As well as being compared against other travel zooms, the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR1 is also often compared to pro digicams, mirrorless, waterproofs, super zooms and compacts. The Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR1's top rivals come from Panasonic (such as the Lumix DMC-ZR3 and the Lumix DMC-LX5) and Canon (such as the Powershot S100 and the PowerShot SX230 HS)

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Panasonic DMC-ZR1 compared to other travel zoom competitors include: it is slightly smaller (compact 98x55x26 mm vs compact 104x59x33 mm), is thinner (1" vs 1.3"), is slightly lighter (158 g vs 194 g) and significantly longer exposures (60 seconds vs 15 seconds).

However, on average it has slightly less zoom (8x vs 14x), doesn't have a built-in GPS, records lower quality movies (720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 24fps), has a slightly smaller screen (2.7" vs 3.0") and doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 240 fps).

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR3

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR3
6 months newer
$185 - $298

Significant advantages of the DMC-ZR3 (vs the DMC-ZR1)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-ZR3 (vs the DMC-ZR1)

  • Much slower max shutter speed: 1/1300 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

common strengths of the DMC-ZR3 and DMC-ZR1

  • Fairly small: Compact 98x55x26 mm vs Compact 98x55x26 mm
  • Light weight: 159 g vs 158 g
  • Thin: 1" vs 1"
arrow Compare the DMC-ZR3 vs the DMC-ZR1

Canon PowerShot SX230 HS

Canon PowerShot SX230 HS
1 year newer
$219 - $304

Significant advantages of the SX230 HS (vs the DMC-ZR1)

  • Has a GPS
  • Significantly more zoom: 14x vs 8x
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 24fps vs 720p @ 30fps

Significant disadvantages of the SX230 HS (vs the DMC-ZR1)

  • Worse wide angle: 28 mm vs 25 mm
  • Significantly larger: Compact 106x59x33 mm vs Compact 98x55x26 mm
  • No boost ISO: None vs 6,400 ISO

common strengths of the SX230 HS and DMC-ZR1

  • None found
arrow Compare the Canon PowerShot SX230 HS vs the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR1

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH25

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH25
1 year newer
$125 - $150

Significant advantages of the DMC-FH25 (vs the DMC-ZR1)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-FH25 (vs the DMC-ZR1)

  • Worse wide angle: 28 mm vs 25 mm

common strengths of the DMC-FH25 and DMC-ZR1

  • Fairly small: Compact 99x56x27 mm vs Compact 98x55x26 mm
  • Light weight: 135 g vs 158 g
  • Very long exposure times: 60 seconds vs 60 seconds
arrow Compare the DMC-FH25 vs the DMC-ZR1

Fujifilm Finepix F600 EXR

Fujifilm Finepix F600 EXR
2 years newer
$229 - $300

Significant advantages of the F600 EXR (vs the DMC-ZR1)

  • Has a GPS
  • Significantly more zoom: 15x vs 8x
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps

Significant disadvantages of the F600 EXR (vs the DMC-ZR1)

  • Significantly larger: Compact 104x63x33 mm vs Compact 98x55x26 mm
  • Significantly heavier: 215 g vs 158 g
  • Significantly thicker: 1.3" vs 1"

common strengths of the F600 EXR and DMC-ZR1

  • None found
arrow Compare the Fujifilm Finepix F600 EXR vs the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR1

Sony Cybershot H70

Sony Cybershot DSC-H70
1 year newer
$170 - $201

Significant advantages of the H70 (vs the DMC-ZR1)

  • Significantly larger screen: 3.0" vs 2.7"

Significant disadvantages of the H70 (vs the DMC-ZR1)

  • Heavier: 194 g vs 158 g
  • Significantly shorter max exposures: 30 seconds vs 60 seconds

common strengths of the H70 and DMC-ZR1

  • Long exposures: 30 seconds vs 60 seconds
arrow Compare the Sony Cybershot DSC-H70 vs the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR1

Nikon Coolpix S8200

Nikon Coolpix S8200
2 years newer
$219 - $250

Significant advantages of the S8200 (vs the DMC-ZR1)

  • Significantly more zoom: 14x vs 8x
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps
  • Significantly higher resolution screen: 961k dots vs 230k dots

Significant disadvantages of the S8200 (vs the DMC-ZR1)

  • Significantly larger: Compact 104x59x33 mm vs Compact 98x55x26 mm
  • Significantly heavier: 213 g vs 158 g
  • Significantly thicker: 1.3" vs 1"

common strengths of the S8200 and DMC-ZR1

  • None found
arrow Compare the Nikon Coolpix S8200 vs the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR1

compared toPro digicam competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Panasonic DMC-ZR1 compared to pro digicam competitors include: it is slightly lighter (158 g vs 277 g) and much longer exposures (60 seconds vs 16 seconds).

However, on average it has a much smaller sensor (1/2.3" 6.1x4.6mm vs 1/1.7" 8.3x6.2mm), doesn't shoot RAW, has a much narrower aperture (f/3.3 vs f/1.8), records lower quality movies (720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 24fps) and has a significantly smaller screen (2.7" vs 3.0").

Canon Powershot S100

Canon Powershot S100
2 years newer
$400 - $430

Significant advantages of the S100 (vs the DMC-ZR1)

  • Shoots RAW
  • Much larger sensor: 1/1.8" 7.5x5.5mm vs 1/2.3" 6.1x4.6mm
  • Much wider aperture: f/2.0 vs f/3.3

Significant disadvantages of the S100 (vs the DMC-ZR1)

  • Much shorter max exposures: 15 seconds vs 60 seconds

common strengths of the S100 and DMC-ZR1

  • Fairly small: Compact 99x60x28 mm vs Compact 98x55x26 mm
  • Light weight: 198 g vs 158 g
  • Thin: 1.1" vs 1"
arrow Compare the Canon Powershot S100 vs the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR1

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5
1 year newer
$320 - $468

Significant advantages of the DMC-LX5 (vs the DMC-ZR1)

  • Much larger sensor: 1/1.7" 8.3x6.2mm vs 1/2.3" 6.1x4.6mm
  • Shoots RAW
  • Much wider aperture: f/2.0 vs f/3.3

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-LX5 (vs the DMC-ZR1)

  • None found

common strengths of the DMC-LX5 and DMC-ZR1

  • Very long exposure times: 60 seconds vs 60 seconds
arrow Compare the DMC-LX5 vs the DMC-ZR1

Samsung TL500

Samsung TL500
6 months newer

Significant advantages of the TL500 (vs the DMC-ZR1)

  • Much larger sensor: 1/1.7" 7.6x5.7mm vs 1/2.3" 6.1x4.6mm
  • Much wider aperture: f/1.8 vs f/3.3
  • Shoots RAW

Significant disadvantages of the TL500 (vs the DMC-ZR1)

  • Significantly heavier: 386 g vs 158 g
  • No boost ISO: None vs 6,400 ISO
  • Much shorter max exposures: 16 seconds vs 60 seconds

common strengths of the TL500 and DMC-ZR1

  • Fairly small: Compact 114x63x29 mm vs Compact 98x55x26 mm
  • Thin: 1.1" vs 1"
arrow Compare the Samsung TL500 vs the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR1

Fujifilm Finepix X10

Fujifilm Finepix X10
2 years newer
$583 - $600

Significant advantages of the X10 (vs the DMC-ZR1)

  • Much larger sensor: 1/1.7" 8.8x6.6mm vs 1/2.3" 6.1x4.6mm
  • Shoots RAW
  • Much wider aperture: f/2.0 vs f/3.3

Significant disadvantages of the X10 (vs the DMC-ZR1)

  • Worse wide angle: 28 mm vs 25 mm
  • Larger: Standard size 117x70x57 mm vs Compact 98x55x26 mm
  • Significantly heavier: 350 g vs 158 g

common strengths of the X10 and DMC-ZR1

  • None found
arrow Compare the Fujifilm Finepix X10 vs the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR1

Nikon Coolpix P300

Nikon Coolpix P300
1 year newer
$277

Significant advantages of the P300 (vs the DMC-ZR1)

  • Much wider aperture: f/1.8 vs f/3.3
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps
  • Significantly higher resolution screen: 921k dots vs 230k dots

Significant disadvantages of the P300 (vs the DMC-ZR1)

  • No boost ISO: None vs 6,400 ISO
  • Much shorter max exposures: 8 seconds vs 60 seconds

common strengths of the P300 and DMC-ZR1

  • Fairly small: Compact 103x58x32 mm vs Compact 98x55x26 mm
  • Light weight: 189 g vs 158 g
  • Thin: 1.3" vs 1"
arrow Compare the Nikon Coolpix P300 vs the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR1

Canon PowerShot S95

Canon PowerShot S95
1 year newer
$359

Significant advantages of the S95 (vs the DMC-ZR1)

  • Much larger sensor: 1/1.7" 7.6x5.7mm vs 1/2.3" 6.1x4.6mm
  • Shoots RAW
  • Much wider aperture: f/2.0 vs f/3.3

Significant disadvantages of the S95 (vs the DMC-ZR1)

  • Worse wide angle: 28 mm vs 25 mm
  • Much shorter max exposures: 15 seconds vs 60 seconds

common strengths of the S95 and DMC-ZR1

  • Fairly small: Compact 99x58x29 mm vs Compact 98x55x26 mm
  • Light weight: 193 g vs 158 g
  • Thin: 1.2" vs 1"
arrow Compare the Canon PowerShot S95 vs the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR1

compared toMirrorless interchangeable-lens competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Panasonic DMC-ZR1 compared to mirrorless interchangeable-lens competitors include: it has better image stabilization (lens vs none), has boost light sensitivity (6,400 ISO vs none), is slightly smaller (compact 98x55x26 mm vs mid size 115x72x42 mm), is thinner (1" vs 1.7") and is significantly lighter (158 g vs 334 g).

However, on average it has a much smaller screen (2.7" vs 3.0"), has a slightly lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 921k dots), takes slightly lower resolution photos (9.8 MP vs 16 MP), slightly lower maximum light sensitivity (1,600 ISO vs 6,400 ISO) and doesn't have a screen which flips out.

Olympus PEN E-PL1

Olympus PEN E-PL1
6 months newer
$279 - $299 14-42mm lens

Significant advantages of the PEN E-PL1 (vs the DMC-ZR1)

  • Shoots RAW
  • Has interchangeable lenses
  • Much larger sensor: Four thirds 18.0x13.5mm vs 1/2.3" 6.1x4.6mm

Significant disadvantages of the PEN E-PL1 (vs the DMC-ZR1)

  • Larger: Mid size 115x72x42 mm vs Compact 98x55x26 mm
  • Significantly heavier: 334 g vs 158 g
  • Significantly thicker: 1.7" vs 1"

common strengths of the PEN E-PL1 and DMC-ZR1

  • Very good image stabilization: Sensor shift vs Lens
  • Long exposures: 60 seconds vs 60 seconds
  • Each has a built-in flash
arrow Compare the Olympus PEN E-PL1 vs the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR1

Sony NEX C3

Sony NEX C3
1 year newer
$499 - $550 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the C3 (vs the DMC-ZR1)

  • Much larger screen: 3.0" vs 2.7"
  • Much higher resolution screen: 921k dots vs 230k dots
  • Much larger sensor: APS-C 23.4x15.6mm vs 1/2.3" 6.1x4.6mm

Significant disadvantages of the C3 (vs the DMC-ZR1)

  • No image stabilization: None vs Lens
  • No built-in flash
  • Significantly shorter max exposures: 30 seconds vs 60 seconds

common strengths of the C3 and DMC-ZR1

  • Fairly small: Compact 110x60x33 mm vs Compact 98x55x26 mm
  • Light weight: 225 g vs 158 g
  • Thin: 1.3" vs 1"
arrow Compare the Sony NEX C3 vs the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR1

Olympus PEN E-PL2

Olympus PEN E-PL2
1 year newer
$449 14-42mm lens

Significant advantages of the PEN E-PL2 (vs the DMC-ZR1)

  • Much larger screen: 3.0" vs 2.7"
  • Shoots RAW
  • Has interchangeable lenses

Significant disadvantages of the PEN E-PL2 (vs the DMC-ZR1)

  • Larger: Mid size 115x72x42 mm vs Compact 98x55x26 mm
  • Much heavier: 362 g vs 158 g
  • Significantly thicker: 1.7" vs 1"

common strengths of the PEN E-PL2 and DMC-ZR1

  • Very good image stabilization: Sensor shift vs Lens
  • Long exposures: 60 seconds vs 60 seconds
  • Each has a built-in flash
arrow Compare the Olympus PEN E-PL2 vs the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR1

Olympus PEN E-P2

Olympus PEN E-P2
3 months newer
$450 17mm lens

Significant advantages of the PEN E-P2 (vs the DMC-ZR1)

  • Much larger screen: 3.0" vs 2.7"
  • Shoots RAW
  • Has interchangeable lenses

Significant disadvantages of the PEN E-P2 (vs the DMC-ZR1)

  • Much heavier: 355 g vs 158 g
  • No built-in flash

common strengths of the PEN E-P2 and DMC-ZR1

  • Very good image stabilization: Sensor shift vs Lens
  • Long exposures: 60 seconds vs 60 seconds
arrow Compare the Olympus PEN E-P2 vs the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR1

compared toWaterproof competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Panasonic DMC-ZR1 compared to waterproof competitors include: it has a slightly wider aperture (f/3.3 vs f/3.9), has slightly more zoom (8x vs 3x), records lower quality movies (720p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps), has a much wider wide angle lens (25 mm vs 38 mm) and has image stabilization (lens vs none).

However, on average it has a significantly smaller screen (2.7" vs 3.0"), slightly lower maximum light sensitivity (1,600 ISO vs 3,200 ISO), is older (july, 2009 vs november, 2009), is thicker (1" vs 0.8") and is not waterproof.

Casio Exilim EX-G1

Casio Exilim EX-G1
3 months newer
$190

Significant advantages of the EX-G1 (vs the DMC-ZR1)

  • Significantly larger screen: 3.0" vs 2.7"
  • Waterproof
  • Thinner: 0.8" vs 1"

Significant disadvantages of the EX-G1 (vs the DMC-ZR1)

  • Much worse wide angle: 38 mm vs 25 mm
  • Significantly narrower aperture: f/3.9 vs f/3.3
  • No image stabilization: None vs Lens

common strengths of the EX-G1 and DMC-ZR1

  • None found
arrow Compare the Casio Exilim EX-G1 vs the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR1

compared toSuper zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Panasonic DMC-ZR1 compared to super zoom competitors include: it is significantly smaller (compact 98x55x26 mm vs prosumer size 116x84x81 mm), is thinner (1" vs 3.2"), is significantly lighter (158 g vs 413 g) and much longer exposures (60 seconds vs 1 seconds).

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.3 vs f/2.8), has significantly less zoom (8x vs 21x), has a slightly lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 920k dots), slightly worse macro focusing (3 cm vs 1 cm) and is older (july, 2009 vs february, 2011).

Nikon Coolpix L120

Nikon Coolpix L120
1 year newer
$227 - $230

Significant advantages of the L120 (vs the DMC-ZR1)

  • Significantly more zoom: 21x vs 8x
  • Significantly higher resolution screen: 920k dots vs 230k dots
  • Significantly larger screen: 3.0" vs 2.7"

Significant disadvantages of the L120 (vs the DMC-ZR1)

  • Significantly larger: Prosumer size 110x77x78 mm vs Compact 98x55x26 mm
  • Much thicker: 3.1" vs 1"
  • Significantly heavier: 406 g vs 158 g

common strengths of the L120 and DMC-ZR1

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size 110x77x78 mm vs Compact 98x55x26 mm
  • Light weight: 406 g vs 158 g
  • Thin: 3.1" vs 1"
arrow Compare the Nikon Coolpix L120 vs the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR1

Olympus SP-565UZ

Olympus SP-565UZ
1 year older

Significant advantages of the SP-565UZ (vs the DMC-ZR1)

  • Wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.3
  • More zoom: 20x vs 8x
  • Shoots RAW

Significant disadvantages of the SP-565UZ (vs the DMC-ZR1)

  • Much larger: Prosumer size 116x84x81 mm vs Compact 98x55x26 mm
  • Smaller screen: 2.5" vs 2.7"
  • Much thicker: 3.2" vs 1"

common strengths of the SP-565UZ and DMC-ZR1

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size 116x84x81 mm vs Compact 98x55x26 mm
  • Light weight: 413 g vs 158 g
  • Thin: 3.2" vs 1"
arrow Compare the Olympus SP-565UZ vs the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR1

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Panasonic DMC-ZR1 compared to compact competitors include: it records lower quality movies (720p @ 30fps vs 480p @ 30fps), has a significantly wider wide angle lens (25 mm vs 35 mm), has better image stabilization (lens vs digital), takes slightly higher resolution photos (9.8 MP vs 8 MP) and slightly closer macro focusing (3 cm vs 5 cm).

