As well as being compared against other pro digicams, the Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5 is also often compared to mirrorless, boutiques, travel zooms and super zooms. The Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5's top rivals come from Canon (such as the Powershot S100 and the PowerShot G12) and Panasonic (such as the Lumix DMC-GF3 and the Lumix ZS20)

compared toPro digicam competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Panasonic DMC-LX5 compared to other pro digicam competitors include: it has a marginally larger sensor (1/1.7" 8.3x6.2mm vs 1/1.7" 7.6x5.7mm), has a slightly wider wide angle lens (24 mm vs 28 mm), has a significantly longer battery life (400 shots vs 200 shots), slightly higher boost light sensitivity (12,800 ISO vs none) and is slightly less expensive ($358.88 vs $598.99).

However, on average it is slightly more noisy at high ISO (132 ISO vs 245 ISO), has slightly lower image quality (41.0 vs 47.0), records lower quality movies (720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 24fps), has slightly less color depth (19.6 bits vs 20.4 bits) and has slightly narrower dynamic range (10.8 EV vs 11.3 EV).

Canon Powershot S100

Canon Powershot S100
1 year newer
$370 - $430

Significant advantages of the S100 (vs the DMC-LX5)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 24fps vs 720p @ 30fps
  • Supports 24p
  • Much higher true resolution: 12 MP vs 10 MP

Significant disadvantages of the S100 (vs the DMC-LX5)

  • Much smaller sensor: 1/1.8" 7.5x5.5mm vs 1/1.7" 8.3x6.2mm
  • Much shorter battery life: 200 shots vs 400 shots
  • No external flash support

common strengths of the S100 and DMC-LX5

  • Supports RAW
  • Good wide angle: 24 mm vs 24 mm
  • Fairly small: Compact 99x60x28 mm vs Mid size 109x65x42 mm
arrow Compare the Canon Powershot S100 vs the Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5

Canon PowerShot G12

Canon PowerShot G12
similar age
$370 - $496

Significant advantages of the G12 (vs the DMC-LX5)

  • Has a flip-out screen
  • Supports 24p
  • Has in-camera HDR

Significant disadvantages of the G12 (vs the DMC-LX5)

  • Much smaller sensor: 1/1.7" 7.6x5.7mm vs 1/1.7" 8.3x6.2mm
  • Significantly narrower aperture: f/2.8 vs f/2.0
  • Significantly worse wide angle: 28 mm vs 24 mm

common strengths of the G12 and DMC-LX5

  • Supports RAW
  • Great battery life: 370 shots vs 400 shots
  • Support external flash
arrow Compare the Canon PowerShot G12 vs the Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5

Olympus XZ-1

Olympus XZ-1
5 months newer
$499 - $500

Significant advantages of the XZ-1 (vs the DMC-LX5)

  • Has an OLED screen: OLED vs LCD
  • Better maximum light sensitivity: 6,400 ISO vs 3,200 ISO

Significant disadvantages of the XZ-1 (vs the DMC-LX5)

  • Significantly worse wide angle: 28 mm vs 24 mm
  • No boost ISO: None vs 12,800 ISO
  • Significantly slower max shutter speed: 1/2000 of a second vs 1/4000 of a second

common strengths of the XZ-1 and DMC-LX5

  • Very large sensors: 1/1.7" 8.3x6.2mm vs 1/1.7" 8.3x6.2mm
  • Supports RAW
  • Fairly small: Mid size 110x64x42 mm vs Mid size 109x65x42 mm
arrow Compare the Olympus XZ-1 vs the Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5

Fujifilm Finepix X10

Fujifilm Finepix X10
1 year newer
$599

Significant advantages of the X10 (vs the DMC-LX5)

  • Significantly lower noise at high ISO: 245 ISO vs 132 ISO
  • Significantly larger sensor: 1/1.7" 8.8x6.6mm vs 1/1.7" 8.3x6.2mm
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps

Significant disadvantages of the X10 (vs the DMC-LX5)

  • Significantly worse wide angle: 28 mm vs 24 mm
  • Smaller screen: 2.8" vs 3.0"
  • Significantly shorter battery life: 300 shots vs 400 shots

common strengths of the X10 and DMC-LX5

  • Very large sensors: 1/1.7" 8.8x6.6mm vs 1/1.7" 8.3x6.2mm
  • Supports RAW
  • Very good boost ISO: 12,800 ISO vs 12,800 ISO
arrow Compare the Fujifilm Finepix X10 vs the Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5

Canon PowerShot S95

Canon PowerShot S95
similar age
$364 - $389

Significant advantages of the S95 (vs the DMC-LX5)

  • Supports 24p
  • Has in-camera HDR
  • Better color depth: 20.4 bits vs 19.6 bits

Significant disadvantages of the S95 (vs the DMC-LX5)

  • Much smaller sensor: 1/1.7" 7.6x5.7mm vs 1/1.7" 8.3x6.2mm
  • Significantly worse wide angle: 28 mm vs 24 mm
  • Much shorter battery life: 200 shots vs 400 shots

common strengths of the S95 and DMC-LX5

  • Supports RAW
  • Fairly small: Compact 99x58x29 mm vs Mid size 109x65x42 mm
  • Very good boost ISO: 12,800 ISO vs 12,800 ISO
arrow Compare the Canon PowerShot S95 vs the Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5

Leica D-LUX 5

Leica D-LUX 5
similar age
$799

Significant advantages of the D-LUX 5 (vs the DMC-LX5)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the D-LUX 5 (vs the DMC-LX5)

  • None found

common strengths of the D-LUX 5 and DMC-LX5

  • Very large sensors: 1/1.7" 8.3x6.2mm vs 1/1.7" 8.3x6.2mm
  • Supports RAW
  • Good wide angle: 24 mm vs 24 mm
arrow Compare the Leica D-LUX 5 vs the Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5

compared toMirrorless interchangeable-lens competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Panasonic DMC-LX5 compared to mirrorless interchangeable-lens competitors include: it has better image stabilization (lens vs none), has a significantly longer battery life (400 shots vs 290 shots), has boost light sensitivity (12,800 ISO vs none), supports an external flash and slightly longer exposures (60 seconds vs 30 seconds).

However, on average it is significantly more noisy at high ISO (132 ISO vs 703 ISO), records lower quality movies (720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps), has significantly lower image quality (41.0 vs 69.0), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 1,200 fps) and has significantly less color depth (19.6 bits vs 21.5 bits).

Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF3

Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF3
1 year newer
$469 (body only)

Significant advantages of the DMC-GF3 (vs the DMC-LX5)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps
  • Lower noise at high ISO: 459 ISO vs 132 ISO
  • Has interchangeable lenses

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-GF3 (vs the DMC-LX5)

  • No image stabilization: None vs Lens
  • Shorter battery life: 320 shots vs 400 shots
  • No external flash support

common strengths of the DMC-GF3 and DMC-LX5

  • Inexpensive: $394.00 vs $358.88
  • Light weight: 264 g vs 277 g
  • Long exposures: 60 seconds vs 60 seconds
arrow Compare the DMC-GF3 vs the DMC-LX5

Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX1

Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX1
1 year newer
$643 - $1,125 (body only)
$739 - $964 14-42mm lens

Significant advantages of the DMC-GX1 (vs the DMC-LX5)

  • Significantly lower noise at high ISO: 703 ISO vs 132 ISO
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 60fps vs 720p @ 30fps
  • Much less startup delay: 1400 ms vs 2300 ms

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-GX1 (vs the DMC-LX5)

  • No image stabilization: None vs Lens
  • Shorter battery life: 310 shots vs 400 shots

common strengths of the DMC-GX1 and DMC-LX5

  • Long exposures: 60 seconds vs 60 seconds
  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Popularity: 8,676,020 vs 8,999,415
arrow Compare the DMC-GX1 vs the DMC-LX5

Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF2

Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF2
3 months newer
$376 14-42mm lens

Significant advantages of the DMC-GF2 (vs the DMC-LX5)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps
  • Much less startup delay: 1000 ms vs 2300 ms
  • Significantly lower noise at high ISO: 506 ISO vs 132 ISO

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-GF2 (vs the DMC-LX5)

  • No image stabilization: None vs Lens
  • Significantly shorter battery life: 300 shots vs 400 shots
  • No boost ISO: None vs 12,800 ISO

common strengths of the DMC-GF2 and DMC-LX5

  • Inexpensive: $375.99 vs $358.88
  • Long exposures: 60 seconds vs 60 seconds
  • Each has a built-in flash
arrow Compare the DMC-GF2 vs the DMC-LX5

Nikon 1 J1

Nikon 1 J1
1 year newer
$547 10-30mm lens

Significant advantages of the J1 (vs the DMC-LX5)

  • Records high-speed movies: 1,200 fps vs None
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps
  • Shoots much faster: 60 fps vs 6 fps

Significant disadvantages of the J1 (vs the DMC-LX5)

  • No image stabilization: None vs Lens
  • Much shorter battery life: 230 shots vs 400 shots
  • No external flash support

common strengths of the J1 and DMC-LX5

  • Inexpensive: $546.95 vs $358.88
  • Light weight: 277 g vs 277 g
  • Popularity: 11,571,421 vs 8,999,415
arrow Compare the Nikon 1 J1 vs the Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5

Olympus PEN E-PL1

Olympus PEN E-PL1
5 months older
$219 - $279 14-42mm lens

Significant advantages of the PEN E-PL1 (vs the DMC-LX5)

  • Significantly lower noise at high ISO: 487 ISO vs 132 ISO
  • Better image quality: 54.0 vs 41.0
  • Has interchangeable lenses

Significant disadvantages of the PEN E-PL1 (vs the DMC-LX5)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.0"
  • Much more shutter lag: 820 ms vs 351 ms
  • Significantly shorter battery life: 290 shots vs 400 shots

common strengths of the PEN E-PL1 and DMC-LX5

  • Good image stabilization: Sensor shift vs Lens
  • Inexpensive: $218.99 vs $358.88
  • Long exposures: 60 seconds vs 60 seconds
arrow Compare the Olympus PEN E-PL1 vs the Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5

Sony Alpha NEX-5

Sony Alpha NEX-5
similar age
$569 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the NEX-5 (vs the DMC-LX5)

  • Much lower noise at high ISO: 796 ISO vs 132 ISO
  • Much better image quality: 69.0 vs 41.0
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps

Significant disadvantages of the NEX-5 (vs the DMC-LX5)

  • No image stabilization: None vs Lens
  • No boost ISO: None vs 12,800 ISO
  • Significantly shorter max exposures: 30 seconds vs 60 seconds

common strengths of the NEX-5 and DMC-LX5

  • Inexpensive: $569.00 vs $358.88
  • Light weight: 287 g vs 277 g
  • Popularity: 12,522,980 vs 8,999,415
arrow Compare the Sony Alpha NEX-5 vs the Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5

compared toBoutique competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Panasonic DMC-LX5 compared to boutique competitors include: it has a slightly wider aperture (f/2.0 vs f/2.8), has slightly more zoom (3.8x vs 1x), has a significantly wider wide angle lens (24 mm vs 35 mm), is much smaller (mid size 109x65x42 mm vs standard size 117x81x65 mm) and has better image stabilization (lens vs none).

However, on average it has much lower image quality (41.0 vs 73.0), records lower quality movies (720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 24fps), has a slightly lower resolution screen (460k dots vs 920k dots), takes slightly lower resolution photos (10 MP vs 14.2 MP) and slightly lower maximum light sensitivity (3,200 ISO vs 12,800 ISO).

Canon PowerShot G1X

Canon PowerShot G1X
1 year newer
$799 - $800

Significant advantages of the G1X (vs the DMC-LX5)

  • Much better image quality: 60.0 vs 41.0
  • Much larger sensor: Four thirds 18.7x14.0mm vs 1/1.7" 8.3x6.2mm
  • Better color depth: 21.7 bits vs 19.6 bits

Significant disadvantages of the G1X (vs the DMC-LX5)

  • Much narrower aperture: f/2.8 vs f/2.0
  • Much larger: Standard size 117x81x65 mm vs Mid size 109x65x42 mm
  • Shoots much slower: 1.9 fps vs 6 fps

common strengths of the G1X and DMC-LX5

  • Great zoom: 4x vs 3.8x
  • Larger than average screens: 3.0" vs 3.0"
  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
arrow Compare the Canon PowerShot G1X vs the Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5

Fujifilm FinePix X100

Fujifilm FinePix X100
similar age
$1,199

Significant advantages of the X100 (vs the DMC-LX5)

  • Much better image quality: 73.0 vs 41.0
  • Much larger sensor: APS-C 23.6x15.8mm vs 1/1.7" 8.3x6.2mm
  • Better color depth: 22.9 bits vs 19.6 bits

Significant disadvantages of the X100 (vs the DMC-LX5)

  • Much more startup delay: 3200 ms vs 2300 ms
  • Much worse wide angle: 35 mm vs 24 mm
  • Much more shutter lag: 403 ms vs 351 ms

common strengths of the X100 and DMC-LX5

  • Wide aperture: f/2.0 vs f/2.0
  • Fast continuous shooting: 5 fps vs 6 fps
  • Good macro capabilities: 10 cm vs 1 cm
arrow Compare the Fujifilm FinePix X100 vs the Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Panasonic DMC-LX5 compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has a much wider aperture (f/2.0 vs f/3.3), takes slightly higher resolution photos (10 MP vs 9.6 MP), has a much larger sensor (1/1.7" 8.3x6.2mm vs 1/2.5" 6.1x4.6mm), has a significantly longer battery life (400 shots vs 260 shots) and slightly closer macro focusing (1 cm vs 5 cm).

However, on average it has way more less zoom (3.8x vs 20x), doesn't have a built-in GPS, records lower quality movies (720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps), is much larger (mid size 109x65x42 mm vs compact 105x59x28 mm) and doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 220 fps).

Panasonic Lumix ZS20

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS20
1 year newer
$291 - $350

Significant advantages of the ZS20 (vs the DMC-LX5)

  • Much more zoom: 20x vs 3.8x
  • Has a GPS
  • Much smaller: Compact 105x59x28 mm vs Mid size 109x65x42 mm

Significant disadvantages of the ZS20 (vs the DMC-LX5)

  • Much smaller sensor: 1/2.5" 6.1x4.6mm vs 1/1.7" 8.3x6.2mm
  • Much narrower aperture: f/3.3 vs f/2.0
  • No RAW support

common strengths of the ZS20 and DMC-LX5

  • Good wide angle: 24 mm vs 24 mm
  • Many focus points: 23 vs 23
  • Popularity: 15,827,276 vs 8,999,415
arrow Compare the Lumix ZS20 vs the Lumix DMC-LX5

Sony Cybershot DSC-HX9v

Sony Cybershot DSC-HX9v
5 months newer
$319 - $330

Significant advantages of the DSC-HX9v (vs the DMC-LX5)

  • Much more zoom: 16x vs 3.8x
  • Has a GPS
  • Much smaller: Compact 105x59x34 mm vs Mid size 109x65x42 mm

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-HX9v (vs the DMC-LX5)

  • Much smaller sensor: 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm vs 1/1.7" 8.3x6.2mm
  • Much narrower aperture: f/3.3 vs f/2.0
  • No RAW support

common strengths of the DSC-HX9v and DMC-LX5

  • Good wide angle: 24 mm vs 24 mm
  • Great battery life: 300 shots vs 400 shots
  • Popularity: 18,939,324 vs 8,999,415
arrow Compare the Sony Cybershot DSC-HX9v vs the Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10
6 months newer
$328

Significant advantages of the DMC-ZS10 (vs the DMC-LX5)

  • Much more zoom: 16x vs 3.8x
  • Has a GPS
  • Much smaller: Compact 105x58x33 mm vs Mid size 109x65x42 mm

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-ZS10 (vs the DMC-LX5)

