Generally, some of the advantages of the Panasonic DMC-L10 compared to pro digicam competitors include: it has a much larger sensor (four thirds 18.0x13.5mm vs 1/1.8" 7.5x5.5mm), is much less noisy at high ISO (429 ISO vs 153 ISO), has slightly better image quality (55.0 vs 50.0), has significantly more color depth (21.3 bits vs 20.7 bits) and has better image stabilization (lens vs none).
However, on average it doesn't record movies (none vs 1080p @ 24fps), has a significantly smaller screen (2.5" vs 3.0"), is slightly larger (professional size 135x96x78 mm vs compact 99x60x28 mm), has significantly narrower dynamic range (10.8 EV vs 11.6 EV) and slightly lower maximum light sensitivity (1,600 ISO vs 6,400 ISO).
Leica Digilux 2
3 years older
|
Significant advantages of the Digilux 2 (vs the DMC-L10)
Significant disadvantages of the Digilux 2 (vs the DMC-L10)
- Much smaller sensor: 1/1.7" 8.8x6.6mm vs Four thirds 18.0x13.5mm
- Much lower true resolution: 4.9 MP vs 10 MP
- No image stabilization: None vs Lens
common strengths of the Digilux 2 and DMC-L10
- Very large sensors: 1/1.7" 8.8x6.6mm vs Four thirds 18.0x13.5mm
- Supports RAW
- Viewfinders: Digital vs Pentamirror
|
|
|
|
Canon Powershot S100
4 years newer
$370 - $430
|
Significant advantages of the S100 (vs the DMC-L10)
- Shoots movies: 1080p @ 24fps vs None
- Much smaller: Compact 99x60x28 mm vs Professional size 135x96x78 mm
- Much larger screen: 3.0" vs 2.5"
Significant disadvantages of the S100 (vs the DMC-L10)
- Much smaller sensor: 1/1.8" 7.5x5.5mm vs Four thirds 18.0x13.5mm
- Much more noise at high ISO: 153 ISO vs 429 ISO
- Worse color depth: 20.7 bits vs 21.3 bits
common strengths of the S100 and DMC-L10
- Supports RAW
- Good image quality: 50.0 vs 55.0
- Good color depth: 20.7 bits vs 21.3 bits
|
|
|
|