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.3 vs f/2.8), has a slightly smaller screen (2.7" vs 3.0") and is thicker (1" vs 0.8").

Canon PowerShot SD790 IS

Canon PowerShot SD790 IS
1 year older

Significant advantages of the SD790 IS (vs the DMC-ZR1)

  • Wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.3
  • Significantly larger screen: 3.0" vs 2.7"

Significant disadvantages of the SD790 IS (vs the DMC-ZR1)

  • Much worse wide angle: 35 mm vs 25 mm
  • No boost ISO: None vs 6,400 ISO
  • Heavier: 195 g vs 158 g

common strengths of the SD790 IS and DMC-ZR1

  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
  • Good macro capabilities: 3 cm vs 3 cm
arrow Compare the Canon PowerShot SD790 IS vs the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR1

Canon PowerShot SD980 IS

Canon PowerShot SD980 IS
similar age

Significant advantages of the SD980 IS (vs the DMC-ZR1)

  • Wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.3
  • Significantly larger screen: 3.0" vs 2.7"
  • Has a touch screen

Significant disadvantages of the SD980 IS (vs the DMC-ZR1)

  • No boost ISO: None vs 6,400 ISO
  • Much shorter max exposures: 15 seconds vs 60 seconds

common strengths of the SD980 IS and DMC-ZR1

  • Good wide angle: 24 mm vs 25 mm
  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
  • Good macro capabilities: 3 cm vs 3 cm
arrow Compare the Canon PowerShot SD980 IS vs the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR1

Canon PowerShot SD880 IS

Canon PowerShot SD880 IS
10 months older

Significant advantages of the SD880 IS (vs the DMC-ZR1)

  • Wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.3
  • Significantly larger screen: 3.0" vs 2.7"

Significant disadvantages of the SD880 IS (vs the DMC-ZR1)

  • Worse wide angle: 28 mm vs 25 mm
  • No boost ISO: None vs 6,400 ISO
  • Heavier: 195 g vs 158 g

common strengths of the SD880 IS and DMC-ZR1

  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
  • Good macro capabilities: 2 cm vs 3 cm
arrow Compare the Canon PowerShot SD880 IS vs the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR1

Olympus VG120

Olympus VG-120
1 year newer
$116

Significant advantages of the VG120 (vs the DMC-ZR1)

  • Wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.3
  • Significantly larger screen: 3.0" vs 2.7"
  • Significantly thinner: 0.8" vs 1"

Significant disadvantages of the VG120 (vs the DMC-ZR1)

  • Worse image stabilization: Digital vs Lens
  • Significantly worse macro capability: 7 cm vs 3 cm
  • Much shorter max exposures: 4 seconds vs 60 seconds

common strengths of the VG120 and DMC-ZR1

  • None found
arrow Compare the Olympus VG-120 vs the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR1

Olympus FE-360

Olympus FE-360
1 year older

Significant advantages of the FE-360 (vs the DMC-ZR1)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the FE-360 (vs the DMC-ZR1)

  • Much worse wide angle: 36 mm vs 25 mm
  • Much lower true resolution: 8 MP vs 9.8 MP
  • No image stabilization: None vs Lens

common strengths of the FE-360 and DMC-ZR1

  • None found
arrow Compare the Olympus FE-360 vs the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR1

Olympus Stylus 7010

Olympus Stylus 7010
similar age

Significant advantages of the 7010 (vs the DMC-ZR1)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the 7010 (vs the DMC-ZR1)

  • Worse wide angle: 28 mm vs 25 mm
  • Much worse macro capability: 10 cm vs 3 cm
  • No boost ISO: None vs 6,400 ISO

common strengths of the 7010 and DMC-ZR1

  • None found
arrow Compare the Olympus Stylus 7010 vs the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR1