Samsung DV150F

5x, f/2.5, 25 mm
Retailer
    Style
      Color
        You save

        Summary Samsung DV150F

        Prices Price
        Camera only
        $399
        all DV150F prices
        Score Snapsort rank
        Within its price range
        #n/a of 0
        Among similar cameras
        #n/a of 1
        Specifications Key specs
        Zoom
        Help 5x
        Screen size
        Help 2.7"
        Aperture
        Help f/2.5
        Screen resolution
        Help 460k dots
        Wide angle
        Help 25 mm
        Movie format
        Help 720p @ 30fps
        see all specifications
        Samsung DV150FSamsung DV150F

        Pros

        Report a correction

        The Samsung DV150F vs other recent compacts

        Aperture Wide aperture Help
        f/2.5
        Size Quite small Help
        Ultra compact (96×55×18 mm)
        Weight Light Help
        116 g
        Built-in flash Built-in flash Help
        Usually standard
        Thickness Thin Help
        0.7"

        Cons

        Report a correction

        The Samsung DV150F vs other recent compacts

        Zoom Below average zoom Help
        5x
        Image stabilization Image stabilization Help
        1. Digital
        Touch screen No touch screen Help
        More buttons
        Sensor type Sensor type Help
        CCD
        Viewfinder Can only preview photos on the screen Help
        None
        Popularity Not so popular Help
        Among snapsort users
        Screen resolution Low resolution screen Help
        460k dots
        Light sensitivity Very poor maximum light sensitivity Help
        3,200 ISO
        Screen flips out Fixed screen Help
        Less flexible
        Announced Old Help
        January 2013
        Fastest shutter speed Slow shutter speed Help
        1/2000 of a second

        Appearance

        front photo of the Samsung DV150Fback photo of the Samsung DV150Fangle photo of the Samsung DV150F

        Discussion

        Samsung DV150F
        DV150F
        Samsung

        Report a correction

        Showing 0 comments