As well as being compared against other travel zooms, the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS1 is also often compared to mirrorless, super zooms, pro digicams and compacts. The Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS1's top rivals come from Panasonic (such as the Lumix DMC-ZS3 and the Lumix ZS20) and Canon (such as the PowerShot SX260 HS and the Powershot SX40)

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Panasonic DMC-ZS1 compared to other travel zoom competitors include: it significantly longer exposures (60 seconds vs 30 seconds).

However, on average it has significantly less zoom (12x vs 20x), doesn't have a built-in GPS, records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 24fps), has a slightly smaller screen (2.7" vs 3.0") and has a slightly lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 921k dots).

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS3

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS3
similar age

Significant advantages of the DMC-ZS3 (vs the DMC-ZS1)

  • Significantly larger screen: 3.0" vs 2.7"
  • Much higher true resolution: 9.8 MP vs 8.6 MP
  • Significantly larger sensor: 1/2.3" 6.1x4.6mm vs 1/2.5" 5.8x4.3mm

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-ZS3 (vs the DMC-ZS1)

  • None found

common strengths of the DMC-ZS3 and DMC-ZS1

  • Very long exposure times: 60 seconds vs 60 seconds
arrow Compare the DMC-ZS3 vs the DMC-ZS1

Panasonic Lumix ZS20

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS20
3 years newer
$291 - $350

Significant advantages of the ZS20 (vs the DMC-ZS1)

  • Much more zoom: 20x vs 12x
  • Has a GPS
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 60fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps

Significant disadvantages of the ZS20 (vs the DMC-ZS1)

  • Much shorter max exposures: 15 seconds vs 60 seconds

common strengths of the ZS20 and DMC-ZS1

  • None found
arrow Compare the Lumix ZS20 vs the Lumix DMC-ZS1

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS5

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS5
1 year newer
$298

Significant advantages of the DMC-ZS5 (vs the DMC-ZS1)

  • Much higher true resolution: 9.8 MP vs 8.6 MP
  • Significantly larger sensor: 1/2.3" 6.1x4.6mm vs 1/2.5" 5.8x4.3mm

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-ZS5 (vs the DMC-ZS1)

  • Much slower max shutter speed: 1/1300 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

common strengths of the DMC-ZS5 and DMC-ZS1

  • Very long exposure times: 60 seconds vs 60 seconds
arrow Compare the DMC-ZS5 vs the DMC-ZS1

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10
2 years newer
$328

Significant advantages of the DMC-ZS10 (vs the DMC-ZS1)

  • Has a GPS
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps
  • More zoom: 16x vs 12x

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-ZS10 (vs the DMC-ZS1)

  • None found

common strengths of the DMC-ZS10 and DMC-ZS1

  • Very long exposure times: 60 seconds vs 60 seconds
arrow Compare the DMC-ZS10 vs the DMC-ZS1

Sony Cybershot DSC-HX9v

Sony Cybershot DSC-HX9v
1 year newer
$319 - $330

Significant advantages of the DSC-HX9v (vs the DMC-ZS1)

  • Has a GPS
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 60fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps
  • Much higher resolution screen: 921k dots vs 230k dots

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-HX9v (vs the DMC-ZS1)

  • No boost ISO: None vs 6,400 ISO
  • Significantly shorter max exposures: 30 seconds vs 60 seconds

common strengths of the DSC-HX9v and DMC-ZS1

  • Long exposures: 30 seconds vs 60 seconds
arrow Compare the Sony Cybershot DSC-HX9v vs the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS1

Canon PowerShot SX260 HS

Canon PowerShot SX260 HS
3 years newer
$299

Significant advantages of the SX260 HS (vs the DMC-ZS1)

  • Much more zoom: 20x vs 12x
  • Has a GPS
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 24fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps

Significant disadvantages of the SX260 HS (vs the DMC-ZS1)

  • Much shorter max exposures: 15 seconds vs 60 seconds

common strengths of the SX260 HS and DMC-ZS1

  • None found
arrow Compare the Canon PowerShot SX260 HS vs the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS1

compared toMirrorless interchangeable-lens competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Panasonic DMC-ZS1 compared to mirrorless interchangeable-lens competitors include: it has image stabilization (lens vs none), has boost light sensitivity (6,400 ISO vs none), is slightly lighter (229 g vs 310 g) and slightly longer exposures (60 seconds vs 30 seconds).

However, on average it records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps), has a much smaller screen (2.7" vs 3.0"), has a slightly lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 460k dots), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 1,200 fps) and takes slightly lower resolution photos (8.6 MP vs 12 MP).

Nikon 1 J1

Nikon 1 J1
2 years newer
$547 10-30mm lens

Significant advantages of the J1 (vs the DMC-ZS1)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps
  • Records high-speed movies: 1,200 fps vs None
  • Much larger screen: 3.0" vs 2.7"

Significant disadvantages of the J1 (vs the DMC-ZS1)

  • No image stabilization: None vs Lens
  • Significantly shorter max exposures: 30 seconds vs 60 seconds

common strengths of the J1 and DMC-ZS1

  • Fairly small: Compact 106x61x29 mm vs Compact 103x60x33 mm
  • Thin: 1.2" vs 1.3"
  • Light weight: 277 g vs 229 g
arrow Compare the Nikon 1 J1 vs the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS1

Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF2

Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF2
1 year newer
$376 14-42mm lens

Significant advantages of the DMC-GF2 (vs the DMC-ZS1)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps
  • Much larger screen: 3.0" vs 2.7"
  • Shoots RAW

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-GF2 (vs the DMC-ZS1)

  • No image stabilization: None vs Lens

common strengths of the DMC-GF2 and DMC-ZS1

  • Fairly small: Mid size 113x68x33 mm vs Compact 103x60x33 mm
  • Thin: 1.3" vs 1.3"
  • Long exposures: 60 seconds vs 60 seconds
arrow Compare the DMC-GF2 vs the DMC-ZS1

compared toSuper zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Panasonic DMC-ZS1 compared to super zoom competitors include: it has a slightly wider wide angle lens (25 mm vs 36 mm), is much smaller (compact 103x60x33 mm vs professional size 87x128x106 mm), is thinner (1.3" vs 4.2"), is significantly lighter (229 g vs 498 g) and much longer exposures (60 seconds vs 15 seconds).

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.3 vs f/2.8), has significantly less zoom (12x vs 24x), records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 24fps), has a slightly lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 460k dots) and doesn't record movies in 24p.

Canon Powershot SX40

Canon Powershot SX40
2 years newer
$340 - $380

Significant advantages of the SX40 (vs the DMC-ZS1)

  • Much more zoom: 35x vs 12x
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 24fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps
  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.7 vs f/3.3

Significant disadvantages of the SX40 (vs the DMC-ZS1)

  • Much larger: Professional size 123x92x108 mm vs Compact 103x60x33 mm
  • Much thicker: 4.3" vs 1.3"
  • Much heavier: 600 g vs 229 g

common strengths of the SX40 and DMC-ZS1

  • None found
arrow Compare the Canon Powershot SX40 vs the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS1

Nikon Coolpix L120

Nikon Coolpix L120
2 years newer
$180 - $220

Significant advantages of the L120 (vs the DMC-ZS1)

  • Much higher resolution screen: 920k dots vs 230k dots
  • More zoom: 21x vs 12x
  • Significantly larger screen: 3.0" vs 2.7"

Significant disadvantages of the L120 (vs the DMC-ZS1)

  • Significantly larger: Prosumer size 110x77x78 mm vs Compact 103x60x33 mm
  • Significantly thicker: 3.1" vs 1.3"
  • Significantly heavier: 406 g vs 229 g

common strengths of the L120 and DMC-ZS1

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size 110x77x78 mm vs Compact 103x60x33 mm
  • Thin: 3.1" vs 1.3"
  • Light weight: 406 g vs 229 g
arrow Compare the Nikon Coolpix L120 vs the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS1

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ48

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ48
2 years newer
$384 - $426

Significant advantages of the DMC-FZ48 (vs the DMC-ZS1)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps
  • Significantly more zoom: 24x vs 12x
  • Wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.3

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-FZ48 (vs the DMC-ZS1)

  • Much larger: Prosumer size 120x79x91 mm vs Compact 103x60x33 mm
  • Much thicker: 3.6" vs 1.3"
  • Much heavier: 498 g vs 229 g

common strengths of the DMC-FZ48 and DMC-ZS1

  • Very long exposure times: 60 seconds vs 60 seconds
arrow Compare the DMC-FZ48 vs the DMC-ZS1

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ20

Placeholder
4 years older

Significant advantages of the DMC-FZ20 (vs the DMC-ZS1)

  • Wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.3
  • Supports an external flash
  • Has a viewfinder: Digital vs None

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-FZ20 (vs the DMC-ZS1)

  • Much worse wide angle: 36 mm vs 25 mm
  • Much lower true resolution: 4.9 MP vs 8.6 MP
  • Much smaller screen: 2.0" vs 2.7"

common strengths of the DMC-FZ20 and DMC-ZS1

  • None found
arrow Compare the DMC-FZ20 vs the DMC-ZS1

Nikon Coolpix P80

Nikon Coolpix P80
9 months older

Significant advantages of the P80 (vs the DMC-ZS1)

  • Wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.3
  • Much higher true resolution: 9.8 MP vs 8.6 MP
  • Has a viewfinder: Digital vs None

Significant disadvantages of the P80 (vs the DMC-ZS1)

  • Significantly larger: Prosumer size 110x79x78 mm vs Compact 103x60x33 mm
  • Significantly thicker: 3.1" vs 1.3"
  • Significantly heavier: 405 g vs 229 g

common strengths of the P80 and DMC-ZS1

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size 110x79x78 mm vs Compact 103x60x33 mm
  • Thin: 3.1" vs 1.3"
  • Light weight: 405 g vs 229 g
arrow Compare the Nikon Coolpix P80 vs the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS1

compared toPro digicam competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Panasonic DMC-ZS1 compared to pro digicam competitors include: it significantly longer exposures (60 seconds vs 15 seconds).

However, on average it has a much smaller sensor (1/2.5" 5.8x4.3mm vs 1/1.7" 8.3x6.2mm), doesn't shoot RAW, has a much narrower aperture (f/3.3 vs f/2.0), records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 24fps) and has a significantly smaller screen (2.7" vs 3.0").

Canon Powershot S100

Canon Powershot S100
2 years newer
$370 - $430

Significant advantages of the S100 (vs the DMC-ZS1)

  • Much larger sensor: 1/1.8" 7.5x5.5mm vs 1/2.5" 5.8x4.3mm
  • Shoots RAW
  • Much wider aperture: f/2.0 vs f/3.3

Significant disadvantages of the S100 (vs the DMC-ZS1)

  • Much shorter max exposures: 15 seconds vs 60 seconds

common strengths of the S100 and DMC-ZS1

  • Fairly small: Compact 99x60x28 mm vs Compact 103x60x33 mm
  • Light weight: 198 g vs 229 g
  • Thin: 1.1" vs 1.3"
arrow Compare the Canon Powershot S100 vs the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS1

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5
1 year newer
$359

Significant advantages of the DMC-LX5 (vs the DMC-ZS1)

  • Much larger sensor: 1/1.7" 8.3x6.2mm vs 1/2.5" 5.8x4.3mm
  • Shoots RAW
  • Much wider aperture: f/2.0 vs f/3.3

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-LX5 (vs the DMC-ZS1)

  • None found

common strengths of the DMC-LX5 and DMC-ZS1

  • Fairly small: Mid size 109x65x42 mm vs Compact 103x60x33 mm
  • Very long exposure times: 60 seconds vs 60 seconds
arrow Compare the DMC-LX5 vs the DMC-ZS1

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Panasonic DMC-ZS1 compared to compact competitors include: it has significantly more zoom (12x vs 4x), has a slightly wider wide angle lens (25 mm vs 28 mm), slightly higher boost light sensitivity (6,400 ISO vs none), has a faster max shutter speed (1/2000 of a second vs 1/1300 of a second) and much longer exposures (60 seconds vs 8 seconds).

However, on average it records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps), has a slightly smaller screen (2.7" vs 3.0"), is significantly larger (compact 103x60x33 mm vs super compact 97x61x20 mm), takes much lower resolution photos (8.6 MP vs 9.8 MP) and slightly lower maximum light sensitivity (1,600 ISO vs 3,200 ISO).

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH8

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH8
2 years newer
$149

Significant advantages of the DMC-FH8 (vs the DMC-ZS1)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.5 vs f/3.3
  • Much smaller: Super compact 96x57x19 mm vs Compact 103x60x33 mm
  • Significantly larger screen: 3.0" vs 2.7"

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-FH8 (vs the DMC-ZS1)

  • Less zoom: 5x vs 12x
  • Much shorter max exposures: 8 seconds vs 60 seconds

common strengths of the DMC-FH8 and DMC-ZS1

  • Good wide angle: 24 mm vs 25 mm
  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
arrow Compare the DMC-FH8 vs the DMC-ZS1

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W670

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W670
3 years newer
$227 - $254

Significant advantages of the DSC-W670 (vs the DMC-ZS1)

  • Much smaller: Super compact 97x58x20 mm vs Compact 103x60x33 mm
  • Much higher true resolution: 9.8 MP vs 8.6 MP
  • Much larger sensor: 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm vs 1/2.5" 5.8x4.3mm

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-W670 (vs the DMC-ZS1)

  • Less zoom: 6x vs 12x
  • Much slower max shutter speed: 1/1000 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

common strengths of the DSC-W670 and DMC-ZS1

  • None found
arrow Compare the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W670 vs the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS1

Nikon Coolpix S70

Nikon Coolpix S70
6 months newer

Significant advantages of the S70 (vs the DMC-ZS1)

  • Much larger screen: 3.5" vs 2.7"
  • Has an OLED screen: OLED vs LCD
  • Much smaller: Super compact 97x61x20 mm vs Compact 103x60x33 mm

Significant disadvantages of the S70 (vs the DMC-ZS1)

  • Significantly narrower aperture: f/3.9 vs f/3.3
  • Less zoom: 5x vs 12x
  • Significantly worse wide angle: 28 mm vs 25 mm

common strengths of the S70 and DMC-ZS1

  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
  • Good macro capabilities: 3 cm vs 3 cm
arrow Compare the Nikon Coolpix S70 vs the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS1

Panasonic Lumix TS20

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS20
3 years newer
$169

Significant advantages of the TS20 (vs the DMC-ZS1)

  • Much smaller: Super compact 101x58x19 mm vs Compact 103x60x33 mm
  • Takes 3D photos
  • Much higher true resolution: 9.6 MP vs 8.6 MP

Significant disadvantages of the TS20 (vs the DMC-ZS1)

  • Significantly narrower aperture: f/3.9 vs f/3.3
  • Significantly less zoom: 4x vs 12x
  • Much shorter max exposures: 8 seconds vs 60 seconds

common strengths of the TS20 and DMC-ZS1

  • Good wide angle: 25 mm vs 25 mm
  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
arrow Compare the Lumix TS20 vs the Lumix DMC-ZS1

Canon PowerShot A3000 IS

Canon PowerShot A3000 IS
1 year newer
$149

Significant advantages of the A3000 IS (vs the DMC-ZS1)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.7 vs f/3.3
  • Much higher true resolution: 9.8 MP vs 8.6 MP
  • Smaller: Compact 97x58x28 mm vs Compact 103x60x33 mm

Significant disadvantages of the A3000 IS (vs the DMC-ZS1)

  • Much worse wide angle: 35 mm vs 25 mm
  • Significantly less zoom: 4x vs 12x
  • No boost ISO: None vs 6,400 ISO

common strengths of the A3000 IS and DMC-ZS1

  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
  • Good macro capabilities: 3 cm vs 3 cm
arrow Compare the Canon PowerShot A3000 IS vs the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS1