vs the WB150F)

  • None found

common strengths of the DSC-W380 and WB150F

  • None found

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Samsung WB150F compared to compact competitors include: it has slightly more zoom (18x vs 4x), has a much wider wide angle lens (24 mm vs 30 mm), has a slightly higher resolution screen (460k dots vs 230k dots), has better image stabilization (lens vs digital) and is newer (january 2012 vs february 2011).

However, on average it is slightly larger (compact (107×60×23 mm) vs super compact (95×59×20 mm)) and is slightly heavier (188 g vs 131 g).

Nikon Coolpix A100

Nikon Coolpix A100
4 years newer
$100

Significant advantages of the Coolpix A100 (vs the WB150F)

  • Significantly lighter: 119 g vs 188 g

Significant disadvantages of the Coolpix A100 (vs the WB150F)

  • Worse image stabilization:
    1. Digital
    vs
    1. Lens

common strengths of the Coolpix A100 and WB150F

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Fairly small: Super compact (95×59×20 mm) vs Compact (107×60×23 mm)
  • Very thin: 0.8" vs 0.9"

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W220

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W220
3 years older

Significant advantages of the DSC-W220 (vs the WB150F)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-W220 (vs the WB150F)

  • Much worse wide angle: 30 mm vs 24 mm
  • Significantly slower max shutter speed: 1/1600 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second
  • Shorter max exposures: 1 seconds vs 16 seconds

common strengths of the DSC-W220 and WB150F

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Fairly small: Super compact (95×57×22 mm) vs Compact (107×60×23 mm)
  • Good image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Lens

Nikon Coolpix S4100

Nikon Coolpix S4100
1 year older
$135

Significant advantages of the S4100 (vs the WB150F)

  • Lighter: 131 g vs 188 g

Significant disadvantages of the S4100 (vs the WB150F)

  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Lens

common strengths of the S4100 and WB150F

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Fairly small: Super compact (95×57×20 mm) vs Compact (107×60×23 mm)
  • Larger than average screens: 3" vs 3"

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W300

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W300
3 years older

Significant advantages of the DSC-W300 (vs the WB150F)

  • Has a viewfinder: Tunnel vs None

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-W300 (vs the WB150F)

  • Much worse wide angle: 35 mm vs 24 mm

common strengths of the DSC-W300 and WB150F

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Fairly small: Compact (94×59×27 mm) vs Compact (107×60×23 mm)
  • Good image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Lens

Canon PowerShot A2300 IS

Canon PowerShot A2300 IS
similar age
$332

Significant advantages of the A2300 IS (vs the WB150F)

  • Lighter: 125 g vs 188 g

Significant disadvantages of the A2300 IS (vs the WB150F)

  • Significantly worse wide angle: 28 mm vs 24 mm

common strengths of the A2300 IS and WB150F

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Fairly small: Super compact (95×54×20 mm) vs Compact (107×60×23 mm)
  • Very thin: 0.8" vs 0.9"

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS22

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS22
7 months older
$225

Significant advantages of the DMC-FS22 (vs the WB150F)

  • Lighter: 126 g vs 188 g
  • Much longer exposures: 60 seconds vs 16 seconds

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-FS22 (vs the WB150F)

  • Significantly worse wide angle: 28 mm vs 24 mm
  • Significantly slower max shutter speed: 1/1600 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

common strengths of the DMC-FS22 and WB150F

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Fairly small: Super compact (95×56×19 mm) vs Compact (107×60×23 mm)
  • Larger than average screens: 3" vs 3"