Summary Ricoh GX200

Prices Price
Camera only $736
all GX200 prices
Score Snapsort rank
Within its price range #n/a of 29 Among similar cameras #n/a of 33
details details
Specifications Key specs
Zoom Help 3x Screen size Help 2.7"
Aperture Help f/2.5 Screen resolution Help 460k dots
Wide angle Help 24 mm Movie format Help 480p @ 30fps
see all specifications
Ricoh Caplio GX200Ricoh Caplio GX200

Pros

Report a correction

The Ricoh GX200 vs other recent pro digicams

Thickness Thin Help
1"
Weight Light Help
260 g
Viewfinder Doesn't use battery, see more detail Help
Digital
Longest exposure Very long exposures Help
180 seconds
Supports RAW Shoots RAW Help
Better editing
Wide angle Great wide angle lens Help
24 mm
Size Really small Help
Compact 112x58x25 mm
External flash External flash Help
Better lighting

Cons

Report a correction

The Ricoh GX200 vs other recent pro digicams

Sensor size Slightly smaller than average sensor Help
1/1.7" 7.6x5.7mm
Aperture Narrow aperture Help
f/2.5
Movie format Low resolution movies Help
480p @ 30fps
Screen size Small screen Help
2.7"
Screen resolution Low resolution screen Help
460k dots
Screen flips out Fixed screen Help
Less flexible
Sensor type Sensor type Help
CCD
Panorama Lacks in-camera panoramas Help
You could stitch photos in post
Light sensitivity (boost) Lacks boost light sensitivity Help
None
Lowest price Very expensive Help
$735.58
High-speed framerate High speed movies Help
Not supported
Light sensitivity Very poor maximum light sensitivity Help
1,600 ISO
Touch screen No touch screen Help
More buttons
External mic jack Lacks an external mic jack Help
Limited to the in-camera mic
HDR Lacks in-camera HDR Help
You could do HDR manually
Announced Old Help
June, 2008
GPS No GPS Help
Missing geo-tagging
Waterproof Not waterproof Help
Stay on land
Popularity Not so popular Help
Among snapsort users

Appearance

front photo of the Ricoh Caplio GX200back photo of the Ricoh Caplio GX200angle photo of the Ricoh Caplio GX200

Discussion

Ricoh Caplio GX200
Caplio GX200
Ricoh

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments