As well as being compared against other super zooms, the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ18 is also often compared to mirrorless, pro digicams, entry-level DSLRs, travel zooms and compacts. The Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ18's top rivals come from Panasonic (such as the Lumix DMC-FZ28 and the Lumix DMC-FZ150) and Nikon (such as the Coolpix P510 and the Coolpix L810)

compared toSuper zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Panasonic DMC-FZ18 compared to other super zoom competitors include: it is slightly smaller (prosumer size 118x75x88 mm vs professional size 120x83x102 mm), is slightly lighter (407 g vs 528 g), shoots RAW and significantly longer exposures (60 seconds vs 30 seconds).

However, on average it has slightly less zoom (18x vs 24x), records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps), has a slightly smaller screen (2.5" vs 3.0"), has a slightly lower resolution screen (207k dots vs 460k dots) and doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 220 fps).

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ28

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ28
1 year newer
$136 - $152

Significant advantages of the DMC-FZ28 (vs the DMC-FZ18)

  • Much higher true resolution: 9.8 MP vs 8 MP
  • Larger screen: 2.7" vs 2.5"

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-FZ28 (vs the DMC-FZ18)

  • None found

common strengths of the DMC-FZ28 and DMC-FZ18

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size 118x75x89 mm vs Prosumer size 118x75x88 mm
  • RAW support
  • Light weight: 417 g vs 407 g
arrow Compare the DMC-FZ28 vs the DMC-FZ18

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ150

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ150
4 years newer
$499

Significant advantages of the DMC-FZ150 (vs the DMC-FZ18)

  • Has an external mic jack
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 60fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps
  • Much larger screen: 3.0" vs 2.5"

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-FZ150 (vs the DMC-FZ18)

  • Significantly shorter max exposures: 30 seconds vs 60 seconds

common strengths of the DMC-FZ150 and DMC-FZ18

  • RAW support
  • Both have digital viewfinders: Digital vs Digital
  • Long exposures: 30 seconds vs 60 seconds
arrow Compare the DMC-FZ150 vs the DMC-FZ18

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35
2 years newer
$400

Significant advantages of the DMC-FZ35 (vs the DMC-FZ18)

  • Much higher true resolution: 9.8 MP vs 8 MP
  • Larger screen: 2.7" vs 2.5"

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-FZ35 (vs the DMC-FZ18)

  • None found

common strengths of the DMC-FZ35 and DMC-FZ18

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size 118x76x89 mm vs Prosumer size 118x75x88 mm
  • RAW support
  • Light weight: 367 g vs 407 g
arrow Compare the DMC-FZ35 vs the DMC-FZ18

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ50

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ50
1 year older

Significant advantages of the DMC-FZ50 (vs the DMC-FZ18)

  • Much higher true resolution: 10 MP vs 8 MP
  • Much larger sensor: 1/1.8" 7.2x5.3mm vs 1/2.5" 5.8x4.3mm
  • Supports an external flash

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-FZ50 (vs the DMC-FZ18)

  • Much worse wide angle: 35 mm vs 28 mm
  • Much larger: Large 141x86x142 mm vs Prosumer size 118x75x88 mm
  • Much smaller screen: 2.0" vs 2.5"

common strengths of the DMC-FZ50 and DMC-FZ18

  • RAW support
  • Both have digital viewfinders: Digital vs Digital
  • Very long exposure times: 60 seconds vs 60 seconds
arrow Compare the DMC-FZ50 vs the DMC-FZ18

Nikon Coolpix P510

Nikon Coolpix P510
4 years newer
$397 - $400

Significant advantages of the P510 (vs the DMC-FZ18)

  • Much more zoom: 41.7x vs 18x
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps
  • Much higher resolution screen: 921k dots vs 207k dots

Significant disadvantages of the P510 (vs the DMC-FZ18)

  • No RAW support
  • Heavier: 555 g vs 407 g
  • Much shorter max exposures: 4 seconds vs 60 seconds

common strengths of the P510 and DMC-FZ18

  • Both have digital viewfinders: Digital vs Digital
arrow Compare the Nikon Coolpix P510 vs the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ18

Fujifilm FinePix S2950

Fujifilm FinePix S2950
3 years newer
$159 - $160

Significant advantages of the S2950 (vs the DMC-FZ18)

  • Much larger screen: 3.0" vs 2.5"
  • Much higher true resolution: 9.7 MP vs 8 MP
  • Can create panoramas in-camera

Significant disadvantages of the S2950 (vs the DMC-FZ18)

  • No RAW support
  • Much shorter max exposures: 8 seconds vs 60 seconds

common strengths of the S2950 and DMC-FZ18

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size 110x73x81 mm vs Prosumer size 118x75x88 mm
  • Light weight: 437 g vs 407 g
  • Both have digital viewfinders: Digital vs Digital
arrow Compare the Fujifilm FinePix S2950 vs the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ18

compared toMirrorless interchangeable-lens competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Panasonic DMC-FZ18 compared to mirrorless interchangeable-lens competitors include: it has higher quality type of viewfinder (digital vs none), has better image stabilization (lens vs none), has boost light sensitivity (6,400 ISO vs none), slightly longer exposures (60 seconds vs 30 seconds) and has a built-in flash.

However, on average it records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps), has a much smaller screen (2.5" vs 3.0"), has a slightly lower resolution screen (207k dots vs 610k dots), takes significantly lower resolution photos (8 MP vs 15.9 MP) and significantly lower maximum light sensitivity (1,250 ISO vs 12,800 ISO).

Samsung NX11

Samsung NX11
3 years newer
$619 - $730 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the NX11 (vs the DMC-FZ18)

  • Much larger screen: 3.0" vs 2.5"
  • Significantly higher resolution screen: 614k dots vs 207k dots
  • Has interchangeable lenses

Significant disadvantages of the NX11 (vs the DMC-FZ18)

  • No image stabilization: None vs Lens
  • Significantly shorter max exposures: 30 seconds vs 60 seconds

common strengths of the NX11 and DMC-FZ18

  • Both have digital viewfinders: Digital vs Digital
  • Each has a built-in flash
arrow Compare the Samsung NX11 vs the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ18

Olympus PEN E-PL1

Olympus PEN E-PL1
2 years newer
$219 - $279 14-42mm lens

Significant advantages of the PEN E-PL1 (vs the DMC-FZ18)

  • Significantly larger screen: 2.7" vs 2.5"
  • Has interchangeable lenses
  • Has an external mic jack

Significant disadvantages of the PEN E-PL1 (vs the DMC-FZ18)

  • No viewfinder: None vs Digital

common strengths of the PEN E-PL1 and DMC-FZ18

  • Good image stabilization: Sensor shift vs Lens
  • Long exposures: 60 seconds vs 60 seconds
  • Each has a built-in flash
arrow Compare the Olympus PEN E-PL1 vs the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ18

Samsung NX200

Samsung NX200
4 years newer
$699 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the NX200 (vs the DMC-FZ18)

  • Much larger screen: 3.0" vs 2.5"
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps
  • Much higher true resolution: 20 MP vs 8 MP

Significant disadvantages of the NX200 (vs the DMC-FZ18)

  • No image stabilization: None vs Lens
  • No viewfinder: None vs Digital
  • Significantly shorter max exposures: 30 seconds vs 60 seconds

common strengths of the NX200 and DMC-FZ18

  • None found
arrow Compare the Samsung NX200 vs the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ18

Olympus OM-D E-M5

Olympus OM-D E-M5
4 years newer
$1,000 - $1,299 (body only)
$1,100 14-42mm lens

Significant advantages of the E-M5 (vs the DMC-FZ18)

  • Much larger screen: 3.0" vs 2.5"
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 60fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps
  • Better maximum light sensitivity: 25,600 ISO vs 1,250 ISO

Significant disadvantages of the E-M5 (vs the DMC-FZ18)

  • No built-in flash

common strengths of the E-M5 and DMC-FZ18

  • Good image stabilization: Sensor shift vs Lens
  • Both have digital viewfinders: Digital vs Digital
  • Long exposures: 60 seconds vs 60 seconds
arrow Compare the Olympus OM-D E-M5 vs the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ18

Olympus PEN E-PM1

Olympus PEN E-PM1
3 years newer
$500 14-42mm lens

Significant advantages of the E-PM1 (vs the DMC-FZ18)

  • Much larger screen: 3.0" vs 2.5"
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 60fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps
  • Has interchangeable lenses

Significant disadvantages of the E-PM1 (vs the DMC-FZ18)

  • No viewfinder: None vs Digital
  • No built-in flash

common strengths of the E-PM1 and DMC-FZ18

  • Good image stabilization: Sensor shift vs Lens
  • Long exposures: 60 seconds vs 60 seconds
arrow Compare the Olympus PEN E-PM1 vs the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ18

compared toPro digicam competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Panasonic DMC-FZ18 compared to pro digicam competitors include: it has significantly more zoom (18x vs 5x), has higher quality type of viewfinder (digital vs none) and much longer exposures (60 seconds vs 15 seconds).

However, on average it has a much smaller sensor (1/2.5" 5.8x4.3mm vs 1/1.7" 7.6x5.7mm), has a slightly narrower aperture (f/2.8 vs f/2.0), records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 24fps), has a much smaller screen (2.5" vs 3.0") and has a slightly lower resolution screen (207k dots vs 461k dots).

Canon PowerShot G12

Canon PowerShot G12
3 years newer
$370 - $496

Significant advantages of the G12 (vs the DMC-FZ18)

  • Much larger sensor: 1/1.7" 7.6x5.7mm vs 1/2.5" 5.8x4.3mm
  • Has a flip-out screen
  • Supports 24p

Significant disadvantages of the G12 (vs the DMC-FZ18)

  • Less zoom: 5x vs 18x
  • No boost ISO: None vs 6,400 ISO
  • Much shorter max exposures: 15 seconds vs 60 seconds

common strengths of the G12 and DMC-FZ18

  • Supports RAW
  • Viewfinders: Tunnel vs Digital
arrow Compare the Canon PowerShot G12 vs the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ18

Canon PowerShot S95

Canon PowerShot S95
3 years newer
$364 - $389

Significant advantages of the S95 (vs the DMC-FZ18)

  • Much larger sensor: 1/1.7" 7.6x5.7mm vs 1/2.5" 5.8x4.3mm
  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.0 vs f/2.8
  • Much larger screen: 3.0" vs 2.5"

Significant disadvantages of the S95 (vs the DMC-FZ18)

  • Less zoom: 3.8x vs 18x
  • Significantly worse macro capability: 5 cm vs 1 cm
  • No viewfinder: None vs Digital

common strengths of the S95 and DMC-FZ18

  • Supports RAW
arrow Compare the Canon PowerShot S95 vs the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ18

Canon Powershot S100

Canon Powershot S100
4 years newer
$370 - $430

Significant advantages of the S100 (vs the DMC-FZ18)

  • Much larger sensor: 1/1.8" 7.5x5.5mm vs 1/2.5" 5.8x4.3mm
  • Much higher true resolution: 12 MP vs 8 MP
  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.0 vs f/2.8

Significant disadvantages of the S100 (vs the DMC-FZ18)

  • Less zoom: 5x vs 18x
  • No viewfinder: None vs Digital
  • Much shorter max exposures: 15 seconds vs 60 seconds

common strengths of the S100 and DMC-FZ18

  • Supports RAW
arrow Compare the Canon Powershot S100 vs the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ18

Canon PowerShot G9

Canon PowerShot G9
similar age

Significant advantages of the G9 (vs the DMC-FZ18)

  • Much larger sensor: 1/1.7" 7.6x5.7mm vs 1/2.5" 5.8x4.3mm
  • Much higher true resolution: 12 MP vs 8 MP
  • Much larger screen: 3.0" vs 2.5"

Significant disadvantages of the G9 (vs the DMC-FZ18)

  • Much worse wide angle: 35 mm vs 28 mm
  • Less zoom: 6x vs 18x
  • No boost ISO: None vs 6,400 ISO

common strengths of the G9 and DMC-FZ18

  • Supports RAW
  • Viewfinders: Tunnel vs Digital
arrow Compare the Canon PowerShot G9 vs the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ18

compared toEntry-level DSLR competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Panasonic DMC-FZ18 compared to entry-level DSLR competitors include: it has image stabilization (lens vs none), is significantly smaller (prosumer size 118x75x88 mm vs prosumer size 127x96x78 mm), is slightly lighter (407 g vs 560 g) and much longer exposures (60 seconds vs 30 seconds).

However, on average it records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps), has a much smaller screen (2.5" vs 3.0"), has a slightly lower resolution screen (207k dots vs 920k dots), takes significantly lower resolution photos (8 MP vs 16.1 MP) and slightly lower maximum light sensitivity (1,250 ISO vs 6,400 ISO).

Canon Rebel T3

Canon Rebel T3
3 years newer
$333 (body only)
$489 - $500 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the T3 (vs the DMC-FZ18)

  • Much larger sensor: APS-C 22.2x14.7mm vs 1/2.5" 5.8x4.3mm
  • Faster autofocus: Phase detection vs Contrast detection
  • Significantly larger screen: 2.7" vs 2.5"

Significant disadvantages of the T3 (vs the DMC-FZ18)

  • No image stabilization: None vs Lens
  • Significantly larger: Professional size 130x100x78 mm vs Prosumer size 118x75x88 mm
  • Much shorter max exposures: 30 seconds vs 60 seconds

common strengths of the T3 and DMC-FZ18

  • Light weight: 459 g vs 407 g
arrow Compare the Canon Rebel T3 vs the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ18

Canon Rebel T3i

Canon Rebel T3i
3 years newer
$619 - $700 (body only)
$745 - $1,000 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the T3i (vs the DMC-FZ18)

  • Much larger sensor: APS-C 22.3x14.9mm vs 1/2.5" 5.8x4.3mm
  • Much larger screen: 3.0" vs 2.5"
  • Much higher resolution screen: 1,040k dots vs 207k dots

Significant disadvantages of the T3i (vs the DMC-FZ18)

  • No image stabilization: None vs Lens
  • Much larger: Professional size 133x99x79 mm vs Prosumer size 118x75x88 mm
  • Much shorter max exposures: 30 seconds vs 60 seconds

common strengths of the T3i and DMC-FZ18

  • None found
arrow Compare the Canon Rebel T3i vs the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ18

Canon EOS Digital Rebel XS

Canon EOS Digital Rebel XS
10 months newer
$348 - $595 (body only)
$439 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the Rebel XS (vs the DMC-FZ18)

  • Much larger sensor: APS-C 22.2x14.8mm vs 1/2.5" 5.8x4.3mm
  • Has interchangeable lenses
  • Has an optical viewfinder: Pentamirror vs Digital

Significant disadvantages of the Rebel XS (vs the DMC-FZ18)

  • No image stabilization: None vs Lens
  • Much shorter max exposures: 30 seconds vs 60 seconds

common strengths of the Rebel XS and DMC-FZ18

  • Very small: Prosumer size 126x98x65 mm vs Prosumer size 118x75x88 mm
  • Light weight: 502 g vs 407 g
arrow Compare the Canon EOS Digital Rebel XS vs the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ18

Nikon D5100

Nikon D5100
3 years newer
$500 - $597 (body only)
$600 - $697 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the D5100 (vs the DMC-FZ18)

  • Much larger sensor: APS-C 23.6x15.6mm vs 1/2.5" 5.8x4.3mm
  • Much larger screen: 3.0" vs 2.5"
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 848 x 480 @ 30fps

Significant disadvantages of the D5100 (vs the DMC-FZ18)

  • No image stabilization: None vs Lens
  • Significantly larger: Prosumer size 127x96x78 mm vs Prosumer size 118x75x88 mm
  • Much shorter max exposures: 30 seconds vs 60 seconds

common strengths of the D5100 and DMC-FZ18

  • None found
arrow Compare the Nikon D5100 vs the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ18

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Panasonic DMC-FZ18 compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has a slightly wider aperture (f/2.8 vs f/3.3), slightly closer macro focusing (1 cm vs 5 cm), slightly higher boost light sensitivity (6,400 ISO vs none), shoots RAW and has a viewfinder (digital vs none).

However, on average it has a significantly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 24 mm), doesn't have a built-in GPS, records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 60fps), has a much smaller screen (2.5" vs 3.0") and has a slightly lower resolution screen (207k dots vs 921k dots).

Samsung WB700

Samsung WB700
3 years newer
$178 - $215

Significant advantages of the WB700 (vs the DMC-FZ18)

  • Much smaller: Compact 99x59x22 mm vs Prosumer size 118x75x88 mm
  • Significantly better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm
  • Much thinner: 0.9" vs 3.5"

Significant disadvantages of the WB700 (vs the DMC-FZ18)

  • No RAW support
  • No viewfinder: None vs Digital
  • No boost ISO: None vs 6,400 ISO

common strengths of the WB700 and DMC-FZ18

  • Great zoom: 18x vs 18x
arrow Compare the Samsung WB700 vs the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ18

Panasonic Lumix ZS20

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS20
4 years newer
$291 - $350

Significant advantages of the ZS20 (vs the DMC-FZ18)

  • Much smaller: Compact 105x59x28 mm vs Prosumer size 118x75x88 mm
  • Has a GPS
  • Significantly better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm

Significant disadvantages of the ZS20 (vs the DMC-FZ18)

  • Narrower aperture: f/3.3 vs f/2.8
  • No RAW support
  • No viewfinder: None vs Digital

common strengths of the ZS20 and DMC-FZ18

  • Great zoom: 20x vs 18x
arrow Compare the Lumix ZS20 vs the Lumix DMC-FZ18

Sony Cybershot DSC-HX9v

Sony Cybershot DSC-HX9v
3 years newer
$319 - $330

Significant advantages of the DSC-HX9v (vs the DMC-FZ18)

  • Much smaller: Compact 105x59x34 mm vs Prosumer size 118x75x88 mm
  • Has a GPS
  • Significantly better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-HX9v (vs the DMC-FZ18)

  • Narrower aperture: f/3.3 vs f/2.8
  • No RAW support
  • No viewfinder: None vs Digital

common strengths of the DSC-HX9v and DMC-FZ18

  • Long exposures: 30 seconds vs 60 seconds
arrow Compare the Sony Cybershot DSC-HX9v vs the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ18

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Panasonic DMC-FZ18 compared to compact competitors include: it has a slightly wider aperture (f/2.8 vs f/3.5), has way more more zoom (18x vs 3x), has a slightly wider wide angle lens (28 mm vs 38 mm), has better image stabilization (lens vs none) and takes slightly higher resolution photos (8 MP vs 7.1 MP).

However, on average it has a slightly smaller screen (2.5" vs 3.0"), is much larger (prosumer size 118x75x88 mm vs super compact 94x51x24 mm), doesn't have a touch screen, is older (july, 2007 vs july, 2010) and is thicker (3.5" vs 1").

Nikon Coolpix L14

Nikon Coolpix L14
similar age
$205

Significant advantages of the L14 (vs the DMC-FZ18)

  • Much smaller: Compact 91x61x26 mm vs Prosumer size 118x75x88 mm
  • Much thinner: 1" vs 3.5"
  • Much lighter: 225 g vs 407 g

Significant disadvantages of the L14 (vs the DMC-FZ18)

  • Much worse wide angle: 38 mm vs 28 mm
  • Much less zoom: 3x vs 18x
  • No image stabilization: None vs Lens

common strengths of the L14 and DMC-FZ18

  • None found
arrow Compare the Nikon Coolpix L14 vs the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ18

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T99

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T99
3 years newer
$193

Significant advantages of the DSC-T99 (vs the DMC-FZ18)

  • Much smaller: Compact 102x58x29 mm vs Prosumer size 118x75x88 mm
  • Much thinner: 1.1" vs 3.5"
  • Much larger screen: 3.0" vs 2.5"

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-T99 (vs the DMC-FZ18)

  • Much less zoom: 4x vs 18x
  • Significantly narrower aperture: f/3.5 vs f/2.8
  • No RAW support

common strengths of the DSC-T99 and DMC-FZ18

  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
  • Long exposures: 30 seconds vs 60 seconds
arrow Compare the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T99 vs the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ18

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX07

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX07
1 year older

Significant advantages of the DMC-FX07 (vs the DMC-FZ18)

  • Much smaller: Super compact 94x51x24 mm vs Prosumer size 118x75x88 mm
  • Much thinner: 0.9" vs 3.5"
  • Much lighter: 170 g vs 407 g

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-FX07 (vs the DMC-FZ18)

  • Much less zoom: 3.6x vs 18x
  • No RAW support
  • Significantly lower true resolution: 7.1 MP vs 8 MP

common strengths of the DMC-FX07 and DMC-FZ18

  • Wide aperture: f/2.8 vs f/2.8
  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Lens
  • Very long exposure times: 60 seconds vs 60 seconds
arrow Compare the DMC-FX07 vs the DMC-FZ18