As well as being compared against other super zooms, the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ40 is also often compared to entry-level DSLRs, travel zooms, pro digicams and compacts. The Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ40's top rivals come from Panasonic (such as the Lumix DMC-FZ48 and the Lumix DMC-FZ150) and Nikon (such as the Coolpix P500 and the Coolpix L120)

compared toSuper zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Panasonic DMC-FZ40 compared to other super zoom competitors include: it shoots RAW, is slightly less expensive ($410.99 vs $610.64), has higher quality type of viewfinder (digital vs none) and significantly longer exposures (60 seconds vs 30 seconds).

However, on average it has slightly less zoom (24x vs 35x), records lower quality movies (720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 24fps), has a slightly lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 920k dots), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 220 fps) and doesn't record movies in 24p.

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ48

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ48
1 year newer
$384 - $426

Significant advantages of the DMC-FZ48 (vs the DMC-FZ40)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps
  • Can create panoramas in-camera

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-FZ48 (vs the DMC-FZ40)

  • No RAW support

common strengths of the DMC-FZ48 and DMC-FZ40

  • Both have digital viewfinders: Digital vs Digital
  • Very long exposure times: 60 seconds vs 60 seconds
arrow Compare the DMC-FZ48 vs the DMC-FZ40

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ150

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ150
1 year newer
$499

Significant advantages of the DMC-FZ150 (vs the DMC-FZ40)

  • Has an external mic jack
  • Has a flip-out screen
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 60fps vs 720p @ 30fps

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-FZ150 (vs the DMC-FZ40)

  • Significantly shorter max exposures: 30 seconds vs 60 seconds

common strengths of the DMC-FZ150 and DMC-FZ40

  • RAW support
  • Both have digital viewfinders: Digital vs Digital
  • Long exposures: 30 seconds vs 60 seconds
arrow Compare the DMC-FZ150 vs the DMC-FZ40

Nikon Coolpix P500

Nikon Coolpix P500
6 months newer
$300

Significant advantages of the P500 (vs the DMC-FZ40)

  • Much more zoom: 36x vs 24x
  • Much higher resolution screen: 920k dots vs 230k dots
  • Has a flip-out screen

Significant disadvantages of the P500 (vs the DMC-FZ40)

  • Significantly narrower aperture: f/3.5 vs f/2.8
  • No RAW support
  • No boost ISO: None vs 6,400 ISO

common strengths of the P500 and DMC-FZ40

  • Both have digital viewfinders: Digital vs Digital
arrow Compare the Nikon Coolpix P500 vs the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ40

Canon Powershot SX40

Canon Powershot SX40
1 year newer
$340 - $380

Significant advantages of the SX40 (vs the DMC-FZ40)

  • Much more zoom: 35x vs 24x
  • Has a flip-out screen
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 24fps vs 720p @ 30fps

Significant disadvantages of the SX40 (vs the DMC-FZ40)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.0"
  • Larger: Professional size 123x92x108 mm vs Prosumer size 120x79x91 mm
  • No RAW support

common strengths of the SX40 and DMC-FZ40

  • Both have digital viewfinders: Digital vs Digital
arrow Compare the Canon Powershot SX40 vs the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ40

Leica V-Lux 2

Leica V-Lux 2
similar age
$1,101

Significant advantages of the V-Lux 2 (vs the DMC-FZ40)

  • Has a flip-out screen
  • Has a CMOS-family sensor: CMOS vs CCD
  • Shoots significantly faster: 11 fps vs 1.8 fps

Significant disadvantages of the V-Lux 2 (vs the DMC-FZ40)

  • No viewfinder: None vs Digital

common strengths of the V-Lux 2 and DMC-FZ40

  • RAW support
  • Very long exposure times: 60 seconds vs 60 seconds
arrow Compare the Leica V-Lux 2 vs the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ40

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ100

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ100
similar age
$611

Significant advantages of the DMC-FZ100 (vs the DMC-FZ40)

  • Has a flip-out screen
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps
  • Records high-speed movies: 220 fps vs None

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-FZ100 (vs the DMC-FZ40)

  • None found

common strengths of the DMC-FZ100 and DMC-FZ40

  • RAW support
  • Both have digital viewfinders: Digital vs Digital
  • Very long exposure times: 60 seconds vs 60 seconds
arrow Compare the DMC-FZ100 vs the DMC-FZ40

compared toEntry-level DSLR competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Panasonic DMC-FZ40 compared to entry-level DSLR competitors include: it has a slightly larger screen (3.0" vs 2.7"), has image stabilization (lens vs none) and much longer exposures (60 seconds vs 30 seconds).

