overview

As well as being compared against other travel zooms, the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR1 is also often compared to ultra compacts and compacts. The Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR1's top rivals come from Panasonic (such as the Lumix DMC-ZR3 and the Lumix DMC-ZS3) and Sony (such as the Cyber-shot DSC-WX1 and the Cyber-shot DSC-H55)

Competitor classes

compared toRecent travel zooms

Generally, some of the advantages of the Panasonic DMC-ZR1 compared to other competitive travel zooms include: it is significantly smaller (compact 98x55x26 mm vs compact 103x60x32 mm), is thinner (1" vs 1.3"), is significantly lighter (158 g vs 214 g) and has a faster max shutter speed (1/2000 of a second vs 1/1600 of a second).

However, on average it has significantly less zoom (8x vs 12x), doesn't have a built-in GPS and is less popular.

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR3

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR3
6 months newer
$209 - $300

Significant advantages of the DMC-ZR3 (vs the DMC-ZR1)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-ZR3 (vs the DMC-ZR1)

  • Significantly slower max shutter speed: 1/1300 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

common strengths of the DMC-ZR3 and DMC-ZR1

  • Very small: Compact 98x55x26 mm vs Compact 98x55x26 mm
  • Very good boost ISO: 6,400 ISO vs 6,400 ISO
  • Very light: 159 g vs 158 g
arrow Compare the DMC-ZR3 vs the DMC-ZR1

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS3

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS3
6 months older
$287 - $300

Significant advantages of the DMC-ZS3 (vs the DMC-ZR1)

  • Significantly more zoom: 12x vs 8x
  • Significantly larger screen: 3.0" vs 2.7"
  • Higher resolution screen: 460k dots vs 230k dots

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-ZS3 (vs the DMC-ZR1)

  • Significantly larger: Compact 103x60x33 mm vs Compact 98x55x26 mm
  • Much heavier: 229 g vs 158 g
  • Significantly thicker: 1.3" vs 1"

common strengths of the DMC-ZS3 and DMC-ZR1

  • Very good boost ISO: 6,400 ISO vs 6,400 ISO
  • Very long exposure times: 60 seconds vs 60 seconds
arrow Compare the DMC-ZS3 vs the DMC-ZR1

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH20

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH20
5 months newer
$145 - $200

Significant advantages of the DMC-FH20 (vs the DMC-ZR1)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-FH20 (vs the DMC-ZR1)

  • None found

common strengths of the DMC-FH20 and DMC-ZR1

  • Fairly small: Compact 100x56x28 mm vs Compact 98x55x26 mm
  • Very good boost ISO: 6,400 ISO vs 6,400 ISO
  • Light weight: 178 g vs 158 g
arrow Compare the DMC-FH20 vs the DMC-ZR1

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS7

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS7
6 months newer
$275 - $400

Significant advantages of the DMC-ZS7 (vs the DMC-ZR1)

  • Has a GPS
  • Significantly more zoom: 12x vs 8x
  • Significantly larger screen: 3.0" vs 2.7"

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-ZS7 (vs the DMC-ZR1)

  • Significantly larger: Compact 103x60x33 mm vs Compact 98x55x26 mm
  • Much heavier: 218 g vs 158 g
  • Significantly thicker: 1.3" vs 1"

common strengths of the DMC-ZS7 and DMC-ZR1

  • Very good boost ISO: 6,400 ISO vs 6,400 ISO
  • Very long exposure times: 60 seconds vs 60 seconds
arrow Compare the DMC-ZS7 vs the DMC-ZR1

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS1

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS1
6 months older
$218 - $253

Significant advantages of the DMC-ZS1 (vs the DMC-ZR1)

  • Significantly more zoom: 12x vs 8x

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-ZS1 (vs the DMC-ZR1)

  • Significantly larger: Compact 103x60x33 mm vs Compact 98x55x26 mm
  • Lower resolution movies: 848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps
  • Significantly smaller sensor: 1/2.5" 5x4mm vs 1/2.5" 6x4mm

common strengths of the DMC-ZS1 and DMC-ZR1

  • Very good boost ISO: 6,400 ISO vs 6,400 ISO
  • Very long exposure times: 60 seconds vs 60 seconds
arrow Compare the DMC-ZS1 vs the DMC-ZR1

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS5

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS5
6 months newer
$222 - $300

Significant advantages of the DMC-ZS5 (vs the DMC-ZR1)

  • Significantly more zoom: 12x vs 8x

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-ZS5 (vs the DMC-ZR1)

  • Significantly larger: Compact 103x60x32 mm vs Compact 98x55x26 mm
  • Significantly heavier: 214 g vs 158 g
  • Significantly thicker: 1.3" vs 1"

common strengths of the DMC-ZS5 and DMC-ZR1

  • Very good boost ISO: 6,400 ISO vs 6,400 ISO
  • Very long exposure times: 60 seconds vs 60 seconds
arrow Compare the DMC-ZS5 vs the DMC-ZR1

compared toRecent ultra compacts

Generally, some of the advantages of the Panasonic DMC-ZR1 compared to competitive ultra compacts include: it has significantly more zoom (8x vs 3x), significantly higher boost light sensitivity (6,400 ISO vs none), takes slightly higher resolution photos (9.8 MP vs 8.1 MP), significantly longer exposures (60 seconds vs 15 seconds) and has a faster max shutter speed (1/2000 of a second vs 1/1600 of a second).

However, on average it has a significantly narrower aperture (f/3.3 vs f/2.4), is significantly larger (compact 98x55x26 mm vs ultra compact 87x56x18 mm), has a CCD-family sensor (CCD vs CMOS), is thicker (1" vs 0.7") and slightly lower maximum light sensitivity (1,600 ISO vs 3,200 ISO).

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX1

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX1
similar age
$200 - $374

Significant advantages of the DSC-WX1 (vs the DMC-ZR1)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.4 vs f/3.3
  • Has a CMOS-family sensor: CMOS vs CCD
  • Significantly smaller: Ultra compact 91x52x20 mm vs Compact 98x55x26 mm

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-WX1 (vs the DMC-ZR1)

  • Significantly smaller sensor: 1/3.6" 5x4mm vs 1/2.5" 6x4mm
  • Much lower resolution: 8.1 MP vs 9.8 MP
  • No boost ISO: None vs 6,400 ISO

common strengths of the DSC-WX1 and DMC-ZR1

  • Good wide-angle: 24 mm vs 25 mm
  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
arrow Compare the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX1 vs the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR1

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W380

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W380
5 months newer
$231 - $303

Significant advantages of the DSC-W380 (vs the DMC-ZR1)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.4 vs f/3.3
  • Significantly smaller: Ultra compact 91x52x20 mm vs Compact 98x55x26 mm
  • Has more storage slots: 2 vs 1

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-W380 (vs the DMC-ZR1)

  • No boost ISO: None vs 6,400 ISO
  • Much shorter max exposures: 2 seconds vs 60 seconds

common strengths of the DSC-W380 and DMC-ZR1

  • Good wide-angle: 24 mm vs 25 mm
  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
arrow Compare the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W380 vs the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR1

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX65

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX65
similar age

Significant advantages of the DMC-FX65 (vs the DMC-ZR1)

  • Wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.3
  • Significantly smaller: Ultra compact 97x54x19 mm vs Compact 98x55x26 mm
  • Significantly thinner: 0.7" vs 1"

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-FX65 (vs the DMC-ZR1)

  • None found

common strengths of the DMC-FX65 and DMC-ZR1

  • Good wide-angle: 25 mm vs 25 mm
  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
  • Extremely good boost ISO: 6,400 ISO vs 6,400 ISO
arrow Compare the DMC-FX65 vs the DMC-ZR1

Canon PowerShot SD780 IS

Canon PowerShot SD780 IS
5 months older
$149 - $265

Significant advantages of the SD780 IS (vs the DMC-ZR1)

  • Significantly smaller: Ultra compact 87x56x18 mm vs Compact 98x55x26 mm
  • Has a viewfinder: Tunnel vs None
  • Significantly thinner: 0.7" vs 1"

Significant disadvantages of the SD780 IS (vs the DMC-ZR1)

  • Significantly worse wide-angle: 33 mm vs 25 mm
  • Significantly less zoom: 3x vs 8x
  • No boost ISO: None vs 6,400 ISO

common strengths of the SD780 IS and DMC-ZR1

  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
  • Good macro capabilities: 3 cm vs 3 cm
arrow Compare the Canon PowerShot SD780 IS vs the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR1

compared toRecent compacts

Generally, some of the advantages of the Panasonic DMC-ZR1 compared to competitive compacts include: it has significantly more zoom (8x vs 3.8x), records lower quality movies (720p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps), has a slightly wider wide-angle lens (25 mm vs 38 mm), slightly closer macro focusing (3 cm vs 10 cm) and has better image stabilization (lens vs none).

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.3 vs f/2.8), has a slightly smaller screen (2.7" vs 3.0"), has a significantly smaller sensor (1/2.5" 6x4mm vs 1/1.7" 7x5mm), doesn't have a touchscreen and doesn't shoot RAW.

Canon PowerShot S90

Canon PowerShot S90
similar age
$340 - $391

Significant advantages of the S90 (vs the DMC-ZR1)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.0 vs f/3.3
  • Much larger sensor: 1/1.7" 7x5mm vs 1/2.5" 6x4mm
  • Shoots RAW

Significant disadvantages of the S90 (vs the DMC-ZR1)

  • Lower resolution movies: 480p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps
  • Less zoom: 3.8x vs 8x
  • Significantly larger: Compact 100x58x31 mm vs Compact 98x55x26 mm

common strengths of the S90 and DMC-ZR1

  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
  • Extremely good boost ISO: 12,800 ISO vs 6,400 ISO
  • Popularity: 3,624,922 vs 616,232
arrow Compare the Canon PowerShot S90 vs the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR1

Casio Exilim EX-G1

Casio Exilim EX-G1
3 months newer
$185 - $230

Significant advantages of the EX-G1 (vs the DMC-ZR1)

  • Significantly larger screen: 3.0" vs 2.7"
  • Waterproof
  • Significantly thinner: 0.8" vs 1"

Significant disadvantages of the EX-G1 (vs the DMC-ZR1)

  • Much worse wide-angle: 38 mm vs 25 mm
  • Significantly less zoom: 3x vs 8x
  • Significantly narrower aperture: f/3.9 vs f/3.3

common strengths of the EX-G1 and DMC-ZR1

  • None found
arrow Compare the Casio Exilim EX-G1 vs the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR1

Canon PowerShot SD980 IS

Canon PowerShot SD980 IS
similar age
$206 - $264

Significant advantages of the SD980 IS (vs the DMC-ZR1)

  • Has a touchscreen
  • Wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.3
  • Significantly larger screen: 3.0" vs 2.7"

Significant disadvantages of the SD980 IS (vs the DMC-ZR1)

  • No boost ISO: None vs 6,400 ISO
  • Much shorter max exposures: 15 seconds vs 60 seconds

common strengths of the SD980 IS and DMC-ZR1

  • Good wide-angle: 24 mm vs 25 mm
  • Good macro capabilities: 3 cm vs 3 cm
  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
arrow Compare the Canon PowerShot SD980 IS vs the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR1