As well as being compared against other boutiques, the Ricoh GXR (A12) is also often compared to mirrorless, pro digicams, entry-level DSLRs and compacts. The Ricoh GXR (A12)'s top rivals come from Sony (such as the NEX-7 and the NEX-5N) and Fujifilm (such as the FinePix X100 and the X-Pro1)

compared toBoutique competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Ricoh GXR (A12) compared to other boutique competitors include: it has a significantly larger screen (3.0" vs 2.5"), has a significantly higher resolution screen (920k dots vs 230k dots), records movies in 24p, has a slightly larger sensor (APS-C 23.6x15.7mm vs four thirds 20.7x13.8mm) and much longer exposures (180 seconds vs 30 seconds).

However, on average it is significantly larger (standard size 114x70x77 mm vs mid size 113x60x56 mm), is thicker (3" vs 2"), is much heavier (453 g vs 280 g), doesn't have a viewfinder (none vs tunnel) and is less popular.

Fujifilm FinePix X100

Fujifilm FinePix X100
10 months newer
$1,199

Significant advantages of the X100 (vs the GXR (A12))

  • Much thinner: 2.1" vs 3"
  • Has a viewfinder: Tunnel vs None

Significant disadvantages of the X100 (vs the GXR (A12))

  • Significantly lower resolution screen: 460k dots vs 920k dots
  • No 24p support
  • Much shorter max exposures: 30 seconds vs 180 seconds

common strengths of the X100 and GXR (A12)

  • Large sensors: APS-C 23.6x15.8mm vs APS-C 23.6x15.7mm
arrow Compare the Fujifilm FinePix X100 vs the Ricoh GXR (A12)

Canon PowerShot G1X

Canon PowerShot G1X
2 years newer
$799 - $800

Significant advantages of the G1X (vs the GXR (A12))

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 24fps vs 720p @ 24fps
  • Image stabilization: Lens vs None
  • Has a flip-out screen

Significant disadvantages of the G1X (vs the GXR (A12))

  • Significantly smaller sensor: Four thirds 18.7x14.0mm vs APS-C 23.6x15.7mm
  • Much shorter max exposures: 60 seconds vs 180 seconds

common strengths of the G1X and GXR (A12)

  • High resolution screens: 920k dots vs 920k dots
  • Larger than average screens: 3.0" vs 3.0"
  • 24p support
arrow Compare the Canon PowerShot G1X vs the Ricoh GXR (A12)

Leica X1

Leica X1
similar age
$2,242

Significant advantages of the X1 (vs the GXR (A12))

  • Much smaller: Compact 124x60x32 mm vs Standard size 114x70x77 mm
  • Much thinner: 1.3" vs 3"
  • Much lighter: 306 g vs 453 g

Significant disadvantages of the X1 (vs the GXR (A12))

  • Much lower resolution screen: 230k dots vs 920k dots
  • Significantly smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.0"
  • Much shorter max exposures: 30 seconds vs 180 seconds

common strengths of the X1 and GXR (A12)

  • Large sensors: APS-C 23.6x15.8mm vs APS-C 23.6x15.7mm
arrow Compare the Leica X1 vs the Ricoh GXR (A12)

Sigma DP2s

Sigma DP2s
3 months newer
$799

Significant advantages of the DP2s (vs the GXR (A12))

  • Much smaller: Mid size 113x60x56 mm vs Standard size 114x70x77 mm
  • Much thinner: 2.2" vs 3"
  • Much lighter: 280 g vs 453 g

Significant disadvantages of the DP2s (vs the GXR (A12))

  • Much smaller screen: 2.5" vs 3.0"
  • Much lower resolution screen: 230k dots vs 920k dots
  • No 24p support

common strengths of the DP2s and GXR (A12)

  • None found
arrow Compare the Sigma DP2s vs the Ricoh GXR (A12)

Sigma DP2

Sigma DP2
1 year older
$916 - $1,061

Significant advantages of the DP2 (vs the GXR (A12))

  • Much smaller: Mid size 113x60x56 mm vs Standard size 114x70x77 mm
  • Much thinner: 2.2" vs 3"
  • Much lighter: 280 g vs 453 g

Significant disadvantages of the DP2 (vs the GXR (A12))

