Generally, some of the advantages of the Panasonic DMC-LX3 compared to mirrorless interchangeable-lens competitors include: it has better image stabilization (lens vs none), records movies in 24p, has boost light sensitivity (6,400 ISO vs none), is slightly smaller (compact 109x60x27 mm vs mid size 115x72x42 mm) and is thinner (1.1" vs 1.5").
However, on average it is significantly more noisy at high ISO (94 ISO vs 667 ISO), records lower quality movies (720p @ 24fps vs 1080p @ 30fps), has significantly lower image quality (39.0 vs 54.0), has slightly less color depth (19.6 bits vs 21.2 bits) and takes slightly lower resolution photos (10 MP vs 15.8 MP).
Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX1
3 years newer
$643 - $1,125 (body only)
$731 - $964 14-42mm lens
|
Significant advantages of the DMC-GX1 (vs the DMC-LX3)
- Much lower noise at high ISO: 703 ISO vs 94 ISO
- Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 60fps vs 720p @ 24fps
- Significantly better image quality: 55.0 vs 39.0
Significant disadvantages of the DMC-GX1 (vs the DMC-LX3)
- No image stabilization: None vs Lens
- No 24p support
- Significantly thicker: 1.5" vs 1.1"
common strengths of the DMC-GX1 and DMC-LX3
- Long exposures: 60 seconds vs 60 seconds
- Each has a built-in flash
|
|
|
|
Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF3
2 years newer
$433 (body only)
|
Significant advantages of the DMC-GF3 (vs the DMC-LX3)
- Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 24fps
- Significantly lower noise at high ISO: 459 ISO vs 94 ISO
- Has interchangeable lenses
Significant disadvantages of the DMC-GF3 (vs the DMC-LX3)
- No image stabilization: None vs Lens
- No 24p support
- No external flash support
common strengths of the DMC-GF3 and DMC-LX3
- Fairly small: Compact 107x67x32 mm vs Compact 109x60x27 mm
- Thin: 1.3" vs 1.1"
- Inexpensive: $394.00 vs $555.27
|
|
|
|
Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF2
2 years newer
$376 14-42mm lens
|
Significant advantages of the DMC-GF2 (vs the DMC-LX3)
- Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 24fps
- Significantly lower noise at high ISO: 506 ISO vs 94 ISO
- Significantly better image quality: 54.0 vs 39.0
Significant disadvantages of the DMC-GF2 (vs the DMC-LX3)
- No image stabilization: None vs Lens
- No 24p support
common strengths of the DMC-GF2 and DMC-LX3
- Fairly small: Mid size 113x68x33 mm vs Compact 109x60x27 mm
- Thin: 1.3" vs 1.1"
- Inexpensive: $375.99 vs $555.27
|
|
|
|
Olympus PEN E-PL1
1 year newer
$260 - $279 14-42mm lens
|
Significant advantages of the PEN E-PL1 (vs the DMC-LX3)
- Significantly lower noise at high ISO: 487 ISO vs 94 ISO
- Significantly better image quality: 54.0 vs 39.0
- Has interchangeable lenses
Significant disadvantages of the PEN E-PL1 (vs the DMC-LX3)
- Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.0"
- No 24p support
- Significantly larger: Mid size 115x72x42 mm vs Compact 109x60x27 mm
common strengths of the PEN E-PL1 and DMC-LX3
- Good image stabilization: Sensor shift vs Lens
- Inexpensive: $259.99 vs $555.27
- Long exposures: 60 seconds vs 60 seconds
|
|
|
|
Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF1
1 year newer
$1,125 14-45mm lens
|
Significant advantages of the DMC-GF1 (vs the DMC-LX3)
- Significantly lower noise at high ISO: 513 ISO vs 94 ISO
- Significantly better image quality: 54.0 vs 39.0
- Has interchangeable lenses
Significant disadvantages of the DMC-GF1 (vs the DMC-LX3)
- No image stabilization: None vs Lens
- No 24p support
common strengths of the DMC-GF1 and DMC-LX3
- Long exposures: 60 seconds vs 60 seconds
- Each has a built-in flash
|
|
|
|
Panasonic Lumix DMC-G3
2 years newer
$500 (body only)
$700 14-42mm lens
|
Significant advantages of the DMC-G3 (vs the DMC-LX3)
- Significantly lower noise at high ISO: 667 ISO vs 94 ISO
- Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 24fps
- Significantly better image quality: 56.0 vs 39.0
Significant disadvantages of the DMC-G3 (vs the DMC-LX3)
- No image stabilization: None vs Lens
- No 24p support
- Significantly larger: Standard size 115x84x47 mm vs Compact 109x60x27 mm
common strengths of the DMC-G3 and DMC-LX3
- Inexpensive: $499.87 vs $555.27
- Long exposures: 60 seconds vs 60 seconds
- Each has a built-in flash
|
|
|
|