As well as being compared against other compacts, the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 is also often compared to ultra compacts, super zooms, travel zooms and digicams. The Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75's top rivals come from Panasonic (such as the Lumix DMC-FX78 and the Lumix DMC-FX65) and Canon (such as the PowerShot SX60 HS and the PowerShot SD1000)

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Panasonic DMC-FX75 compared to other compact competitors include: it has a slightly wider aperture (f/2.2 vs f/3.5), has a slightly wider wide angle lens (24 mm vs 28 mm), has a touch screen, is thinner (0.9" vs 1.1") and slightly longer exposures (60 seconds vs 30 seconds).

However, on average it has a slightly lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 920k dots), slightly lower maximum light sensitivity (1,600 ISO vs 6,400 ISO), has a CCD-family sensor (CCD vs CMOS), is older (june 2010 vs april 2013) and is slightly more expensive ($544.81 vs $158.57).

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX78

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX78
7 months newer

Significant advantages of the DMC-FX78 (vs the DMC-FX75)

  • Larger screen: 3.5" vs 3"

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-FX78 (vs the DMC-FX75)

  • Much slower max shutter speed: 1/1300 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

common strengths of the DMC-FX78 and DMC-FX75

  • Wide aperture: f/2.5 vs f/2.2
  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Good wide angle: 24 mm vs 24 mm

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LF1

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LF1
2 years newer
$299

Significant advantages of the DMC-LF1 (vs the DMC-FX75)

  • Has a CMOS-family sensor: CMOS vs CCD
  • Much higher resolution screen: 920k dots vs 230k dots
  • Better maximum light sensitivity: 6,400 ISO vs 1,600 ISO

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-LF1 (vs the DMC-FX75)

  • Significantly worse wide angle: 28 mm vs 24 mm
  • No touch screen
  • Thicker: 1.1" vs 0.9"

common strengths of the DMC-LF1 and DMC-FX75

  • Wide aperture: f/2 vs f/2.2
  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Larger than average screens: 3" vs 3"

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T99

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T99
similar age
$159

Significant advantages of the DSC-T99 (vs the DMC-FX75)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-T99 (vs the DMC-FX75)

  • Significantly narrower aperture: f/3.5 vs f/2.2
  • Significantly thicker: 1.1" vs 0.9"
  • Much shorter max exposures: 30 seconds vs 60 seconds

common strengths of the DSC-T99 and DMC-FX75

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Larger than average screens: 3" vs 3"
  • Good image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Lens

compared toUltra compact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Panasonic DMC-FX75 compared to ultra compact competitors include: it has a slightly wider aperture (f/2.2 vs f/2.8), has a much wider wide angle lens (24 mm vs 35 mm), has a slightly larger screen (3" vs 2.5"), has better image stabilization (lens vs none) and has a touch screen.

However, on average it is slightly larger (compact (103×55×23 mm) vs ultra compact (86×54×19 mm)), is thicker (0.9" vs 0.7") and doesn't have a viewfinder (none vs tunnel).

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX65

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX65
10 months older

Significant advantages of the DMC-FX65 (vs the DMC-FX75)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-FX65 (vs the DMC-FX75)

  • None found

common strengths of the DMC-FX65 and DMC-FX75

  • None found

Canon PowerShot SD1000

Canon PowerShot SD1000
3 years older
$670

Significant advantages of the SD1000 (vs the DMC-FX75)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the SD1000 (vs the DMC-FX75)

  • None found

common strengths of the SD1000 and DMC-FX75

  • None found

compared toSuper zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Panasonic DMC-FX75 compared to super zoom competitors include: it has a much wider aperture (f/2.2 vs f/3.4), is significantly smaller (compact (103×55×23 mm) vs large (128×93×114 mm)), has a touch screen, is thinner (0.9" vs 4.5") and is significantly lighter (165 g vs 650 g).

However, on average it has significantly less zoom (5x vs 65x), has a significantly narrower wide angle lens (24 mm vs 21 mm), has a much lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 922k dots), slightly lower maximum light sensitivity (1,600 ISO vs 6,400 ISO) and doesn't shoot as fast continuously (1.8 fps vs 6.4 fps).

Canon PowerShot SX60 HS

Canon PowerShot SX60 HS
4 years newer
$431 - $449

Significant advantages of the SX60 HS (vs the DMC-FX75)

  • Much higher resolution screen: 922k dots vs 230k dots
  • Has a CMOS-family sensor: CMOS vs CCD
  • Significantly better wide angle: 21 mm vs 24 mm

Significant disadvantages of the SX60 HS (vs the DMC-FX75)

  • Much narrower aperture: f/3.4 vs f/2.2
  • Significantly larger: Large (128×93×114 mm) vs Compact (103×55×23 mm)
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the SX60 HS and DMC-FX75

  • Fairly small: Large (128×93×114 mm) vs Compact (103×55×23 mm)
  • Light weight: 650 g vs 165 g
  • Thin: 4.5" vs 0.9"

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Panasonic DMC-FX75 compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has a significantly wider wide angle lens (24 mm vs 28 mm), has a significantly wider aperture (f/2.2 vs f/3.4), has a slightly larger screen (3" vs 2.7"), has better image stabilization (lens vs sensor shift) and has a touch screen.

However, on average it is older (june 2010 vs february 2011).

Fujifilm FinePix T200

Fujifilm FinePix T200
8 months newer

Significant advantages of the T200 (vs the DMC-FX75)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the T200 (vs the DMC-FX75)

  • Significantly worse wide angle: 28 mm vs 24 mm
  • Significantly narrower aperture: f/3.4 vs f/2.2
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the T200 and DMC-FX75

  • Very small: Compact (97×57×28 mm) vs Compact (103×55×23 mm)
  • Very thin: 1.1" vs 0.9"
  • Very light: 151 g vs 165 g

compared toDigicam competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Panasonic DMC-FX75 compared to digicam competitors include: it has a significantly wider aperture (f/2.2 vs f/2.8), has a significantly wider wide angle lens (24 mm vs 28 mm), has a significantly larger screen (3" vs 2.4"), has a slightly higher resolution screen (230k dots vs 115k dots) and has image stabilization (lens vs none).

However, on average it is significantly more expensive ($544.81 vs $103.66).

Nikon Coolpix P50

Nikon Coolpix P50
2 years older
$104

Significant advantages of the P50 (vs the DMC-FX75)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the P50 (vs the DMC-FX75)

  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Lens
  • Significantly worse wide angle: 28 mm vs 24 mm
  • Significantly narrower aperture: f/2.8 vs f/2.2

common strengths of the P50 and DMC-FX75

  • Wide aperture: f/2.8 vs f/2.2
  • Light weight: 210 g vs 165 g