Generally, some of the advantages of the Panasonic DMC-LX5 compared to super zoom competitors include: it has a significantly wider aperture (f/2.0 vs f/2.8), has a slightly larger screen (3.0" vs 2.7"), is much smaller (mid size 109x65x42 mm vs professional size 123x92x108 mm), has a much larger sensor (1/1.7" 8.3x6.2mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm) and significantly higher boost light sensitivity (12,800 ISO vs 6,400 ISO).
However, on average it has way more less zoom (3.8x vs 35x), records lower quality movies (720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 60fps), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 220 fps), doesn't record movies in 24p and doesn't shoot as fast continuously (6 fps vs 10.3 fps).
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ150
1 year newer
$499
|
Significant advantages of the DMC-FZ150 (vs the DMC-LX5)
- Has an external mic jack
- Much more zoom: 24x vs 3.8x
- Has a flip-out screen
Significant disadvantages of the DMC-FZ150 (vs the DMC-LX5)
- Much smaller sensor: 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm vs 1/1.7" 8.3x6.2mm
- Significantly narrower aperture: f/2.8 vs f/2.0
- Much larger: Prosumer size 124x82x92 mm vs Mid size 109x65x42 mm
common strengths of the DMC-FZ150 and DMC-LX5
- RAW support
- Support external flash
- Long exposures: 30 seconds vs 60 seconds
|
|
|
|
Canon Powershot SX40
1 year newer
$340 - $380
|
Significant advantages of the SX40 (vs the DMC-LX5)
- Much more zoom: 35x vs 3.8x
- Has a flip-out screen
- Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 24fps vs 720p @ 30fps
Significant disadvantages of the SX40 (vs the DMC-LX5)
- Much smaller sensor: 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm vs 1/1.7" 8.3x6.2mm
- Much larger: Professional size 123x92x108 mm vs Mid size 109x65x42 mm
- Significantly narrower aperture: f/2.7 vs f/2.0
common strengths of the SX40 and DMC-LX5
- Wide aperture: f/2.7 vs f/2.0
- Support external flash
- Popularity: 29,173,545 vs 8,999,415
|
|
|
|
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ48
1 year newer
$384 - $426
|
Significant advantages of the DMC-FZ48 (vs the DMC-LX5)
- Much more zoom: 24x vs 3.8x
- Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps
- Can create panoramas in-camera
Significant disadvantages of the DMC-FZ48 (vs the DMC-LX5)
- Much smaller sensor: 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm vs 1/1.7" 8.3x6.2mm
- Significantly narrower aperture: f/2.8 vs f/2.0
- Significantly larger: Prosumer size 120x79x91 mm vs Mid size 109x65x42 mm
common strengths of the DMC-FZ48 and DMC-LX5
- Very long exposure times: 60 seconds vs 60 seconds
|
|
|
|