Generally, some of the advantages of the Ricoh GR Digital III compared to mirrorless interchangeable-lens competitors include: it has a slightly larger screen (3.0" vs 2.5"), has a significantly higher resolution screen (920k dots vs 460k dots), is significantly smaller (compact 109x59x26 mm vs mid size 113x76x43 mm), is thinner (1" vs 1.7") and is significantly lighter (208 g vs 453 g).
However, on average it records lower quality movies (480p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps), doesn't have a viewfinder (none vs digital), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 1,200 fps), slightly lower maximum light sensitivity (1,600 ISO vs 6,400 ISO) and doesn't have a touch screen.
Pentax Q
1 year newer
$704 (body only)
$463 5mm lens
|
Significant advantages of the Q (vs the GR Digital III)
- Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 480p @ 30fps
- Image stabilization: Sensor shift vs None
- Has interchangeable lenses
Significant disadvantages of the Q (vs the GR Digital III)
- Much lower resolution screen: 360k dots vs 920k dots
common strengths of the Q and GR Digital III
- Fairly small: Compact 98x57x31 mm vs Compact 109x59x26 mm
- Thin: 1.2" vs 1"
- Light weight: 200 g vs 208 g
|
|
|
|
Ricoh GXR (A12)
3 months newer
|
Significant advantages of the GXR (A12) (vs the GR Digital III)
- Higher resolution movies: 720p @ 24fps vs 480p @ 30fps
- Has interchangeable lenses
- Supports 24p
Significant disadvantages of the GXR (A12) (vs the GR Digital III)
- Much larger: Standard size 114x70x77 mm vs Compact 109x59x26 mm
- Much thicker: 3" vs 1"
- Much heavier: 453 g vs 208 g
common strengths of the GXR (A12) and GR Digital III
- High resolution screens: 920k dots vs 920k dots
- Each has a built-in flash
|
|
|
|
Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX1
2 years newer
$643 - $1,125 (body only)
$739 - $964 14-42mm lens
|
Significant advantages of the DMC-GX1 (vs the GR Digital III)
- Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 60fps vs 480p @ 30fps
- Has interchangeable lenses
- Has a touch screen
Significant disadvantages of the DMC-GX1 (vs the GR Digital III)
- Significantly lower resolution screen: 460k dots vs 920k dots
- Significantly thicker: 1.5" vs 1"
common strengths of the DMC-GX1 and GR Digital III
- Each has a built-in flash
|
|
|
|
Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF3
1 year newer
$469 (body only)
|
Significant advantages of the DMC-GF3 (vs the GR Digital III)
- Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 480p @ 30fps
- Has interchangeable lenses
- Has a touch screen
Significant disadvantages of the DMC-GF3 (vs the GR Digital III)
- Significantly lower resolution screen: 460k dots vs 920k dots
- No external flash support
common strengths of the DMC-GF3 and GR Digital III
- Fairly small: Compact 107x67x32 mm vs Compact 109x59x26 mm
- Thin: 1.3" vs 1"
- Light weight: 264 g vs 208 g
|
|
|
|
Nikon 1 V1
2 years newer
$797 - $947 10-30mm lens
|
Significant advantages of the V1 (vs the GR Digital III)
- Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 480p @ 30fps
- Records high-speed movies: 1,200 fps vs None
- Faster autofocus: Phase detection vs Contrast detection
Significant disadvantages of the V1 (vs the GR Digital III)
- Significantly larger: Mid size 113x76x43 mm vs Compact 109x59x26 mm
- Significantly thicker: 1.7" vs 1"
- No built-in flash
common strengths of the V1 and GR Digital III
- High resolution screens: 921k dots vs 920k dots
|
|
|
|
Leica M8
2 years older
|
Significant advantages of the M8 (vs the GR Digital III)
- Has a viewfinder: Rangefinder vs None
- Much larger sensor: APS-H 27.0x18.0mm vs 1/1.7" 7.6x5.7mm
- Has interchangeable lenses
Significant disadvantages of the M8 (vs the GR Digital III)
- Much smaller screen: 2.5" vs 3.0"
- Much lower resolution screen: 230k dots vs 920k dots
- Significantly larger: Mid size 139x80x37 mm vs Compact 109x59x26 mm
common strengths of the M8 and GR Digital III
|
|
|
|