However, on average it has a slightly lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 920k dots), takes slightly lower resolution photos (9.8 MP vs 14.2 MP), slightly lower maximum light sensitivity (1,600 ISO vs 6,400 ISO), doesn't record movies in 24p and doesn't shoot as fast continuously (1.8 fps vs 4 fps).

Nikon D3100

Nikon D3100
similar age
$500 - $547 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the D3100 (vs the DMC-FZ40)

  • Much larger sensor: APS-C 23.1x15.4mm vs 1/2.3" 6.1x4.6mm
  • Faster autofocus: Phase detection vs Contrast detection
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 24fps vs 720p @ 30fps

Significant disadvantages of the D3100 (vs the DMC-FZ40)

  • No image stabilization: None vs Lens
  • Much shorter max exposures: 30 seconds vs 60 seconds

common strengths of the D3100 and DMC-FZ40

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size 124x96x73 mm vs Prosumer size 120x79x91 mm
  • Light weight: 505 g vs 499 g
  • Inexpensive: $499.99 vs $410.99
arrow Compare the Nikon D3100 vs the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ40

Canon Rebel T3

Canon Rebel T3
6 months newer
$333 (body only)
$489 - $500 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the T3 (vs the DMC-FZ40)

  • Much larger sensor: APS-C 22.2x14.7mm vs 1/2.3" 6.1x4.6mm
  • Faster autofocus: Phase detection vs Contrast detection
  • Has interchangeable lenses

Significant disadvantages of the T3 (vs the DMC-FZ40)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.0"
  • No image stabilization: None vs Lens
  • Much shorter max exposures: 30 seconds vs 60 seconds

common strengths of the T3 and DMC-FZ40

  • Light weight: 459 g vs 499 g
  • Inexpensive: $333.00 vs $410.99
arrow Compare the Canon Rebel T3 vs the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ40

Nikon D5100

Nikon D5100
8 months newer
$500 - $597 (body only)
$600 - $697 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the D5100 (vs the DMC-FZ40)

  • Much larger sensor: APS-C 23.6x15.6mm vs 1/2.3" 6.1x4.6mm
  • Faster autofocus: Phase detection vs Contrast detection
  • Much higher resolution screen: 920k dots vs 230k dots

Significant disadvantages of the D5100 (vs the DMC-FZ40)

  • No image stabilization: None vs Lens
  • Much shorter max exposures: 30 seconds vs 60 seconds

common strengths of the D5100 and DMC-FZ40

  • Inexpensive: $499.99 vs $410.99
arrow Compare the Nikon D5100 vs the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ40

Nikon D3000

Nikon D3000
1 year older
$487 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the D3000 (vs the DMC-FZ40)

  • Much larger sensor: APS-C 23.6x15.8mm vs 1/2.3" 6.1x4.6mm
  • Faster autofocus: Phase detection vs Contrast detection
  • Has interchangeable lenses

Significant disadvantages of the D3000 (vs the DMC-FZ40)

  • No image stabilization: None vs Lens
  • Does not take movies: None vs 720p @ 30fps
  • Much shorter max exposures: 30 seconds vs 60 seconds

common strengths of the D3000 and DMC-FZ40

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size 126x97x64 mm vs Prosumer size 120x79x91 mm
  • Inexpensive: $486.96 vs $410.99
arrow Compare the Nikon D3000 vs the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ40

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Panasonic DMC-FZ40 compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has slightly more zoom (24x vs 16x), has a slightly wider aperture (f/2.8 vs f/3.3), slightly closer macro focusing (1 cm vs 5 cm), slightly higher boost light sensitivity (6,400 ISO vs none) and shoots RAW.

However, on average it doesn't have a built-in GPS, records lower quality movies (720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 60fps), has a slightly lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 921k dots), is much larger (prosumer size 120x79x91 mm vs compact 105x59x34 mm) and doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 220 fps).

