Generally, some of the advantages of the Panasonic DMC-TZ10 compared to compact competitors include: it has significantly more zoom (12x vs 3.1x), has a much wider wide angle lens (25 mm vs 38 mm), has a much larger screen (3.0" vs 2.0"), has a slightly higher resolution screen (460k dots vs 86k dots) and has better image stabilization (lens vs none).
However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.3 vs f/2.7), is significantly larger (compact 103x60x33 mm vs super compact 92x55x19 mm), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 240 fps), slightly lower maximum light sensitivity (1,600 ISO vs 3,200 ISO) and doesn't record movies in 24p.
Canon IXUS 220 HS
1 year newer
$270
|
Significant advantages of the IXUS 220 HS (vs the DMC-TZ10)
- Much smaller: Super compact 92x55x19 mm vs Compact 103x60x33 mm
- Significantly wider aperture: f/2.7 vs f/3.3
- Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 24fps vs 720p @ 30fps
Significant disadvantages of the IXUS 220 HS (vs the DMC-TZ10)
- Less zoom: 5x vs 12x
- Significantly smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.0"
- No built-in GPS
common strengths of the IXUS 220 HS and DMC-TZ10
- Good wide angle: 24 mm vs 25 mm
- Good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
- Good macro capabilities: 3 cm vs 3 cm
|
|
|
|
Nikon Coolpix L3
3 years older
|
Significant advantages of the L3 (vs the DMC-TZ10)
- Significantly smaller: Compact 91x61x26 mm vs Compact 103x60x33 mm
- Significantly lighter: 170 g vs 218 g
- Significantly thinner: 1" vs 1.3"
Significant disadvantages of the L3 (vs the DMC-TZ10)
- Much worse wide angle: 38 mm vs 25 mm
- Much lower true resolution: 5 MP vs 9.8 MP
- Much smaller screen: 2.0" vs 3.0"
common strengths of the L3 and DMC-TZ10
|
|
|
|