  • Much smaller screen: 2.5" vs 3.0"
  • Much lower resolution screen: 230k dots vs 920k dots
  • No 24p support

common strengths of the DP2 and GXR (A12)

  • None found
arrow Compare the Sigma DP2 vs the Ricoh GXR (A12)

Sigma DP1x

Sigma DP1x
3 months newer
$790

Significant advantages of the DP1x (vs the GXR (A12))

  • Much smaller: Mid size 113x60x50 mm vs Standard size 114x70x77 mm
  • Much thinner: 2" vs 3"
  • Much lighter: 250 g vs 453 g

Significant disadvantages of the DP1x (vs the GXR (A12))

  • Much smaller screen: 2.5" vs 3.0"
  • Much lower resolution screen: 230k dots vs 920k dots
  • Significantly smaller sensor: Four thirds 20.7x13.8mm vs APS-C 23.6x15.7mm

common strengths of the DP1x and GXR (A12)

  • None found
arrow Compare the Sigma DP1x vs the Ricoh GXR (A12)

compared toMirrorless interchangeable-lens competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Ricoh GXR (A12) compared to mirrorless interchangeable-lens competitors include: it has a slightly larger screen (3.0" vs 2.5"), records movies in 24p, has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs CCD), much longer exposures (180 seconds vs 30 seconds) and has a built-in flash.

However, on average it records lower quality movies (720p @ 24fps vs 1080p @ 24fps), doesn't have a viewfinder (none vs digital), takes significantly lower resolution photos (10.4 MP vs 18.1 MP), significantly lower maximum light sensitivity (3,200 ISO vs 16,000 ISO) and doesn't have a touch screen.

Sony NEX-7

Sony NEX-7
1 year newer
$1,200 (body only)
$1,350 - $1,499 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the NEX-7 (vs the GXR (A12))

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 60fps vs 720p @ 24fps
  • Much higher true resolution: 24 MP vs 10.4 MP
  • Has a viewfinder: Digital vs None

Significant disadvantages of the NEX-7 (vs the GXR (A12))

  • Much shorter max exposures: 30 seconds vs 180 seconds

common strengths of the NEX-7 and GXR (A12)

  • High resolution screens: 921k dots vs 920k dots
  • Both support 24p, which is uncommon in cameras similar to these
  • Large sensors: APS-C 23.5x15.6mm vs APS-C 23.6x15.7mm
arrow Compare the Sony NEX-7 vs the Ricoh GXR (A12)

Sony NEX-5N

Sony NEX-5N
1 year newer
$598 - $600 (body only)
$698 - $700 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the NEX-5N (vs the GXR (A12))

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 60fps vs 720p @ 24fps
  • Better maximum light sensitivity: 25,600 ISO vs 3,200 ISO
  • Has interchangeable lenses

Significant disadvantages of the NEX-5N (vs the GXR (A12))

  • Much shorter max exposures: 30 seconds vs 180 seconds
  • No built-in flash

common strengths of the NEX-5N and GXR (A12)

  • High resolution screens: 920k dots vs 920k dots
  • Both support 24p, which is uncommon in cameras similar to these
arrow Compare the Sony NEX-5N vs the Ricoh GXR (A12)

Fujifilm X-Pro1

Fujifilm X-Pro1
2 years newer
$1,991 - $2,298 (body only)

Significant advantages of the X-Pro1 (vs the GXR (A12))

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 24fps vs 720p @ 24fps
  • Has a viewfinder: Tunnel vs None
  • Has interchangeable lenses

Significant disadvantages of the X-Pro1 (vs the GXR (A12))

  • Much shorter max exposures: 30 seconds vs 180 seconds
  • No built-in flash

common strengths of the X-Pro1 and GXR (A12)

  • High resolution screens: 1,230k dots vs 920k dots
  • Both support 24p, which is uncommon in cameras similar to these
  • Large sensors: APS-C 23.6x15.6mm vs APS-C 23.6x15.7mm
arrow Compare the Fujifilm X-Pro1 vs the Ricoh GXR (A12)

Olympus OM-D E-M5

Olympus OM-D E-M5
2 years newer
$1,000 - $1,299 (body only)
$1,100 14-42mm lens

Significant advantages of the E-M5 (vs the GXR (A12))

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 60fps vs 720p @ 24fps
  • Better maximum light sensitivity: 25,600 ISO vs 3,200 ISO
  • Has a viewfinder: Digital vs None

Significant disadvantages of the E-M5 (vs the GXR (A12))

  • No 24p support
  • Lower resolution screen: 610k dots vs 920k dots
  • Smaller sensor: Four thirds 17.3x13.0mm vs APS-C 23.6x15.7mm

common strengths of the E-M5 and GXR (A12)

  • Long exposures: 60 seconds vs 180 seconds
arrow Compare the Olympus OM-D E-M5 vs the Ricoh GXR (A12)

Sony Alpha NEX-5

Sony Alpha NEX-5
6 months newer
$569 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the NEX-5 (vs the GXR (A12))

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 24fps
  • Has interchangeable lenses
  • Has a flip-out screen

Significant disadvantages of the NEX-5 (vs the GXR (A12))

  • No 24p support
  • Much shorter max exposures: 30 seconds vs 180 seconds
  • No built-in flash

common strengths of the NEX-5 and GXR (A12)

  • High resolution screens: 920k dots vs 920k dots
arrow Compare the Sony Alpha NEX-5 vs the Ricoh GXR (A12)

Leica M9

Leica M9
similar age
$6,900 (body only)

Significant advantages of the M9 (vs the GXR (A12))

  • Has a viewfinder: Rangefinder vs None
  • Much larger sensor: Full frame 36.0x24.0mm vs APS-C 23.6x15.7mm
  • Much higher true resolution: 18.1 MP vs 10.4 MP

Significant disadvantages of the M9 (vs the GXR (A12))

  • Much smaller screen: 2.5" vs 3.0"
  • Much lower resolution screen: 230k dots vs 920k dots
  • Does not take movies: None vs 720p @ 24fps

common strengths of the M9 and GXR (A12)

  • Large sensors: Full frame 36.0x24.0mm vs APS-C 23.6x15.7mm
arrow Compare the Leica M9 vs the Ricoh GXR (A12)

compared toPro digicam competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Ricoh GXR (A12) compared to pro digicam competitors include: it has a much larger sensor (APS-C 23.6x15.7mm vs 1/1.7" 7.6x5.7mm), has a slightly larger screen (3.0" vs 2.8"), has a slightly higher resolution screen (920k dots vs 461k dots), records movies in 24p and has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs CCD).

However, on average it is slightly larger (standard size 114x70x77 mm vs compact 109x59x33 mm), doesn't have image stabilization (none vs sensor shift), takes slightly lower resolution photos (10.4 MP vs 12 MP), doesn't have a screen which flips out and lacks a built in HDR feature.

Ricoh GR Digital IV

Ricoh GR Digital IV
1 year newer
$665 - $803

Significant advantages of the IV (vs the GXR (A12))

  • Image stabilization: Sensor shift vs None
  • Significantly smaller: Compact 109x59x33 mm vs Standard size 114x70x77 mm
  • Higher resolution screen: 1,230k dots vs 920k dots

Significant disadvantages of the IV (vs the GXR (A12))

  • Much smaller sensor: 1/1.8" 7.5x5.5mm vs APS-C 23.6x15.7mm
  • No 24p support
  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS

common strengths of the IV and GXR (A12)

  • Supports RAW
  • High resolution screens: 1,230k dots vs 920k dots
  • Support external flash
arrow Compare the GR Digital IV vs the GXR (A12)

Canon Powershot S100

Canon Powershot S100
1 year newer
$370 - $430

Significant advantages of the S100 (vs the GXR (A12))

  • Image stabilization: Lens vs None
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 24fps vs 720p @ 24fps
  • Much higher true resolution: 12 MP vs 10.4 MP

Significant disadvantages of the S100 (vs the GXR (A12))

  • Much smaller sensor: 1/1.8" 7.5x5.5mm vs APS-C 23.6x15.7mm
  • Significantly lower resolution screen: 461k dots vs 920k dots
  • Much shorter max exposures: 15 seconds vs 180 seconds

common strengths of the S100 and GXR (A12)

  • Supports RAW
  • Both support 24p, which is uncommon in cameras similar to these
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
arrow Compare the Canon Powershot S100 vs the Ricoh GXR (A12)

Canon PowerShot G12

Canon PowerShot G12
10 months newer
$370 - $496

Significant advantages of the G12 (vs the GXR (A12))

  • Image stabilization: Lens vs None
  • Has a flip-out screen
  • Has in-camera HDR

Significant disadvantages of the G12 (vs the GXR (A12))

  • Much smaller sensor: 1/1.7" 7.6x5.7mm vs APS-C 23.6x15.7mm
  • Significantly lower resolution screen: 461k dots vs 920k dots
  • Smaller screen: 2.8" vs 3.0"

common strengths of the G12 and GXR (A12)

  • Supports RAW
  • Both support 24p, which is uncommon in cameras similar to these
  • Support external flash
arrow Compare the Canon PowerShot G12 vs the Ricoh GXR (A12)

Fujifilm Finepix X10

Fujifilm Finepix X10
1 year newer
$599

Significant advantages of the X10 (vs the GXR (A12))

  • Image stabilization: Lens vs None
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 24fps
  • Much higher true resolution: 12 MP vs 10.4 MP

Significant disadvantages of the X10 (vs the GXR (A12))

  • Much smaller sensor: 1/1.7" 8.8x6.6mm vs APS-C 23.6x15.7mm
  • No 24p support
  • Significantly lower resolution screen: 460k dots vs 920k dots

common strengths of the X10 and GXR (A12)

  • Very large sensors: 1/1.7" 8.8x6.6mm vs APS-C 23.6x15.7mm
  • Supports RAW
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
arrow Compare the Fujifilm Finepix X10 vs the Ricoh GXR (A12)

Ricoh GR Digital III

Ricoh GR Digital III
3 months older
$719

Significant advantages of the GR Digital III (vs the GXR (A12))

  • Significantly smaller: Compact 109x59x26 mm vs Standard size 114x70x77 mm
  • Much thinner: 1" vs 3"
  • Significantly lighter: 208 g vs 453 g

Significant disadvantages of the GR Digital III (vs the GXR (A12))

  • Much smaller sensor: 1/1.7" 7.6x5.7mm vs APS-C 23.6x15.7mm
  • No 24p support
  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS

common strengths of the GR Digital III and GXR (A12)

  • Supports RAW
  • High resolution screens: 920k dots vs 920k dots
  • Support external flash
arrow Compare the GR Digital III vs the GXR (A12)

Ricoh Caplio GX200

Ricoh Caplio GX200
1 year older
$742

Significant advantages of the GX200 (vs the GXR (A12))

  • Image stabilization: Sensor shift vs None
  • Much higher true resolution: 12 MP vs 10.4 MP
  • Significantly smaller: Compact 112x58x25 mm vs Standard size 114x70x77 mm

Significant disadvantages of the GX200 (vs the GXR (A12))

  • Much smaller sensor: 1/1.7" 7.6x5.7mm vs APS-C 23.6x15.7mm
  • No 24p support
  • Significantly lower resolution screen: 460k dots vs 920k dots

common strengths of the GX200 and GXR (A12)

  • Supports RAW
  • Support external flash
  • Very long exposure times: 180 seconds vs 180 seconds
arrow Compare the Caplio GX200 vs the GXR (A12)

compared toEntry-level DSLR competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Ricoh GXR (A12) compared to entry-level DSLR competitors include: it records movies in 24p, is much smaller (standard size 114x70x77 mm vs professional size 132x105x77 mm), is much lighter (453 g vs 740 g) and much longer exposures (180 seconds vs 30 seconds).

However, on average it records lower quality movies (720p @ 24fps vs 1080p @ 30fps), doesn't have image stabilization (none vs sensor shift), takes significantly lower resolution photos (10.4 MP vs 16.1 MP), slightly lower maximum light sensitivity (3,200 ISO vs 12,800 ISO) and doesn't have a screen which flips out.

Pentax K-5

Pentax K-5
10 months newer
$1,129 (body only)
$1,283 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the K-5 (vs the GXR (A12))

  • Has a viewfinder: Pentaprism vs None
  • Faster autofocus: Phase detection vs Contrast detection
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 25fps vs 720p @ 24fps

Significant disadvantages of the K-5 (vs the GXR (A12))

  • Much shorter max exposures: 30 seconds vs 180 seconds
  • No 24p support
  • Much larger: Prosumer size 130x96x72 mm vs Standard size 114x70x77 mm

common strengths of the K-5 and GXR (A12)

  • High resolution screens: 920k dots vs 920k dots
  • Large sensors: APS-C 23.6x15.7mm vs APS-C 23.6x15.7mm
  • Fairly small: Prosumer size 130x96x72 mm vs Standard size 114x70x77 mm
arrow Compare the Pentax K-5 vs the Ricoh GXR (A12)

Nikon D5100

Nikon D5100
1 year newer
$500 - $597 (body only)
$600 - $697 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the D5100 (vs the GXR (A12))

  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None
  • Faster autofocus: Phase detection vs Contrast detection
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 24fps

Significant disadvantages of the D5100 (vs the GXR (A12))

  • Much shorter max exposures: 30 seconds vs 180 seconds
  • Much larger: Prosumer size 127x96x78 mm vs Standard size 114x70x77 mm

common strengths of the D5100 and GXR (A12)

  • High resolution screens: 920k dots vs 920k dots
  • 24p support
arrow Compare the Nikon D5100 vs the Ricoh GXR (A12)

Nikon D7000

Nikon D7000
10 months newer
$1,000 - $1,197 (body only)
$1,100 55-200mm lens

Significant advantages of the D7000 (vs the GXR (A12))

  • Has a viewfinder: Pentaprism vs None
  • Faster autofocus: Phase detection vs Contrast detection
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 24fps vs 720p @ 24fps

Significant disadvantages of the D7000 (vs the GXR (A12))

  • Much shorter max exposures: 30 seconds vs 180 seconds
  • Much larger: Professional size 132x105x77 mm vs Standard size 114x70x77 mm
  • Much heavier: 780 g vs 453 g

common strengths of the D7000 and GXR (A12)

  • High resolution screens: 920k dots vs 920k dots
  • 24p support
arrow Compare the Nikon D7000 vs the Ricoh GXR (A12)

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Ricoh GXR (A12) compared to compact competitors include: it has a much higher resolution screen (920k dots vs 230k dots), takes slightly higher resolution photos (10.4 MP vs 9.7 MP), records movies in 24p, has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs CCD) and has a much larger sensor (APS-C 23.6x15.7mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm).

However, on average it is much larger (standard size 114x70x77 mm vs super compact 93x55x19 mm), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 240 fps), doesn't have image stabilization (none vs lens), is older (november, 2009 vs february, 2011) and is thicker (3" vs 0.8").

Canon ELPH 100 HS

Canon ELPH 100 HS
1 year newer
$105 - $189

Significant advantages of the 100 HS (vs the GXR (A12))

  • Much smaller: Super compact 93x55x19 mm vs Standard size 114x70x77 mm
  • Much thinner: 0.8" vs 3"
  • Image stabilization: Lens vs None

Significant disadvantages of the 100 HS (vs the GXR (A12))

  • Much smaller sensor: 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm vs APS-C 23.6x15.7mm
  • Much lower resolution screen: 230k dots vs 920k dots
  • No RAW support

common strengths of the 100 HS and GXR (A12)

  • Both support 24p, which is uncommon in cameras similar to these
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
arrow Compare the Canon ELPH 100 HS vs the Ricoh GXR (A12)

Casio Exilim EX-G1

Casio Exilim EX-G1
similar age
$190

Significant advantages of the EX-G1 (vs the GXR (A12))

  • Much smaller: Compact 104x64x20 mm vs Standard size 114x70x77 mm
  • Much thinner: 0.8" vs 3"
  • Much lighter: 154 g vs 453 g

Significant disadvantages of the EX-G1 (vs the GXR (A12))

  • Much smaller sensor: 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm vs APS-C 23.6x15.7mm
  • Much lower resolution screen: 230k dots vs 920k dots
  • No 24p support

common strengths of the EX-G1 and GXR (A12)

  • None found
arrow Compare the Casio Exilim EX-G1 vs the Ricoh GXR (A12)