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10
6 months newer
$328

Significant advantages of the DMC-ZS10 (vs the DMC-FZ40)

  • Has a GPS
  • Much smaller: Compact 105x58x33 mm vs Prosumer size 120x79x91 mm
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-ZS10 (vs the DMC-FZ40)

  • Less zoom: 16x vs 24x
  • Narrower aperture: f/3.3 vs f/2.8
  • No RAW support

common strengths of the DMC-ZS10 and DMC-FZ40

  • Very long exposure times: 60 seconds vs 60 seconds
arrow Compare the DMC-ZS10 vs the DMC-FZ40

Sony Cybershot DSC-HX9v

Sony Cybershot DSC-HX9v
5 months newer
$319 - $330

Significant advantages of the DSC-HX9v (vs the DMC-FZ40)

  • Has a GPS
  • Much higher resolution screen: 921k dots vs 230k dots
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 60fps vs 720p @ 30fps

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-HX9v (vs the DMC-FZ40)

  • Less zoom: 16x vs 24x
  • Narrower aperture: f/3.3 vs f/2.8
  • No RAW support

common strengths of the DSC-HX9v and DMC-FZ40

  • Long exposures: 30 seconds vs 60 seconds
arrow Compare the Sony Cybershot DSC-HX9v vs the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ40

Canon PowerShot SX230 HS

Canon PowerShot SX230 HS
6 months newer
$239 - $307

Significant advantages of the SX230 HS (vs the DMC-FZ40)

  • Has a GPS
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps
  • Much smaller: Compact 106x59x33 mm vs Prosumer size 120x79x91 mm

Significant disadvantages of the SX230 HS (vs the DMC-FZ40)

  • Significantly less zoom: 14x vs 24x
  • Significantly worse wide angle: 28 mm vs 25 mm
  • No RAW support

common strengths of the SX230 HS and DMC-FZ40

  • None found
arrow Compare the Canon PowerShot SX230 HS vs the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ40

Olympus SZ-30MR

Olympus SZ-30MR
7 months newer
$355 - $471

Significant advantages of the SZ-30MR (vs the DMC-FZ40)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps
  • Significantly smaller: Mid size 106x69x40 mm vs Prosumer size 120x79x91 mm
  • Has a CMOS-family sensor: CMOS vs CCD

Significant disadvantages of the SZ-30MR (vs the DMC-FZ40)

  • No RAW support
  • No viewfinder: None vs Digital
  • Much shorter max exposures: 4 seconds vs 60 seconds

common strengths of the SZ-30MR and DMC-FZ40

  • Great zoom: 24x vs 24x
  • Wide aperture: f/3.0 vs f/2.8
arrow Compare the Olympus SZ-30MR vs the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ40

Panasonic Lumix ZS20

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS20
1 year newer
$291 - $350

Significant advantages of the ZS20 (vs the DMC-FZ40)

  • Has a GPS
  • Much smaller: Compact 105x59x28 mm vs Prosumer size 120x79x91 mm
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 60fps vs 720p @ 30fps

Significant disadvantages of the ZS20 (vs the DMC-FZ40)

  • Narrower aperture: f/3.3 vs f/2.8
  • No RAW support
  • No viewfinder: None vs Digital

common strengths of the ZS20 and DMC-FZ40

  • Great zoom: 20x vs 24x
arrow Compare the Lumix ZS20 vs the Lumix DMC-FZ40

compared toPro digicam competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Panasonic DMC-FZ40 compared to pro digicam competitors include: it has much more zoom (24x vs 3.8x), has higher quality type of viewfinder (digital vs none) and significantly longer exposures (60 seconds vs 15 seconds).

However, on average it has a much smaller sensor (1/2.3" 6.1x4.6mm vs 1/1.7" 8.3x6.2mm), has a slightly narrower aperture (f/2.8 vs f/2.0), records lower quality movies (720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 24fps), has a slightly lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 461k dots) and is significantly larger (prosumer size 120x79x91 mm vs compact 99x60x28 mm).

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5
similar age
$359

Significant advantages of the DMC-LX5 (vs the DMC-FZ40)

  • Much larger sensor: 1/1.7" 8.3x6.2mm vs 1/2.3" 6.1x4.6mm
  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.0 vs f/2.8
  • Significantly smaller: Mid size 109x65x42 mm vs Prosumer size 120x79x91 mm

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-LX5 (vs the DMC-FZ40)

  • Much less zoom: 3.8x vs 24x
  • No viewfinder: None vs Digital

common strengths of the DMC-LX5 and DMC-FZ40

  • Supports RAW
  • Inexpensive: $358.88 vs $410.99
  • Very long exposure times: 60 seconds vs 60 seconds
arrow Compare the DMC-LX5 vs the DMC-FZ40

Canon PowerShot G12

Canon PowerShot G12
similar age
$370 - $496

Significant advantages of the G12 (vs the DMC-FZ40)

  • Much larger sensor: 1/1.7" 7.6x5.7mm vs 1/2.3" 6.1x4.6mm
  • Has a flip-out screen
  • Supports 24p

Significant disadvantages of the G12 (vs the DMC-FZ40)

  • Much less zoom: 5x vs 24x
  • Significantly worse wide angle: 28 mm vs 25 mm
  • Smaller screen: 2.8" vs 3.0"

common strengths of the G12 and DMC-FZ40

  • Supports RAW
  • Viewfinders: Tunnel vs Digital
  • Inexpensive: $370.00 vs $410.99
arrow Compare the Canon PowerShot G12 vs the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ40

Canon Powershot S100

Canon Powershot S100
1 year newer
$370 - $430

Significant advantages of the S100 (vs the DMC-FZ40)

  • Much larger sensor: 1/1.8" 7.5x5.5mm vs 1/2.3" 6.1x4.6mm
  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.0 vs f/2.8
  • Much smaller: Compact 99x60x28 mm vs Prosumer size 120x79x91 mm

Significant disadvantages of the S100 (vs the DMC-FZ40)

  • Much less zoom: 5x vs 24x
  • No viewfinder: None vs Digital
  • Much shorter max exposures: 15 seconds vs 60 seconds

common strengths of the S100 and DMC-FZ40

  • Supports RAW
  • Inexpensive: $369.99 vs $410.99
arrow Compare the Canon Powershot S100 vs the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ40

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Panasonic DMC-FZ40 compared to compact competitors include: it has way more more zoom (24x vs 5x), has a slightly larger screen (3.0" vs 2.7"), slightly closer macro focusing (1 cm vs 5 cm), shoots RAW and has a viewfinder (digital vs none).

However, on average it records lower quality movies (720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 24fps), is much larger (prosumer size 120x79x91 mm vs super compact 92x55x19 mm), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 240 fps), slightly lower maximum light sensitivity (1,600 ISO vs 3,200 ISO) and doesn't have a touch screen.

Canon ELPH 300 HS

Canon ELPH 300 HS
6 months newer
$148 - $179

Significant advantages of the 300 HS (vs the DMC-FZ40)

  • Much smaller: Super compact 92x55x19 mm vs Prosumer size 120x79x91 mm
  • Much thinner: 0.8" vs 3.6"
  • Much lighter: 141 g vs 499 g

Significant disadvantages of the 300 HS (vs the DMC-FZ40)

  • Much less zoom: 5x vs 24x
  • Significantly smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.0"
  • No RAW support

common strengths of the 300 HS and DMC-FZ40

  • Wide aperture: f/2.7 vs f/2.8
  • Good wide angle: 24 mm vs 25 mm
  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
arrow Compare the Canon ELPH 300 HS vs the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ40

Samsung PL170

Samsung PL170
7 months newer
$206 - $273

Significant advantages of the PL170 (vs the DMC-FZ40)

  • Much smaller: Super compact 95x57x19 mm vs Prosumer size 120x79x91 mm
  • Much thinner: 0.7" vs 3.6"
  • Much lighter: 153 g vs 499 g

Significant disadvantages of the PL170 (vs the DMC-FZ40)

  • Much less zoom: 5x vs 24x
  • Narrower aperture: f/3.3 vs f/2.8
  • No RAW support

common strengths of the PL170 and DMC-FZ40

  • Good image stabilization: Lens, Digital vs Lens
arrow Compare the Samsung PL170 vs the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ40