Generally, some of the advantages of the Panasonic DMC-FZ40 compared to compact competitors include: it has way more more zoom (24x vs 5x), has a slightly larger screen (3.0" vs 2.7"), slightly closer macro focusing (1 cm vs 5 cm), shoots RAW and has a viewfinder (digital vs none).
However, on average it records lower quality movies (720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 24fps), is much larger (prosumer size 120x79x91 mm vs super compact 92x55x19 mm), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 240 fps), slightly lower maximum light sensitivity (1,600 ISO vs 3,200 ISO) and doesn't have a touch screen.
Canon ELPH 300 HS
6 months newer
$148 - $179
|
Significant advantages of the 300 HS (vs the DMC-FZ40)
- Much smaller: Super compact 92x55x19 mm vs Prosumer size 120x79x91 mm
- Much thinner: 0.8" vs 3.6"
- Much lighter: 141 g vs 499 g
Significant disadvantages of the 300 HS (vs the DMC-FZ40)
- Much less zoom: 5x vs 24x
- Significantly smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.0"
- No RAW support
common strengths of the 300 HS and DMC-FZ40
- Wide aperture: f/2.7 vs f/2.8
- Good wide angle: 24 mm vs 25 mm
- Good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
|
|
|
|
Samsung PL170
7 months newer
$206 - $273
|
Significant advantages of the PL170 (vs the DMC-FZ40)
- Much smaller: Super compact 95x57x19 mm vs Prosumer size 120x79x91 mm
- Much thinner: 0.7" vs 3.6"
- Much lighter: 153 g vs 499 g
Significant disadvantages of the PL170 (vs the DMC-FZ40)
- Much less zoom: 5x vs 24x
- Narrower aperture: f/3.3 vs f/2.8
- No RAW support
common strengths of the PL170 and DMC-FZ40
- Good image stabilization: Lens, Digital vs Lens
|
|
|
|