As well as being compared against other compacts, the Samsung MV900F MultiView is also often compared to waterproofs, ultra compacts, travel zooms and super zooms. The Samsung MV900F MultiView's top rivals come from Olympus (such as the Tough TG-4) and Canon (such as the PowerShot SX610 HS and the PowerShot S110)

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Samsung MV900F MultiView compared to other compact competitors include: it has a significantly wider wide angle lens (25 mm vs 37 mm), has a much larger screen (3.3" vs 2.8"), has a slightly higher resolution screen (614k dots vs 230k dots), is much smaller (super compact (99×60×17 mm) vs compact (112×66×31 mm)) and has a touch screen.

However, on average it slightly lower maximum light sensitivity (3,200 ISO vs 12,800 ISO), doesn't have a built-in GPS and is not waterproof.

Olympus Tough TG-4

Olympus Tough TG-4
2 years newer
$447

Significant advantages of the TG-4 (vs the MV900F MultiView)

  • Has a GPS
  • Better maximum light sensitivity: 6,400 ISO vs 3,200 ISO
  • Waterproof

Significant disadvantages of the TG-4 (vs the MV900F MultiView)

  • Much larger: Compact (112×66×31 mm) vs Super compact (99×60×17 mm)
  • Doesn't have an OLED screen: LCD vs OLED
  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.3"

common strengths of the TG-4 and MV900F MultiView

  • Wide aperture: f/2 vs f/2.5
  • Thin: 1.2" vs 0.7"

Canon PowerShot S110

Canon PowerShot S110
similar age
$439

Significant advantages of the S110 (vs the MV900F MultiView)

  • Better maximum light sensitivity: 12,800 ISO vs 3,200 ISO

Significant disadvantages of the S110 (vs the MV900F MultiView)

  • Much larger: Compact (99×59×27 mm) vs Super compact (99×60×17 mm)
  • Doesn't have an OLED screen: LCD vs OLED
  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.3"

common strengths of the S110 and MV900F MultiView

  • Wide aperture: f/2 vs f/2.5
  • Very small: Compact (99×59×27 mm) vs Super compact (99×60×17 mm)
  • Good image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Lens

Casio Exilim EX-Z1200 SR

Casio Exilim EX-Z1200 SR
5 years older

Significant advantages of the EX-Z1200 SR (vs the MV900F MultiView)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the EX-Z1200 SR (vs the MV900F MultiView)

  • Much worse wide angle: 37 mm vs 25 mm
  • Much smaller screen: 2.8" vs 3.3"
  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS

common strengths of the EX-Z1200 SR and MV900F MultiView

  • Wide aperture: f/2.8 vs f/2.5
  • Very small: Super compact (93×58×22 mm) vs Super compact (99×60×17 mm)
  • Good image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    2. Sensor shift
    vs
    1. Lens

compared toWaterproof competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Samsung MV900F MultiView compared to waterproof competitors include: it has a slightly wider aperture (f/2.5 vs f/3.5), has a much larger screen (3.3" vs 3"), has a screen which flips out, has an OLED screen (OLED vs LCD) and is newer (july 2012 vs february 2012).

However, on average it has a slightly lower resolution screen (614k dots vs 921k dots) and is not waterproof.

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX20

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX20
4 months older

Significant advantages of the DSC-TX20 (vs the MV900F MultiView)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-TX20 (vs the MV900F MultiView)

  • None found

common strengths of the DSC-TX20 and MV900F MultiView

  • None found

compared toUltra compact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Samsung MV900F MultiView compared to ultra compact competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.3" vs 3"), has a slightly higher resolution screen (614k dots vs 230k dots), has better image stabilization (lens vs digital), has a touch screen and has a screen which flips out.

Samsung SH100

Samsung SH100
1 year older

Significant advantages of the SH100 (vs the MV900F MultiView)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the SH100 (vs the MV900F MultiView)

  • None found

common strengths of the SH100 and MV900F MultiView

  • None found

Samsung ST150F

Samsung ST150F
5 months newer

Significant advantages of the ST150F (vs the MV900F MultiView)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the ST150F (vs the MV900F MultiView)

  • None found

common strengths of the ST150F and MV900F MultiView

  • None found

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Samsung MV900F MultiView compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has a slightly wider aperture (f/2.5 vs f/3.8), has a much larger screen (3.3" vs 2.7"), is much smaller (super compact (99×60×17 mm) vs compact (105×61×27 mm)), has a touch screen and has a screen which flips out.

However, on average it slightly lower maximum light sensitivity (3,200 ISO vs 6,400 ISO) and is older (july 2012 vs january 2015).

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS45

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS45
2 years newer
$552

Significant advantages of the DMC-ZS45 (vs the MV900F MultiView)

  • Higher resolution screen: 1,040k dots vs 614k dots
  • Better maximum light sensitivity: 6,400 ISO vs 3,200 ISO

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-ZS45 (vs the MV900F MultiView)

  • Much larger: Compact (108×60×32 mm) vs Super compact (99×60×17 mm)
  • Doesn't have an OLED screen: LCD vs OLED
  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.3"

common strengths of the DMC-ZS45 and MV900F MultiView

  • Very small: Compact (108×60×32 mm) vs Super compact (99×60×17 mm)
  • Very thin: 1.3" vs 0.7"
  • Light weight: 249 g vs 132 g

Canon PowerShot SX610 HS

Canon PowerShot SX610 HS
2 years newer
$254

Significant advantages of the SX610 HS (vs the MV900F MultiView)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the SX610 HS (vs the MV900F MultiView)

  • Much larger: Compact (105×61×27 mm) vs Super compact (99×60×17 mm)
  • Significantly narrower aperture: f/3.8 vs f/2.5
  • Doesn't have an OLED screen: LCD vs OLED

common strengths of the SX610 HS and MV900F MultiView

  • Very small: Compact (105×61×27 mm) vs Super compact (99×60×17 mm)
  • Very thin: 1.1" vs 0.7"
  • Very light: 191 g vs 132 g

Nikon Coolpix S6900

Nikon Coolpix S6900
2 years newer
$325

Significant advantages of the S6900 (vs the MV900F MultiView)

  • Better maximum light sensitivity: 6,400 ISO vs 3,200 ISO

Significant disadvantages of the S6900 (vs the MV900F MultiView)

  • Much larger: Compact (99×58×28 mm) vs Super compact (99×60×17 mm)
  • Doesn't have an OLED screen: LCD vs OLED
  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.3"

common strengths of the S6900 and MV900F MultiView

  • Very small: Compact (99×58×28 mm) vs Super compact (99×60×17 mm)
  • Very thin: 1.1" vs 0.7"
  • Very light: 181 g vs 132 g

Panasonic Lumix DMC-SZ10

Panasonic Lumix DMC-SZ10
2 years newer
$330

Significant advantages of the DMC-SZ10 (vs the MV900F MultiView)

  • Better maximum light sensitivity: 6,400 ISO vs 3,200 ISO

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-SZ10 (vs the MV900F MultiView)

  • Much larger: Compact (99×60×30 mm) vs Super compact (99×60×17 mm)
  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS
  • Doesn't have an OLED screen: LCD vs OLED

common strengths of the DMC-SZ10 and MV900F MultiView

  • Very small: Compact (99×60×30 mm) vs Super compact (99×60×17 mm)
  • Very light: 177 g vs 132 g
  • Very thin: 1.2" vs 0.7"

Nikon Coolpix S6600

Nikon Coolpix S6600
1 year newer

Significant advantages of the S6600 (vs the MV900F MultiView)

  • Better maximum light sensitivity: 6,400 ISO vs 3,200 ISO

Significant disadvantages of the S6600 (vs the MV900F MultiView)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.3"
  • Much larger: Compact (97×57×27 mm) vs Super compact (99×60×17 mm)
  • Doesn't have an OLED screen: LCD vs OLED

common strengths of the S6600 and MV900F MultiView

  • Very small: Compact (97×57×27 mm) vs Super compact (99×60×17 mm)
  • Very light: 165 g vs 132 g
  • Very thin: 1.1" vs 0.7"

Samsung WB150F

Samsung WB150F
6 months older

Significant advantages of the WB150F (vs the MV900F MultiView)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the WB150F (vs the MV900F MultiView)

  • Much larger: Compact (107×60×23 mm) vs Super compact (99×60×17 mm)
  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS
  • Doesn't have an OLED screen: LCD vs OLED

common strengths of the WB150F and MV900F MultiView

  • Very small: Compact (107×60×23 mm) vs Super compact (99×60×17 mm)
  • Very thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"
  • Very light: 188 g vs 132 g

compared toSuper zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Samsung MV900F MultiView compared to super zoom competitors include: it has a significantly wider aperture (f/2.5 vs f/3.1), has a much larger screen (3.3" vs 3"), has a significantly higher resolution screen (614k dots vs 230k dots), is slightly smaller (super compact (99×60×17 mm) vs prosumer size (118×81×100 mm)) and has better image stabilization (lens vs sensor shift).

However, on average it doesn't have a viewfinder (none vs digital).

Fujifilm FinePix S3200

Fujifilm FinePix S3200
1 year older
$698

Significant advantages of the S3200 (vs the MV900F MultiView)

  • Has a viewfinder: Digital vs None

Significant disadvantages of the S3200 (vs the MV900F MultiView)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.3"
  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS
  • Doesn't have an OLED screen: LCD vs OLED

common strengths of the S3200 and MV900F MultiView

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size (118×81×100 mm) vs Super compact (99×60×17 mm)
  • Light weight: 540 g vs 132 g
  • Thin: 3.9" vs 0.7"