  • Much smaller sensor: 1/2.3" 6.1x4.6mm vs 1/1.7" 8.3x6.2mm
  • Much narrower aperture: f/3.3 vs f/2.0
  • No RAW support

common strengths of the DMC-ZS10 and DMC-LX5

  • Good wide angle: 24 mm vs 24 mm
  • Very long exposure times: 60 seconds vs 60 seconds
  • Very fast max shutter speeds: 1/4000 of a second vs 1/4000 of a second
arrow Compare the DMC-ZS10 vs the DMC-LX5

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS7

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS7
5 months older
$361

Significant advantages of the DMC-ZS7 (vs the DMC-LX5)

  • Has a GPS
  • Significantly more zoom: 12x vs 3.8x
  • Much smaller: Compact 103x60x33 mm vs Mid size 109x65x42 mm

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-ZS7 (vs the DMC-LX5)

  • Much smaller sensor: 1/2.3" 6.1x4.6mm vs 1/1.7" 8.3x6.2mm
  • Much narrower aperture: f/3.3 vs f/2.0
  • No RAW support

common strengths of the DMC-ZS7 and DMC-LX5

  • Very long exposure times: 60 seconds vs 60 seconds
arrow Compare the DMC-ZS7 vs the DMC-LX5

compared toSuper zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Panasonic DMC-LX5 compared to super zoom competitors include: it has a significantly wider aperture (f/2.0 vs f/2.8), has a slightly larger screen (3.0" vs 2.7"), is much smaller (mid size 109x65x42 mm vs professional size 123x92x108 mm), has a much larger sensor (1/1.7" 8.3x6.2mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm) and significantly higher boost light sensitivity (12,800 ISO vs 6,400 ISO).

However, on average it has way more less zoom (3.8x vs 35x), records lower quality movies (720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 60fps), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 220 fps), doesn't record movies in 24p and doesn't shoot as fast continuously (6 fps vs 10.3 fps).

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ150

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ150
1 year newer
$499

Significant advantages of the DMC-FZ150 (vs the DMC-LX5)

  • Has an external mic jack
  • Much more zoom: 24x vs 3.8x
  • Has a flip-out screen

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-FZ150 (vs the DMC-LX5)

  • Much smaller sensor: 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm vs 1/1.7" 8.3x6.2mm
  • Significantly narrower aperture: f/2.8 vs f/2.0
  • Much larger: Prosumer size 124x82x92 mm vs Mid size 109x65x42 mm

common strengths of the DMC-FZ150 and DMC-LX5

  • RAW support
  • Support external flash
  • Long exposures: 30 seconds vs 60 seconds
arrow Compare the DMC-FZ150 vs the DMC-LX5

Canon Powershot SX40

Canon Powershot SX40
1 year newer
$340 - $380

Significant advantages of the SX40 (vs the DMC-LX5)

  • Much more zoom: 35x vs 3.8x
  • Has a flip-out screen
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 24fps vs 720p @ 30fps

Significant disadvantages of the SX40 (vs the DMC-LX5)

  • Much smaller sensor: 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm vs 1/1.7" 8.3x6.2mm
  • Much larger: Professional size 123x92x108 mm vs Mid size 109x65x42 mm
  • Significantly narrower aperture: f/2.7 vs f/2.0

common strengths of the SX40 and DMC-LX5

  • Wide aperture: f/2.7 vs f/2.0
  • Support external flash
  • Popularity: 29,173,545 vs 8,999,415
arrow Compare the Canon Powershot SX40 vs the Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ48

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ48
1 year newer
$384 - $426

Significant advantages of the DMC-FZ48 (vs the DMC-LX5)

  • Much more zoom: 24x vs 3.8x
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps
  • Can create panoramas in-camera

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-FZ48 (vs the DMC-LX5)

  • Much smaller sensor: 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm vs 1/1.7" 8.3x6.2mm
  • Significantly narrower aperture: f/2.8 vs f/2.0
  • Significantly larger: Prosumer size 120x79x91 mm vs Mid size 109x65x42 mm

common strengths of the DMC-FZ48 and DMC-LX5

  • Very long exposure times: 60 seconds vs 60 seconds
arrow Compare the DMC-FZ48 vs the DMC-LX5