Generally, some of the advantages of the Pentax WS80 compared to entry-level DSLR competitors include: it records lower quality movies (720p @ 30fps vs none), slightly higher maximum light sensitivity (6,400 ISO vs 1,600 ISO), is newer (august, 2009 vs january, 2008), is much smaller (super compact 92x60x22 mm vs prosumer size 134x95x74 mm) and is thinner (0.9" vs 2.9").
However, on average it doesn't have image stabilization (none vs sensor shift), doesn't shoot as fast continuously (1.1 fps vs 2.8 fps), has a much smaller sensor (1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm vs APS-C 23.5x15.7mm), doesn't have a viewfinder (none vs pentamirror) and doesn't shoot RAW.
Pentax K200D
1 year older
$1,104 18-200mm lens
|
Significant advantages of the K200D (vs the WS80)
- Much larger sensor: APS-C 23.5x15.7mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm
- Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None
- Image stabilization: Sensor shift vs None
Significant disadvantages of the K200D (vs the WS80)
- Much larger: Prosumer size 134x95x74 mm vs Super compact 92x60x22 mm
- Much thicker: 2.9" vs 0.9"
- Worse maximum light sensitivity: 1,600 ISO vs 6,400 ISO
common strengths of the K200D and WS80
|
|
|
|