As well as being compared against other compacts, the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX10 is also often compared to travel zooms and pro digicams. The Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX10's top rivals come from Panasonic (such as the Lumix ZS25 and the Lumix DMC-FX7) and Casio (such as the Exilim EX-Z110 and the Exilim EX-Z60)

Competitor classes

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Panasonic DMC-FX10 compared to other compact competitors include: it has a slightly larger screen (2.5" vs 2.4"), has better image stabilization (lens vs digital) and much longer exposures (60 seconds vs 8 seconds).

However, on average it doesn't record movies in 24p and is older (january 2007 vs july 2008).

Casio Exilim EX-Z110

Placeholder
1 year older

Significant advantages of the EX-Z110 (vs the DMC-FX10)

  • Has a viewfinder: Tunnel vs None

Significant disadvantages of the EX-Z110 (vs the DMC-FX10)

  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Lens
  • Much smaller screen: 2" vs 2.5"
  • Much shorter max exposures: 1/8 of a second vs 60 seconds

common strengths of the EX-Z110 and DMC-FX10

  • Fairly small: Compact (90×60×27 mm) vs Super compact (94×51×24 mm)
  • Light weight: 151 g vs 155 g
  • Thin: 1.1" vs 0.9"

Olympus T100

Olympus T-100
3 years newer
$90

Significant advantages of the T100 (vs the DMC-FX10)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the T100 (vs the DMC-FX10)

  • Worse image stabilization:
    1. Digital
    vs
    1. Lens
  • Much narrower aperture: f/4.6 vs f/2.8
  • Much shorter max exposures: 4 seconds vs 60 seconds

common strengths of the T100 and DMC-FX10

  • Fairly small: Compact (93×60×23 mm) vs Super compact (94×51×24 mm)
  • Light weight: 122 g vs 155 g
  • Thin: 0.9" vs 0.9"

Casio Exilim EX-Z60

Casio Exilim EX-Z60
1 year older
$138

Significant advantages of the EX-Z60 (vs the DMC-FX10)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the EX-Z60 (vs the DMC-FX10)

  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Lens
  • Significantly worse wide angle: 38 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much shorter max exposures: 4 seconds vs 60 seconds

common strengths of the EX-Z60 and DMC-FX10

  • Fairly small: Super compact (95×61×20 mm) vs Super compact (94×51×24 mm)
  • Thin: 0.8" vs 0.9"
  • Light weight: 148 g vs 155 g

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX7

Placeholder
2 years older
$82

Significant advantages of the DMC-FX7 (vs the DMC-FX10)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-FX7 (vs the DMC-FX10)

  • Much shorter max exposures: 8 seconds vs 60 seconds

common strengths of the DMC-FX7 and DMC-FX10

  • Fairly small: Super compact (94×50×24 mm) vs Super compact (94×51×24 mm)
  • Thin: 0.9" vs 0.9"
  • Light weight: 153 g vs 155 g

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS62

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS62
2 years newer

Significant advantages of the DMC-FS62 (vs the DMC-FX10)

  • Better wide angle: 33 mm vs 35 mm

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-FS62 (vs the DMC-FX10)

  • None found

common strengths of the DMC-FS62 and DMC-FX10

  • Fairly small: Super compact (97×55×22 mm) vs Super compact (94×51×24 mm)
  • Light weight: 135 g vs 155 g
  • Thin: 0.9" vs 0.9"

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX150

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX150
1 year newer
$400

Significant advantages of the DMC-FX150 (vs the DMC-FX10)

  • Much better wide angle: 28 mm vs 35 mm
  • Supports 24p
  • Significantly larger screen: 2.7" vs 2.5"

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-FX150 (vs the DMC-FX10)

  • None found

common strengths of the DMC-FX150 and DMC-FX10

  • Fairly small: Compact (97×54×25 mm) vs Super compact (94×51×24 mm)
  • Thin: 1" vs 0.9"
  • Very long exposure times: 60 seconds vs 60 seconds

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Panasonic DMC-FX10 compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has a slightly wider aperture (f/2.8 vs f/3.3), is significantly smaller (super compact (94×51×24 mm) vs compact (103×60×33 mm)), is thinner (0.9" vs 1.3"), is slightly lighter (155 g vs 206 g) and significantly longer exposures (60 seconds vs 30 seconds).

However, on average it has slightly less zoom (3x vs 20x), has a much narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 24 mm), doesn't have a built-in GPS, records lower quality movies (848 x 480 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 60fps) and has a much smaller screen (2.5" vs 3").

Panasonic Lumix ZS25

Panasonic Lumix ZS25
6 years newer

Significant advantages of the ZS25 (vs the DMC-FX10)

  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 2.5"
  • Records high-speed movies: 220 fps vs None

Significant disadvantages of the ZS25 (vs the DMC-FX10)

  • Significantly larger: Compact (105×59×28 mm) vs Super compact (94×51×24 mm)
  • Much shorter max exposures: 30 seconds vs 60 seconds

common strengths of the ZS25 and DMC-FX10

  • Fairly small: Compact (105×59×28 mm) vs Super compact (94×51×24 mm)
  • Thin: 1.1" vs 0.9"
  • Long exposures: 30 seconds vs 60 seconds

Panasonic Lumix ZS20

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS20
5 years newer
$600

Significant advantages of the ZS20 (vs the DMC-FX10)

  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Has a GPS
  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 2.5"

Significant disadvantages of the ZS20 (vs the DMC-FX10)

  • Significantly larger: Compact (105×59×28 mm) vs Super compact (94×51×24 mm)
  • Much shorter max exposures: 15 seconds vs 60 seconds

common strengths of the ZS20 and DMC-FX10

  • Fairly small: Compact (105×59×28 mm) vs Super compact (94×51×24 mm)
  • Thin: 1.1" vs 0.9"

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS7

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS7
3 years newer

Significant advantages of the DMC-ZS7 (vs the DMC-FX10)

  • Much better wide angle: 25 mm vs 35 mm
  • Has a GPS
  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 2.5"

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-ZS7 (vs the DMC-FX10)

  • Significantly larger: Compact (103×60×33 mm) vs Super compact (94×51×24 mm)
  • Significantly thicker: 1.3" vs 0.9"
  • Heavier: 218 g vs 155 g

common strengths of the DMC-ZS7 and DMC-FX10

  • Very long exposure times: 60 seconds vs 60 seconds

compared toPro digicam competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Panasonic DMC-FX10 compared to pro digicam competitors include: it has a much larger screen (2.5" vs 2"), is significantly smaller (super compact (94×51×24 mm) vs large (128×93×129 mm)), has image stabilization (lens vs none), is newer (january 2007 vs august 2006) and is thinner (0.9" vs 5.1").

However, on average it has a much narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 28 mm), has a slightly lower resolution screen (115k dots vs 235k dots), takes slightly lower resolution photos (5.9 MP vs 9.1 MP), doesn't have a viewfinder (none vs digital) and has fewer storage slots (1 vs 2).

Fujifilm FinePix S9100

Fujifilm FinePix S9100
5 months older
$456

Significant advantages of the S9100 (vs the DMC-FX10)

  • Much better wide angle: 28 mm vs 35 mm
  • Higher resolution screen: 235k dots vs 115k dots
  • Has more storage slots: 2 vs 1

Significant disadvantages of the S9100 (vs the DMC-FX10)

  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Lens
  • Much larger: Large (128×93×129 mm) vs Super compact (94×51×24 mm)
  • Much thicker: 5.1" vs 0.9"

common strengths of the S9100 and DMC-FX10

  • Built-in flashes