Summary Ricoh GX200

Prices Price
Camera kit
$340
Score Snapsort rank
Within its price range
#n/a of 6
Among similar cameras
#n/a of 12
Specifications Key specs
Zoom
Help 3x
Screen size
Help 2.7"
Aperture
Help f/2.5
Screen resolution
Help 460k dots
Wide angle
Help 24 mm
Movie format
Help 480p @ 30fps
see all specifications
Ricoh Caplio GX200Ricoh Caplio GX200

gallery

Explore our gallery of 21 sample photos taken by the Ricoh Caplio GX200.

Pros

Report a correction

The Ricoh GX200 vs other recent pro digicams

Built-in flash Built-in flash Help
Usually standard
Thickness Thin Help
1"
External flash External flash Help
Better lighting
Viewfinder Doesn't use battery, see more detail Help
Digital
Size Really small Help
Compact (112×58×25 mm)
Weight Light Help
260 g
Lowest price Inexpensive Help
$340.00
Longest exposure Very long exposures Help
180 seconds

Cons

Report a correction

The Ricoh GX200 vs other recent pro digicams

Aperture Slightly narrow aperture Help
f/2.5
Movie format Low resolution movies Help
480p @ 30fps
Screen size Very small screen Help
2.7"
Light sensitivity Very poor maximum light sensitivity Help
1,600 ISO
Touch screen No touch screen Help
More buttons
Screen flips out Fixed screen Help
Less flexible
External mic jack Lacks an external mic jack Help
Limited to the in-camera mic
Sensor type Sensor type Help
CCD
Fastest shutter speed Slow shutter speed Help
1/2000 of a second
Sensor size Small sensor Help
1/1.7" 7.6x5.7mm
Screen resolution Very low resolution screen Help
460k dots
Image stabilization Image stabilization Help
  1. Sensor shift
Supports 24p No 24p movies Help
Missing that film look
True resolution Lower true resolution Help
12 MP
Autofocus contrast detection autofocus Help
slower focusing
Screen type Screen type Help
LCD
Announced Old Help
June 2008
Popularity Not so popular Help
Among snapsort users

Appearance

front photo of the Ricoh Caplio GX200back photo of the Ricoh Caplio GX200angle photo of the Ricoh Caplio GX200

Discussion

Ricoh Caplio GX200
Caplio GX200
Ricoh

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments