As well as being compared against other pro digicams, the Ricoh GR Digital III is also often compared to boutiques, mirrorless and travel zooms. The Ricoh GR Digital III's top rivals come from Ricoh (such as the GR Digital IV and the Caplio GX200) and Fujifilm (such as the FinePix X100 and the Finepix X10)

compared toPro digicam competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Ricoh GR Digital III compared to other pro digicam competitors include: it has a slightly higher resolution screen (920k dots vs 614k dots), is thinner (1" vs 1.7") and supports an external flash.

However, on average it has a slightly smaller sensor (1/1.7" 7.6x5.7mm vs 1/1.7" 8.3x6.2mm), records lower quality movies (480p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 24fps), has a slightly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 24 mm), doesn't have image stabilization (none vs lens) and takes significantly lower resolution photos (10 MP vs 12 MP).

Ricoh GR Digital IV

Ricoh GR Digital IV
2 years newer
$665 - $803

Significant advantages of the IV (vs the GR Digital III)

  • Image stabilization: Sensor shift vs None
  • Higher resolution screen: 1,230k dots vs 920k dots

Significant disadvantages of the IV (vs the GR Digital III)

  • None found

common strengths of the IV and GR Digital III

  • Supports RAW
  • High resolution screens: 1,230k dots vs 920k dots
  • Fairly small: Compact 109x59x33 mm vs Compact 109x59x26 mm
arrow Compare the GR Digital IV vs the GR Digital III

Canon PowerShot S95

Canon PowerShot S95
1 year newer
$364 - $389

Significant advantages of the S95 (vs the GR Digital III)

  • Image stabilization: Lens vs None
  • Supports 24p
  • Has in-camera HDR

Significant disadvantages of the S95 (vs the GR Digital III)

  • Significantly lower resolution screen: 461k dots vs 920k dots
  • Significantly worse macro capability: 5 cm vs 1 cm
  • No external flash support

common strengths of the S95 and GR Digital III

  • Supports RAW
  • Fairly small: Compact 99x58x29 mm vs Compact 109x59x26 mm
  • Light weight: 193 g vs 208 g
arrow Compare the Canon PowerShot S95 vs the Ricoh GR Digital III

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5
1 year newer
$359

Significant advantages of the DMC-LX5 (vs the GR Digital III)

  • Much larger sensor: 1/1.7" 8.3x6.2mm vs 1/1.7" 7.6x5.7mm
  • Image stabilization: Lens vs None
  • Significantly better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-LX5 (vs the GR Digital III)

  • Significantly lower resolution screen: 460k dots vs 920k dots

common strengths of the DMC-LX5 and GR Digital III

  • Supports RAW
  • Fairly small: Mid size 109x65x42 mm vs Compact 109x59x26 mm
  • Support external flash
arrow Compare the Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5 vs the Ricoh GR Digital III

Ricoh Caplio GX200

Ricoh Caplio GX200
1 year older
$742

Significant advantages of the GX200 (vs the GR Digital III)

  • Significantly better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm
  • Much higher true resolution: 12 MP vs 10 MP
  • Image stabilization: Sensor shift vs None

Significant disadvantages of the GX200 (vs the GR Digital III)

  • Significantly narrower aperture: f/2.5 vs f/1.9
  • Significantly lower resolution screen: 460k dots vs 920k dots
  • Significantly smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.0"

common strengths of the GX200 and GR Digital III

  • Supports RAW
  • Fairly small: Compact 112x58x25 mm vs Compact 109x59x26 mm
  • Thin: 1" vs 1"
arrow Compare the Caplio GX200 vs the GR Digital III

Olympus XZ-1

Olympus XZ-1
1 year newer
$499 - $500

Significant advantages of the XZ-1 (vs the GR Digital III)

  • Much larger sensor: 1/1.7" 8.3x6.2mm vs 1/1.7" 7.6x5.7mm
  • Has an OLED screen: OLED vs LCD
  • Image stabilization: Sensor shift vs None

Significant disadvantages of the XZ-1 (vs the GR Digital III)

  • Lower resolution screen: 614k dots vs 920k dots

common strengths of the XZ-1 and GR Digital III

  • Supports RAW
  • Fairly small: Mid size 110x64x42 mm vs Compact 109x59x26 mm
  • Support external flash
arrow Compare the Olympus XZ-1 vs the Ricoh GR Digital III

Fujifilm Finepix X10

Fujifilm Finepix X10
2 years newer
$599

Significant advantages of the X10 (vs the GR Digital III)

  • Much larger sensor: 1/1.7" 8.8x6.6mm vs 1/1.7" 7.6x5.7mm
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 480p @ 30fps
  • Image stabilization: Lens vs None

Significant disadvantages of the X10 (vs the GR Digital III)

  • Significantly lower resolution screen: 460k dots vs 920k dots
  • Smaller screen: 2.8" vs 3.0"
  • Larger: Standard size 117x70x57 mm vs Compact 109x59x26 mm

common strengths of the X10 and GR Digital III

  • Supports RAW
  • Support external flash
arrow Compare the Fujifilm Finepix X10 vs the Ricoh GR Digital III

compared toBoutique competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Ricoh GR Digital III compared to boutique competitors include: it has a significantly wider aperture (f/1.9 vs f/2.8), has a slightly wider wide angle lens (28 mm vs 35 mm), has a significantly larger screen (3.0" vs 2.5"), has a significantly higher resolution screen (920k dots vs 230k dots) and is significantly smaller (compact 109x59x26 mm vs mid size 113x60x50 mm).

However, on average it has a much smaller sensor (1/1.7" 7.6x5.7mm vs APS-C 23.6x15.8mm), lacks boost light sensitivity (none vs 12,800 ISO), has a CCD-family sensor (CCD vs CMOS), has a slower max shutter speed (1/2000 of a second vs 1/4000 of a second) and significantly shorter exposures (1 seconds vs 30 seconds).

Fujifilm FinePix X100

Fujifilm FinePix X100
1 year newer
$1,199

Significant advantages of the X100 (vs the GR Digital III)

  • Much larger sensor: APS-C 23.6x15.8mm vs 1/1.7" 7.6x5.7mm
  • Has a CMOS-family sensor: CMOS vs CCD
  • Has boost ISO: 12,800 ISO vs None

Significant disadvantages of the X100 (vs the GR Digital III)

  • Much larger: Standard size 127x75x54 mm vs Compact 109x59x26 mm
  • Significantly worse wide angle: 35 mm vs 28 mm
  • Significantly lower resolution screen: 460k dots vs 920k dots

common strengths of the X100 and GR Digital III

  • Wide aperture: f/2.0 vs f/1.9
  • Good macro capabilities: 10 cm vs 1 cm
arrow Compare the Fujifilm FinePix X100 vs the Ricoh GR Digital III

Sigma DP2

Sigma DP2
10 months older
$916 - $1,061

Significant advantages of the DP2 (vs the GR Digital III)

  • Much larger sensor: Four thirds 20.7x13.8mm vs 1/1.7" 7.6x5.7mm
  • Has a CMOS-family sensor: CMOS vs CCD

Significant disadvantages of the DP2 (vs the GR Digital III)

  • Much worse wide angle: 41 mm vs 28 mm
  • Much smaller screen: 2.5" vs 3.0"
  • Much lower resolution screen: 230k dots vs 920k dots

common strengths of the DP2 and GR Digital III

  • Fairly small: Mid size 113x60x56 mm vs Compact 109x59x26 mm
  • Light weight: 280 g vs 208 g
  • Inexpensive: $916.25 vs $718.53
arrow Compare the Sigma DP2 vs the Ricoh GR Digital III

Leica X1

Leica X1
similar age
$2,242

Significant advantages of the X1 (vs the GR Digital III)

  • Much larger sensor: APS-C 23.6x15.8mm vs 1/1.7" 7.6x5.7mm
  • Has a CMOS-family sensor: CMOS vs CCD
  • Significantly longer exposures: 30 seconds vs 1 seconds

Significant disadvantages of the X1 (vs the GR Digital III)

  • Much narrower aperture: f/2.8 vs f/1.9
  • Much lower resolution screen: 230k dots vs 920k dots
  • Much worse macro capability: 30 cm vs 1 cm

common strengths of the X1 and GR Digital III

  • Very small: Compact 124x60x32 mm vs Compact 109x59x26 mm
  • Very thin: 1.3" vs 1"
  • Light weight: 306 g vs 208 g
arrow Compare the Leica X1 vs the Ricoh GR Digital III

Sigma DP1x

Sigma DP1x
6 months newer
$790

Significant advantages of the DP1x (vs the GR Digital III)

  • Much larger sensor: Four thirds 20.7x13.8mm vs 1/1.7" 7.6x5.7mm
  • Has a CMOS-family sensor: CMOS vs CCD
  • Significantly faster max shutter speed: 1/4000 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

Significant disadvantages of the DP1x (vs the GR Digital III)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.5" vs 3.0"
  • Much lower resolution screen: 230k dots vs 920k dots
  • Significantly larger: Mid size 113x60x50 mm vs Compact 109x59x26 mm

common strengths of the DP1x and GR Digital III

  • Fairly small: Mid size 113x60x50 mm vs Compact 109x59x26 mm
  • Thin: 2" vs 1"
  • Very light: 250 g vs 208 g
arrow Compare the Sigma DP1x vs the Ricoh GR Digital III

Sigma DP1

Sigma DP1
2 years older
$708

Significant advantages of the DP1 (vs the GR Digital III)

  • Much larger sensor: Four thirds 20.7x13.8mm vs 1/1.7" 7.6x5.7mm
  • Has a CMOS-family sensor: CMOS vs CCD
  • Significantly faster max shutter speed: 1/4000 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

Significant disadvantages of the DP1 (vs the GR Digital III)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.5" vs 3.0"
  • Much lower resolution screen: 230k dots vs 920k dots
  • Lower true resolution: 4.6 MP vs 10 MP

common strengths of the DP1 and GR Digital III

  • Very small: Compact 109x60x31 mm vs Compact 109x59x26 mm
  • Very thin: 1.2" vs 1"
  • Light weight: 270 g vs 208 g
arrow Compare the Sigma DP1 vs the Ricoh GR Digital III

compared toMirrorless interchangeable-lens competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Ricoh GR Digital III compared to mirrorless interchangeable-lens competitors include: it has a slightly larger screen (3.0" vs 2.5"), has a significantly higher resolution screen (920k dots vs 460k dots), is significantly smaller (compact 109x59x26 mm vs mid size 113x76x43 mm), is thinner (1" vs 1.7") and is significantly lighter (208 g vs 453 g).

However, on average it records lower quality movies (480p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps), doesn't have a viewfinder (none vs digital), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 1,200 fps), slightly lower maximum light sensitivity (1,600 ISO vs 6,400 ISO) and doesn't have a touch screen.

Pentax Q

Pentax Q
1 year newer
$704 (body only)
$463 5mm lens

Significant advantages of the Q (vs the GR Digital III)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 480p @ 30fps
  • Image stabilization: Sensor shift vs None
  • Has interchangeable lenses

Significant disadvantages of the Q (vs the GR Digital III)

  • Much lower resolution screen: 360k dots vs 920k dots

common strengths of the Q and GR Digital III

  • Fairly small: Compact 98x57x31 mm vs Compact 109x59x26 mm
  • Thin: 1.2" vs 1"
  • Light weight: 200 g vs 208 g
arrow Compare the Pentax Q vs the Ricoh GR Digital III

Ricoh GXR (A12)

Placeholder
3 months newer

Significant advantages of the GXR (A12) (vs the GR Digital III)

  • Higher resolution movies: 720p @ 24fps vs 480p @ 30fps
  • Has interchangeable lenses
  • Supports 24p

Significant disadvantages of the GXR (A12) (vs the GR Digital III)

  • Much larger: Standard size 114x70x77 mm vs Compact 109x59x26 mm
  • Much thicker: 3" vs 1"
  • Much heavier: 453 g vs 208 g

common strengths of the GXR (A12) and GR Digital III

  • High resolution screens: 920k dots vs 920k dots
  • Each has a built-in flash
arrow Compare the GXR (A12) vs the GR Digital III

Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX1

Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX1
2 years newer
$643 - $1,125 (body only)
$739 - $964 14-42mm lens

Significant advantages of the DMC-GX1 (vs the GR Digital III)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 60fps vs 480p @ 30fps
  • Has interchangeable lenses
  • Has a touch screen

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-GX1 (vs the GR Digital III)

  • Significantly lower resolution screen: 460k dots vs 920k dots
  • Significantly thicker: 1.5" vs 1"

common strengths of the DMC-GX1 and GR Digital III

  • Each has a built-in flash
arrow Compare the Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX1 vs the Ricoh GR Digital III

Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF3

Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF3
1 year newer
$469 (body only)

Significant advantages of the DMC-GF3 (vs the GR Digital III)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 480p @ 30fps
  • Has interchangeable lenses
  • Has a touch screen

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-GF3 (vs the GR Digital III)

  • Significantly lower resolution screen: 460k dots vs 920k dots
  • No external flash support

common strengths of the DMC-GF3 and GR Digital III

  • Fairly small: Compact 107x67x32 mm vs Compact 109x59x26 mm
  • Thin: 1.3" vs 1"
  • Light weight: 264 g vs 208 g
arrow Compare the Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF3 vs the Ricoh GR Digital III

Nikon 1 V1

Nikon 1 V1
2 years newer
$797 - $947 10-30mm lens

Significant advantages of the V1 (vs the GR Digital III)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 480p @ 30fps
  • Records high-speed movies: 1,200 fps vs None
  • Faster autofocus: Phase detection vs Contrast detection

Significant disadvantages of the V1 (vs the GR Digital III)

  • Significantly larger: Mid size 113x76x43 mm vs Compact 109x59x26 mm
  • Significantly thicker: 1.7" vs 1"
  • No built-in flash

common strengths of the V1 and GR Digital III

  • High resolution screens: 921k dots vs 920k dots
arrow Compare the Nikon 1 V1 vs the Ricoh GR Digital III

Leica M8

Leica M8
2 years older

Significant advantages of the M8 (vs the GR Digital III)

  • Has a viewfinder: Rangefinder vs None
  • Much larger sensor: APS-H 27.0x18.0mm vs 1/1.7" 7.6x5.7mm
  • Has interchangeable lenses

Significant disadvantages of the M8 (vs the GR Digital III)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.5" vs 3.0"
  • Much lower resolution screen: 230k dots vs 920k dots
  • Significantly larger: Mid size 139x80x37 mm vs Compact 109x59x26 mm

common strengths of the M8 and GR Digital III

  • None found
arrow Compare the Leica M8 vs the Ricoh GR Digital III

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Ricoh GR Digital III compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has a much wider aperture (f/1.9 vs f/3.3), has a slightly higher resolution screen (920k dots vs 460k dots), is slightly smaller (compact 109x59x26 mm vs compact 103x60x33 mm), has a much larger sensor (1/1.7" 7.6x5.7mm vs 1/2.3" 6.1x4.6mm) and is thinner (1" vs 1.3").

However, on average it has much less zoom (1x vs 16x), has a slightly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 25 mm), doesn't have a built-in GPS, records lower quality movies (480p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps) and doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 1,000 fps).

Ricoh CX6

Ricoh CX6
2 years newer
$481

Significant advantages of the CX6 (vs the GR Digital III)

  • More zoom: 10.7x vs 1x
  • Image stabilization: Sensor shift vs None
  • Higher resolution screen: 1,230k dots vs 920k dots

Significant disadvantages of the CX6 (vs the GR Digital III)

  • Much narrower aperture: f/3.5 vs f/1.9
  • Much smaller sensor: 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm vs 1/1.7" 7.6x5.7mm
  • No RAW support

common strengths of the CX6 and GR Digital III

  • Very high resolution screens: 1,230k dots vs 920k dots
  • Good macro capabilities: 1 cm vs 1 cm
arrow Compare the CX6 vs the GR Digital III

Sony Cybershot DSC-HX9v

Sony Cybershot DSC-HX9v
1 year newer
$319 - $330

Significant advantages of the DSC-HX9v (vs the GR Digital III)

  • Much more zoom: 16x vs 1x
  • Has a GPS
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 60fps vs 480p @ 30fps

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-HX9v (vs the GR Digital III)

  • Much narrower aperture: f/3.3 vs f/1.9
  • Much smaller sensor: 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm vs 1/1.7" 7.6x5.7mm
  • No RAW support

common strengths of the DSC-HX9v and GR Digital III

  • Very high resolution screens: 921k dots vs 920k dots
arrow Compare the Sony Cybershot DSC-HX9v vs the Ricoh GR Digital III

Casio Exilim ZR100

Casio Exilim EX-ZR100
1 year newer
$302 - $411

Significant advantages of the ZR100 (vs the GR Digital III)

  • Records high-speed movies: 1,000 fps vs None
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 480p @ 30fps
  • Significantly better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm

Significant disadvantages of the ZR100 (vs the GR Digital III)

  • Much smaller sensor: 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm vs 1/1.7" 7.6x5.7mm
  • Much narrower aperture: f/3.0 vs f/1.9
  • Significantly lower resolution screen: 460k dots vs 920k dots

common strengths of the ZR100 and GR Digital III

  • Wide aperture: f/3.0 vs f/1.9
  • Good macro capabilities: 1 cm vs 1 cm
arrow Compare the Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 vs the Ricoh GR Digital III

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS7

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS7
6 months newer
$361

Significant advantages of the DMC-ZS7 (vs the GR Digital III)

  • Has a GPS
  • Significantly more zoom: 12x vs 1x
  • Significantly better wide angle: 25 mm vs 28 mm

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-ZS7 (vs the GR Digital III)

  • Much narrower aperture: f/3.3 vs f/1.9
  • Much smaller sensor: 1/2.3" 6.1x4.6mm vs 1/1.7" 7.6x5.7mm
  • Significantly lower resolution screen: 460k dots vs 920k dots

common strengths of the DMC-ZS7 and GR Digital III

  • None found
arrow Compare the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS7 vs the Ricoh GR Digital III