As well as being compared against other super zooms, the Samsung WB110 is also often compared to digicams and ultra compacts. The Samsung WB110's top rivals come from Samsung (such as the WB1100F and the WB2100) and Fujifilm (such as the FinePix F800EXR)

Competitor classes

compared toSuper zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Samsung WB110 compared to other super zoom competitors include: it has a slightly wider wide angle lens (22 mm vs 24 mm).

However, on average it has a slightly lower resolution screen (460k dots vs 921k dots), doesn't have a screen which flips out, has a CCD-family sensor (CCD vs CMOS), is older (july 2013 vs february 2015) and has a slower max shutter speed (1/2000 of a second vs 1/4000 of a second).

Samsung WB1100F

Samsung WB1100F
6 months newer
$299

Significant advantages of the WB1100F (vs the WB110)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the WB1100F (vs the WB110)

  • Significantly worse wide angle: 25 mm vs 22 mm

common strengths of the WB1100F and WB110

  • Fairly small: Professional size (125×87×96 mm) vs Prosumer size (114×79×86 mm)
  • Light weight: 462 g vs 385 g
  • Thin: 3.8" vs 3.4"

Nikon Coolpix L840

Nikon Coolpix L840
1 year newer
$274

Significant advantages of the L840 (vs the WB110)

  • Has a CMOS-family sensor: CMOS vs CCD
  • Significantly higher resolution screen: 921k dots vs 460k dots
  • Has a flip-out screen

Significant disadvantages of the L840 (vs the WB110)

  • None found

common strengths of the L840 and WB110

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size (114×89×96 mm) vs Prosumer size (114×79×86 mm)
  • Light weight: 538 g vs 385 g
  • Thin: 3.8" vs 3.4"

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LZ30

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LZ30
6 months older

Significant advantages of the DMC-LZ30 (vs the WB110)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-LZ30 (vs the WB110)

  • Significantly worse wide angle: 25 mm vs 22 mm

common strengths of the DMC-LZ30 and WB110

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size (124×84×91 mm) vs Prosumer size (114×79×86 mm)
  • Light weight: 558 g vs 385 g
  • Thin: 3.6" vs 3.4"

Canon PowerShot SX410 IS

Canon PowerShot SX410 IS
1 year newer
$199

Significant advantages of the SX410 IS (vs the WB110)

  • Significantly faster max shutter speed: 1/4000 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

Significant disadvantages of the SX410 IS (vs the WB110)

  • None found

common strengths of the SX410 IS and WB110

  • Fairly small: Standard size (104×69×85 mm) vs Prosumer size (114×79×86 mm)
  • Very light: 325 g vs 385 g
  • Thin: 3.3" vs 3.4"

Nikon Coolpix B500

Nikon Coolpix B500
2 years newer
$242 - $257

Significant advantages of the Coolpix B500 (vs the WB110)

  • Has a CMOS-family sensor: CMOS vs CCD
  • Significantly higher resolution screen: 921k dots vs 460k dots
  • Has a flip-out screen

Significant disadvantages of the Coolpix B500 (vs the WB110)

  • None found

common strengths of the Coolpix B500 and WB110

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size (114×78×95 mm) vs Prosumer size (114×79×86 mm)
  • Light weight: 541 g vs 385 g
  • Thin: 3.7" vs 3.4"

Nikon Coolpix L820

Nikon Coolpix L820
5 months older

Significant advantages of the L820 (vs the WB110)

  • Has a CMOS-family sensor: CMOS vs CCD
  • Significantly higher resolution screen: 921k dots vs 460k dots

Significant disadvantages of the L820 (vs the WB110)

  • Slower max shutter speed: 1/1500 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

common strengths of the L820 and WB110

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size (111×76×85 mm) vs Prosumer size (114×79×86 mm)
  • Light weight: 470 g vs 385 g
  • Thin: 3.3" vs 3.4"

compared toDigicam competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Samsung WB110 compared to digicam competitors include: it has a slightly wider aperture (f/3.1 vs f/3.5), has a significantly wider wide angle lens (22 mm vs 25 mm), has better image stabilization (DigitalLens vs sensor shift) and is newer (july 2013 vs july 2012).

However, on average it has a CCD-family sensor (CCD vs CMOS) and is slightly heavier (385 g vs 208 g).

Fujifilm FinePix F800EXR

Fujifilm FinePix F800EXR
1 year older

Significant advantages of the F800EXR (vs the WB110)

  • Has a CMOS-family sensor: CMOS vs CCD

Significant disadvantages of the F800EXR (vs the WB110)

  • Significantly worse wide angle: 25 mm vs 22 mm
  • Worse image stabilization:
    1. Sensor shift
    vs
    1. Digital
    2. Lens

common strengths of the F800EXR and WB110

  • None found

compared toUltra compact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Samsung WB110 compared to ultra compact competitors include: it has significantly more zoom (26.4x vs 5x), has a significantly wider wide angle lens (22 mm vs 25 mm), has a much larger screen (3" vs 2.7"), has better image stabilization (DigitalLens vs digital) and is newer (july 2013 vs january 2013).

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.1 vs f/2.5), is much larger (prosumer size (114×79×86 mm) vs ultra compact (96×55×18 mm)), is thicker (3.4" vs 0.7") and is much heavier (385 g vs 116 g).

Samsung DV150F

Samsung DV150F
6 months older

Significant advantages of the DV150F (vs the WB110)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the DV150F (vs the WB110)

  • None found

common strengths of the DV150F and WB110

  • None found