Summary Pentax XG-1

Prices Price
Camera only
$228
Score Snapsort rank
Within its price range
#n/a of 6
Among similar cameras
#n/a of 21
Specifications Key specs
Zoom
Help 52x
Screen size
Help 3"
Aperture
Help f/2.8
Screen resolution
Help 460k dots
Wide angle
Help 24 mm
Movie format
Help 1080p @ 30fps
see all specifications
Pentax XG-1Pentax XG-1

Pros

Report a correction

The Pentax XG-1 vs other recent digicams

Zoom Huge zoom Help
52x
HDR In-camera HDR Help
Combines multiple exposures
Viewfinder Doesn't use battery, see more detail Help
Digital
Screen flips out Flip-out screen Help
Great for movies
Panorama In-camera panoramas Help
Stitches together multiple photos into a panorama
Report a correction

The Pentax XG-1 vs other recent super zooms

Lowest price Inexpensive Help
$228.00

Cons

Report a correction

The Pentax XG-1 vs other recent digicams

Size Slightly large Help
Professional size (119×89×98 mm)
True resolution Lower true resolution Help
9.7 MP
Announced Old Help
July 2014
Weight Heavy Help
567 g
Touch screen No touch screen Help
More buttons
Sensor size Small sensor Help
1/2.3" 6.17x4.55mm
Thickness Thick Help
3.9"
Longest exposure Short exposures Help
4 seconds
Report a correction

The Pentax XG-1 vs other recent super zooms

Movie format Full HD Help
1080p @ 30fps
High-speed framerate High speed movies Help
Not supported
Light sensitivity Poor maximum light sensitivity Help
3,200 ISO
Battery life Shorter battery life Help
240 shots
External flash No external flash Help
Less expandable
Popularity Not so popular Help
Among snapsort users
Screen resolution Low resolution screen Help
460k dots
Image stabilization Image stabilization Help
  1. Sensor shift
Supports 24p No 24p movies Help
Missing that film look
External mic jack Lacks an external mic jack Help
Limited to the in-camera mic
Fastest shutter speed Slow shutter speed Help
1/2000 of a second

Appearance

front photo of the Pentax XG-1back photo of the Pentax XG-1angle photo of the Pentax XG-1

Discussion

Pentax XG-1
XG-1
Pentax

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments